Upload
siyuan-guo
View
393
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Shared Vocabulary
How large populations converge to a shared vocabulary without global coordination?
• innate knowledge?
• group dynamics of agents ?
Naming Game
•each agent has an inventory of words, Wi
•all agents face a same set of objects, O
•each agent have a dictionary of vocabulary, Vi
•a set of agents, A, interact with each other (two at a time) and update their vocabularies, Vi
From: Baronchelli, A., & Felici, M. (2006). Sharp transition towards shared vocabularies in multi-agent systems. Journal
of Statistical Physics.
How agents interact: a minimal strategy
Combinatorial Naming Game
•Duality of Patterning, Hockett (1960):
• combinatoriality: [k]+[æ]+[t] = “cat”
• compositionality: “meaning”+“less” = “meaningless”
When and how to combine?
•size of phonemeInventory < size of objects
•phonemeInventory is used up
•when inventing word, avoid using used word
a problem: homonym
• multiple objects have the same name
• when there are only 2 agents, no homophones
• the number of homophone will grow sharply with population size and finally become relatively stable.
Will the size of phoneme inventory change the dynamics
of homonym?
darker green lines = more initial phonemes
phonemeInventory = [2,4,8,16], objects = 8,
population = [2,4,8,16,32]
Will the social structures of agents change the dynamics of
homonym?
• default method = complete graph
• what about a tree graph?
• circle graph?
• scale-free(Barabasi-Albert) graph?
objects:8; populations:[2,4,8,16,32,64]; social structure: •black: complete graph•green: tree graph•blue: circle graph•red: scale-free graph
• Changes of social structures of agents seem cannot help much.• Additional strategies(interacting rules) should be implemented.