Upload
deepa-a-k
View
501
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin derived monomers over supported metal catalysts
Presented by,
A. K. Deepa
Research guide: Dr. Paresh L. Dhepe
Catalysis & Inorganic Chemistry Division
CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India
Tel. 91-20-25902024, Fax. 91-20-25902633,
Email: [email protected]
Group Webpage: http://academic.ncl.res.in/pl.dhepe
M M M
R’ = H, -OCH3
R’’ = H, -CH2-CH=CH2
Hydrocarbons
HDO
H2
Lignin derived phenolic monomers
Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) Depolymerization of lignin can produce aromatic monomers, which can be used as fuel
additives or octane enhancers Higher O-contents of aromatic monomers (27 %, C9.5H11O3) reduces the fuel efficiency
Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) reactions upgrades the aromatic monomers Lignin derived aromatic monomers consists of several substitutions such as, alkyl, alkoxy,
hydroxyl, olefinic double bonds etc. Hence in the upgrading reactions of these types of compounds, there exists a competition between HDO and hydrogenation (reduction) of double bond or ring or aldehyde or ketone groups.
Lignin derived aromatic monomers like guaiacol, phenols, syringol, eugenol used to study HDO
reactions Sulfided CoMo and NiMo are conventional HDO catalysts, but has drawbacks like coke
formation and sulfur contamination Various combination of metals (Pt, Pd, Ru) and supports chosen from acidic [Al2O3 (AL), SiO2-
Al2O3 (SA)] neutral [carbon (C)], and basic [hydrotalcite (HT)] type The acidic supports are known to cleave C-O bonds and that the neutral and basic supports
may reduce the coke formation on the catalysts and thus increase the catalyst life. Hence we choose diverse supports in our work to study the activity difference.
Supported metals (for hydrodeoxygenation)
Synthesis technique: Impregnation
Support + Water
Stirred, 16h, R.T.
Calcined & Reduced (400 °C, 2h)
Dried
Aq. Solution of metal precursor
Metals: Pt, Pd, Ru
Supports: Acidic(SiO2-Al2O3, Ɣ-Al2O3 ),
Neutral(Carbon), Basic( HT)
M M M
R’ = H, -OCH3
R’’ = H, -CH2-CH=CH2
Hydrocarbons
HDO
H2
Lignin derived
phenolic monomers
Supported metals characterized using XRD, HRTEM, N2 sorption, ICP-OES techniques
Properties of supported metals Metals: Pt, Pd, Ru; Supports: Acidic(SiO2-Al2O3, Ɣ-Al2O3 ), Neutral(Carbon), Basic( HT)
HRTEM images of supported metal catalysts (a) AL (b) C (c) SA (d) HT.
Pd Pt
Ru
Catalyst
BET
surface
area[a]
[m2 g-1]
Average
particle
size[b]
[nm]
Carbon (C) 1000 -
Ɣ-Al2O3 (AL) 154 -
SiO2-Al2O3 (SA) 532 -
Hydrotalcite (HT) 250 -
Pd/C 1400 5
Pd/AL 122 10
Pd/SA 500 20
Pd/HT 187 15
Pt/C 1500 3
Pt/AL 174 15
Pt/SA 510 8
Pt/HT 159 3
Ru/C 850 3
Ru/AL 123 22
Ru/SA 490 15
Ru/HT 165 16 [a]N2 sorption study, [b]HRTEM analysis
30 40 50 60 70
Inte
nsity
(a.u
)
2
(111) (200) (220)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
30 40 50 60 70
Inte
nsty
(a.u
)
2
a
b
c
d
(111) (200) (220)
30 40 50 60 70
Inte
nst
y(a
.u)
2
a
b
c
d
(111) (200) (220)
XRD patterns of supports and supported Pd catalysts. (a) AL (b) SA (c) HT (d) Pd/C (e) Pd/AL (f) Pd/SA (g) Pd/HT
XRD patterns of supported Pt catalysts (a) Pt/C (b) Pt/AL (c) Pt/SA (d) Pt/HT
XRD patterns of supported Ru catalysts (a) Ru/C (b) Ru/AL (c) Ru/SA (d) Ru/HT
XRD
Catalyst Theoretical
[wt%]
Actual
[wt%]
Pd/C 3 3
Pd/AL 3 3
Pd/SA 3 2.8
Pd/HT 3 2.9
Pt/C 3 3
Pt/AL 3.5 3.3
Pt/SA 2 2
Pt/HT 3.5 3.2
Ru/C 3 3
Ru/AL 3 2.8
Ru/SA 3 3.1
Ru/HT 3 2.9
ICP-OES
HDO of phenol
Possible products formed in HDO of phenol. Where ‘1’ is phenol, ‘2’ is cyclohexanol, ‘3’is cyclohexene, ‘4’ is
cyclohexane and ‘5’ is benzene.
