1. PISA 2012 Results: Students and Money Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st CENTURY (Volume VI)
2. Note by Turkey: The information in this document with
reference toCyprus relates to the southern part of the Island.
There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek
Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable
solution is found within the context of the United Nations,Turkey
shall preserve its position concerning the Cyprus issue. Note by
all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European
Union: The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the
United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in
this document relates to the area under the effective control of
the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. The statistical data for
Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant
Israeli authorities. The use ofsuch data by the OECD is without
prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and
Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of
international law. Photo credits: Flying Colours Ltd/Getty Images
Jacobs Stock Photography/Kzenon khoa vu/Flickr/Getty Images Mel
Curtis/Corbis Shutterstock/Kzenon Simon Jarratt/Corbis Corrigenda
to OECD publications may be found on line at:
www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. OECD 2014 You can copy,
download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can
include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia
products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and
teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD
as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or
commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to
[email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of
this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed
directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at
[email protected] or the Centre franais dexploitation du droit de
copie (CFC) at [email protected]. This work is published under
the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The
opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily
reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document
and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of
or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of
international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any
territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD
(2014), PISA 2012 Results: Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century (VolumeVI), PISA, OECD Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264208094-en ISBN 978-92-64-20808-7
(print) ISBN 978-92-64-20809-4 (PDF)
3. Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills for the 21st
Century Volume VI OECD 2014 3 Equipping citizens with the skills
necessary to achieve their full potential, participate in an
increasingly interconnected global economy, and ultimately convert
better jobs into better lives is a central preoccupation of policy
makers around the world. Results from the OECDs recent Survey of
Adult Skills show that highly skilled adults are twice as likely to
be employed and almost three times more likely to earn an
above-median salary than poorly skilled adults. In other words,
poor skills severely limit peoples access to better-paying and more
rewarding jobs. Highly skilled people are also more likely to
volunteer, see themselves as actors rather than as objects of
political processes, and are more likely to trust others. Fairness,
integrity and inclusiveness in public policy thus all hinge on the
skills of citizens. The ongoing economic crisis has only increased
the urgency of investing in the acquisition and development of
citizens skills both through the education system and in the
workplace. At a time when public budgets are tight and there is
little room for further monetary and fiscal stimulus, investing in
structural reforms to boost productivity, such as education and
skills development, is key to future growth. Indeed, investment in
these areas is essential to support the recovery, as well as to
address long-standing issues such as youth unemployment and gender
inequality. In this context, more and more countries are looking
beyond their own borders for evidence of the most successful and
efficient policies and practices. Indeed, in a global economy,
success is no longer measured against national standards alone, but
against the best-performing and most rapidly improving education
systems. Over the past decade, the OECD Programme for International
Student Assessment, PISA, has become the worlds premier yardstick
for evaluating the quality, equity and efficiency of school
systems. But the evidence base that PISA has produced goes well
beyond statistical benchmarking. By identifying the characteristics
of high-performing education systems PISA allows governments and
educators to identify effective policies that they can then adapt
to their local contexts. The results from the PISA 2012 assessment,
which was conducted at a time when many of the 65 participating
countries and economies were grappling with the effects of the
crisis, reveal wide differences in education outcomes, both within
and across countries. Using the data collected in previous PISA
rounds, we have been able to track the evolution of student
performance over time and across subjects. Of the 64 countries and
economies with comparable data, 40 improved their average
performance in at least one subject. Top performers such as
Shanghai in China or Singapore were able to further extend their
lead, while countries like Brazil, Mexico, Tunisia and Turkey
achieved major improvements from previously low levels of
performance. Some education systems have demonstrated that it is
possible to secure strong and equitable learning outcomes at the
same time as achieving rapid improvements. Of the 13 countries and
economies that significantly improved their mathematics performance
between 2003 and 2012, three also show improvements in equity in
education during the same period, and another nine improved their
performance while maintaining an already high level of equity
proving that countries do not have to sacrifice high performance to
achieve equity in education opportunities. Nonetheless, PISA 2012
results show wide differences between countries in mathematics
performance. The equivalent of almost six years of schooling, 245
score points, separates the highest and lowest average performances
Foreword
4. Foreword 4 OECD 2014 Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI of the countries that took
part in the PISA 2012 mathematics assessment. The difference in
mathematics performances within countries is even greater, with
