31
Effectiveness and Ethical Implications of Ranked Choice Voting in Minneapolis 2013 Elections Erica L. Mauter St. Catherine University St. Paul, MN May 2014

Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

My masters thesis research asked the question: "Did the use of the ranked choice voting electoral system in the Minneapolis 2013 municipal elections achieve its purported benefits by functioning as a more inclusive electoral system and by inspiring more inclusive campaigns?" I publicly presented this research on May 1, 2014, for my MA in Organizational Leadership at St. Catherine University in St. Paul, MN.

Citation preview

Page 1: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Effectiveness and Ethical Implications of Ranked Choice Voting in Minneapolis 2013 Elections

Erica L. MauterSt. Catherine UniversitySt. Paul, MNMay 2014

Page 2: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

What is RCV?

http://youtu.be/oHRPMJmzBBw

Page 3: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Minneapolis in 2013• 35 Mayoral Candidates• 13 City Council Seats• Park & Recreation Board• Board of Estimate and Taxation• Soil and Water Conservation

District Supervisor• City Charter Ballot Questions

Page 4: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Did the use of the ranked choice voting electoral system in the Minneapolis 2013 municipal

elections achieve its purported benefits by functioning as an

inclusive electoral system and by inspiring more inclusive

campaigns?

Page 5: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

A MORE INCLUSIVE ELECTORAL PROCESS

INCLUSION AND DEMOCRACY

COMMUNITY ORGANIZING

MORE INCLUSIVE CAMPAIGNING

COMPLEXITY CREATES BARRIERS TO

PARTICIPATION

CONCEPTUAL CONTEXT

Page 6: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

INCLUSION AND DEMOCRACY(Young, 2000)

PUBLIC DELIBERATION

PUBLICDECISION-MAKING

InclusionPolitical EqualityReasonablenessPublicity

Social Justice = Ideal

Page 7: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

“collective action by community members drawing on the strength of numbers, participatory processes, and indigenous leadership to decrease power disparities and achieve shared goals for social change”

(Staples, 2004)

COMMUNITY ORGANIZING

Page 8: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

A MORE INCLUSIVE ELECTORAL PROCESS

Primary Election

General Election

General Election

Runoff Election

TWO-ROUND SYSTEMS

SPOILERS

Page 9: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

MORE INCLUSIVE CAMPAIGNING

Page 10: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

COMPLEXITY CREATES BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION

Page 11: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Did the use of the ranked choice voting electoral system in the Minneapolis 2013 municipal

elections achieve its purported benefits by functioning as an

inclusive electoral system and by inspiring more inclusive

campaigns?

Page 12: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

METHODOLOGYLITERATURE INTERVIEWS

PUBLIC ELECTION

DATAETHICAL

ANALYSIS

Page 13: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

FINDINGS

Campaigns UsedRCV-Specific Tactics

Outreach to HistoricallyUnder-Represented Populations

RCV Education

Positivity and Lack of Negative Campaigning

Page 14: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Language of Choice

Campaigns Used RCV-Specific Tactics

Broader Voter Communication Universe

Distinguishing Candidate From Competitors

Assessing Success

Coalition Campaigning Not a Factor

Page 15: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

OUTREACH TO HISTORICALLY UNDER-REPRESENTED

POPULATIONS

Page 16: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

RCV EDUCATION

Page 17: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Positivity and Lack of Negative

Campaigning“you have the

disease of small vision”

Page 18: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

¯\_(ツ )_/¯

Page 19: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

INCLUSION AND DEMOCRACY(Young, 2000)

PUBLIC DELIBERATION

PUBLICDECISION-MAKING

InclusionPolitical EqualityReasonablenessPublicity

Social Justice = Ideal

Page 20: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Inclusive + EqualInclusive

Campaigning Public Deliberation

Inclusive Electoral System Public

Decision-making

Inclusive + Equal

Page 21: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

PublicDeliberation

Inclusive + Equal

Page 22: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Task-Oriented

Analytic ProcessCreate Information BasePrioritize Key ValuesIdentify SolutionsWeigh SolutionsMake Best Decision

Gastil & Black (2008)

Page 23: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Relational

Social ProcessSpeaking OpportunitiesMutual ComprehensionConsiderationRespect

Gastil & Black (2008)

Page 24: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Inclusivity and Community OrganizingCollective ActionParticipatory ProcessesIndigenous LeadershipDecreasing Power DisparitiesAchieving Shared Goals

Conversations

Hodges35% of 1st Choices

63% of 1st+2nd+3rd Choices

Page 25: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Inclusive + Equal

PublicDecision-Making

Page 26: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

2001 2005 2009 20130

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

Minneapolis Municipal Election Year Voter Turnout

RCVGeneralPrimary

Election Year

Vote

r Tur

nout

2006 2008 2010 20120%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Minneapolis Federal Election Year Voter Turnout

GeneralPrimary

Election Year

Vote

r Tur

nout

TURNO

UT

Page 27: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

VOTERSRANKEDTHEIRCHOICES

Page 28: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

IS RCV A MORE INCLUSIVE ELECTORAL PROCESS?

WERE CAMPAIGNS MORE INCLUSIVE?

SOCIAL JUSTICE & INCLUSION

PUBLIC DELIBERATIONPUBLIC DECISION-MAKINGDID COMPLEXITY

CREATE A BARRIER TO PARTICIPATION?

Page 29: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

QUESTIONS(And, hopefully, answers.)

Page 30: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

MY WIFEMissy Weldy

MY COMMITTEEAmy Ihlan, J.D., Ph.D. (Advisor)Ariella Tilsen, MAOLMartha Hardesty, Ph.D.

ANDSharon Radd, Ed.D.Rebecca Hawthorne, Ph.D.

ALSOMy MAOL ClassmatesElection Nerds of Minneapolis

Page 31: Was Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) in Minneapolis More Inclusive?

Photos: Flickr Creative CommonsMpls55408, Matthew Paulson, Joe D, Scott*, Baratunde Thurston, Sage Ross, Leia Scofield,

Mpls55408, dayna mason, Quinn Dombrowski, Erica Mauter, Tony Seneadza, feeb, reway2007, duncan c, povertyinitiative, Michael Hartford,

Gozamos, Joe D, Dave King, Carolyn Sewell, Victoria Belanger

Video: Minnesota Public Radio

MEDIA CREDITS