Reaction conditions: Phenol (2 mmol), Catalyst
(Substrate/Metal = 200 mole ratio), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2
pressure at RT = 3 MPa, 250 °C, 1h.
Complete HDO activity achieved on supported metals were found to be far better than the earlier works
where cyclohexane (4) yield was very less (4 %) even when reactions were done at 400 °C over sulfided CoMo catalysts
HDO of guaiacol: Role of acidic support
Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12 mmol), Catalyst (0.2 g), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT=3 MPa, 250 °C, 1-6h
AL (0.1mmol/g) (less acidic)
100% 100%
12% 44%
75% 42%
13% 14%
3h 6h
SA (0.63mmol/g)
(acidic)
3h 6h
88% 99%
2% 0%
36% 77%
48% 20%
Conv.
-------
1h 100% 100%
Pd/C Pd/C
HDO of guaiacol
Possible products formed in HDO of guaiacol Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12 mmol), Catalyst (0.2 g),
Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT = 3 MPa, 250 °C, 1h.
Catalytic studies using Pd catalysts
First step of ring hydrogenation is a metal catalyzed reaction however, further cleavage of C-O bond happens only when the support is acidic (SA)
C-O bond dissociation energy in guaiacol (6) (aromatic alcohol) (469 kJmol-1) is greater than that of methoxy cyclohexanol (7) (secondary alcohol) (385 kJmol-1). Therefore during HDO reactions, guaiacol (6) will first undergo hydrogenation to obtain methoxy cyclohexanol (7) , followed by deoxygenation to obtain cyclohexane (4)
HDO of guaiacol: Role of acidic support
Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12 mmol), Catalyst (0.2 g), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT=3 MPa, 250 °C, 1-6h
AL (0.1mmol/g) (less acidic)
100% 100%
12% 44%
75% 42%
13% 14%
3h 6h
SA (0.63mmol/g)
(acidic)
3h 6h
88% 99%
2% 0%
36% 77%
48% 20%
Conv.
-------
1h 100% 100%
Pd/C Pd/C
SA (0.63mmol/g)
(acidic)
AL (0.1mmol/g) (less acidic)
C (neutral)
HT (0.88mmol/g)
(basic)
HDO of guaiacol: Catalytic studies using Pt and Ru catalysts
76% 61%
75% 54% 10% 29%
7%
41% 66%
17% 5% 80% 19%
14% 11% 5%
87% 37% 49% 38%
12%
6%
47% 25%
Pt Ru
Pt Ru
Pt Ru
Pt Ru
Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12 mmol), Catalyst (0.2 g), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2
pressure at RT=3 MPa, 250 °C, 1h.
5%
Conv.
Pt/AL
41% 50% 70%
10% 20% 25%
17% 14% 25%
14% 15% 20%
1h 3h 6h
Pd/SA
1h 3h 6h
52% 78% 88%
0% 0% 0%
50% 75% 80%
0% 0% 0%
Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12 mmol), Catalyst (0.2 g), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2
pressure at RT=3 MPa, 250 °C, 1-6h
HDO of guaiacol: Time study
Conv.
Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12 mmol), Pd/SA (0.2g),
Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT = 3 MPa, 200-250 °C,
3h.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
200 230 250
Yie
ld(%
)
Temperature (°C) Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (12mmol), Pd/SA (0.2 g),
Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT = 1-3 MPa, 250 °C,
3h.