over 300 points the equivalent of more than seven years of
schooling often separating the highest- and the lowest-achieving
students in a country. Clearly, all countries and economies have
excellent students, but few have enabled all students to excel. The
report also reveals worrying gender differences in students
attitudes towards mathematics: even when girls perform as well as
boys in mathematics, they report less perseverance, less motivation
to learn mathematics, less belief in their own mathematics skills,
and higher levels of anxiety about mathematics. While the average
girl underperforms in mathematics compared with the average boy,
the gender gap in favour of boys is even wider among the
highest-achieving students. These findings have serious
implications not only for higher education, where young women are
already under- represented in the science, technology, engineering
and mathematics fields of study, but also later on, when these
young women enter the labour market. This confirms the findings of
the OECD Gender Strategy, which identifies some of the factors that
create and widen the gender gap in education, labour and
entrepreneurship. Supporting girls positive attitudes towards and
investment in learning mathematics will go a long way towards
narrowing this gap. PISA 2012 also finds that the
highest-performing school systems are those that allocate
educational resources more equitably among advantaged and
disadvantaged schools and that grant more autonomy over curricula
and assessments to individual schools. A belief that all students
can achieve at a high level and a willingness to engage all
stakeholders in education including students, through such channels
as seeking student feedback on teaching practices are hallmarks of
successful school systems. PISA is not only an accurate indicator
of students abilities to participate fully in society after
compulsory school, but also a powerful tool that countries and
economies can use to fine-tune their education policies.There is no
single combination of policies and practices that will work for
everyone, everywhere. Every country has room for improvement, even
the top performers. Thats why the OECD produces this triennial
report on the state of education across the globe: to share
evidence of the best policies and practices and to offer our timely
and targeted support to help countries provide the best education
possible for all of their students. With high levels of youth
unemployment, rising inequality, a significant gender gap, and an
urgent need to boost growth in many countries, we have no time to
lose. The OECD stands ready to support policy makers in this
challenging and crucial endeavour. Angel Gurra OECD
Secretary-General Foreword 4 OECD 2014 Creative Problem Solving:
StudentS SkillS in taCkling real-life ProblemS volume v of the
countries that took part in the PISA 2012 mathematics assessment.
The difference in mathematics performances within countries is even
greater, with over 300 points the equivalent of more than seven
years of schooling often separating the highest- and the
lowest-achieving students in a country. Clearly, all countries and
economies have excellent students, but few have enabled all
students to excel. The report also reveals worrying gender
differences in students attitudes towards mathematics: even when
girls perform as well as boys in mathematics, they report less
perseverance, less motivation to learn mathematics, less belief in
their own mathematics skills, and higher levels of anxiety about
mathematics. While the average girl underperforms in mathematics
compared with the average boy, the gender gap in favour of boys is
even wider among the highest-achieving students. These findings
have serious implications not only for higher education, where
young women are already under- represented in the science,
technology, engineering and mathematics fields of study, but also
later on, when these young women enter the labour market. This
confirms the findings of the OECD Gender Strategy, which identifies
some of the factors that create and widen the gender gap in
education, labour and entrepreneurship. Supporting girls positive
attitudes towards and investment in learning mathematics will go a
long way towards narrowing this gap. PISA 2012 also finds that the
highest-performing school systems are those that allocate
educational resources more equitably among advantaged and
disadvantaged schools and that grant more autonomy over curricula
and assessments to individual schools. A belief that all students
can achieve at a high level and a willingness to engage all
stakeholders in education including students, through such channels
as seeking student feedback on teaching practices are hallmarks of
successful school systems. PISA is not only an accurate indicator
of students abilities to participate fully in society after
compulsory school, but also a powerful tool that countries and
economies can use to fine-tune their education policies. There is
no single combination of policies and practices that will work for
everyone, everywhere. Every country has room for improvement, even
the top performers. Thats why the OECD produces this triennial
report on the state of education across the globe: to share
evidence of the best policies and practices and to offer our timely
and targeted support to help countries provide the best education
possible for all of their students. With high levels of youth
unemployment, rising inequality, a significant gender gap, and an
urgent need to boost growth in many countries, we have no time to
lose. The OECD stands ready to support policy makers in this
challenging and crucial endeavour. Angel Gurra OECD
Secretary-General
5. Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills for the 21st
Century Volume VI OECD 2014 5 This report is the product of a
collaborative effort between the countries participating in PISA,
the experts and institutions working within the framework of the
PISA Consortium, and the OECD Secretariat. This Volume of the
report is the result of a collaboration between the Directorate for
Education and Skills and the Directorate for Financial and
Enterprise Affairs, whose programme of work includes financial
literacy issues. The report was drafted by Andreas Schleicher,
Francesco Avvisati, Francesca Borgonovi, Miyako Ikeda, Hiromichi
Katayama, Flore-Anne Messy, Chiara Monticone, Guillermo Montt,
Sophie Vayssettes and Pablo Zoido, with statistical support from
Simone Bloem, Josefa Palacios and Giannina Rech and editorial
oversight by Marilyn Achiron. Additional analytical and editorial
support was provided by Adele Atkinson, Jonas Bertling, Marika
Boiron, Clia Braga-Schich, Tracey Burns, Michael Davidson,
Cassandra Davis, Elizabeth Del Bourgo, John A. Dossey, Joachim
