Upload
ronaldo-degazon
View
1.235
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Ronaldo Degazon Wednesday 09/05/12 Physics: Lab #8 Thermal Physics
Aim: To investigate the cooling curve of a substance.
Apparatus: candle wax, test tube, test tube holder, Bunsen burner, tripod & beaker, thermometer,
stop-clock, retort stand, water & wire gauze, glass rod
Diagram:
Procedure:
1. The apparatus was set up as shown in Diagram A, with the substance in a water
bath.
2. The substance was heated until it was completely melted and well above its melting
point.
3. The test tube containing the substance was removed and placed in a retort stand,
with the thermometer in the liquid as shown in Diagram B.
4. The stop-clock was started and the temperature was recorded every half minute
until it fell to well below its melting point. The thermometer was not removed
during solidification.
5. The substance was re heated to a temperature above its melting point so the
thermometer could have been removed from the substance.
6. A cooling curve of F versus t was plotted for the substance.
Results:
Time / s Temperature / oC
30 62
60 59.5 90 57
120 56.5 150 55
180 54.5 210 54.5
240 54
270 54 300 53.5
330 53.5 360 53.5
390 53.5 420 53.5
450 53.5
480 53.5 510 53
540 52.5 570 52.5
600 51 630 51
Time / s Temperature / oC
660 50.5
690 50 720 50
750 49.5 780 49
810 48.5 840 48
870 47.5
900 47
Discussion:
The melting point of a substance is the temperature at which it changes from a solid to
liquid. Also the process in which a liquid turns into a solid is called solidification which occurs at the
freezing point; the exact opposite of the melting point. When a substance solidifies, the heat released
during that process is called the latent heat of solidification.
From the experiment, it was deduced that the melting point of candle wax was 53.5 oC
because it remained at that temperature for 180 seconds. Heat was being lost during that period but the
temperature did not fall at all. Therefore it was concluded that the heat was no lost but was used to
repair the bonds of the molecules. The heat used during that 180 seconds is its latent heat of
solidification.
Dark brown flakes were noticed moving around in the candle wax when melted.
However, when solidified, these flakes remained still. This can be accounted for with the Kinetic Theory.
The theory states that liquids consist of clusters of particles that are free to move and that solids consist
of fixed particles which are restricted from moving but only vibrate about a fixed point. When the wax
was melted, the brown flakes moved around from being bombarded by the moving clusters in the liquid
wax. However, when the wax solidified there was no movement amongst the particles and so the flakes
no longer moved.
The Kinetic Theory can also be used to explain the shape of the graph. First it states that
all matter is made of tiny particles. It goes on to say that these particles when supplied with energy,
move faster and hence their average kinetic energy increases. Average kinetic e nergy is proportional to
temperature, hence the more heat supplied the higher the temperature. Applying the theory to this
experiment, you could say that the more heat released by the candle wax, the lower its average kinetic
energy fell and hence the lower its temperature dropped.
From points A to B, as more heat was released by the candle wax, the lower its
temperature fell hence the downwards trend in the line. However, from B to C the line remained
straight – the wax’s temperature remained constant. This is simply because the being lost was not being
absorbed by the wax’s surroundings, it was being used to repair the bonds of the molecules, hence the
average kinetic energy of the particles did not fall. Nevertheless, when the bonds were repaired and the
wax had solidified, the surroundings resumed absorbing the heat from the wax, hence from C to D there
is another downward trend.
Sources of Error:
- Human Reaction Time: there was a possibility that the temperature reading was not
taken exactly 30 seconds after the previous reading.
- Parallax Error: there was a possibility of a parallax error when reading the scale of
the thermometer.
- There was the possibility that the wax would have melted too quickly and vaporized.
- There was a possibility that the thermometer would take the reading of the tube’s
temperature and not the wax’s.
Precautions:
- To reduce parallax error, the thermometer reading was taken with the eye
perpendicular to the level of liquid in the thermometer.
- The test tube containing the candle wax was heated indirectly in a water bath to
control the rate at which it was heated so that it didn’t melt too quickly.
- It was ensured that the thermometer did not touch the bottom of the test tube to
ensure that the temperature of the wax was taken and not the tube.
- A glass rod was used to stir the water to ensure that its temperature remained
uniform throughout.
Conclusion: A cooling curve was successfully obtained for candle wax.