Upload
planning1
View
93
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Sustainable Energy:
An Element of Urban Revitalization
Philip Michalowski, AICP
David Kooris, AICP
Ben Toby
Daniel Donovan
PANEL
Moderator: Philip Michalowski, AICP, Director of Planning, Milone & McBroom
Panel: David Kooris, AICP, Director of Planning and Economic Development, Bridgeport, CT
Ben Toby, Vice President of Sales, FuelCell Energy
Daniel Donovan, Principal, NuPower, LLC
BGreen 2020 A Sustainability Plan for Bridgeport, Connecticut Energy Generation Infrastructure Supporting Economic Development
David M. Kooris Director, Office of Planning and Economic Development
CT’s Most Populous City: ~150k Spatially Confined: 16.1 Sq Mi Lower Income: Median HH Income less than ½ that for County
Where We’ve Been
• 2009: From Vision to Plan:
Establishing a Framework – Mayor’s Executive Order
– Carbon Inventory
– Public/Private Partnership
– CAC And Five Technical Committees
– Comprehensive Sustainability Plan
• Developing Stakeholder Relationships
• Identifying Project and Program Opportunities
• Land Use / Transportation
• Energy
• Recycling
• Business, Jobs & Purchasing
• Green Spaces
• Water Resources
• Outreach and Education
“Recipient of Governor’s 2010 Climate Change Award”
BGreen 2020
City Energy Plan Using EECBG (2010)
% Increase Sector-Based 22% (adjusted 24%)(E) Population-Based 18% (adjusted 14%)(E) Sector-Based 11% (adjusted 13%)(BAU) Population-Based 10% (adjusted 6%)(BAU)
A Quantified Strategy for Emissions Reduction
Green Building Renewable Energy Land Use and Transportation MSW/Recycling & Water Attainable through Utility, State, Regional, & Federal Actions (not quantified)
Setting Achievable But, Difficult Targets
Boost Bridgeport’s Regional Train Ridership Transfer Auto To Bus Transit Carpool, Vanpool, & Car Share TOD Walk and Bike Switch to Alt Vehicle Fuels Reduce Municipal Fleet Emissions Benefit from CAFÉ Standards
Energy Efficiency & Generation
• Energy Improvement District
• Comprehensive Energy Plan
• Green Energy Park
• Fuel Cell Park
• Biomass Projects to Convert Food Waste & Sludge to Electricity
• Municipal Building Retrofit/ Performance Contracting
• Solar Leasing Initiatives
• Residential Aggregation & Weatherization Programs
• First Municipality in CT to Implement C-PACE (Commercial & Industrial Property Assessed Clean Energy)
Total Energy Consumption in $ for all City Buildings
Facilities Consolidation + Retrofits
2300000
2500000
2700000
2900000
FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12$
Waste Recovery Plant
• Owned by Waste Management
• ~70 Mw
• Anchor Entity Reclassifying Waste
• Opportunities for Carbon Sequestration for Economic Development
Fuel Cell
• Non-Combustion Generation from Natural Gas
• Second Largest in World
• 15 MW • Developed by Fuel
Cell Energy • Owned by
Dominion • CT Project 150 • Grid PPA with CL&P
Green Energy Park
• ~5 MW Solar (~3MW) and Fuel Cell (~2MW)
• Grid Generation by UI
• City Land – 20 Year Lease
• Legislative Action on Generation
• Regulatory Relief on Return
Sludge and Waste Food Digesters
Sludge • City RFP • ~1.5MW • Direct Energy Sale to
Facility • Remove ~200 Trucks Food • ~3MW • PPA with City via Virtual
Net Metering & Local Industrial Purchase
• Legislative Action (CT & NYC)
• Spinoff ED Potential
Thermal Loop
• Low Temperature • Capture Waste Heat
from Waste-Energy and Fuel Cell
• Eliminate Need for Local Heating Plants for 6 Million Sq Ft of Buildings
• Lower Operating Costs; Competitive Advantage
• CEFIA • C-PACE
Bridgeport Biodiesel & American Oil Solutions
Biodiesel • DEEP Permits for
Yellow and Brown Grease
• EPA Permits for Sale • Expanding from 1-
10 Million Gallons / Year
American Oil • Recycles Tires • Oil, Metal • Gas to Run Process
and Power Building • Water Heated for
Facility
Green Workforce Housing
• Adaptive Re-Use
• 375 Units
• LEED Certified
• Public Support in Acquisition
• Public Support on Environmental and Parking
• Remake City Gateway
Microgrid & Virtual Net Metering
Microgrid
• Legislative Action
• PILOT Program – Awarded First Round
• ~1.5 MW
• Natural Gas
• N+1 Redundancy
• State Pays for Interconnect and City Pays for Generation
Virtual Net Metering
• Legislative Action
• Up to 5 Municipal Meters
• Up to 10 Meters if Connected to Microgrid
Resiliency
• Rebuild By Design
• HUD Post-Sandy Initiative
• 10 Communities
• Planning for 2080
• Combination of Soft and Hard
Solutions
THANK YOU!