Funke, Samuel Greiff, Tue Halgreen, Ben Jensen, Eckhard Klieme,
Andr Laboul, Henry Levin, Sophie Limoges, Barry McCrae, Juliette
Mendelovits, Tadakazu Miki, Christian Monseur, Simon Normandeau,
Lorena Ortega, Mathilde Overduin, Elodie Pools, Dara Ramalingam,
William H. Schmidt (whose work was supported by the Thomas J.
Alexander fellowship programme), Kaye Stacey, Lazar Stankov, Ross
Turner, Elisabeth Villoutreix and Allan Wigfield. The systemlevel
data collection was conducted by the OECD NESLI (INES Network for
the Collection and Adjudication of System-Level Descriptive
Information on Educational Structures, Policies and Practices)
team: Bonifacio Agapin, Estelle Herbaut and Jean Yip. Volume II
also draws on the analytic work undertaken by Jaap Scheerens and
Douglas Willms in the context of PISA 2000. Administrative support
was provided by Claire Chetcuti, Juliet Evans, Jennah Huxley and
Diana Tramontano. The OECD contracted the Australian Council for
Educational Research (ACER) to manage the development of the
mathematics, problem solving and financial literacy frameworks for
PISA 2012.Achieve was also contracted by the OECD to develop the
mathematics framework with ACER. The expert group that guided the
preparation of the mathematics assessment framework and instruments
was chaired by Kaye Stacey; Joachim Funke chaired the expert group
that guided the preparation of the problem-solving assessment
framework and instruments; and Annamaria Lusardi led the expert
group that guided the preparation of the financial literacy
assessment framework and instruments. The PISA assessment
instruments and the data underlying the report were prepared by the
PISA Consortium, under the direction of Raymond Adams at ACER. BBVA
provided financial support for the international part of the PISA
financial literacy assessment. The development of the report was
steered by the PISA Governing Board, which is chaired by Lorna
Bertrand (UnitedKingdom), with Luiz Cludio Costa (Brazil), Dana
Kelly (United States) and Sungsook Kim (Korea) as vicechairs, who
succeeded Beno Csapo (Hungary), Daniel McGrath (United States) and
Ryo Watanabe (Japan) during the period. Annex C of the volumes
lists the members of the various PISA bodies, as well as the
individual experts and consultants who have contributed to this
report and to PISA in general. Acknowledgements
6. Table of Contents Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 7 Executive
Summary13 Readers Guide17 What is PISA?19 Chapter 1 The Assessment
of Financial Literacy in PISA 201225 The importance of financial
literacy..........................................................................................................................................................................................27
Limited and uneven provision of financial education in
schools..........................................................................................................................28
The need for data on students financial
literacy.............................................................................................................................................................30
The financial literacy assessment in PISA
2012.................................................................................................................................................................31
Defining financial literacy for 15-year-old
students.......................................................................................................................................................32
Assessing financial
literacy...............................................................................................................................................................................................................34
Content..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................34
Processes..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................36
Contexts............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................38
Evidence from PISA about financial education in
schools.........................................................................................................................................39
Examples of questions used in the 2012 financial literacy
assessment.............................................................................................................43
Chapter 2 Student Performance in Financial Literacy53 How the PISA
2012 financial literacy results are
reported.......................................................................................................................................54
How financial literacy proficiency levels are reported in PISA
2012................................................................................................................55
Average level of proficiency in financial
literacy..............................................................................................................................................................56
What students know and can do in financial
literacy...................................................................................................................................................58
A profile of PISA financial literacy
questions......................................................................................................................................................................58
Student performance at the different levels of proficiency in
financial
literacy........................................................................................58
Variations in financial literacy
proficiency...........................................................................................................................................................................65
Students performance in financial literacy in comparison with
reading and mathematics performance..............................68
Students performance in financial literacy at different levels of
performance in
mathematics....................................................71
Countries participating in the financial literacy
assessment....................................................................................................................................73
Chapter 3 Relationship between Financial Literacy and Student
Background77 Gender differences in financial
literacy..................................................................................................................................................................................78
The relationship between socio-economic status, immigrant
background and financial
