View
472
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presentation for
March 4, 2014
[ Ephesus Church - Fordham
Boulevard ] Small Area Planning and Traffic/Stormwater Analysis
[ Framework Plan ]
• Increased Connectivity Throughout
• Create Greenspace System• Create Mixed-Use Nodes• Multi-Family Residential
Development• Increased Transit Presence and
Facilities • Roadway Operational
Improvements:1. Extend Legion Road2. Extend South Elliot Road3. Long-Term Road Connections in Village
Plaza and Ram’s Plaza4. Intersection Improvements5. Operational Improvements
[ Framework Components: Density ]
Higher Density Lower Density
Presented to Council:February 28, 2011 &
May 16, 2011
• Transitions to neighborhoods
• Density along Fordham Blvd.
Development Density
Neighborhood Transition Approximately 3-4 stories
Central Residential Core Approximately 5-6 stories
High Density Mixed-Use and Commercial
Development
Approximately 6+ stories
This was developed by Urban Collage in the May of 2011 and
shared with the Council Committee on Economic Development as a part
of discussion of density and site plan presentation by the former
Colony Apartments. (Concept idea on following slide)
[ Conceptual 3D Massing ]
[ Ephesus Church- Fordham
SAP ]Development Summary
Residential Units 1,084 +/-
Office368,000 +/-
Retail258,000 +/-
Hotel 280,000+/-
[ Implementation ] [ Implementation ]
> Implementation Strategies (Adopted by Council)
1.Create zoning tools to help encourage redevelopment
2.Work with Planning Department to establish the best mechanism for regulatory changes and the timing associated
with it.
3.Create a New Redevelopment Zoning District.
4.Consider Development Agreements.
5.Move forward with further evaluation of transportation/transit solutions for the district
6.Conduct preliminary engineering on priority projects to establish feasibility and refined cost.
7.Work with NCDOT to identify future partnerships on transportation projects of regional significance.
8.Work to organize the area for future conversations based around planned and conceptualized improvements
9.Work with area stakeholders to implement “low hanging fruit” improvements.
10.Continue ongoing discussions with community citizens as implementation continues.
11.Continue project-by-project negotiations with property owners and development interests to communicate intent of
the plan.
12.Seek alternatives to finance improvements based on engineering work and other public improvements,.
13.Explore the feasibility of public/private financing mechanisms such as a Municipal Service District (MSD), Tax
Increment Finance (TIF) and/or a synthetic TIF
> Implementation Strategies (Adopted by Council)
1.Create zoning tools to help encourage redevelopment
2.Work with Planning Department to establish the best mechanism for regulatory changes and the timing associated
with it.
3.Create a New Redevelopment Zoning District.
4.Consider Development Agreements.
5.Move forward with further evaluation of transportation/transit solutions for the district
6.Conduct preliminary engineering on priority projects to establish feasibility and refined cost.
7.Work with NCDOT to identify future partnerships on transportation projects of regional significance.
8.Work to organize the area for future conversations based around planned and conceptualized improvements
9.Work with area stakeholders to implement “low hanging fruit” improvements.
10.Continue ongoing discussions with community citizens as implementation continues.
11.Continue project-by-project negotiations with property owners and development interests to communicate intent of
the plan.
12.Seek alternatives to finance improvements based on engineering work and other public improvements,.
13.Explore the feasibility of public/private financing mechanisms such as a Municipal Service District (MSD), Tax
Increment Finance (TIF) and/or a synthetic TIF
[ Functional Engineering ][ Functional Engineering ]
1A1C
23
6
1B
Eastgate
1
A
1
B
1C
Phase ID- Wayfinding signage
· Incorporate directional /wayfinding signage to encourage preferred traffic movements, such as the existing ‘slip’ lane from Fordham Boulevard into Rams Plaza as a substitute for the current left-turn movement from Ephesus Church Road.
- Currently unfunded
2
3
Willow Drive to Elliot Road Connector:
This connector road needs additional functional engineering
and consideration.
6
Approximately $8.8 for road/ped/bike
improvements.> When there are substantial road improvements, bike and pedestrian
improvements are incorporated. Existing streets with limited or no improvements
will need bike/ped improvements made in the future.
> Transit has participated in this planning and been consulted as we continue to
plan the improvements.
• Phase I $2.4M• Phase II $4.0M • Phase III $1.3M• Phase IV included in Phase
II OPCC• Phase V included in Phase I
OPCC• Phase VI $1.1M (assuming
roundabout at Elliott) Not currently considered to be funded.
Eastgate
[ Modern Code Components ]
BUILDING TYPESBUILDING TYPES ELEMENTSELEMENTS USESUSES PARKINGPARKING
BLOCKSBLOCKS STREETSSTREETS ADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATION MAPMAP
++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
[ Modern Code Components ]
BUILDING TYPESBUILDING TYPES ELEMENTSELEMENTS USESUSES PARKINGPARKING
BLOCKSBLOCKS STREETSSTREETS ADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATION MAPMAP
++ ++ ++
++ ++ ++
Ephesus Church Road
Elliott Road Extension
Fordham Boulevard
Franklin Street
Elliott Road
Legion Road
*
*
*
[ Stormwater ][ Stormwater ]
How do we allow development to occur in this district when it is prone to flooding?
1. Manage Stormwater as a district. Develop a Municipal Service District to fund maintenance, collect only minimum of $50,000.
