58
A scientist’s view toward Social Media & Twitter Craig R. McClain @DrCraigMc

A Scientist's View of Twitter

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Scientist's View of Twitter

A scientist’s view toward

Social Media & Twitter

Craig R. McClain @DrCraigMc

Page 2: A Scientist's View of Twitter

You$are$free$to:$

Copy,$share,$adapt,$or$re2mix;$

Photograph,$film,$or$broadcast;$

Blog,$live2blog,$or$post$video$of;$

Provided$that:$You$a?ribute$the$work$to$its$author$and$respect$the$rights$and$licenses$associated$with$its$components.$

First Lesson: Have A Slide Like This

Craig R. McClain @DrCraigMc #dukescicomm

slide thanks to @ethanwhite

Page 3: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Deep Sea News

Deep SeaNews

DSN

Chief Editor DSN#deepsndeepseanews.com @deepseanews

scienceofthesouth.com

storyofsize.com

Page 4: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Why Should I Even Give A Flying Flip?

Page 5: A Scientist's View of Twitter

More than half of the human race is under the age of 30,

they've never known life without the internet.

Guess how they feel about social media?

Page 6: A Scientist's View of Twitter

3 out of 4 Americans use social technology -Forrester, The Growth of Social Technology Adoption, 2008

Page 7: A Scientist's View of Twitter

All media is now social media

Technology is shifting the power away from

editors, the publishers, the establishment, the

media elite.

Now it's the people who are in control.

-Rupert Murdoch

Page 8: A Scientist's View of Twitter

If Facebook were a country it would be the most populated in the world

In Billions

Facebook 1.49 China 1.36 India 1.25 U.S. 0.32

http://news.yahoo.com/number-active-users-facebook-over-230449748.html

Page 9: A Scientist's View of Twitter

http://www.insidefacebook.com/2010/02/15/new-facebook-statistics-show-big-increase-in-content-sharing-local-business-pages/

Every minute:Facebook users share nearly 2.5 million pieces of content.

Twitter users tweet nearly 300,000 times. Instagram users post nearly 220,000 new photos.

YouTube users upload 72 hours of new video content

Page 10: A Scientist's View of Twitter

http://www.dailyillini.com/features/health_and_living/article_323b7fd8-966a-11e2-b435-001a4bcf6878.html

1/3 of women aged 18-34 check Facebook when they first wake up

...even before going to the bathroom

Page 11: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 12: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Of all the social media venues,why should scientists focus on Twitter?

1.Easy to start and use

2.Massive usage

3.Scientific community is already engaging

4.Clear benefits for scientists

Page 13: A Scientist's View of Twitter

316 million active users on Twitter

Page 14: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 15: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 16: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 17: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 18: A Scientist's View of Twitter

anatomy of a tweet

Page 19: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 20: A Scientist's View of Twitter

#hashtags

Page 21: A Scientist's View of Twitter

#rstats

Page 22: A Scientist's View of Twitter

#conferences

Page 23: A Scientist's View of Twitter

#hashtags

#molluscmonday #wormwednesday #fossilfriday#scicomm#icanhazpdf

#academia #highered #phdchat#figureclub#sciart

http://librarianbyday.tumblr.com/post/93243914600/10-must-have-academic-twitter-hashtags-for http://www.academiaobscura.com/essential-hashtags-for-academics/ http://sylvaindeville.net/2014/10/24/top-10-twitter-hashtags-for-scientists/

Page 24: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Assignment Check out a #hashtag. Tweet something to it.

Tweet something to #dukescicomm

Page 25: A Scientist's View of Twitter

economy of space

Page 26: A Scientist's View of Twitter

140 characters

Page 27: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Twitter Extenders

Page 28: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Shortening URLs

Page 29: A Scientist's View of Twitter

MT (modified tweets) and the quote tweet

Use MT and rewrite a RT to save words

Also HT for heard through or hat tip

Page 30: A Scientist's View of Twitter

MT (modified tweets) and the quote tweet

1.Don't Multi-ReTweet 2.Contractions 3.No More "And", & 4.Drop Pronouns: One of the easiest to lose is "that." So "the website that I love"

becomes "the website I love". 5.Omit Needless Words 6.Kill "I": You can make your tweets more declarative and shorter if you

occasionally drop the "I" 7.Turn Words into Numbers 8.Remove Extra Spaces: Twitter counts double spaces between words. 9.Drop the period 10.Use Word Shortcuts: "With" becomes "w/." "Love" becomes "Luv." 11.Drop Vowels: e.g. "classroom" into "classrm".