David M. Kooris
Director
Office of Planning and Economic Development
City of Bridgeport
999 Broad Street, 2nd Floor
Bridgeport, CT 06604
203-576-7221
Ultra-Clean | Efficient | Reliable Power
Bridgeport CT: National Leadership in Clean Energy
Presentation for SNEAPA October 2014
Manufacture / EPC
Global manufacturing profile • North America
• Europe
• Asia via partner
Engineering, Procurement and
Construction • Project development
• Project Finance
R&D
Design megawatt–class
distributed power
generation solutions
• Global fuel cell platform
• Robust intellectual property
portfolio
• Developing hybrid
applications of existing
technology for new markets
Integrated Fuel Cell Company
Services
Operate & Maintain power
plants
• Over 100 DFC® plants
operating at more than 50
sites in 9 countries
• >2.8 billion kWh ultra-clean
power produced
• > 300 MW installed/backlog
Providing turn-key distributed power generation solutions NASDAQ: FCEL
25
Scalable Solutions
Individual fuel cell
&
350 kW fuel cell stack
Four-Stack Module
1.4 megawatts
Completed module
1.4 megawatts
2.8 MW
DFC3000®
• Utilizes two modules
• Adequate to power
2,800 homes
1.4 MW
DFC1500®
• Utilizes one module
• Adequate to power
1,400 homes
59MW fuel
cell park • Utilizes 21
DFC3000
plants
Global platform – scale enhances economics
26
Near-zero Emissions
Power Source Efficiency (%LHV)
NOx (lb/MWh)
SOx (lb/MWh)
PM¹⁰ (lb/MWh)
CO₂ (lb/MWh)
Average U.S. Grid 33% 3.43 7.9 0.19 1,408
Average U.S. Fossil Fuel Plant 36% 5.06 11.6 0.27 2,031
DFC® Fuel Cell on Nat Gas 47% 0.01 0.0001 0.00002 940
DFC® Fuel Cell on Nat Gas (CHP) 80% 0.006 0.00006 0.00001 550
DFC® Fuel Cell on Biogas (CHP) 80% 0.006 0.00006 0.00001 0
Source for non-DFC data: “Model Regulations For The Output Of Specified Air Emissions From Smaller scale Electric Generation
Resources Model Rule and Supporting Documentation”, October 15, 2002; The Regulatory Assistance Project report to NREL
27
Competitive LCOE (USA)
$0.20 to
$0.15
$0.10 to
$0.07 $0.10
to $0.05
$0.23 to
$0.18
$0.09 to
$0.06
$0.12 to
$0.09
$0.15 to
$0.07
T&D
T&D T&D
T&D
T&D
T&D
T&D
$0.00
$0.05
$0.10
$0.15
$0.20
$0.25
FuelCell
Energy 2.8 MW
Wind 100 MW
$0.14 - $0.15(a)
$0.09 - $0.11(b)
$/kWh Unsubsidized Levelized
Cost of Energy (LCOE)
CT Baseload Power $0.14
CA Baseload Power $0.12
(d)
Distributed
Solar PV(c)
10 MW
Combined
Cycle 550 MW
Nuclear 1,100 MW
Coal 600 MW
Intermittent Renewable Generation
Utility
Solar
PV(c) 10 MW
Central Generation(f)
(a) LCOE of $0.15/kWh with natural gas at $8/mmBtu or $0.14.kWh at $6/mmBtu; each $2/mmBtu change equates to about $0.01/kWh.
