Upload
jon-wiggins
View
26
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ContinuedTeam pursuit – screening for potential
IWI trainerspool 2009
2009IWI trainerspool
Crank length and action reaction potential CNS/PNS
crank lengths and making the right choice regarding the changes in speed and acceleration from the smaller track and tighter corners. Even important are the watts and these were ok even on a smaller gear and on a tighter track. Consideration had to made with the slight peak-watt difference during the 12secs on the front.
Here the gearing was smaller and the crank lengths for were 170mm. It is clear to see that the peak watts are made as per/normal but now the pickup from drop-off is possible. This was not possible before. This is due to the VP.
2009IWI trainerspool
2009IWI trainerspool
The speed of the pedal, Vp, depends on the cadence, Cd, and
the crank length, Cl. Pedal velocity is a critical area of evaluation in understanding gear size over cadence and crank length. This drop-off and pickup out of the turn is emphasizing the importance of pedal speed and not gearing. Action/ reaction element is accented.
This is the element of gearing and fitness. Being able to react and increase speed comes through pedal velocity and the sustained effort is realized through gear change and fitness especially endurance based towards the end of the race. AeCand AeP en AeP adaptations.
•250m 21.371 9 21.371•500m 36.225 11 14.854•750m 51.107 12 14.882•1000m 1:06.189 12 15.082•1250m 1:21.592 12 15.403•1500m 1:36.913 13 15.321•1750m 1:52.268 13 15.355•2000m 2:07.950 14 15.682•2250m 2:23.637 15 15.687•2500m 2:38.965 15 15.328•2750m 2:54.445 15 15.480•3000m 3:10.324 15 15.879•3250m 3:25.819 15 15.495•3500m 3:41.250 14 15.431•3750m 3:57.294 14 16.044•4000m 4:13.098 14 15.804
Interpretate results and understand physiological improvements needed to realise adaptations
2009IWI trainerspool
Team pursuit
•Drop off - fatigue? Why – what reasons –resistance program – lack of sleep or jet-lag
for example
•Technical areas - skill problems?
Individual pursuit analysis
2009IWI trainerspool
Here is a good example of the individual pursuit. Note the drop-off and reaction to this, indicating a strong aerobic power and importantly a solid aerobic capacity base. For this athlete hopefully generating the aerobic capacity even more will enable him to produce a higher average aerobic power
2009IWI trainerspool
Here are illustrations of real problems in the team pursuit. Dropping the pace is often an area of crank length and gearing choice to made in relationship to the athletes condition and experience. Here the crank smaller crank lengths would help solve this problem. If they were 170mm and not 172,5.
However other considerations need to made concerning condition. Here the athlete is stressed and not recovered fully from big individual-pursuit effort the day before. It is noticeable that athletes with high vo2max and large Aerobic capacity motors can certainly recover very well.
2009IWI trainerspool
Aero
bic
Anaerobic
Power: •Balancing the aerobic and anaerobic power. This is dictated by your aerobic capacity limitations •Aerobic power pushes the oxygen energy possibilities towards race zone – cycling faster•Anaerobic power expands the height of the point of the triangle and dictates how long the cyclist can ride fast
Capacity: Total amount of energy available. Developing the triangle in length top-end speed and breadth towards base endurance - aerobic and anaerobic lie perpendicular to each other but have very important roles to play in regenerating or establishing time trial and pursuit potential.
Aerobic
Anaerobic
Capacity Power
Assists anaerobic capacity – works against both powers
Works against aerobic power
Works against both capacities
Works against both capacities
Whats happening in pursuit for the big engine?
2009IWI trainerspool
4km time kph m/sav.watt
s*
caden
ceSteptest 2km time kph m/s
av.watts
*cadence
Elite Olympic 4.18.0 55.80 15.5 590+ 126 Elite Olympic 2.05 57.60 16 590+ 126
Elite World class 4.23.0 54.72 15.2 540 125 Elite World class 2.07 56.66 15.74 550 126
Elite European 4.25.0 54.32 15.09 520 125 Elite European 2.09 55.80 15.50 515 125
Elite National 4.28.0 53.71 14.92 490 124 Elite National 2.11 54.93 15.26 490 124
U23 World class 4.26.0 54.10 15.03 480 125 U23 World class 2.09.0 55.80 15.50 480 124
21j 2% 4.31.0 53.13 14.76 21j 2% 2.12.0 54.54 15.15
20j 3% 4.34.0 52.52 14.59 20j 3% 2.13.0 54.10 15.03
19j 5% 4.39.0 51.58 14.33 19j 5% 2.15.0 52.31 14.49
U23 European 4.30.0 53.31 14.81 450 124 U23 European 2.11.0 54.93 15.26 460 124
21j 2% 4.35.0 52.34 14.54 21j 2% 2.14.0 53.71 14.92
20j 3% 4.44.0 50.68 14.08 20j 3% 2.15.0 52.31 14.49
19j 5% 4.49.0 49.82 13.84 19j 5% 2.18.0 52.16 14.49
U23 National 4.36.0 52.16 14.49 420 122 U23 National 2.15.0 53.31 14.81 420 122
Juniors World class Na Na Na Na NaJuniors World
class2.15.0 53.31 14.81 400 124
17j 2% 2.18.0 52.16 14.49
Juniors European Na Na Na Na Na Juniors European 2.18.0 52.16 14.49 390 124
17j 2% 2.21.0 51.04 14.18
Juniors National Na Na Na Na Na Juniors National 2.23.0 50.32 13.98 360 124
Athlete top-sport potential tables – evolution in multi-year planning to realise world-class performances.
