Unit 27 Task 3 Week 5-8

Unit 27 Task 3

Week 5-8Oscar Gamble

Week 5/8Improvement Priority 1: Improvement Priority 2:Date: 02/03/15 Date: 04/03/15

Time: 11.30a.m Time: 11.30a.m

Venue: Worthing College Gym Venue: Worthing Leisure Centre Track

Equipment: Squat Rack (squats, calf raises, jump squats)Leg Press MachineStep Up Bench

Equipment: 400 Metre trackConesStop Watch

Weather: Overcast Weather: Overcast

Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the sets and reps of each exercise regarding training his legs with the medium intensity weights and the decreased rest time.

Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the different sprint distances I had set out for him however Scott said that the final jog was quite tiring.

Athlete Feedback / Questions:

Scott said he found the decreased rest time quite hard to cope with as sets would feel much harder and take more time to complete.


Scott informed me that the final jog was quite hard after the more intense sprints.

Is Progress As Expected?If No Describe:

Progress is as expected. Is Progress As Expected?If No Describe:

Progress is as expected.

Are the Next Session Overload and Progression Plans Appropriate?If No Describe:

I believe the next sessions overload and progression plans are appropriate as Scott has now had two weeks at a medium intensity weight and is ready for an increased higher intensity weight.


The next sessions overload and progression plans are appropriate.

Was Contingency Needed? If Yes Describe:

No Was Contingency Needed? If Yes Describe:

No







Coaches Review: Scott struggled with the higher intensity weights however with some assistance supporting him with different exercises he was able to complete the training session.

Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the different sprint distances I had set out for him and again found the jog after all the exercises quite tiring and felt fatigue.


Scott did not ask any questions or give any feedback after exercise.





Progress is as expected.


The next sessions overload and progression plans are appropriate because there is no progression or overload going to be taking place in week 7, and since Scott found week 6 a slight struggle and needed assistance, then the halt in progression was very appropriate. The reason I originally put no progression plans in week 7 was because I wanted Scott to ensure a good standard before the final and hardest push of week 8.


The next sessions overload and progression plans are appropriate.



No







Coaches Review: Scott was able to complete the training session with much less assistance.

Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the different sprint distances I had set out for him even after the decrease in rest time between sets.


Scott fed back to me that the holt in progression for week 7 was a good idea before a much tougher more challenging final week.




There is no progression taking place this week. Is Progress As Expected?If No Describe:

Progress is as expected


The next sessions overload and progression plans are appropriate because this is the final big push before ending the training programme and the reason no progression took place this week.


The next sessions overload and progression plans are appropriate because Scott was able to successfully complete the training session and I expect the final week of training to push Scott to the maximum.



No







Coaches Review: Scott struggled in this final week however I would not say because of the high intense weights but purely because of the decrease in rest time. However Scott with slight assistance did manage to complete the training session and the training programme.

Coaches Review: Scott was able to perform all of the different sprint distances I had set out for him even after the further decrease in rest time between sets.




Scott admitted that the final weeks sprint training was extremely tough and that the decrease in rest time made the session a lot tougher.



Progress is as expected


This is the end of the training programme. Are the Next Session Overload and Progression Plans Appropriate?If No Describe:

This is the end of the training programme.



No

Week 8 Final Testing Excellence Trait – Weakness 1/2

Trait: Power

Test Name: Sargent Jump Test - http://www.brianmac.co.uk/sgtjump.htm

Standardised Test:

Yes Normative Data: Yes / No

Test Result 1: 49 Test Result 1 Rating: Average

Test Result 2: 49 Test Result 2 Rating: Average

Test Result 3: 50 Test Result 3 Rating: Above Average

Best Result: 50

Best Result Rating:

Above Average

Week 8 Final Testing Excellence Trait – Weakness 2/2

Trait: Speed

Test Name: 35 Metre Sprint Test - http://www.brianmac.co.uk/speedtest.htm

Standardised Test:

