Upload
public-affairs-centre
View
260
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
How do India's Members of Parliament spend their constituency development funds? Do they spend it at all? Public Affairs Centre (PAC), Bangalore conducted a study on MPLADS to analyse and understand the utilisation pattern among the MPs ( Sabha & Rajya Sabha) in Karnataka.Public Affairs Centre is a non-profit organisation based in Bangalore dedicated to promoting good governance through research, advocacy and action.
Citation preview
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
1
How do MPs utilise MPLADS in Karnataka? ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ
ºÉÃUÉ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉƼÀÄîvÁÛgÉ?
A Venugopala Reddy
K Prabhakar Patibandla Srikant
Public Affairs Centre 15, KIADB Industrial Area,
Bommasandra-Jigani Link Road Bangalore- 562 105. www.pacindia.org
Email: [email protected]
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
2
Introduction ¥ÀjZÀAiÀÄ
Member of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS) allows the legislators (MPs) get a chance to don the role of executive by choosing and allocating development works. Each MP is allocated Rs. 5 Crores per annum currently, while till last year it was Rs. 2 Crores per annum. With such a huge amount at the disposal of each MP, it is often assumed that it would be used completely. ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ AiÉÆÃd£É (MPLADS) ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä PÁAiÀÄðªÁå¦Û PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À°è C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À CAiÉÄÌ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¤UÀ¢üvÀªÁzÀ
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀĪÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÁðºÀPÀgÀ ¥ÁvÀæªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ªÀð»¸ÀĪÀ CªÀPÁ±ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¥ÀqÉ¢zÁÝgÉ. ¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀªÁV F AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr ¥ÀæwAiÉƧ⠸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÆ, ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ. 5
PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀªÀgÉUÉ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ®Ä CºÀðgÁVzÁÝgÉ. PÀ¼ÉzÀ ªÀµÀðzÀªÀgÉUÀÆ F «Äw
ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ.2 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼À¶ÖvÀÄÛ. EµÀÄÖ §ÈºÀvï ªÉÆvÀÛzÀ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀܽÃAiÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ
PÉ®¸ÀUÀ½UÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸À®Ä C¢üPÁgÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ¸ÀA¸Àvï ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ, EzÀgÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtð
¥ÀæAiÉÆÃd£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄ C©üªÀÈ¢Þ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À°è vÉÆqÀV¹PÉÆArzÁÝgÉ JAzÀÄ
H»¹PÉƼÀî¯ÁVwÛzÉ.
Against this backdrop, Public Affairs Centre (PAC) launched a study on MPLADS to understand and analyse the utilisation pattern among the MPs ( Sabha & Rajya Sabha) in Karnataka. The present study looked at variations in MPLADS spending by various criteria, such as backward and forward regions, education qualifications of MPs, extent of experience of MPs, among other factors. F »£É߯ÉAiÀÄ°è, ¥À©èPï C¥sÉÃgïì ¸ÉAlgï (¦J¹), F AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°è JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ
(¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈É & gÁdå¸À¨sÉ) ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ jÃw G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀÄvÁÛgÉ JA§ÄzÀ£ÀÄß CxÀð
ªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ «±Éèö¸ÀĪÀÅzÀPÁÌV CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀªÉÇAzÀ£ÀÄß PÉÊUÉÆArvÀÄÛ. F CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀªÀÅ
ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀ ºÁUÀÆ »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, JA¦UÀ¼À ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀ CºÀðvÉ, C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÁUÀÆ
EvÀgÀ ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀAqÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ jÃw
G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉƼÀî¯ÁVzÉ JA§ÄzÀgÀ §UÉÎ UÀªÀĤ¸À¯ÁVzÉ.
Many MPs did not bother to utilise the MPLAD fund fully. Some members from Rajya Sabha did not even initiate spending under MPLADS. Only two MPs from 14thLok Sabha (2004-09) utilised 100 per cent of funds under MPLADS. At a time when MPs are not even utilising Rs. 2 Crore per annum completely, it is interesting to note that the same has been increased to Rs. 5 Crore per annum. ºÀ®ªÀÅ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹PÉƼÀÄîªÀ §UÉÎ ºÉaÑ£À
C¸ÀQÛªÀ»¸ÀzÉ EgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. DzÀgÉ PÉ®ªÀÅ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÄ F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß
G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀߪÀ£ÀÆß ¸ÀºÀ ªÀiÁqÀ¢gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. 14£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ°è
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
3
(2004-09) DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ PÉêÀ® JgÀqÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, F MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ±ÉÃ.100gÀµÀÄÖ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ w½zÀÄ §A¢zÉ. »AzÉ EzÀÝ gÀÆ.2 PÉÆÃn
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀĪÀ°è JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ «¥sÀ®gÁVgÀĪÀ ¸ÀAzÀ s̈ÀðzÀ°è,
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ. 5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaѹgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CvÀåAvÀ PÀÄvÀƺÀ®PÀgÀ
«µÀAiÀĪÁVzÉ.