literacy.................................................81
Socio-economic
status............................................................................................................................................................................................................82
Parental
influence.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................84
Immigrant background and language spoken at
home.....................................................................................................................................93
Main background factors explaining variations in student
performance........................................................................................................96
7. Table of contents 8 OECD 2014 Students and Money: Financial
Literacy Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI Chapter 4Students
Experience, Attitudes and Behaviour, and their Performance in
Financial Literacy 99 Students experiences with money matters and
financial
literacy....................................................................................................................100
Students who hold bank accounts and prepaid debit cards and their
performance in financial literacy....................100 Students
sources of money and financial
literacy............................................................................................................................................105
Students attitudes and financial
literacy............................................................................................................................................................................109
Students spending behaviour and financial
literacy..................................................................................................................................................110
Chapter 5Selected policy and practical implications of the
financial literacy
assessment....................................................................................................................................................................................117
Financial literacy is an essential life skill for young
people...................................................................................................................................118
Large proportions of students have only basic skills in financial
literacy....................................................................................................118
Build on core knowledge and
skills.........................................................................................................................................................................................119
Promote positive attitudes towards
learning....................................................................................................................................................................119
Support girls and underperforming
boys.............................................................................................................................................................................120
Reduce inequities in financial literacy related to socio-economic
status....................................................................................................120
Enhance research and evaluation
opportunities............................................................................................................................................................120
Annex A PISA 2012 Technical background123 Annex A1 Indices from the
student context questionnaire124 Annex A2 The PISA target
population, the PISA samples and the definition of schools128 Annex
A3 Technical notes on analyses in this volume138 Annex A4 Quality
assurance143 Annex A5 The design of the financial literacy
assessment144 Annex B PISA 2012
Data.......................................................................................................................................................................................................147
Annex C THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PISA A COLLABORATIVE
EFFORT195 BOXES BoxVI.1.1 Financial empowerment and the role of
financial
education.............................................................................................................................26
BoxVI.1.2 National strategies for financial
education...............................................................................................................................................................27
BoxVI.1.3 Measuring financial literacy as a life
skill.................................................................................................................................................................31
BoxVI.1.4 Key features of the assessment of financial literacy in
PISA
2012.....................................................................................................................31
BoxVI.2.1 Interpreting cross-country comparisons in financial
literacy
performance.....................................................................................................60
BoxVI.2.2 Top performers in financial
literacy.............................................................................................................................................................................64
BoxVI.3.1 Gender differences in financial knowledge among
adults...................................................................................................................................81
BoxVI.3.2 Parents occupations in finance and students financial
literacy........................................................................................................................90
BoxVI.3.3 Financial literacy performance and school
location..............................................................................................................................................90
BoxVI.3.4 The potential role of schools in financial
literacy...................................................................................................................................................92
BoxVI.4.1 Legal framework for young peoples access to financial
products.................................................................................................................
105 BoxVI.4.2 Students saving behaviour and financial literacy in
Shanghai-China...........................................................................................................
113 BoxVI.5 Providing effective financial education in Brazilian
schools............................................................................................................................