Yes Normative Data: Yes / No

Test Result 1: 4.98 Test Result 1 Rating: Good



Best Result: 4.91

Best Result Rating:

Good

Profiling WheelAthlete Name: Scott Goodman

Coaches Name: Dave HallDate: 09/12/2014

Student Name Oscar Gamble

Football Performance LevelEnter Your

Score:Coaches Score:

Aerobic Fitness 6 7Flexibility 5 7Muscular Endurance 5 7Strength 4 6Speed 8 8Body Composition 4 6Balance 6 8Co-ordination 6 8Reaction Time 6 7Power 7 7Agility 5 7Concentration 6 7Use of Skills 6 8Control of Anxiety 7 8Stress 6 8Vision 7 7Pass Accuracy 8 8Use of Both Feet 7 7Positioning 6 7Decision Making 7 7

Total out of 200: 122 145 A score of 10 is: Under 18s England CollegesA score of 8 is: Best player in College First TeamA score of 6 is: College First TeamA score of 4 is: Best player in College Second TeamA score of 2 is: College Second TeamA score of 0 is: Foundation Level Football

Aerobic Fitness Flexibility

Muscular Endurance

Strength

Speed

Body Composition

Balance

Co-ordination

Reaction Time

PowerAgilityConcentration

Use of Skills

Control of Anxiety

Stress

Vision

Pass Accuracy

Use of Both Feet

Positioning

Decision Making

0

5

10

Player ScoreCoaches Score

API/ASAAthlete Name: Scott Goodman

Coaches Name: Dave HallDate: 09/12/2014

Student Name Oscar GambleFootball Performance Level API ASA Discrepancy

Aerobic Fitness 8 7 24Flexibility 6 6 24Muscular Endurance 7 7 21Strength 8 6 32Speed 6 8 12Body Composition 7 6 28Balance 8 7 24Co-ordination 8 7 24Reaction Time 6 7 18Power 8 8 16Agility 7 7 21Concentration 7 8 14Use of Skills 8 8 16Control of Anxiety 7 8 14Stress 8 7 24Vision 9 9 9Pass Accuracy 10 9 10Use of Both Feet 8 8 16Positioning 8 8 16Decision Making 8 8 16

The Six Testing Areas Are Shown Below - These Are Based On The Six Largest Discrepancies AboveDiscrepancy 1 Strength

Discrepancy 2 Body Composition

Discrepancy 3 Aerobic Fitness

Discrepancy 4 Flexibility

Discrepancy 5 Power

Discrepancy 6 Balance

Similarities and Differences between Previous Task, Week 4 and Week 8

Similarities After the 8 weeks of training and reviewing Scott at this final finishing point, there are some similarities regarding his API/ASA and Profiling Wheel. Beginning with speed, a similarity throughout the whole eight week period is that the API rating from Scott for speed has stayed the same at a 6. Regarding speed there are no other similarities. With power, there are a few similarities which are shown, such as Scotts coach not increasing his rating of Scotts power from a 7 throughout. Also Scotts API score has stayed at an 8 during the course of the eight weeks. A final similarly shown is my scoring of Scott's power, which has stayed at 6 from week four to week eight. DifferencesAfter the 8 weeks of training and reviewing Scott at this final finishing point, there are some differences regarding his API/ASA and Profiling Wheel. Beginning with speed a difference is that my rating of Scott’s speed has increased from a 7 to an 8 during the whole eight week period. Another is Scotts coaches rating of his speed has increased from a 6 in the previous task, to a 7 at week four and an 8 in week eight. This is the same as Scotts API scoring who started at a 6 and finished at an 8. Moving onto power a difference is that my rating for Scott went from a 4 in the previous task to a 6 after four weeks. Another difference is Scotts ASA rating increasing from a 6 in the previous task, to a 7 at week four and an 8 in week 8. The fact all these differences have taken place is because Scott, myself and his coach have all seen improvements in his performance due to the recent training programme which he has undergone.

Sports

Unit 27 Task 3 Week 5-8