27
biosecurity built on science PBCRC 2110 Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems Michael Renton and Maggie Triska Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre

Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

PBCRC 2110 Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

Michael Renton and Maggie Triska

Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre

Page 2: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Problem being addressed

Optimal surveillance design

(what’s the best way to look for something you don’t want to find)

Page 3: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Problem being addressed

What is the best design for a surveillance system?

- Number of samples (traps etc)

- Location of sampling

- Frequency of sampling

Page 4: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

General methods specific applications

Three case studies

- Grape phylloxera

- PCN

- Fruit fly

Page 5: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Grape phylloxera

Page 6: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Grape phylloxera

High virulenceLow virulence

High suitabilityMedium suitability

Low suitability

Page 7: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Grape phylloxera

Standard

↑↓ Density

Target high

suitability soil

Page 8: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Grape phylloxera results

Page 9: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Grape phylloxera results

Surveillance design based on soil types

- More efficient

Sampling density

- Relatively minor effect

Low virulent genotypes in low suitability conditions

- Many, many years before detection

Page 10: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Vic statistical areas

Properties

Movement

Fresh Seed

PCN

Page 11: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Spread simulations

Infested Detected

- Predict spread under different surveillance strategies

Page 12: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

PCN results

Page 13: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

PCN summary

Survey density ↑

- ↓ infested properties

Survey arrangement (with fixed density)

- variation between strategies

Detection

Surveillance: Region +

Random

Page 14: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Fruit fly

Page 15: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Individual

trees

Orchards

High risk

introduction

sites

Initial

Incursion

Initial

Incursion

Page 16: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Surveillance (trapping) designs

grid random

Page 17: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

adhockmeans

firstfirst

Page 18: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Results!

Better!

1 10 100 1000 10000

N trees

pro

ba

bility

0.0

00

10

.00

10

.01

0.1

1

gridadhoc

firstfirstkmeansrandom

0 100 200 300 400

days to detection

pro

ba

bility

0.0

00

10

.00

10

.01

0.1

1

gridadhoc

firstfirstkmeansrandom

Page 19: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

NZ MPI: Q-fly case study

Data from 2015 Q-fly incursion

Analysis of surveillance to confirm eradication

Page 20: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Open questions and next steps

Practicality and adoption of designs?

Ease of use (training module for fruit fly)

Ease of generalisation

- to new locations, species, organisms, situations…

Effects of biology and spread?

Effects of better detection?

- Better traps (sooner, longer distances, mobile, adaptive)

- Better sampling/diagnostic methods

Page 21: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Thanks!

Page 22: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Page 23: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Page 24: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Grape phylloxera

Page 25: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

PCN

Page 26: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Page 27: Design and Evaluation of Targeted Biosecurity Surveillance Systems

biosecurity built on science

Probability of detection from active and passive surveillance increasing as a function of time since first infestation of a field.

0 5 10 15

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

t

p

active

passive

Detection and diagnostics?

1 5 10 50 500 5000

N trees

pro

ba

bility

0.0

00

10

.00

10

.01

0.1

1grid

adhocopt_timeopt_ninfs

firstfirstkmeansrandom