Temperature study Pressure study
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3
Yie
ld(%
)
Pressure(MPa)
HDO of guaiacol
Recycle study: Catalysts were recycled upto4 cycles, without undergoing any deactivation
Catalyst stablity (spent catalyst) was also confirrmed using XRD and ICP-OES analysis
HDO of eugenol
Possible products formed in HDO of eugenol. Where ‘13’ is eugenol, ‘14’ is propylguaiacol, ‘15’ is propylphenol, ‘16’ is propylcyclohexanol, ‘17’ is propylcyclohexane, ‘18’ is propylmethoxycyclohexanol, ‘19’ is methoxypropylcyclohexane, ‘20’ is isoeugenol and ‘21’ is methylguaiacol
Catalytic studies over Pd catalysts
Reaction conditions: Eugenol (2 mmol), Catalyst (Substrate/Metal = 200 mole ratio), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT = 3 MPa, 250 °C, 1 h.
HDO of eugenol:Catalytic studies over Ru and Pt catalysts
Reaction conditions: Eugenol (2 mmol), Catalyst (Substrate/Metal = 200 mole ratio), Hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT = 3 MPa, 250 °C, 1 h. Conversion was 100 % for all the catalytic reactions
Ru
Pt
Recycle study: Catalysts were recycled upto4 cycles, without undergoing any deactivation. Catalyst stablity (spent catalyst) was also confirrmed using XRD and ICP-OES analysis
Effect of electron density (deficiency or richness) of metal particles on supports
When a metal is loaded on an acidic support, there occurs a polarization of electron density of metal atom towards the nearby cations on the acidic support (Brönsted acidity)
If metal-support interaction is present, XPS analysis of these matal show a poitive shift in B.E B.E. of Pd/SA and Pd/C appear at 333.5 and 340.7 eV corresponding to Pd3d5/2 and Pd3d3/2,
respectively which corresponds to fully reduced Pd nanoparticles XPS data shown here for Pd/SA doesn’t show a positive shift in the binding energy values of
Pd3d5/2 and Pd3d3/2, which indicates that the metal nanoparticles are less dependent on the support acidity.
330 335 340 345 350
Pd0 3d 3/2
Binding Energy (eV)
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
335.5
Pd0 3d 5/2
340.7
330 335 340 345 350
Pd0 3d5/2
Inte
nsity (
a.u
.)
Binding energy (eV)
335.4
Pd0 3d5/2
340.7
Pd/SA Pd/C
Reaction conditions: Guaiacol (0.164 g) + Eugenol (0.164 g), Catalyst (0.065 g), hexadecane (30 mL), H2 pressure at RT = 3MPa, 250 0C, 1 h.
HDO of guaiacol and eugenol mixture over Pt catalysts
SA
(acidic)
C (neutral)
88% 0% 0% 85%
99% 98% 0% 0%
100% 80% 0% 4% 0% 12%
100% 10% 0% 0% 80% 0%
Conv. Conv.
Metal supported on acidic supports can preferably perform maximum HDO under the optimized reaction conditions
The studies performed here will help in designing highly active catalysts for the complete HDO of lignin derived aromatic monomers
Complete HDO of lignin derived aromatic monomer mixture using supported metal catalysts which will finally help in the one pot HDO of lignin into hydrocarbon fuels using the best catalytic system.
For catalyst with acidic support, the phenol molecule will approach and adsorb on the catalyst surface in vertical manner resulting in deoxygenation. But in the case of catalyst with neutral support, planar interaction was observed between the aromatic ring and support
Mechanism proposed for ring hydrogenation versus HDO for lignin derived aromatic monomers
The main aim of this work was to understand the role of metal and support in HDO reactions of phenol, guaiacol and eugenol Combination of any metal with strong acidic support helps to achieve best HDO activity Neutral and basic supports, selectively ring hydrogenation products can be obtained
Catalyst recyclability study was performed (at least 4 times) Mixture of phenolic compounds (guaiacol and eugenol) which mimics actual lignin derived bio-oils was also studied The understanding of the catalysts functionalities will help to enhance the yields of desired products and develop active catalysts
Conclusions
For further reading………
• Function of metals and supports on the hydrodeoxygenation of phenolic compounds. A. K. Deepa and Paresh L. Dhepe, ChemPlusChem, 2014, 79, 1573-1583. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cplu.201402145/abstract