Highlights of the Study CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
On an average LS MPs (57%) showed better utilisation than RS MPs (30%).
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ¯ÉPÀÌzÀ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (57%) gÁdå¸À¨sÁ
JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (30%) GvÀÛªÀĪÁVzÁÝgÉ.
The utilisation seems to be deteriorating from 14th (57%) to 15th (47%) among LS MPs
F §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt 14£Éà (57%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉVAvÀ 15£Éà (47%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ
CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ºÉÆðPÉAiÀÄ°è PÀrªÉÄAiÀiÁVzÉ.
Backward region MPs (47%) from North Karnataka utilised less than forward region MPs (63%) from South Karnataka.
zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (63%), GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ
»AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (47%) §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è »AzÀĽ¢zÁÝgÉ.
High utilisation seems to be associated with the less educated MPs. C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ GvÀÛªÀÄ §¼ÀPÉ, ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀªÁV PÀrªÉÄ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°ègÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼À°è ºÉaÑzÉ.
On the whole experienced MPs (58%) had fared better than first timers (56%) in utilisation of funds.
MmÁÖgÉAiÀiÁV F §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ½UÉ(56%)
ºÉÆð¹zÀgÉ, C£ÀÄ s̈ÀªÀ«gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ(58%) GvÀÛªÀĪÁVzÁÝgÉ.
Objectives & Methodology GzÉÝñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «zsÁ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
To evaluate the utilisation of MPLADS funds in Karnataka; (2004-09 & 2009-11
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è MPLADS §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiË®å¥Á¥À£À; (2004-09 & 2009-11)
To analyse spending patterns by region, party and other criteria; §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiÁzÀjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀæzÉñÀ, ¥Ánð ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÀ ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀAqÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹
«±Éèö¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ;
To rank MPs based on their utilisation of MPLADS MPLADS §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ JA¦UÀ½UÉ gÁåAPï ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ;
Data-base from MPLADS website
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
4
MPLADS ªÉ¨ï¸ÉÊmï£À qÉÃmÁ-¨Éøï¤AzÀ <http://www.mplads.nic.in/sslapps/mplads
works/masterrep.ASP> Limitations of the Study CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ «ÄwUÀ¼ÀÄ
26 MPs (2004-09) – Belgaum &Chikkodi data not available 26 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (2004-09) - ¨É¼ÀUÁ« & aPÉÆÌÃr zÀvÁÛA±À ®¨sÀå«®è.
22 MPs (2009-11) – 6 constituencies data not available 22 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (2009-11) – 6 PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À zÀvÁÛA±À ®¨sÀå«®è.
MPLADS in India ¨sÁgÀvÀzÀ°è MPLADS Rs. 2 Crore per each MP per year for both Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha (now
increased to Rs. 5 Crore) for constituency development. ¥ÀæwAiÉƧ⠯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ & gÁdå¸À s̈Á JA¦UÉ ¥ÀæwªÀµÀð PÉëÃvÀæ C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÁV gÀÆ.2
PÉÆÃn (¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ gÀÆ. 5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaѸÀ¯ÁVzÉ)UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁUÀÄwÛzÉ.
Nearly Rs. 8000 crores allocated for MPLADS (all India) for 2004-09. 2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ ¨sÁgÀvÀzÁzÀåAvÀ MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄr ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁzÀ MlÄÖ ºÀt
¸Àj¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ. 8,000 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ
Of this, Rs. 5450 crores for LS MPs were allocated during 2004-09. Karnataka share is 5% (Rs. 280 crores).
EzÀgÀ°è 2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á JA¦UÀ½UÉ ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÀÝ MlÄÖ C£ÀÄzÁ£À gÀÆ. 5,450 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ. EzÀgÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¥Á®Ä ±ÉÃ.5% (gÀÆ.280 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ).
