Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Multiple Resolution & Relationsgetting much more out of a DOI
Chuck KoscherDirector of Technology
`
10.1245/s10434-016-5211-6
the normal behavior of a DOI: just go to the article
`10.1245/s10434-016-5211-6
much more can be done
Point to multiple copies ofthe same thing: Multiple Resolution
Point to other related things: Relations
translation
prior version
datareferenced articles
Point to Cited articles: Cited-By
`
multiple resolution
the problem: copies live on more than one platform
DOI points to an interim page, that page contains multiple links
`
an interim page (this is hosted by Crossref)
How does it work?
One primary depositorDeposits the metadataIndicates the the DOI is multiple-resolution ready
(=unlocked)
One (or more) secondary depositor(s)Cannot update metadataCan add URLsRequire a multiple resolution deposit account
` multiple resolution: some observations
Requires a lot of coordination
Needs a lot of Crossref staff attention
Controls and management are complicated
Automatic multiple resolutionWe are currently testing a system for books
• Book publisher specifies a group of all organizations allowed to deposit metadata and assign Crossref DOIs (“co-access group”)
• Any member of the group can create a Crossref DOI at any time
• Crossref automatically creates the interim “pop-up” page when additional record is added
• Crossref aliases different DOIs for the same content so they act the same
`
multiple resolution: an improvement
Co-Access for books
the problem: articles do not stand alone anymore
`
relations
researcher
We’ll make the researcher the center of this perspective
researcher
institution
Research
To start the researcher
becomes affiliated with some
institution and begins work on a research project
researcher
institution
Funding sourceResearch
Trials registry
Data
authorauthorauthor
Of course they get funding for their
research, may have to register their research
and likely use data which may be authored
by someone else
researcher
institution
Funding sourceResearch
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
They read papers which have their own authors and then maybe post
a preprint to a repository
researcher
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
PublisherOf course they
work with colleagues to
create the paper and then with a publisher to get
formally published
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
The paper gets published, but may be more
than just a manuscript and is
broken out into parts
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
The publisher may issue a translated
version and, oops, a correction
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
Readers add the paper to
collaboration networks
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
Of course, the paper directs us to the other papers, funding and
registries. And the posted pre-print should tell
readers where to get the Version of Record
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Repeat
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
… and Again
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
recommends
reviewscomments
SCNs
researcher
Published paper
institution
authorauthorauthor
Funding sourceResearch
Supplementary material
Images Figures
Pre-print
Trials registry
Other paper
Other paper
Other paper
Data
authorauthorauthor
authorauthorauthor
Publisher
correction
Translation
GOOD NEWS! We are giving identifiers to all this stuff,
right?
orcid orcid
orcid
orcidorcid
orcid
doi
doi
doi doi
doi
doi
doidoi
Org-id Org-id
Org-idaward
doi
orcid
orcid
We need to map this data
`
Metadata Records Relationships Among Works
WORKS
Data,Components (figures/tables/images),
Supplemental materialse.g. DataCite, Figshare DOI
e.g. ORCID iDs, Org Identifiers
CrossMark,Open Funder RegistryClinical Trials Registry
Translation,Preprint,A Review,A comment
“is same as”
“is preprint of”
”is based on”“has part”,
“is supplemented by”
“update”“is part of”“funded by” “claims w
ork”,
“affiliated” Contributors,Affiliations
e.g. Funders,Open Funder Registry ID
e.g. Crossref, mEDRA DOI
Works/’things’ can be identified using: DOIs, Urls, PMIds, Orcids ISSNs, other
the solution
`
Put these relationships into your MetadataThey are a version of
this
Each of these
Claim
but why?
`
Put these relationships into your Metadata
`
`APIs will let metadata
consumers react to these relations
This thing…
… is made up of these things
`
`
`A reference to the data from which
this data was derived
… is the basis for thing #1
Thing #1 …
Thing #2 …
… is made up of thing #2
`The source data DOI’s metadata automatically
reflects the relation claim
`
This is the map!
`