World class performance tables in the form of progression percentages.•World class performance times are an important start point for building references for any progression performance talent program.•These world class times will dictate the screening test reference points. Athlete quality screening is the key. •To produce a screening norm that allows a 5% opportunity to nurture your athletes. It is from experience that 5% over a period of 2-3 years is comprehensible in realising an evolutionary projection towards these major goals.
2009IWI trainerspool
3km time kph m/sav.watt
s*
caden
ce2km time kph m/s
av.watts
*cadence
Elite Olympic Na Na Na Na Na Elite Olympic 2.09 55.80 15.50 660 130
Elite World class 3.16 55.08 15.30 520 126 Elite World class 2.12 54.54 15.15 620 130
Elite European 3.18 54.54 15.15 498 125 Elite European 2.14 53.71 14.92 580 126
Elite National 3.21 53.71 14.92 480 125 Elite National Na Na Na Na Na
U23 World class 3.18 54.54 15.15 460 124 U23 World class 2.14 53.71 14.92 533 124
21j 2% 3.21 53.71 14.92 21j 2% 2.16 52.92 14.70
20j 3% 3.23 53.17 14.77 20j 3% 2.18 52.16 14.49
19j 5% 3.27 52.16 14.49 19j 5% 2.20 51.40 14.28
U23 European 3.20 54 15 440 124 U23 European 2.17 52.52 14.59 520 124
21j 2% 3.24 52.92 14.7 21j 2% 2.19 51.76 14.38
20j 3% 3.26 52.41 14.56 20j 3% 2.21 51.04 14.18
19j 5% 3.30 51.40 14.28 19j 5% 2.23 50.32 13.98
U23 National 3.22 53.46 14.85 410 124 U23 National 2.20 51.40 14.28 490 124
Juniors World
class3.22 53.46 14.85 400 124
Juniors World
class2.14 53.71 14.92 480 126
17j 2% 3.26 17j 2% 2.16
Juniors European 3.24 52.92 14.70 380 124 Juniors European 2.18 52.16 14.49 460 126
17j 2% 3.28 17j 2% 2.20
Juniors National 3.27 52.16 14.49 360 124 Juniors National 2.21 51.04 14.18 420 126
2009IWI trainerspool
4km achtervolging time kph m/s av.watts* av.cadence actual av.rond.tempo
Elite Olympic 3.56.0 60.98 16.94 510 128 236 na
2% 4.00.72 59.79 16.61 500 240.72 na
3% 4.03.08 59.22 16.45 490 243.08 na
5% 4.07.80 58.10 16.14 470 247.80 na
Elite World class 4.05.0 58.75 16.32 480 245 na
Elite European 4.08.0 58.03 16.12 460 248 na
Elite National 4.15.0 56.44 15.68 415 126 255 na
4km achtervolging time kph m/s av.watts* av.cadence actual av.rond.tempo
vertrektijd 250m 20.0 45.0 12.5 715 116 20.0 20.0
26j 2% 20.4 44.10 12.25 20.4 20.4
25j 3% 20.6 43.66 12.13 20.6 20.6
24j 5% 21.0 42.84 11.9 21.0 21.0
23j 6% 21.2 42.44 11.79 650 113 21.2 21.2
22j 7% 21.4 42.04 11.68 21.4 21.4
21j 8% 21.6 41.65 11.57 21.6 21.6
20j 9% 21.8 41.25 11.46 21.8 21.8
19j 10% 22.0 40.89 11.36 22.0 22.0
18j 11% 22.2 40.53 11.26 22.2 22.2
17j 12% 22.4 40.17 11.16 22.4 22.4
2009IWI trainerspool
4km
achtervolgingtime kph m/s av.watts* av.cadence actual av.rond.tempo
vertrek 1e
1000m 1.04 56.23 15.62 590 126 64 14.66
26j 2% 1.05 55.36 15.38 65 14.86
25j 3% 1.06 54.54 15.15 66 15.13
24j 5% 1.07 53.71 14.92 67 15.33
23j 6% 1.07 53.71 14.92
530 126 67 15.26
21j 8% 1.09 52.16 14.49
69 15.86
20j 9% 1.09 52.16 14.49 69 15.96
19j 10% 1.10 51.40 14.28 70 16.06
18j 11% 1.11 50.68 14.08 71 16.20
17j 12% 1.11 50.68 14.08 71 16.26
4km
achtervolgingtime kph m/s av.watts* av.cadence actual av.rond.tempo
potential av.