Rs. 2500 crores was allocated for Rajya Sabha MPs (2004-09). Karnataka share is 4.8% (Rs. 120 crores)
2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ gÁdå¸À s̈Á JA¦UÀ½UÉ gÀÆ.2,500 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVvÀÄÛ.
EzÀgÀ°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¥Á®Ä 4.8% (gÀÆ. 120 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ)
Total share for Karnataka is Rs. 400 crores. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ MlÄÖ ¥Á®Ä gÀÆ. 400 PÉÆÃnUÀ¼ÀÄ
How is MPLADS utilised in Karnataka? PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ°è MPLADS §¼ÀPÉ ºÉÃVzÉ?
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
5
How Lok Sabha MPs (2004-09)performed (Top & Bottom five MPs)? ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À(2004-09)PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÉ (ªÉÆzÀ® ºÁUÀÆ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ 5 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ)?
(Rs in Lakhs)
Note: Numbers in parenthesis denote ranking on spending and number of works carried out respectively. UÀªÀĤ¹: ªÉÄÃ¯É ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ CªÀgÀuÉ aºÉß ªÀåAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ ¤qÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀÆa¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
According to CAG report, at the national level minimum utilisation of funds is 37.4% and maximum 52.4%. Around 50% of funds went unutilised for 2004-09 Lok Sabha. ¹Jf ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, F ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt gÁµÀÖç ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è PÀ¤µÀ× ±ÉÃ.37.4 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
UÀjµÀ× ±ÉÃ.37.4 gÀ¶ÖzÉ. 2004-09gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è MlÄÖ ±ÉÃ.50% ºÀt
§¼ÀPÉAiÀiÁUÀzÉ G½¢zÉ.
Overall 14thLok Sabha MPs from Karnataka utilised 57%. PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è 14£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MmÁÖgÉ ±ÉÃ.57% ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Only Devegowda and Mallikarjunappa managed to utilise 100 per cent of funds allocated to them.
²æà zÉêÉÃUËqÀ ºÁUÀÆ ²æà ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥ÀàgÀªÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Srikantappa ranks last in fund utilisation for the period 2004-09 among Karnataka Lok Sabha MPs.
2004-09gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ, F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀĪÀ°è
²æÃPÀAoÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀÄ PÉÆãÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
6
How Rajya Sabha MPs performed 2004-09? 2004-09gÀ £ÀqÀÄªÉ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÉ ºÉÃVvÀÄÛ?
Sl.No. PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå Name of Member ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ
Party ¥Ánð
State of Origin ªÀÄÆ® gÁdå
% of spend on actual entitled MlÄÖ ºÀtzÀ°è RZÀÄð ªÀiÁrzÀ
±ÉÃPÀqÀªÁgÀÄ «ªÀgÀ
1
Prema Cariappa ¥ÉæêÀiÁ PÁjAiÀÄ¥Àà
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
84.7 84.7
2
Oscar Fernandes D¸ÀÌgï ¥sÀ£ÁðAr¸ï
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
79.0 79.0
3
Janardhana Poojary d£ÁzsÀð£À ¥ÀÆeÁj
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
74.4 74.4
4
Bimba Raikar ©A¨Á gÁAiÀiïPÀgï
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
45.9 45.9
5
K.B. Krishna Murthy PÉ.©. PÀȵÀÚªÀÄÆwð
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
31.7 31.7
6
B. K. Hariprasad ©.PÉ. ºÀj¥Àæ¸Ázï
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
27.5 27.5
7
K. Rahman Khan PÉ. gÀºÀªÀiÁ£ï SÁ£ï
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
23.5 23.5
8
M. V. Rajashekaran JA.«. gÁd±ÉÃRgÀ£ï
INC LJ£ï¹
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
19.6 19.6
9
Vijay Mallya «dAiÀiï ªÀįÁå
IND LJ£ïr
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
8.5 8.5
10
M. Venkaiah Naidu JA. ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå £ÁAiÀÄÄØ
BJP ©eɦ
Andhra Pradesh DAzsÀæ ¥ÀæzÉñÀ
5.5 5.5
11
K.B. Shanappa PÉ.©.±Át¥Àà
BJP ©eɦ
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
5.3 5.3
12
M. A. M. Ramaswamy JA.J.JA. gÁªÀĸÁé«Ä
JDS eÉrJ¸ï
Tamil Nadu vÀ«Ä¼ÀÄ£ÁqÀÄ
2.0 2.0
13
M. Rajasekara Murthy JA. gÁd±ÉÃRgÀ ªÀÄÆwð
JDS eÉrJ¸ï
Karnataka PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
0.9 0.9
STATE AS A WHOLE MmÁÖgÉ gÁdå
30.4 30.4
Prema Cariappa ranks top in utilisation, while Rajasekara Murthy ranks lowest.