121
8. Table of contents Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 9 Figures Figure
VI.1.1 Map of selected financial literacy questions in PISA 2012,
illustrating the content
categories...............................................................35
Figure VI.1.2 Map of selected financial literacy questions in PISA
2012, illustrating the process
categories...............................................................36
Figure VI.1.3 Map of selected financial literacy questions in PISA
2012, illustrating the context
categories................................................................38
Figure VI.1.4 Availability of financial education in
schools..........................................................................................................................................................40
Figure VI.1.5 Integrating financial education into the school
curriculum.................................................................................................................................41
Figure VI.1.6 Who provides financial education in
schools?........................................................................................................................................................41
Figure VI.1.7 Professional development in financial
education...................................................................................................................................................42
Figure VI.1.8
Invoice..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................43
Figure VI.1.9 At the
market...............................................................................................................................................................................................................45
Figure VI.1.10 New
offer.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................48
Figure VI.1.11 Pay
slip...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................50
Figure VI.2.1 The relationship between questions and student
performance on a
scale.....................................................................................................55
Figure VI.2.2 Comparing countries and economies performance in
financial
literacy......................................................................................................56
Figure VI.2.3 Financial literacy performance among participating
countries/economies....................................................................................................57
Figure VI.2.4 Map of selected financial literacy questions in PISA
2012, illustrating the proficiency
levels.................................................................59
Figure VI.2.5 Summary description of the five levels of proficiency
in financial
literacy....................................................................................................61
Figure VI.2.6 Percentage of students at each level of proficiency
in financial
literacy.........................................................................................................62
Figure VI.2.a Top performers in financial
literacy.............................................................................................................................................................................65
Figure VI.2.7 Variation in financial literacy performance within
countries and
economies...............................................................................................66
Figure VI.2.8 Performance differences among the highest- and
lowest-achieving
students................................................................................................67
Figure VI.2.9 Correlation between financial literacy, mathematics
and reading
performance...........................................................................................68
Figure VI.2.10 Variation in financial literacy performance
associated with performance in mathematics and
reading...............................................69 Figure
VI.2.11 Relative performance in financial
literacy................................................................................................................................................................70
Figure VI.2.12 Expected performance in financial literacy, by
mathematics
performance....................................................................................................71
Figure VI.2.13 Patterns of relative performance in financial
literacy.............................................................................................................................................72
Figure VI.2.14 Contexts of countries participating in the
assessment of financial
literacy.....................................................................................................74
Figure VI.2.15 Financial literacy performance and per capita
GDP.............................................................................................................................................74
Figure VI.2.16 Financial literacy performance and percentage of
people who have an account at a formal financial institution or
post
office................................................................................................................................................................................75
Figure VI.3.1 Financial literacy performance, by
gender................................................................................................................................................................79
Figure VI.3.2 Gender differences in financial literacy performance,
before and after accounting for mathematics and reading
performance...............................................................................................................................................................................................80
Figure VI.3.3 Proficiency in financial literacy among boys and
girls, OECD countries and
economies.........................................................................80
Figure VI.3a Gender differences in financial literacy performance
(adults)............................................................................................................................81
Figure VI.3.4 Students socio-economic status and financial
literacy, OECD countries and
economies........................................................................83
Figure VI.3.5 Comparing countries and economies performance in
financial literacy and
equity................................................................................84
Figure VI.3.6 Proportion of the variation in students performance
explained by socio-economic
status......................................................................85
Figure VI.3.7 Proportion of the variation in students performance
explained by family
wealth......................................................................................85
Figure VI.3.8 Difference in financial literacy, mathematics and
reading performance related to parents highest educational
status..................86 Figure VI.3.9 Differences in financial
literacy performance related to parents highest educational status,
before and after accounting for mathematics and reading
performance...............................................................................................................................................................87
Figure VI.3.10 Difference in financial literacy, mathematics and
reading performance related to parents highest occupational
status...............88 Figure VI.3.11 Differences in financial
literacy performance related to parents highest occupational
status, before and after accounting for mathematics and reading
performance........................................................................................................................................89
Figure VI.3.12 Financial literacy performance, by frequency of
discussing money matters with parents, after accounting for
socio-economic status, OECD countries and
economies..............................................................................................................................89
Figure VI.3b Parents occupations in finance and financial literacy
performance................................................................................................................90
Figure VI.3c Financial literacy performance, by school location,
after accounting for socio-economic
status...........................................................91
Figure VI.3d Between-school differences in financial literacy,
mathematics and reading
performance........................................................................92
Figure VI.3e Between- and within-school differences that are unique
to financial literacy, or that are shared with mathematics
performance.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................93
Figure VI.3.13 Difference related to immigration status in
financial literacy, mathematics and reading
performance.................................................94
Figure VI.3.14 Difference in financial literacy performance between
immigrant and non-immigrant
students..............................................................94
9. Table of contents 10 OECD 2014 Students and Money: Financial
Literacy Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI Figure VI.3.15
Difference in financial literacy performance, by language at
home.................................................................................................................95
Figure VI.3.16 Proportion of the variation in financial literacy
performance explained by demographic and socio-economic
factors.................96 Figure VI.4.1 Percentage of students
holding a bank account and/or a prepaid debit
card.............................................................................................