3km 2.39.0 62.24 17.29 460 130 159 14.45
26j 2% 2.42.18 61.02 16.95 162.18 14.74
25j 3% 2.43.77 60.44 16.79 163.77 14.88
24j 5% 2.46.95 59.29 16.47 166.95 15.17
23j 6% 2.48.54 58.71 16.31
440
128 168.54 15.32
22j 7% 2.50.13 58.17 16.16 170.13 15.46
21j 8% 2.51.72 57.63 16.01 171.72 15.61
20j 9% 2.53.31 57.09 15.86 173.31 15.75
19j 10% 2.54.90 56.59 15.72 174.90 15.90
18j 11% 2.56.49 56.08 15.58 176.49 16.04
17j 12% 2.58.08 55.58 15.44 178.08 16.18
2009IWI trainerspool
1km time kph m/s av.watts* cadence
Elite Olympic 60 59.97 16.66 960 134
Elite World class 1.01 59 16.39 920 132
Elite European 1.03 57.13 15.87 912 130
Elite National 1.05 55.36 15.38 900 128
U23 World class 1.03 57.13 15.87 900 128
21j 2% 1.04 56.23 15.62
20j 3% 1.05 55.36 15.38
19j 5% 1.06 54.54 15.15
U23 European 1.05 55.36 15.38 860 128
21j 2% 1.06 54.54 15.15
20j 3% 1.07 53.71 14.92
19j 5% 1.08 52.92 14.70
U23 National 1.07 53.71 14.92 820 126
Juniors World class 1.03 57.13 15.87 890 126
17j 2% 1.04 56.23 15.62 na na
Juniors European 1.04 56.23 15.62 860 126
17j 2% 1.05 55.36 15.38 na na
Juniors National 1.06 54.54 15.15 820 126
2009IWI trainerspool
Globaal overzicht piste field test
Evaluatie Step test 50x14 vollewiel kleine tubs
Elite 51x15 normaal spokewielen met bandjes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
06.11.03 2.23.35 2.15.88 2.20.72 2.20.72 2.21.52
06.12.21 2.11.22 2.14.42 2.20.79 2.13.22
07.06.01 2.16.52
07.07.17 2.13.97
07.07.19 2.21.55 2.14.53
07.10.01 2.11.16 2.13.21 2.21.0 2.16.27 2.12.65
07.10.15 2.09.03 2.13.68 2.11.91 2.15.06 2.11.22 2.19.07
07.12.21 2.15.0 2.21.0
08.03.16 2.07.17 2.11.37
Sea level test 1/10/2007 VWEM
Athlete Start time TimeDif VIANS kph Vians m/s Pians Av. RPM 7e Max mml Max av watt spo2 Rec.Hr 5'TR Temp. ° Gearing
1 2.16.27 -4,52 46,03 12,787 344,4 14,1 477 97 104 21° 50x14
2 2.21.0 *7.42 46,72 12,98 ** 12,4 ** 97 121 19° 50x14
3 2.11.16 -0,06 48,42 13,45 310 15,6 445 98 102 20° 50x14
4 2.12.65 -0,57 48,16 13,38 ** 13,1 ** 99 114 19° 50x14
5 2.13.21 -0,76 48,27 13,41 377,7 9,9 508,9 99 109 21° 50x14
Sea level test 15/10/2007 VWEM
Athletestart time Time
Dif VIANS kph Vians m/s Pians Av.RPM 7e Max mml Max av watt spo2 Rec.Hr 5'TR Temp. ° Gearing
1 2.15.06 -1,06 46,11 12,81 334,4 na 13,2 448,6 Na Na 22° 50x14
2 2.11.91 -9,09 48,09 13,36 390 na 12,4 496,8 Na Na 22° 50x14
3 2.09.03 -2,88 48,45 13,6 312 na 14,9 444 Na Na 23° 50x14
4 2.11.22 -1,43 48,81 13,56 430 na 12,7 475,9 Na Na 18° 50x14
5 2.13.68 *0.47 50,97 14,16 387,3 na 9 Na Na Na 18° 50x14
6 2.19.07 na 46,72 12,98 Na na 15 Na Na Na 23° 48x14
Sea level test 21/12/2007 VWEM
Athletestart time Time
Dif VIANS kph Vians m/s Pians Av.RPM 7e Max mml Max av watt spo2 Rec.Hr 5'TR Temp. ° Gearing
1 11:00 2.15.0 -88 48.31 13.42 381.8 124.8 12.4 517 na na 21° 50x14
Sea level test 16/03/2008 VWEM
Athletestart time Time
Dif VIANS kph Vians m/s Pians Av.RPM 7e Max mml Max av watt spo2 Rec.Hr 5'TR Temp. ° Gearing
1 11:00 2.07.17 -8 51.22 14.2 416 126.2 14.0 551 na na 18° 50x14
4 11:00 2.11.37 15 49.79 13.8 392 124.9 10,2 514 na na 18° 50x14
2009IWI trainerspool
Training camps - LOGGING
2009IWI trainerspool
2009IWI trainerspool
2009IWI trainerspool