§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÉæêÀiÁ PÁjAiÀÄ¥Àà ªÉÆzÀ® ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°zÀÝgÉ, gÁd±ÉÃRgÀ ªÀÄÆwð J®èjVAvÀ PɼÀV£À ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
Two MPs from outside Karnataka – Venkaiah Naidu and MAM Ramaswamy – ranks lowest in utilisation.
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
7
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ºÉÆgÀV£À E§âgÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ – ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå £ÁAiÀÄÄØ ºÁUÀÆ JAJJA gÁªÀĸÁé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀÄ §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è PÉÆãÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
None of the MPs from Rajya Sabha managed to utilise 100 per cent of allocated funds for the period 2004-09.
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, gÁdå ¸À s̈ÉAiÀÄ AiÀiÁªÉǧ⠸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÆ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¹zÀÝ ºÀtzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.100gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
Ten out of 13 MPs utilised less than 50% of their fund. 13gÀ°è 10 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.50QAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
Overall fund utilisation by Rajya Sabha MPs was 30% during 2004-09. 2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JA¦UÀ¼À MmÁÖgÉ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ±ÉÃ.30%.
MPs from which region spent more – Backward or forward? AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ - »AzÀĽzÀ CxÀªÁ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀ?
Though the needs of backward regions would be more, in Karnataka, MPs from North Karnataka showed lower utilisation than the MPs from South Karnataka. ¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV ºÀtzÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÉZÁÑV »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À°èzÀÝgÀÆ, GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ
JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¹PÉÆArzÁÝgÉ.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
North Karnataka (10) South Karnataka(16)
47
63
Percentage of fund utilisation by North Vs South Karnataka
57
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
8
Does higher education of MPs mean higher utilisation? ºÉZÀÄÑ «zÁåºÀðvÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÉZÀÄÑ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉAiÉÄÃ?
MPs with lower academic qualifications utilised MPLADS better than the
more educated. ºÉZÀÄÑ «zÁåºÀðvÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ, PÀrªÉÄ «zÁåºÀðvÉ ¥ÀqÉzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MPLADS
ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄA¢zÁÝgÉ.
Which party leads? AiÀiÁªÀ ¥Ánð ªÀÄÄAZÀÆtÂAiÀÄ°èzÉ?
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
PUC (5) Matriculation (3)
Graduate & Above (18)
65.2
59.1
55.2
70
56
52
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
JDS (2) BJP (14) INC (9)
57
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
9
JD(S) with 70% utilisation leads in utilisation of MPLADS among all the
parties. eÉrJ¸ï ±ÉÃ.70%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è
J¯Áè ¥ÀPÀëUÀ½VAvÀ ªÀÄÄA¢zÉ.
BJP with 14 MPs ranks second in utilisation (56%), while Congress with 9 MPs has utilised only around 50 %.
14 JA¦UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ ©eɦ ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀgÀ ªÀÄÆ®PÀ JgÀqÀ£Éà ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, 9 JA¦UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ PÁAUÉæ̧ ï PɪÀ® ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ
§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÉ.
Only JD(S) managed to utilise more than the Karnataka state average of 57 %.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ±ÉÃ.57% gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtQÌAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß eÉr(J¸ï) ¥ÀPÀë ªÀiÁrPÉÆArzÉ.
Who spends more: Experienced MPs or First-timers? ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrPÉÆArgÀĪÀªÀgÀÄ AiÀiÁgÀÄ: C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ CxÀªÁ
ªÉÆzÀ°UÀgÀÄ?
Experienced MPs showed better utilisation in JD(S) eÉr(J¸ï) ¥ÀPÀëzÀ°è C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
First time MPs showed better utilisation of MPLADS funds in BJP and marginally better in Congress.
JDS-(1+1) INC-(3+6) BJP-(8+6) Overall (13+13)
29
56 54 56
100
50
28
58
Frist Time Experienced
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
10
©eɦAiÀÄ°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ. PÁAUÉæ¸ï£À°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸Àé®à ªÀÄnÖUÉ
GvÀÛªÀÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
On the whole experienced MPs with 58% utilisation did marginally better than first time MPs (56%).
