28
Integrating various data types for building 2/3D models of the subsurface for risk assessments Marc Hijma Applied Geology and Geophysics

DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Integrating various data types for building

2/3D models of the subsurface for risk assessments

Marc Hijma

Applied Geology and Geophysics

Page 2: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

27 oktober 2016

• Easy to use tool to visualize large sets of subsurface data

• Easy to use tool to create 2D/3D models of the subsurface for risk-

assessments

• Two examples • Assessing a measure against backward-erosion piping

• Stochastic subsurface scenario’s below Dutch dikes

iMOD – 2/3D MODELS – RISK ASSESSMENTS

Page 3: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

iMOD – Creating 3D-model of very complex subsurface

Page 4: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma
Page 5: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Backward-erosion piping

Page 6: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Several possible measures

Berm

Drains

Page 7: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Several possible measures

Berm

Drains

Geotextile

Van der Herik, Sliedrecht

Page 8: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Several possible measures

Berm

Drains

Geotextile

Coarse-sand barrier

Page 9: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Coarse-sand barrier

Page 10: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Coarse-sand barrier

Page 11: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Coarse-sand barrier

Page 12: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Coarse-sand barrier

Page 13: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Coarse-sand barrier

Page 14: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

The goal: create the best possible 3D-model

This work is done together with MSc.-student Amir Argaman

Merge all borehole-logs into one iMOD file with similar lithological classes

Using kriging: create first rough 3D-model of lithological variation

Using geological knowledge: identify main units and improve the interpolation

Put hard data in: location and infill of lakes, filled-in lakes, berms, dikes

Using local measurements: head, permeability

Create 3D-groundwater model that is needed to analyze the coarse-sand barrier

Page 15: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma
Page 16: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

To be continued….

Page 17: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

iMOD – Creating stochastic scenario’s

Page 18: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Stochastic subsurface scenario’s below Dutch dikes: 3500 km

Page 19: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Stochastic subsurface scenario’s: subsurface is very important

Page 20: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

3D model of the geology below a highway

Page 21: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Point data not enough to capture variability

Page 22: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Stochastic approach using iMOD

6 december 2017

0

-5

-10

Gebied II

50% 50%

0

-5

-10

Gebied III

30% 30% 30% 10%

0

-5

-10

Gebied I

15% 40%5% 20% 20%

0

-5

-10

Gebied IV

15% 10% 25% 45% 5%

I

II

III

IV

Page 23: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Stochastic approach using iMOD

6 december 2017

Page 24: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

iMOD: 2D sections along a dike.

Page 25: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Creating subsurface scenarios

8 juni 2015

• Each scenario gets its own probabity of occurence

• Depth of each layer: modal, maximum, minimum

Page 26: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

6 december 2017

Combined probability of failure

Page 27: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

Used for all primary levees!

3500 km dikes

1081 segments (gem. 3.3 km)

5573 scenario’s (5 per segment on average)

Page 28: DSD-INT 2017 Integrating various data types when building a 3D model of the subsurface on a local scale - Hijma

3D model of the geology below a highway

[email protected]