Upload
kittelson-slides
View
14.354
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
A Look Ahead to the 2010 HCM
Mark Vandehey, PEFebruary 4, 2010
UFUNIVERSITYof
FLORIDA Texas Transportation InstituteUNIVERSITY
polytechnic
Presentation Overview
• Introduction• Summary of significant changes• Overall organization• Conclusion
NCHRP 3-92 – Production of the 2010 HCM
• HCM’s 5th Major Revision (1950, 1965, 1985, 2000)• Project began in October 2007 • Chapters delivered to TRB between July 2009 and March
2010– Currently 95% Complete
• Scheduled for publication by TRB by the end of 2010• Key tasks:
State of the Art Review and Inventory Focus Groups Supplemental Research for 2010 HCM Prepare Draft Chapters Assist TRB During Publication Process
Outreach to Professionals
• Focus groups on the HCM2000 early in the project– Mix of perspectives (DOT, city/county, consultants,
academia)• Website for HCQS Committee members and friends
– Research reports supporting new HCM content– Issue papers on HCM organization, objectives, content– Review and comment on draft chapters– Research team responses to comments
• Presentations like this one
Presentation Overview
• Introduction• Summary of significant changes• Overall organization• Conclusion
Summary of Significant Changes
• Incorporation of New Research• Integrated Multimodal Approach• Increased Emphasis of Alternative Tools• New Chapter on Active Traffic Management
Incorporation of New Research
• NCHRP 3-60(Interchange Ramp Terminals)
• NCHRP 3-64(HCM Applications Guide)
• NCHRP 3-65(Roundabouts in the United States)
• NCHRP 3-70(Multi-Modal Arterial LOS)
• NCHRP 3-75(Freeway Weaving)
• NCHRP 3-79(Arterial Travel Speeds)
Incorporation of New Research (cont’d.)
• NCHRP 3-82 (Default Values for HCM)• NCHRP 3-85 (Guidelines for the Use of Alternative Traffic
Analysis Tools)• NCHRP 20-7 (Two-Lane Highways)• FHWA Research on Active Traffic Management• NCHRP 3-92 supplemental research
– Signalized Intersection Methodology (new delay method and structure changes reflecting actuated control)
– Gap acceptance for six-lane, two-way stop-controlled Intersections
– 75 mph speed-flow curve for freeways
9
Multimodal LOS Measure Issues
• HCM 2010 will consider a broader range of factors for ped and bike analysis
• Current HCM method focuses on speed, delay, and space• Florida & NCHRP 3-70 research suggest these aren’t the
key factors• Auto volumes highly important to bike & ped service quality
HCM2000: Ped LOS A HCM2000: Ped LOS D
Vision for 2010 HCM - Interrupted Flow Facilities
• Multimodal Evaluation– Emphasize combined evaluation of auto, ped, bike, and
transit
Pedestrian LOSAutomobile LOSBicycle LOS Transit LOS
Interactions
FDOT Quality/LOS Handbook 2002
11
MMLOS Urban Street Applications
• Segments – All four modes
• Signalized Intersections– Auto, ped and bike mode
• Facility– All four modes
segmentfacility
12
2010 HCM Approach
• Focus on the traveler perspective• Allow trade-offs between modes to be evaluated• Presence of one mode affects other modes
Mode Affected
Impacting Mode
Auto Ped Bike Transit
AutoAuto & HV volumes
Turning patternsLane configurations
Minimum green timeTurn conflicts
Mid-block crossings
Turn conflictsPassing delay
Heavy vehicleBlocking delaySignal priority
Ped
Auto & HV volumesCycle length
Driver yieldingTurn conflicts
Traffic separation
Sidewalk crowdingCrosswalk crowding
Cross-flows
Shared-path conflicts
Bicyclist yielding