MmÁÖgÉ C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.58%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀgÀ
ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀ ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ
JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ ¸Àé®à ªÀÄÄA¢zÁÝgÉ.
Sector-wise utilisation by Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha MPs ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ & gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JA¦UÀ¼À «¨sÁUÀªÁgÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ «ªÀgÀ
Majority of the MPs from Lok Sabha spent money (48%) on community halls, while Rajya Sabhas spent on roads with 37%
§ºÀÄvÉÃPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 48%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ½UÁV §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÉ, gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.37%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼À C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÁV
§¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
Health and sanitation ranked lower among both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs.
DgÉÆÃUÀå ºÁUÀÆ £ÉʪÀÄð®åPÉÌ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ ºÁUÀÆ gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JgÀqÀÆ ªÀÄ£ÉUÀ¼À
JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ PÉÆãÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.
% of utilisation for Lok Sabha 2009-11 2009-11gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ ±ÉÃPÀqÀªÁgÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ
Sl.No PÀæªÀÄ
¸ÀASÉå
Name of Member ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ
Constituency PÉëÃvÀæ
Party ¥ÀPÀë
% spend on actual
RZÀÄð ªÀiÁrzÀ
±ÉÃPÀqÀªÁgÀÄ
ºÀtzÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt
1 Joshi, Pralhad Venkatesh eÉÆö, ¥ÀæºÁèzï ªÉAPÀmÉñï
Dharwad zsÁgÀªÁqÀ
BJP ©eɦ
100.0 100.0
2 Gowda, Chandre D.B. UËqÀ, ZÀAzÉæà r.©.
Bangalore North ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ GvÀÛgÀ
BJP ©eɦ
100.0 100.0
3 Hegde, Anant Kumar Dattatreya ºÉUÉØ, C£ÀAvÀPÀĪÀiÁgï zÀvÁÛvÉæÃAiÀÄ
Uttara Kannada GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÀßqÀ
BJP ©eɦ
100.0 100.0
4 D. V. Sadananda Gowda r.«. ¸ÀzÁ£ÀAzÀ UËqÀ
Udupi,Chikmagalur GqÀĦ, aPÀ̪ÀÄUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ
BJP ©eɦ
83.4 83.4
5 Kateel, Nalin Kumar PÀnîÄ, £À½£ï PÀĪÀiÁgï
Dakshina Kannada zÀQët PÀ£ÀßqÀ
BJP ©eɦ
75.1 75.1
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
11
6 Vishwanath, Adagooru Huchegowda «±Àé£Áxï, CqÀUÀÆgÀÄ ºÀÄZÉÑÃUËqÀ
Mysore ªÉÄʸÀÆgÀÄ
INC LJ£ï¹
73.7 73.7
7 Gaddigoudar, Parvatagouda Chandanagouda UÀrØUËqÀgÀ, ¥ÀªÀðvÀUËqÀ ZÀAzÀ£ÀUËqÀ
Bagalkot ¨ÁUÀ®PÉÆÃmÉ
BJP ©eɦ
59.8 59.8
8 Devegowda, H.D. zÉêÉÃUËqÀ, ºÉZï.r.
Hassan ºÁ¸À£À
JD(S) eÉr(J¸ï
)
53.5 53.5
9 Jigajinagi, Ramesh Chandappa fUÀftV, gÀªÉÄñï ZÀAzÀ¥Àà
Bijapur(SC) ©eÁ¥ÀÄgÀ (J¸ï¹)
