Upload
warren-fothergill-cmiosh
View
228
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Operational Safety in O
il & G
as
Warren Fothergill C
MIO
SH
Training Assessment M
anagerKnow
ledge Grid
�C
omm
itting to Process Safety�
Understanding the H
azards & Risks
�M
anaging Risk�
Learning from experience
Safety Managem
ent in Context
Com
mitm
ent to Process Safety in Oil &
Gas
ProcessSafety
�C
ulture�
Com
pliancew
ithStandards
�Process
SafetyC
ompetency
�W
orkforceinvolvem
ent�
StakeholderOutreach
Com
mitm
ent to Process Safety in Oil &
Gas
Who
Impacts
onProcess
Safety
�O
perators�
ShiftManagers
�Engineers
�SeniorLeaders,M
anagers
Principles of Process Safety in Oil &
Gas
LeadershipPrinciples
inProcess
Safety
�C
learandpositive
processsafety
leadership�
Processsafety
leadershiprequires
boardlevelinvolvem
entand
competence.
�G
oodprocess
safetym
anagement
requiresconstant
activeengagem
ent;�
Boardlevel
visibilityand
promotion
ofprocess
safetyleadership
isessentialto;
�Engagem
entofthew
orkforceis
needed;�
Monitorprocess
safetyperform
ance;�
Publicationof;and
�Share
bestpracticeacross
sectors
Arrangem
ents for Process Safety in Oil &
Gas
Organisation
&Resourcing
�Accountabilities
defined�
Mem
berof
Boardto
befully
conversantin
ProcessSafety
Managem
ent�
Appropriateresources
made
available�
Developm
entofprogramm
eofprom
otionofProcess
Safety�
Systems
andarrangem
entsestablished
�Periodic
reviews
ofProcessSafety
risks�
Settingofleading
&lagging
indicators�
Engagementoforganisations
within
sectorgroups�
Systemof‘retention’in
terms
ofcorporateknow
ledge
Failing Process Safety in Oil &
Gas
The‘Blind
Spots’
�ProjectExecution
�Safety
Assessment
�Technology
�H
uman
Factors�
Organisation
�O
perations&
Maintenance
�Risk
Acceptance�
AccidentInvestigations�
Managem
ent&Leadership
Understanding H
azards & Risks in O
il & G
as
Understand
Hazards
&Risks
�Process
Knowledge
Managem
ent�
Hazard
Identificationand
RiskAnalysis
Qualitative vs. Q
uantitative Risk Assessm
ent
•U
sing q
ualitative m
etho
ds to
determ
ine freq
uen
cy and
severity
Qualitative (Q
)
•W
here freq
uen
cy and
severity are app
roxim
ately qu
antified
with
in
ranges
Semi-qualitative (SQ
)
•W
here fu
ll qu
antificatio
n is d
emo
nstrated
Quantified risk assessm
ent (QRA)
Assessing the Risks in O
il & G
as
Semi-Q
uantitative (SQ)
Use this if it is
adequate for deciding on appropriate controls.Record findings and recom
mendations.
If not adequate, first increase the depth of modelling of the risk assessm
ent and see if it now m
eets requirem
ents. If it does, record the findings and recom
mendations.
Determ
ining the Right Method of Risk A
ssessment
Qualitative (Q
)
Use this m
ethod if it isadequate for deciding on appropriate controls.
Record the findings and recomm
endations.
If notadequate, then use
(Continued)
Assessing the Risks in O
il & G
as
Quantified Risk A
ssessment (Q
RA)
If adequate, use QRA.
If not, increase depth of the risk assessment m
odel until it answers all questions.
Record findings and recomm
endations
Intheir
Offshore
Information
SheetNo3/
2006,theU
KH
SEgive
more
industryspecific
guidanceon
howto
determine
which
riskassessm
entm
ethodis
appropriate. Ifnotadequate,then
use Assessing the Risks in O
il & G
as
HAZO
P
�Purpose
-to
identifyany
deviationsfrom
designintent,
theircausesand
consequences.�
Useful
atdesign
stageof
hazardousinstallations/
processes.�
Multi-disciplinary
teamand
brainstorming
�U
sesguide
words
toidentify
deviationse.g.M
ORE,LESS
�D
eviseactions
toreduce
riskdow
nto
acceptablelevel.