(b) Mid-term LCOE target of $0.09-$0.11/kWh based on global production volume of approximately 210 MW annually.
(c) Distributed solar based on rooftop installation in SW USA with 20-23% capacity factor; Utility solar based on tracking technology and 27-28% capacity.
(d) Installation and maintenance cost of Transmission & Distribution (T&D) is estimated to add up to $0.024/kWh.
(e) Gas peaking addresses intermittency of solar and wind when power is required but sun not shining/wind not blowing.
(f) Does not include waste disposal costs, incremental emission clean-up costs or nuclear-related security costs.
Source: Company estimates, Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis—Version 7.0 , U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) & Oak Ridge National Lab.
Gas(e)
Peaking 100-200 MW
28
29
Combined Heat & Power Applications
300 kW Hot Water CHP for Onion
Waste digester in California
2.8 MW Hot Water CHP Waste Water
Digester Plant in California
1.4 MW Steam CHP for campus
energy system at University in CT
Type: 14.9 MW fuel cell park Owner: Utility owned DOC: Dec-2013
30
• Power sold to grid
• Enhances grid resiliency
• Renewable baseload power
• Easy to site – 14.9 MW on only 1.5 acres
– Clean, quiet & vibration free
– Urban brownfield now a revenue generator
Dominion Bridgeport Fuel Cell Park
“The Dominion Bridgeport Fuel Cell
Park is another important step in our
efforts to identify and develop
opportunities to produce clean energy
that is reliable and cost effective" Thomas F. Farrell II, Chairman
President and CEO
Dominion
31
Strategic Benefits
• Adds new ‘clean energy’ generation to
Dominion’s portfolio
• Private capital providing public benefits • Local and state tax revenue
• Job creation in Connecticut
• Ultra-Clean power generation in an urban location • Virtually zero NOx that causes smog
• Virtually zero PM10 the can contribute to asthma
• Revitalizing industrial urban area
• Meets 2% of CT RPS goals • Meeting 10% of Project 150 program
• Viable distributed generation resource in utility
service area and beyond • Ultra-clean baseload power generation
• Ideal for use in combined heat and power applications
• Power islanding applications
• Modest space requirements • About 10 MW of fuel cells per one acre, compared to
• About 1 MW of solar per one acre
32
Operation & Maintenance
The fuel cell park is operated and
remotely monitored by the FuelCell
Energy Global Technical Assistance
Center (GTAC)
The GTAC remotely operates
installations around the world,
including:
• Monitoring operating status
• Performing remote troubleshooting, diagnostics and resolution
• Utilizing a quality tracking system
• Dispatching field service technicians
Trained technicians staff the GTAC
around-the-clock, 365 days per year
Field service personnel provide on-site
maintenance
Global Technical Assistance Center (GTAC)
Danbury, Connecticut
Type: 59 MW fuel cell park Owner: Consortium w/ electric & gas utility DOC: Dec-2013
33
• Scalable consisting of 21 DFC3000® power plants – Only ~ 5.2 acres for 59 MW
• Supplying electric grid and district heating system
• Constructed in only 14 months
• Adequate to power ~ 140,000 S. Korean homes
World’s Largest Fuel Cell Park
“The scale of this
installation is contributing
to the power and heating
needs of an urban
population and generating
the electricity in a highly
efficient and ultra-low
emission profile that
supports our National
renewable portfolio
standard,” Tae-Ho Lee
Chief Executive Officer
Gyeonggi Green Energy
36
How the Direct FuelCell® Works
Electrochemical Conversion of