2. Any site that turns dirt, pays initial fee for future capital for stormwater.
3. We provide approximately $1.2 million for district stormwater improvements. Water quality and quantity management.
4. If singular sites increase impervious surface, a separate evaluation would take place to determine impact and improvements to be made by the developer.
5. We have also requested $700,000 from MPO to fund connections between Eastgate and Village Plaza across the proposed Best Management Practice (BMP).
1
2
21
[ Conceptural Sketch ][ Conceptural Sketch ]
Key Items to improve flow and prevent daming.
[ Affordable Housing ][ Affordable Housing ]
[ Affordable Housing ][ Affordable Housing ]
Adopted Goal of 300 new units
-DHIC proposal can add up to 200 units-Other opportunities
Adopted Goal of 300 new units
-DHIC proposal can add up to 200 units-Other opportunities
[ Affordable Housing ][ Affordable Housing ]
[ Plan Implementation][ Plan Implementation]
District Value
•Land $57,602,000
•Building $96,400,000
TOTAL $154,000,000
District Value
•Land $57,602,000
•Building $96,400,000
TOTAL $154,000,000
[ Ephesus Church-Fordham District ][ Ephesus Church-Fordham District ]
Roads $8.8 million
Storm water $1.2 million
Total $10. million
Roads $8.8 million
Storm water $1.2 million
Total $10. million
[ Projected Investment: Private]With Orange County
[ Projected Investment: Private]With Orange County
Name Property Square FeetValue PSFProjected Value
Projected TOCH Tax (.515) Existing Value
Existing CH Tax Net
Orange County PROJECTED
Quality Inn 200000 $175 $35,000,000 $180,250 $6,017,642 $30,931 $149,319 $300,300The Park Residences 680000 $150 $102,000,000 $525,300 $7,369,494 $37,879 $487,421 $875,160The Park (comm site) $3,000,000 $15,450 $15,450 $25,740Former Theater Residences 240000 $150 $36,000,000 $185,400 $1,345,050 $6,914 $178,486 $308,880
Retail 10000 $100 $1,000,000 $5,150 $5,150 $8,580$0 $0
TOTAL PROJECTED: $177,000,000 $911,550 $14,732,186 $75,723 $835,827 $1,518,660GROWTH $12
Total available Incuding Orange Co. $2,354,487
PROJECTED INVESTMENT
Projected Value is based on the TIF Analysis Appendix of the Small Area Plan - 2011
Other potential redevelopment opportunities:
1)Ram’s Plaza2)Chapel Hill Inn (former Holiday Inn)3)Eastgate4)Other shopping centers
Other potential redevelopment opportunities:
1)Ram’s Plaza2)Chapel Hill Inn (former Holiday Inn)3)Eastgate4)Other shopping centers
[ Financing: Public ][ Financing: Public ]
Project Development Financing (TIF) – A method where local government borrows against future tax income created by already planned new development.
Special Assessment District – The Bond debt is broken up and allocated for the life of the bonds to each property owner on a pro-rata basis.
Municipal Service District – An equal tax to all business and property owners in the district with the rate set annually.
Phase I $2.4MPhase II $4.0M (assuming stop control at Ephesus Church)
Phase III $1.3MPhase VI $1.1MStormwater $1.2MBorrow $10.M 2014-2015
Phase I $2.4MPhase II $4.0M (assuming stop control at Ephesus Church)
Phase III $1.3MPhase VI $1.1MStormwater $1.2MBorrow $10.M 2014-2015
[ Financing: Public ][ Financing: Public ]
[ The Plan: Stimulate private investment ][ The Plan: Stimulate private investment ]
1) Project Development Financing - Request that the County consider participating in the debt repayment by pledging new taxes from new development back to the Town until the debt is paid. If we borrow $10,000,000 the annual payment would be around $900,000 for 15yrs, (or [Recommended if the County does not participateif the County does not participate] $770,000 for 20 yrs).
1) Project Development Financing - Request that the County consider participating in the debt repayment by pledging new taxes from new development back to the Town until the debt is paid. If we borrow $10,000,000 the annual payment would be around $900,000 for 15yrs, (or [Recommended if the County does not participateif the County does not participate] $770,000 for 20 yrs).
2) Authorize a Municipal Service District (as secondary) to pay for maintenance of the Stormwater maintenance, probably a tax rate of $.04 for a targeted minimum of $50,000 annually. Tax rate can be reduced as the value of the district increases.
2) Authorize a Municipal Service District (as secondary) to pay for maintenance of the Stormwater maintenance, probably a tax rate of $.04 for a targeted minimum of $50,000 annually. Tax rate can be reduced as the value of the district increases.
Create two-level financing district with Project Development Financing as the primary and capture increased value from the Town to pay debt.
[ Future timeline ][ Future timeline ]
> Work Session on March 6, 2014 at Chapel Hill Library at 6:00pm
> Town Council on March 24, 2014 at Southern Human Services Center at 7:00pm.
T oday:
1.Reviewed Small Area Plan
2.Concepts for traffic improvements
3.Working on the details of a stormwater plan
4.That Council is considering the rezoning for the district
5.The we will have the final Stormwater plans/model in late March
6.Council will vote on the Stormwater Plan in April/May
7.Finalize the vote on synthetic/TIF financing in May
8.Establish a Municipal Service District in May
9.Set a date for all items to be effective (probably July 1, 2014)
Thank You !q u e s t i o n s ?
Thank You !q u e s t i o n s ?