Methodology A
ssessing the Risks in Oil &
Gas
HA
ZID
�Purpose
-to
identifyallhazards
forlaterriskassessm
ent�
Uses
“brainstorming”,aided
bykey
words.
�U
sefulwhen
consideringchanges
toexisting
plantlayout.
Methodology for A
ssessing the Risks in Oil &
G
as
FMEA
�
How
caneach
componentfail?
�C
ause?�
Effectson
systemas
aw
hole?�
How
serious?�
Can
thefailure
bedetected
beforeeffects
become
serious?
Methodology for A
ssessing the Risks in Oil &
G
as
The Concept of Risk C
ontrol Barrier Models –
“bow-tie”
Methodology for A
ssessing the Risks in Oil &
G
as
Hazards
inO
il&G
as
�H
ydrocarbons�
Gases
–including
Hydrogen
Sulphide,Methane,N
itrogen�
Noise
�Silica
�Particulate
Matter(D
iesel)�
Chem
icals�
Biocides�
Naturally
Occurring
RadioactiveM
aterials�
Temperature
Extremes
�Pressure
�Fatigue
Hazards in O
il & G
as
Manage Risk in O
il & G
as
Manage
Risk
�O
peratingProcedures
�Safe
Working
Procedures�
AssetIntegrity&
Reliability�
ContractorM
anagement
�Training
andQ
ualityAssurance
�M
anagementofC
hange�
OperationalReadiness
�C
onductofOperations
�Em
ergencyM
anagement
RiskM
anagement
Know your risks and w
hat youshould be doing about them
Plan, prioritise, implem
ent risk controls
Make sure risk controls rem
ain effective
Review and learn
Manage Risk in O
il & G
as
SourcesofW
ritten,RecognisedG
oodPractice
include:
�(U
K)HSE
Guidance
andAC
oPs�
Nationalorlocalgovernm
entguidance�
Internationalornationalstandards
(BS,CEN
,CEN
ELEC,ISO
,IEC
,etc.)�
Industryspecific
orsector
guidancefrom
tradefederations,
professionalinstitutions,etc.
Using Standards to M
anage Risk in Oil &
Gas
Typical Legal Requirements/G
ood Practice:
Regulatorsrequire
safetycase/safety
reportsubm
issionfor
eachinstallation
type.
Installationcannot
operateuntil
SC/SR
acceptedby
regulator(regulatorw
illinspectinstallation)
Notification
requiredto
regulatorat
designstage
(orw
henm
ovedorchange
ofuse).
TypicalExam
ples:Safety
Case
(offshore),Safety
Report(O
nshore)
Using Standards to M
anage Risk in Oil &
Gas
ThePurpose
ofD
ocumented
Evidencesuch
asSafety
Cases
andSafety
Reports
Toensure
thatduty
holdersdesign/operate
theirfacilities
safely.i.e.Measures
inplace
toidentify
potentialfor,prevent
andm
itigatem
ajoraccidents.
Using Standards to M
anage Risk in Oil &
Gas
The Typical Content of Safety C
ases and Safety Reports
Identifym
ajor accident hazards –use risk assessm
ents, bow-tie diagram
s, design calculations etc.
1•
Each h
azard scen
ario
2•
threats to
safety and
their cau
ses
3•
barriers to
preven
t tho
se threats
4•
con
sequ
ences o
f each th
reat were it to
be realised
5•
recovery m
easures req
uired
6•
factors th
at cou
ld escalate th
e hazard
or its co
nseq
uen
ces
Using Standards to M
anage Risk in Oil &
Gas
Evaluate major accident risks
and measures taken (or to be
taken).
1•
Identifyeach
hazard
/incid
ent scen
ario
2•
Assessfreq
ue
ncy criteria
3•
Assessco
nseq
uen
ce criteria
4•
AssessEER
facilities and
requ
iremen
ts
5•
Identifyan
d assess
risk con
trol m
easures again
st ALA
RP
Using Standards to M
anage Risk in Oil &
Gas
Arrangements for audits and audit reports
Adequate SMS in place
Major accident prevention policies
(in the case of safety reports)
Identify safety critical elements
in place to manage m
ajor accident hazards
Details of the em
ergency plan.
