19
International Competitiveness of Botswana’s beef industry Tebogo B. Seleka Pinkie G. Kebakile Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis Conference on Policies for Competitive Smallholder Livestock Production Gaborone, Botswana, 4-6 March 2015

International competitiveness of Botswana’s beef industry

  • Upload
    ilri

  • View
    94

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

International Competitiveness of Botswana’s beef industry

Tebogo B. Seleka

Pinkie G. KebakileBotswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis

Conference on Policies for Competitive Smallholder Livestock ProductionGaborone, Botswana, 4-6 March 2015

Outline

• Introduction

• Measuring international Competitiveness

• Results

- Against SADC countries

- Against leading beef exporters

• Factors underlying Botswana’s beef industry competitiveness

Introduction

• Beef industry in Botswana plays a key role in the economy.

- It accounts for a large proportion of agricultural value added.

- It is the second leading source of export revenue after minerals.

- It is one of the key sources of livelihood among rural dwellers – as a source of income and employment (including self-employment).

• However;

- Its share of agricultural value added has declined over time.

- Beef exports have declined

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

2006

2009

Year

Qu

an

tit

ies (

Mt)

0.00

200,000.00

400,000.00

600,000.00

800,000.00

1,000,000.00

1,200,000.00

Re

al

Va

lue

s(2

00

6 p

ric

es)

QTY (Mt)

Real Values

Measuring international competitiveness

• RCA1ij= xij/xnj

• RCA2ij=(xij/xnj)/(xik/xnk)

• RCA3ij=(xij-mij)/(xij+mij)

• NPij=(xij-mij)/pij

• PCij=pij/cij

- RCA=Revealed comparative advantage, x= exports, m=imports, I= country I, j = beef, k= all agricultural commodities, n=set of countries (SADC or leading beef exporters), NP = ratio of net trade to production, PC=ratio of production to consumption, p = production, c= consumption.

Results: Botswana more competitive than SADC countries but its competitiveness has decline over time – RCA2

0102030405060708090

100

Botswana Namibia South Africa Zimbabwe

Ratio of net trade to production

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Botswana Namibia South Africa Zimbabwe

Ratio of production to consumption

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Botswana Namibia South Africa Zimbabwe

Botswana Compares well with leading beef exporters by its relative competitiveness has

declined over time: RCA2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Argentina Australia Botswana Namibia New Zealand Uruguay

Ratio of net trade to production

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

19

61

19

63

19

65

19

67

19

69

19

71

19

73

19

75

19

77

19

79

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

20

09

20

11

Argentina Australia Botswana Namibia

New Zealand Uruguay USA

Ratio of production to consumption

-

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

8.00

9.00

19

61

19

63

19

65

19

67

19

69

19

71

19

73

19

75

19

77

19

79

19

81

19

83

19

85

19

87

19

89

19

91

19

93

19

95

19

97

19

99

20

01

20

03

20

05

20

07

20

09

20

11

Argentina Australia Botswana Namibia

New Zealand Uruguay USA

Factors underlying competitiveness: Supply-side factors – cattle population

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Rat

io o

f co

mm

un

al (

Pe

rce

nt)

He

ads

(th

ou

san

ds)

Cattle Share of communal

• Poor productivity indicators

- Mortality rates averages 12 percent in communal system – although they have improved over time

- Off-take rates averaged 8 percent under communal arrangements

- Calving rates averaged 57 percent and have stagnated over time.

- Cattle prices declined consistently from 1974 to 2006.

- Disease outbreak (FMD).

- Recurrent drought

Demand-side factors – increasing domestic demand for beef – Cattle sales for export slaughter declined from 80 to 40 percent

0102030405060708090

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

Shar

e o

f B

MC

He

ads

sold

YearTotal BMC

BMC throughput declined two fold from 1984 to 2012

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

300,000

He

ads

Year

Institutional factors: one channel export marketing through the BMC a threat to industry

sustainability

-200000

-150000

-100000

-50000

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

• Preference erosion in the EU market due to future policy reforms.

Conclusions• Botswana’s beef industry is more competitive

than other SADC countries, but compares well with leading beef exporters.

• Declining competitiveness levels are due to low and stagnant productivity.

• Increasing domestic demand for beef in Botswana, which has resulted in declining exports.

• Future threats include single channel export marketing and possible preference erosion in the EU market.