BJP ©eɦ
52.0 52.0
10 Moily, M. Veerappa ªÉƬÄè, JA. «ÃgÀ¥Àà
Chikkballapur aPÀ̧¼Áî¥ÀÄgÀ
INC LJ£ï¹
50.3 50.3
11 Udasi, Shivkumar Chanabasappa GzÁ¹, ²ªÀPÀĪÀiÁgï ZÀ£Àߧ¸À¥Àà
Haveri ºÁªÉÃj
BJP ©eɦ
44.4 44.4
12 Mohan, P. C. ªÉÆúÀ£ï ¦.¹.
Bangalore Central ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ ¸ÉAlæ¯ï
BJP ©eɦ
28.6 28.6
13 Ananth Kumar C£ÀAvÀ PÀĪÀiÁgï
Bangalore South ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ zÀQët
BJP ©eɦ
24.8 24.8
14 Shivaramagouda ²ªÀgÁªÀÄUËqÀ
Koppal PÉÆ¥Àà¼À
BJP ©eɦ
24.6 24.6
15 Shantha, J. ±ÁAvÁ, eÉ.
Bellary (ST) §¼Áîj (J¸ïn)
BJP ©eɦ
23.6 23.6
16 Yeddyurappa, Raghavendra AiÀÄqÀÆågÀ¥Àà, gÁWÀªÉÃAzÀæ
Shimoga ²ªÀªÉÆUÀÎ
BJP ©eɦ
22.4 22.4
17 Swamy, Janardhana ¸Áé«Ä, d£ÁzsÀð£À
Chitradurga(SC) avÀæzÀÄUÀð (J¸ï¹)
BJP ©eɦ
20.1 20.1
18 Singh, N.Dharam ¹AUï, J£ï. zsÀgÀA
Bidar ©ÃzÀgï
INC LJ£ï¹
15.9 15.9
19 Kumaraswamy, H.D. PÀĪÀiÁgÀ¸Áé«Ä, ºÉZï.r.
Bangalore Rural ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆgÀÄ UÁæªÀiÁAvÀgÀ
JD(S) eÉr(J¸ï
)
7.0 7.0
20 Basavaraj,GangasandraSiddappa §¸ÀªÀgÁeï, UÀAUÀ¸ÀAzÀæ ¹zÀÝ¥Àà
Tumkur vÀĪÀÄPÀÆgÀÄ
BJP ©eɦ
4.9 4.9
21 Siddeshwara, GowdarMallikarjunappa
Davanagere zÁªÀtUÉgÉ
BJP ©eɦ
2.6 2.6
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
12
¹zÉÝñÀégÀ, UËqÀgÀ ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà
22 Dhruvanarayana, Rangaswamy zsÀȪÀ£ÁgÁAiÀÄt, gÀAUÀ¸Áé«Ä
Chamrajanagar(SC) ZÁªÀÄgÁd£ÀUÀgÀ (J¸ï¹)
INC LJ£ï¹
1.3 1.3
STATE AS A WHOLE MmÁÖgÉ gÁdå
47.0 47.0
During the 15th Lok Sabha (2009-11), only 3 MPs managed to utilise 100 per cent of allocated funds.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈É CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è (2009-11), PÉêÀ® 3 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Devegowda who topped in utilisation of MPLAD funds in 14thLok Sabha, managed to spend only little above 50% in the first two years of 15thLok Sabha.
14£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£À ¥ÀqÉ¢zÀÝ zÉêÉÃUËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ, 15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ® 2 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À°è ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÀiÁvÀæ
ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÀÄ.
Rangaswamy Dhruvanaryana of Congress ranks the lowest in utilisation of MPLADS funds in 15thLok Sabha.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è PÁAUÉæ¸ï£À ²æà gÀAUÀ¸Áé«Ä zsÀȪÀ£ÁgÁAiÀÄt CªÀgÀÄ
MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è J®èjVAvÀ PɼÀV£À ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
Only 9 MPs managed to utilise more than 50 % of funds in 15thLok Sabha.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è PÉêÀ® 9 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.50%QÌAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Average utilisation ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj §¼ÀPÉ
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
14th Lok Sabha (2004-09) 26
15th Lok Sabha (2009-11) 22
Past 7 Years spending (2004-11)
57.1
47
54.5
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
13
14thLok Sabha showed better utilisation of MPLAD funds than 15thLok Sabha. Thus, utilisation ratio is declining over these periods.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈ÉVAvÀ, 14£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À s̈Á CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è MPLADS ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉaÑ£À ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ°è §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrPÉƼÀî¯ÁVzÉ. F ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, §¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ C£ÀÄ¥ÁvÀ
ªÀµÀð¢AzÀ ªÀµÀðPÉÌ E½ªÀÄÄRªÁUÀÄwÛzÉ.
On an average Karnataka Lok Sabha MPs spent 54.5% in the past 7 years.