Using Standards to M
anage Risk in Oil &
Gas
Managem
ent of Change in O
il & G
as
Managem
entofChange
ProceduresSH
OU
LDidentify
�the
scopeofthe
changes(w
hatneedsto
change)�
theroles
andresponsibilities
ofthose
managing
andm
akingthe
changes�
howrisk
analysisis
tobe
undertaken�
methods
usedto
comm
unicatethe
changes�
trainingofpersonnelinvolved
Learning from Experience in O
il & G
as
Managem
entof
Change
controlwillbe
neededw
hen,e.g.
�equipm
entisreplaced
with
non-identicalparts�
newitem
sorequipm
entisadded
tothe
system�
changesare
made
tothe
operatingprocedures
(ifoutside
establisheddesign
basisand
safeoperating
envelope).
Learning from Experience in O
il & G
as
Learningfrom
Experience
�IncidentInvestigation
�M
easurement&
Metrics
�Auditing
�M
anagementReview
s&
Continuous
Improvem
ent
ReasonsW
hyW
eDON’T
Learn?
�If
itisn’t
aregulatory
requirement,w
eare
notgoing
todo
it!�
Managem
entSystem
sare
overem
phasisedw
hilethe
technicalaspects
ofprocess
safety,which
actuallycontrol
thehazards
andm
anagerisk,are
neglected�
Auditingcosts
arehigh
andthey
focuson
symptom
sand
notthecauses
�M
anagementdoes
notunderstand�
Verbal
supportfor
implem
entationis
inconsistentw
ithfiscalsupport
Learning from Incidents
Investigationto
Learning
�The
failureto
comply
with
systems
ofwork
andcontrols
�Focus
on‘realcauses’
�V
iewthe
incidentas
"theconsequence
ofa
failureor
inadequacyin
thesafety
managem
entsystem"
�Identify
failuresin
them
anagementsystem
Learning from Incidents
Learning from Incidents
CausalFactor.v.RootC
ause
Causal
:Any
behaviour,om
ission,or
deficiencythat
ifcorrected,
eliminated,
oravoided
probablyw
ouldhave
preventedthe
incident
Root:
Underlying
deficienciesin
thepolicies,
procedures,training,
expectationsand
comm
unicationsthat
allowed
theC
ausalFactor
toexist
Deepw
aterHorizon
Explosion–
GulfofM
exico2
010
“Theteam
didnot
identifyany
singleaction
orinaction
thatcaused
thisincident.Rather,a
complex
andinterlinked
seriesof
mechanical
failures,hum
anjudgm
ents,engineering
design,operational
implem
entation,environm
entalconditions
andteam
interfacescam
etogether
toallow
theinitiation
andescalation
oftheaccident.”
Excerptfromthe
reportpreparedby
BPpostincident
Learning from Incidents
Learning from Incidents –
Causation M
odel
LOSS
•H
arm
•D
amage
•Substandard quality product/service
•Liability, etc.
INC
IDEN
T
•Potential LossProducingEvent
IMM
EDIA
TEC
AU
SESRO
OT
CA
USES
INA
DEQ
UATE
SYSTEMS
CO
NTRO
L
INA
DEQ
UATE
RISK A
SSESSMEN
T
Inadequate:
•Baseline
•Issue Based
•C
ontinuous
•H
uman
Factors
•W
orkplaceFactors
Incident Causation M
odel
Problem Solving M
odel
•SubstandardA
cts
•Substandard C
onditions
Inadequate:
•System
s
•Standards
•C
ompliance
Pre-contactC
ontactPost-C
ontact
T h r e s h o l d l i m i t M
easurement of C
ontrolM
easurement of C
auseM
easurement of C
onsequence
E.I.DuPontde
Nem
ours&
Co
Inc.Buffalo,N
ewYork
Flamm
ableV
apourExplosion
Welding
onTank
Containing
VinylFluoride
(1Killed,1
injured)N
ovember9,2010
Identifythe
CRITITC
AL
FAC
TORS
–and
analyseO
NE
ofthem
(45
mins)
Learning from Incidents –
Case Study