Heavy vehicleTransit stop queues
Stop cross-flowsVehicle yielding
Bike
Auto & HV volumesAuto & HV speedOn-street parking
Turn conflictsTraffic separation
Shared-path conflicts
Min. green timeTurn conflicts
Mid-block xings
Bike volumesHeavy vehicleBlocking delay
Tracks
TransitAuto volumesSignal timing
Ped. env. qualityMinimum green time
Turn conflictsMid-block crossings
Bike env. qualityBike volumes
Bus volumes
13
Service Measures in the 2010 HCM
System Element
Service Measure Provided
Chapter Auto Ped Bike Transit
Freeway Facility 10
Basic Freeway Segment 11
Freeway Weaving Segment 12
Fwy. Merge/Diverge Seg. 13
Multilane Highway 14
Two-Lane Highway 15
Urban Street Facility 16
Urban Street Segment 17
Signalized Intersection 18
Two-Way Stop 19
All-Way Stop 20
Roundabout 21
Interchange Ramp Term. 22
Off-Street Ped-Bike Facility 23
14
More Emphasis on Alternative Tools
• Explicit recognition that HCM analytical procedures may not always be the best procedure
• Range of alternative tools– Deterministic tools (e.g., TRANSYT-7F for arterial performance)– Stochastic tools (e.g., VISSIM for network performance)
• Examples of applications
15
Alternative Tool Example:Backup from Signal
Mainline vehicles unable to reach the exit lanes Wasted time
on the signal approach
16
Active Traffic Management (ATM)
• New ATM Chapter • Describes ATM measures• Provides known information/methods for evaluating impacts• Advises on appropriateness of HCM and simulation methods• Identifies strategies for maximizing return on investment • Identifies innovative strategies
17
Lane and Shoulder Treatments
FHWA Managed Lanes Primer
Google Street View
18
Congestion Pricing
FHWA, MinnDOT Technologies that Complement Congestion Pricing Primer
Congestion Pricing Primer
19
Innovative Interchange Designs
20
High Capacity Intersection Designs
Presentation Overview
• Introduction• Summary of significant changes• Overall organization• Conclusion
HCM Evolution
• HCM scope has grown over time– Increasing coverage of various system elements and
modes– User interest in more-detailed procedures
• HCM page count has grown correspondingly– 1950: 160 pages– 1965: 432 pages– 1985: 512 pages– 2000: 1,224 pages
Overall Organization
• The 2010 HCM will consist of four volumes– Volume 1: Concepts– Volume 2: Uninterrupted Flow– Volume 3: Interrupted Flow– Volume 4: Applications Guide
24
Overall Organization of HCM 2010
Volume Target Audience Format
% Total Printed Pages
I: ConceptsNew analysts and decision makers
Bound & PDF 20
II: Uninterrupted Flow Facilities
Analysts Loose leaf & PDF 30
III: Interrupted flow Facilities
Analysts Loose leaf & PDF 50
IV: Applications Guide and Supplemental Material
Analysts, software engineers, and researchers
Live/On-line N/A
Volume 1Concepts
Front Matter1. HCM User’s Guide2. Applications3. Modal Characteristics4. Traffic Flow & Capacity Concepts5. Traveler Perception Concepts6. Analysis Tools7. Interpreting & Presenting Results8. Executive Summary/Policy Considerations9. Glossary & SymbolsVolume 1 Index
Chapter 8
• Executive summary of the HCM for decision-makers • Outline:
– Highway capacity concepts for decision-makers– QOS concepts for decision-makers– Analysis process
• Levels of analysis, analysis tool selection, HCM methodologies, interpreting results
– Decision-making considerations• Tools vs. standards, HCM methodology evolution, variations in user
satisfaction, role of companion documents• Consider more than LOS!