Fuel Heating Value to Electricity
– Inherently more efficient than
engines and turbines
– Ultra-Clean:
• No combustion
• Virtually zero pollutants • Negligible Nox
(causes smog), Sox
(causes acid rain), PM
(aggravates asthma)
– Continuous baseload power
– Scalable with high efficiency
– Easy to site
• Low emissions, quiet,
modest space
requirements
– Hydrogen produced within
fuel cell from clean natural
gas
– No need for H2 infrastructure
38
Fuel Cell Stack Configuration
Individual fuel cell component
400 components are used to build one 350
kW fuel cell stack
4 stacks are combined to build a 1.4 MW plant
The stacks are enclosed, creating the fuel cell module
Two modules are used for a 2.8 MW power plant
$0
$200
$400
2010 2011 2012 2013 Q3 2014
Product Services Advanced technology
Financial Highlights
USD in millions USD in millions
USD in millions
Revenue Gross Profit
Revenue Backlog Product Cost per kW
$0
$100
$200
2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM - Q32014
-$20
-$10
$0
$10
2010 2011 2012 2013 LTM - Q32014
22% CAGR
$0
$2,500
$5,000
$7,500
$10,000
2003 2007 current mid-term
Current costs only 25% of first commercial sale in 2003
39
Bridgeport Thermal
41
Low Temperature District Thermal use of waste heat to provide
economic, efficient and environmentally friendly domestic
hot water and space heating
Bridgeport Thermal
42
Low Temperature District Heating Proven Technology
• Greater Copenhagen Regional Thermal – approximately 1.5 million
households, representing around 60% of the Danish population with much of the heat supplied generated by CHP.
• Stanford University – converted from
central cogen plant to low temperature heat recovery system with addition of 20 miles of low temperature piping and 150 campus buildings
Bridgeport Thermal
Flexible Pipe Installation
Copenhagen, Denmark
44
Buried Plastic Valves Copenhagen, Denmark
Bridgeport Thermal
Low Temperature District Heating Overview
Several reliable waste heat sources
Large concentration of thermal customers
lower capital & operating cost and low line loss
Provide long term heating at discount to current heating option
46
Bridgeport Thermal
Project Services
• Low Temperature Thermal Energy
• Heat Recovery • Heat Delivery
• Converting Low Cost Electric Power to Chilled Water
51
Distribute Energy Products as Licensed Thermal Energy Carrier
Bridgeport Thermal
52
Project Team
Ramboll Group • District Thermal Engineering Design Firm • Focus – District Thermal/Building Design/Environmental
Engineering Smith Engineering
• Engineering Consulting Firm • Focus – Central Energy Plant Optimization and Customer Data
Analysis Milone & MacBroom
• Regional Civil Engineering Firm • Focus – Pipe Route Analysis and Permitting
Bridgeport Thermal
Thermal Customer Profile Totaling approximately 3.5 million square feet
53
• Academic • University of Bridgeport • Housatonic Community College
• Commercial • Webster Arena • Peoples Bank
• Government • City Buildings • State Buildings
Bridgeport Thermal
Wheelabrator WtE Facility 67 MW
54
Emera Combined Cycle Facility 520 MW
Potential Heat Sources
United Illuminating Fuel Cell Facility 3 MW
Bridgeport Thermal
Project Steps
55
• Quantified customer cooling and heating loads
• Completed technical evaluation and selection of heat recovery
• Complete network design – November 2014 • Enter into customer and thermal host
agreements – January 2015 • Develop turnkey bid packages • Start construction – mid 2015
Bridgeport Thermal
NuPower Bridgeport Thermal LLC
Contact: Daniel Donovan [email protected] 203.395.4148
56