101 Figure VI.4.2 Performance in financial literacy, by whether
students hold a bank
account.............................................................................................
101 Figure VI.4.3 Percentage of students holding a bank account and
a prepaid debit card
(combined)...........................................................................
103 Figure VI.4.4 Performance in financial literacy, by whether
students hold a bank account and a prepaid debit card, after
accounting for socio-economic
status...........................................................................................................................................................................................
103 Figure VI.4.5 Percentage of students holding a bank account, by
socio-economic
status................................................................................................
104 Figure VI.4.6 Students sources of
money........................................................................................................................................................................................
106 Figure VI.4.7 Students sources of money and financial literacy,
after accounting for socio-economic status, OECD countries and
economies...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
107 Figure VI.4.8 Students sources of money, by gender, OECD
countries and
economies...................................................................................................
108 Figure VI.4.9 Students sources of money, by socio-economic
status, OECD countries and
economies.....................................................................
109 Figure VI.4.10aDifferences in financial literacy performance,
by level of
perseverance......................................................................................................
110 Figure VI.4.10bDifferences in financial literacy performance,
by level of openness to problem
solving........................................................................
111 Figure VI.4.11 Financial literacy performance, by students
spending
behaviour.................................................................................................................
112 Figure VI.4.12 Students spending
behaviour....................................................................................................................................................................................
112 Figure VI.4a Financial literacy performance, by students saving
behaviour,
Shanghai-China......................................................................................
113 Figure VI.4b Students saving behaviour, by socio-economic
status,
Shanghai-China.....................................................................................................
114 Figure A5 Distribution of items in financial
literacy...............................................................................................................................................................145
Tables Table A1.1 Student questionnaire rotation
design.....................................................................................................................................................................
126 Table A2.1a PISA target populations and
samples.......................................................................................................................................................................
130 Table A2.2a
Exclusions.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
133 Table A2.3a Response
rates................................................................................................................................................................................................................
134 Table A2.4a Sample size for financial
literacy..............................................................................................................................................................................
137 Table A3.1 Percentage of missing values to questions about the
provision of financial education in
school........................................................ 141
Table A3.2 Percentage of missing values to money management
questions.....................................................................................................................
142 Table VI.1.1 Availability of financial
education............................................................................................................................................................................
148 Table VI.1.2 Teaching financial
education.....................................................................................................................................................................................
148 Table VI.1.3 Who provides financial education at
school?.......................................................................................................................................................
150 Table VI.1.4 Teachers professional development in financial
education.............................................................................................................................
150 Table VI.2.1 Percentage of students at each proficiency level
in financial
literacy...........................................................................................................
151 Table VI.2.2 Mean score and variation in student performance in
financial
literacy.......................................................................................................
151 Table VI.2.3 Top performers in financial literacy, mathematics
and/or
reading.................................................................................................................
152 Table VI.2.4 Correlation of financial literacy performance with
performance in mathematics and
reading.............................................................
153 Table VI.3.1 Gender differences in student performance in
financial
literacy....................................................................................................................
155 Table VI.3.2 Gender differences in financial literacy
performance, after accounting for performance in mathematics and
reading............... 156 Table VI.3.3 Percentage of students at
each proficiency level in financial literacy, mathematics and
reading, by gender................................... 157 Table
VI.3.4 Financial literacy performance and socio-economic
status.............................................................................................................................
159 Table VI.3.5 Relationship between student performance in
financial literacy, mathematics and reading, and factors of
socio-economic
status.............................................................................................................................................................................................
160 Table VI.3.6 Parents highest education and financial literacy
performance.......................................................................................................................
161 Table VI.3.7 Parents highest occupation and financial literacy
performance.....................................................................................................................
162 Table VI.3.8 Parents occupation in finance and financial
literacy
performance...............................................................................................................
