101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication - How can libraries support changing research workflows

(except logo’s)

101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication How can libraries support changing research workflows?

Bianca Kramer & Jeroen Bosman EIFL General Assembly, Riga, November 13, 2015

@MsPhelps@jeroenbosman

analysis

outreach assessmentpublication

writingdiscovery

https://osf.io/

The research workflow – a cyclic model

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

preparation

analysis

writingpublication

outreach

assessment discovery

The research workflow – a cyclic model

2005

2010

Discovery

Analysis

WritingPublication

Out

reac

h

Assessm

ent

Survey: scholarly communication tools

Survey: scholarly communication tools

Survey results: Researcher profiles

others

MyScienceWork

ResearcherID

Academia.edu

Profile page at own institution

ORCID

Google Scholar Citations

ResearchGate

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481)

Survey results: Researcher profiles

others

MyScienceWork

ResearcherID

Academia.edu

Profile page at own institution

ORCID

Google Scholar Citations

ResearchGate

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

PhD student / Postdoc / Faculty (n=3481) Librarians (n=638)

Example research workflows: traditional and innovative

Open Science

y y y y yElsevier

Example research workflows:company silos / open science

How can libraries support researchers ?

Utrecht University Library The Netherlands

Call to action – help distribute our survey

English françaisEspañolРусский简体中文日本語العربية

Custom URL - get data from your institution

• Reconsider tools practiced in information literacy classes

• Support licensing decisions

• Prepare for talks with faculty/PhD-students/postdocs

• Compare research practices in your institution with

national and global data• Find out where your users stand on Open Access/Open Science

Show that as a library you think with researchers, not for them

Thank you !101innovations.wordpress.com

Three goals for science & scholarship (G-E-O)

• declaring competing interests• replication & reproducibility• meaningful assessment• effective quality checks• credit where it is due• no fraud, plagiarism

research governance

changes

• connected tools & platforms• no publ. size restrictions• null result publishing• speed of publication• (web)standards, IDs• semantic discovery• re-useability• versioning

technical changes & standards

open peer review •open (lab)notes •

plain language •open drafting •

open access •CC-0/BY •

economic & copyright

changes

researcher

funder

publisher

public

government library

good

efficient open