PÀ¼ÉzÀ 7 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À°è PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ±ÉÃ.54.5%gÀµÀÄÖ
ºÀt§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Comparative Ranking of 14th & 15th LS 14 & 15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ gÁåAQAUï ºÉÆðPÉ
14th
Ranking
(Works) 14£Éà gÁåAQAUï
(PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ)
15th
Ranking
(Works) 15£Éà gÁåAQAUï
(PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ)
SECTOR («¨sÁUÀ)
14th
Ranking
(Amount) 14£ÉÃ
gÁåAQAUï
(ªÉÆvÀÛ)
15th
Ranking
(Amount) 15£Éà gÁåAQAUï
(ªÉÆvÀÛ)
1 1 Community Halls ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
1 1
2 2 Roads gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼ÀÄ
2 2
3 3 Education ²PÀët
3 3
4 4 Others EvÀgÉ
4 4
5 5 Drinking Water PÀÄrAiÀÄĪÀ ¤ÃgÀÄ
5 6
6 6 Drainage/Culverts ZÀgÀAr/PÁ®ÄªÉUÀ¼ÀÄ
6 8
7 7 Bus Shelters §¸ï ¤¯ÁÝtUÀ¼ÀÄ
7 5
8 7 Sanitation £ÉʪÀÄð®å
8 9
9 10 Street Lights ©Ã¢ ¢Ã¥ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
9 10
10 8 Irrigation ¤ÃgÁªÀj
10 7
11 11 Health DgÉÆÃUÀå
11 11
There is no priority change in the top three sectors – community halls,
roads, education – between 14th & 15th LS.
14£Éà & 15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ s̈ÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ, gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼ÀÄ, ²PÀët
«¨sÁUÀUÀ½UÉ ºÉaÑ£À ªÀĺÀvÀÛ÷é ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
14
Health continues to remain the least favoured.
DgÉÆÃUÀåPÉÌ J®èQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ UÀªÀÄ£À ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
Major Findings ¥ÀæªÀÄÄR D«µÁÌgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
Overall, the average utilisation of funds by all MPs is only 50% according to the CAG for 2004-09.
¹Jf ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ 2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, J¯Áè JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MmÁÖgÉ
±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt ªÀiÁvÀæ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
On an average LS MPs (57%) showed better utilisation than RS MPs (30%). Since RS MPs are not directly elected, it appears that there is no incentive/pressure on them to utilise MPLADS.
±ÉÃ.57%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, ±ÉÃ. 30%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ G£ÀßvÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ. gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ
£ÉÃgÀªÁV DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁV®è¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀÄ CªÀgÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ºÉaÑ£À MvÀÛqÀ/¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀ E®è JAzÀÄ w½zÀÄ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
The utilisation seems to be deteriorating from 14th (57%) to 15th (47%) among LS MPs.
14£Éà (57%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ 15£Éà (47%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è
JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è E½ªÀÄÄR ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.
Among the current RS Vijay Mallya (IND,) did not utilise the funds as of 2011.
¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, CAzÀgÉ 2011gÀ ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ gÁdå¸À s̈Á
JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ «dAiÀiï ªÀįÁå (LJ£ïr), C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁr®è.
Backward region MPs (47%) from North Karnataka utilised less than forward region MPs (63%) from South Karnataka.
GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (±ÉÃ.47%) zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (±ÉÃ. 63%) PÀrªÉÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
High utilisation seems to be associated with the less educated MPs. PUC qualified MPs topped the spending followed by Matriculates and Graduates. Is higher education a liability?
PÀrªÉÄ ²PÀët ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉaÑ£À ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ. ¦AiÀÄĹ vÉÃUÀðqÉAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ®£Éà ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, J¸ïJ¸ïJ¯ï¹
ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀzÀ«ÃzsÀgÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆArzÁÝgÉ. CAzÀgÉ
G£ÀßvÀ ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ MAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÉAiÉÄÃ?
On the whole experienced MPs (58%) had fared better than first timers (56%) in utilisation of funds.
MmÁÖgÉAiÀiÁV C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.58%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÉ, ªÉÆzÀ®£É ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
15
Only first timers from BJP fared better with 54%, while experienced MPs spent only 28%
PÉêÀ® ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ ©eɦ ¥ÀPÀëzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.54%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt
§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ. C£ÀÄ s̈ÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.28%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
Party-wise (2004-09), JDS leads with 70% utilisation followed by BJP with 56% and INC with 52%
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀPÀëªÁgÀÄ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, ±ÉÃ. 70%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt
§¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ eÉr(J¸ï) ¥ÀPÀë ªÀÄÄA¢zÀÝgÉ, ©eɦ ±ÉÃ. 56% ºÁUÀÆ LJ£ï¹
±ÉÃ.52%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ »AzÀĽ¢ªÉ.
BJP leads in utilisation for 15th LS (2009-11) with 52% utilisation followed by INC with 35% and JDS with 30%
2009-11gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è ©eɦ ±ÉÃ. 52%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ
ªÉÆzÀ®£Éà ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, LJ£ï¹ ±ÉÃ. 35% ºÁUÀÆ eÉr(J¸ï) ±ÉÃ.30%gÀµÀÄÖ
§¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ »AzÀĽ¢ªÉ.