Page 31: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Assignment: Compose A Tweet #dukescicomm

The relationship between scientists and journalists has evolved in recent years with the advent of numerous sociocultural changes and drastic shifts within the media ecosystem. Media professionals have traditionally been the gatekeepers of scientific information, but new media technologies grant scientists more power than ever before to be proactive about their public communication. In this article, I provide an overview of the science–media relationship and scientists as public communicators. Specifically, I recount the relationship that has traditionally existed between scientists and media professionals, explain how this relationship has evolved over recent years, and highlight what I believe are some of the most salient and exciting areas for future research examining scientists' efforts to engage with the public.

Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science Anthony Dudo Sociology Compass http://goo.gl/9yNZKj

Page 32: A Scientist's View of Twitter

what do I tweet

Page 33: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Social media is a tool like a microscope. It can be used well and badly.

It can be used to do a lot of different things -Jon Eisen

Page 34: A Scientist's View of Twitter

•Eavesdropping:  follow  informa4ve  people  to  get  informa4on  and  learn  

•Dialogue:  exchange,  discuss,  and  debate  informa4on  (Asking  specific  ques4ons?)  

•Broadcast:  used  by  news  organiza4ons  and  businesses  to  inform  audience  about  news  or  products/services,  outreach  

•Data  collec4on:  e.g  fishermen  using  TwiJer  to  monitor  fish  popula4ons.  

•Impromptu  journalism:  e.g.  landing  on  Hudson  river,  Mumbai  aJacks,  Iran  post-­‐elec4on  protests  

•Mindcas4ng:    following  a  single  story  or  topic,  with  links,  for  a  period  of  4me,  e.g.  like  my  ongoing  coverage  of  the  #oilspill

“To  do  science,  you  have  to  know  what’s  going  on  in  science.  I  found  Twi9er…most  useful  for  becoming  informed  of  what  other  people  are  doing  in  science.  By  sharing  comments,  links,  informaAon,  and  notes  about  new  scienAfic  developments  with  trusted  sources  I  am  be9er  able  to  keep  up  with  the  vast  amount  of  informaAon  in  my  fields  of  interest.  Social  networks  enable  real-­‐Ame  highlighAng  and  ranking  and  tracking  of  what’s  going  on  in  the  world  of  science.”    -­‐Jon  Eisen

Page 35: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Inreach versus

Outreach

*

*Mr. T has nothing to do with this. I simply have always wanted to put a photo of Mr. T in a presentation.

Page 36: A Scientist's View of Twitter

followers and lists

Page 37: A Scientist's View of Twitter

How do I get followers

This is largely out or your control but….

1. Be patient 2. Follow people yourself 3. Engage people on Twitter 4. Tweet to popular hashtags 5. Tweet interesting content 6. Be famous (online or offline)

Page 38: A Scientist's View of Twitter

How do I find followers

1. Search for specific people and topics 2. Follow people under a relevant hashtag 3. Follow people who are following you

Page 39: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Lists

A list is a curated group of Twitter users. You can create your own lists or subscribe to lists created by others. Viewing a list timeline will show you a stream of Tweets from only the users

on that list.

Note: Lists are used for reading Tweets only. You cannot send or direct a Tweet to members of a list, for only those list

members to see.

Page 40: A Scientist's View of Twitter

https://support.twitter.com/articles/76460

Assignment Create A List

Page 41: A Scientist's View of Twitter

profiles

Page 42: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 43: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 44: A Scientist's View of Twitter
Page 45: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Profiles

Page 46: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Assignment Create/Update Your Profile

Page 47: A Scientist's View of Twitter

popularity and virality

Page 48: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Berger and Milkman (2012)

• The  results  indicate  that  posi4ve  content  is  more  viral  than  nega4ve  content  

• Virality  is  par4ally  driven  by  physiological  arousal.    

• Content  that  evokes  high-­‐arousal  posi4ve  (awe)  or  nega4ve  (anger  or  anxiety)  emo4ons  is  more  viral.    

• Content  that  evokes  low-­‐arousal,  or  deac4va4ng,  emo4ons  (e.g.,  sadness)  is  less  viral.

Whether things go viral is related to physiological arousal

Page 49: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Do not be too popular if you want to be seen as credible

Page 50: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Networks

Page 51: A Scientist's View of Twitter

managing the stream

Page 52: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Twitter is the equivalent of drinking out of firehose

Page 53: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Tweetdeck

Page 54: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Storify

https://storify.com/DrCraigMc/wood-fall

Page 55: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Assignment Download Tweetdeck

& Explore

Page 56: A Scientist's View of Twitter

tweets gone wrong and trolls

Page 57: A Scientist's View of Twitter

Subtweets & Trolls

subtweet: (on Twitter) a post that refers to a particular user without directly mentioning them, typically as a form of furtive mockery or criticism.

internet troll: a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, often for their own amusement

Page 58: A Scientist's View of Twitter