Volume 2Uninterrupted Flow
How to Use Volume 2
10. Freeway Facilities
11. Basic Freeway Segments
12. Freeway Weaving Segments
13. Ramps & Ramp Junctions
14. Multilane Highways
15. Two-Lane Highways
Volume 2 Index
Ph
oto
: Le
e R
od
eg
erd
ts
HCM2010 Updates Chapter 10: Freeway Facilities
• Incorporates all Freeway Chapter Changes, plus
• Definition of Average Facility Density
• LOS Measure and Table
• Increased Emphasis on Impacts of Weather and Work Zones
Methodology
• Macroscopic Method by Segment– Basic Freeway Segments– Weaving Segments– On-ramp and Off-Ramp Segments
• Directional Methodology• Extended Time-Space Domain
– Distinguish Demand and Volume– Queue Interaction between segments
and time periods• Two Flow Regimes
– Undersaturated (all d/c<1.0)– Oversaturated (any d/c>1.0)
• Implemented in FREEVAL2010
Time-Space Domain
S1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T1
S4 S5 S6 S7 S8S2 S3
Inputs and Outputs
• Inputs– Geometry (from Google or CAD)– Jam density– Free-flow speed and ramp speeds– Truck percentage (can vary)– 15-minute demand flows
• Output– Speed, Density, Travel Time, Capacity, Throughput– Segment Measures also include LOS– Facility Aggregation by Time Interval– Detailed output Worksheets...– 3-D plots of selected outputs
Facility and Segments
Directional Facility
ONR-1 OFR-1 ONR-2 OFR-2 ONR-3 OFR-3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
ONR-1 OFR-1 ONR-2 OFR-2 ONR-3 OFR-3
1 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Segment Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Segment Type
B ONR B OFR B B or W B ONR R OFR B
Segment Length (ft.)
5280 1500 2280 1500 5280 2640 5280 1140 360 1140 5280
No. Lanes 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
FREEVAL Output Screens
FREEVAL Output Graphs
1
3
50.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time Interval
d/c
Segment Number
d/c Contours
1.00-1.20
0.80-1.00
0.60-0.80
0.40-0.60
0.20-0.40
0.00-0.20
1
3
50.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time Interval
v/c
Segment Number
v/c Contours
1.00-1.20
0.80-1.00
0.60-0.80
0.40-0.60
0.20-0.40
0.00-0.20
1
3
50.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time Interval
Spee
d (m
i/hr
)
Segment Number
Space Mean Speed Contours (mi/hr)
50.00-60.00
40.00-50.00
30.00-40.00
20.00-30.00
10.00-20.00
0.00-10.00
1
3
50.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time Interval
Den
sity
(veh
/mi/
ln)
Segment Number
Density Contours (veh/mi/ln)
50.00-60.00
40.00-50.00
30.00-40.00
20.00-30.00
10.00-20.00
0.00-10.00
FREEVAL Output Tables (LOS)
Volume 3Interrupted Flow
How to Use Volume 3
16. Urban Street Facilities
17. Urban Street Segments
18. Signalized Intersections
19. Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections
20. All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections
21. Roundabouts
22. Interchange Ramp Terminals
23. Off-Street Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities
Volume 3 Index
Ph
oto
: Le
e R
od
eg
erd
ts
Chapter 22Interchange Ramp Terminals
• Additional Lost Time Procedure– Reduction in effective green period– Two causes for reduction
• Queue spillback• Demand starvation
• Lost Time Due to Queue Spillback
Northbound incurs additional lost time
Volume 4
• Electronic-only• 12 chapters• New Chapter on Active Traffic Management• Supplemental chapters
– Target audience:• Users who seek a greater depth of understanding• Users who plan to develop HCM implementation software
– Sensitivity analyses, statistics on methodological uncertainty, data collection forms, some worksheets
– Example problems and computational results• Updated HCM Applications Guide• Technical Reference Library• Interpretations & clarifications
Style
• Similar to HCM2000, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, and the Highway Safety Manual– Better use of margin space– More efficient graphics
layout– Facilitates hyperlinking in
the electronic version
Presentation Overview
• Introduction• Summary of significant changes• Overall organization• Conclusion
Conclusion
• The 2010 HCM will incorporate the results of more than$5 million in funded research since the HCM2000
• It incorporates a number of changes desired by the user community
• It continues the HCM’s (and the user community’s) evolution toward a more multimodal approach to addressing transportation issues
• It is designed to continue to be relevant to users in an age of increasing reliance on software tools