Two MPs (Devegowda, Mallikarjunappa) utilised 100% of the allocated money (2004-09).
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è E§âgÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ zÉêÉÃUËqÀ, ºÁUÀÆ ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà CªÀgÀÄ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
Community halls seem to be the most preferred works for MPs of LS, while roads is the preferred sector for Rajya Sabha MPs during 2004-09.
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è §ºÀÄvÉÃPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½UÉ ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ¼À
C©üªÀÈ¢Þ ºÁUÀÆ ¤ªÀiÁðt ¥ÀæªÀÄÄRªÁVzÀÝgÉ, gÁdå¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ gÀ¸ÉÛUÀ¼À
C©üªÀÈ¢ÞUÉ ¥ÁæªÀÄÄRåvÉ ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.
Devegowda tops spending on community halls with 95.6% of his total funds (2004-09).
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è zÉêÉÃUËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ ¤UÀ¢üvÀ C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.95.6%gÀµÀÄÖ
ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀUÀ½UÁV §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
RS MPs nominated from outside Karnataka have no incentive to spend -- Venkaiah Naidu & MAM Ramaswamy from other states had very low utilisation.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ºÉÆgÀV¤AzÀ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À §½, RZÀÄð
ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà ¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀzsÀ£À«gÀ°®è. EvÀgÀ gÁdåUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå
£ÁAiÀÄÄØ & JAJJA gÁªÀĸÁé«Ä CªÀgÀÄ CvÀåAvÀ PÀ¼À¥É ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À ¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
Spending pattern varies significantly between the MPs of LS & RS. ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ ºÁUÀÆ gÁdå¸À s̈É JA¦UÀ¼À £ÀqÀÄªÉ §¼ÀPÉ «zsÁ£ÀzÀ°è §ºÀ¼ÀµÀÄÖ
ªÀåvÁå¸ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢ªÉ.
PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
16
Tejasvini Gowda with Ph.D spent only 26.5% of funds, while Devegowda with diploma and Mallikarjunappa with matriculation spent100%.
¦ºÉZïr ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ vÉÃd¹é¤ UËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ ±ÉÃ.26.5%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÀiÁvÀæ ºÀt §¼À¹zÀÝgÉ, r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ zÉêÉÃUËqÀ ºÁUÀÆ J¸ïJ¸ïJ¯ï¹ ²PÀët ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ
ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà CªÀgÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
Policy Implications… PÁAiÀÄð¤Ãw vÉÆqÀPÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ...
When nearly 50% of MPLADS entitlements remain unutilised, was there a need for increasing the allocation to Rs. 5 crores per MP?
MPLADS ºÀt ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÉÆvÀÛ §¼ÀPÉAiÀiÁUÀzÉà G½¢gÀĪÀ
¸ÀAzÀ s̈ÀðzÀ°è, F C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ¥Àæw JA¦UÉ gÀÆ.5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaѸÀĪÀ
CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EvÉÛÃ?
The poor record of RS MPs clearly reflects their lack of constituency linkages, as they are nominated by parties. What is the need and rationale of the fund for RS MPs?
gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À PÀ¼À¥É ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À¢AzÁV, vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À PÀqÉUÉ CªÀjVgÀĪÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀPÀðzÀ §UÉÎ w½AiÀÄÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÀPÀëUÀ½AzÀ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÃgÀ £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ EzÀPÉÌ
PÁgÀt«gÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÁV gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½UÉ C£ÀÄzÁ£À §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ
¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÉÃ?
What needs to be done to improve greater responsiveness and interest in the use of the Fund by MPs from Northern Karnataka where the needs are in fact greater?
ºÉZÀÄÑ »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÁæAvÀåzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ F
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄxÀðªÁV §¼À¹PÉƼÀÄîªÀAvÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀî¨ÉÃPÀÄ?
How can the public be better informed about the use of the Fund, so that MP’s accountability is enhanced?
F jÃw C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ®¨sÀåvÉ §UÉÎ d£ÀgÀ°è ºÉaÑ£À CjªÀÅ ªÀÄÆr¹, D ªÀÄÆ®PÀ F
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀ𠧼ÀPÉUÁV JA¦UÀ¼À dªÁ¨ÁÝj ºÉaѸÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ºÉÃUÉ?