13
Top 10 ways to make sure your work is never published, or worse, cited Nick Hopwood (University of Technology, Sydney) All views are my own © Nick Hopwood 2013, updated 26 July 2013

Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A slide show highlighting key points from my blog posts on publication and citation Please note, this is a replacement for my original version in which I neglected to provide full citations for some ideas. My bad. http://nickhop.wordpress.com/2013/05/19/10-easy-ways-to-make-sure-you-have-no-publication-record-when-you-finish-your-phd-and-forever-after/ http://nickhop.wordpress.com/2013/05/26/10-ways-to-make-sure-your-journal-article-never-gets-cited/

Citation preview

Page 1: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

Top 10 ways to make sure your work is never published, or worse, cited

Nick Hopwood (University of Technology, Sydney)

All views are my own

© Nick Hopwood 2013, updated 26 July 2013

Page 2: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

1Good papers that are never

read may be found here

Never submit your work to anyone for review

Why? Fear of rejection / criticismPerfectionismOther excuses

100% safe ZERO chance of getting published in journals

Page 3: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

2You can be your own worst

enemy

Perfect your work first

Anyway… Perfectionism is often other excuses in disguise

You will never write a perfect textAccept this, get over it, and move on

Page 4: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

3Get E.O.S.

CausesNot re-draftingNot seeking critical feedbackAvoiding the hard questionsBeing in a hurry: ‘quick & dirty’ is really just ‘dirty’

Early Onset SatisfactionMem Fox’s idea

via @ThomsonPat’s blog ‘patter’ http://wp.me/p1GJk8-xE

You are not as good as you think you are

Page 5: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

4Collapse under harsh critique

Certainties in research:Death, taxes, nasty reviews

This is a rather dull re-hash of very familiar ground… as a piece of policy analysis this is

derivative and lacking in insight and originality. It would merit a ‘B’ as an M.Ed. Essay (in Walford 2001 Doing qualitative

educational research)

Page 6: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

5Flog the wrong paper

MethodWrite one title / abstract, and then a completely different paper, ensuring you fail to deliver on your promise

Effective way to frustrate and disappoint reviewers

Does exactly what it says on the tin

Page 7: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

Oops!You’re actually going to submit something to a journal. Eek! It might get accepted :-0

Better make sure no-one ever reads or, worse, cites it!

Page 8: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

6Give it a truly dreadful title

Choice elementsNo connection to ongoing conversationNo sense of what is newJargonPuns

Stop people even reading the abstract!

= “A dull and irrelevant waste of time”

Page 9: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

7Match your title with an equally poor abstract

Poor abstracts (tiny texts) fail to:LOCATE paper in bigger pictureGive a clear, specific FOCUS for studyREPORT what was done and foundARGUE what is new, and why anyone should care(Kamler & Thomson 2006 Helping doctoral students write, London: Routledge); see also:http://www.slideshare.net/AndreDaniels/writing-an-abstract-presentation

Good abstracts (tiny texts) are hard to write but worth the effort (Kamler & Thomson 2006)

Leave readers with no sense of where the paper is going

Page 10: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

8Hide your arguments in waffle

AvoidStarting paras by announcing key ideaReminding readers of key pointsBeing explicit: “What is new here is…”Did I mention reinforcement?

Your readers need it S-P-E-L-L-I-N-G O-U-T for them

Argument & contribution under here somewhere

Page 11: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

9Make no worthwhile argument at all

BORRRRR-ING!Fear of over-claiming leads to too much caution – saying nothing of valueTime taken to read your ‘nothing’ paper is time your readers can never get back

Therefore it can be seen that to a certain extent the statement is true

Not only will readers FORGET your paper, they’ll be really ANNOYED with you too!

Page 12: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

10Over claim

Unsubstantiated conclusions & rampant

speculation

A paper isn’t worth its salt unless youChange the face of health servicesUndo all the wrongs of historyFind a cure for cancerEliminate all global injustice

“I humbly accept the Nobel Prize for my contribution to … based on one journal paper”

Page 13: Academia: How to never get published, read, or worse, cited!

Thanksnickhop.wordpress.com

@NHopUTS