164 Table VI.3.9 Students who discuss money matters with parents
and financial literacy
performance..........................................................................
164 Table VI.3.10 Immigrant background and financial literacy
performance..............................................................................................................................
166
10. Table of contents Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 11 Table VI.3.11
Language spoken at home and financial literacy
performance.......................................................................................................................
168 Table VI.3.12 School location and financial literacy
performance...........................................................................................................................................
168 Table VI.3.13 Variation in financial literacy
performance...........................................................................................................................................................
170 Table VI.3.14 Strength of the relationship between financial
literacy and mathematics performance, and between financial
literacy and reading performance, between and within
schools....................................................................................................................................
171 Table VI.3.15 Proportion of the variation in financial
literacy, mathematics and reading performance explained by
socioeconomic
factors................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
172 Table VI.4.1 Students who hold a bank account and/or a prepaid
debit
card....................................................................................................................
175 Table VI.4.2 Performance in financial literacy, by whether
students hold a bank account and/or prepaid debit
card.......................................... 175 Table VI.4.3
Performance in financial literacy, by whether students hold a bank
account and a prepaid debit card (combined).....................
176 Table VI.4.4 Students who hold a bank account and/or a prepaid
debit card, by
gender..............................................................................................
177 Table VI.4.5 Students who hold a bank account and/or a prepaid
debit card, by socio-economic
status.................................................................
177 Table VI.4.6 Students sources of
money........................................................................................................................................................................................
178 Table VI.4.7 Performance in financial literacy, mathematics and
reading, by students sources of
money...............................................................
179 Table VI.4.8 Students sources of money, by
gender...................................................................................................................................................................
182 Table VI.4.9 Students sources of money, by socio-economic
status.....................................................................................................................................
183 Table VI.4.10 Students attitudes and performance in financial
literacy.................................................................................................................................
185 Table VI.4.11 Students spending
behaviour....................................................................................................................................................................................
186 Table VI.4.12 Performance in financial literacy, by students
spending behaviour, before and after accounting for socio-economic
status......... 186 Table VI.4.13 Performance in financial
literacy, by students spending
behaviour..............................................................................................................
187 Table VI.4.14 Students spending behaviour, by
gender...............................................................................................................................................................
189 Table VI.4.15 Students spending behaviour, by socio-economic
status.................................................................................................................................
190 Table VI.4.16 Students saving
behaviour.........................................................................................................................................................................................
191 Table VI.4.17 Performance in financial literacy, by students
saving behaviour, before and after accounting for socio-economic
status......... 191 Table VI.4.18 Performance in financial
literacy, by students saving behaviour, before and after accounting
for socio-economic status and
attitudes....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
192 Table VI.4.19 Students saving behaviour, by
gender....................................................................................................................................................................
193 Table VI.4.20 Students saving behaviour, by socio-economic
status......................................................................................................................................
194 Thisbookhas... StatLinks 2 AservicethatdeliversExcel les
fromtheprintedpage!
LookfortheStatLinksatthebottomleft-handcornerofthetablesorgraphsinthisbook.
TodownloadthematchingExcel
spreadsheet,justtypethelinkintoyourInternetbrowser,
startingwiththehttp://dx.doi.orgprefix.
IfyourereadingthePDFe-bookedition,andyourPCisconnectedtotheInternet,simply
clickonthelink.YoullfindStatLinksappearinginmoreOECDbooks.
11. Executive Summary 13Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 Finance is a part
of everyday life for many 15-year-olds: they are already consumers
of financial services such as bank accounts with access to online
payment facilities. As they near the end of compulsory education,
students will also face complex and challenging financial choices.
One of their first major decisions may be to choose whether to
continue with formal education and how to finance such study.
Financial literacy is thus an essential life skill, and high on the
global policy agenda. Shrinking welfare systems, shifting
demographics, and the increased sophistication and expansion of
financial services have all contributed to a greater awareness of
the importance of ensuring that citizens and consumers of all ages
are financially literate. Some governments have started developing
strategies and policies to improve financial literacy. The
financial literacy assessment in PISA 2012 offers the first ever
international assessment of the financial knowledge and skills of
15-year-old students. A second assessment is planned for PISA 2015,
which will make it possible to monitor change and provide further
evidence on the design and implementation of policies to enhance
financial literacy. This volume reports the results of the PISA
2012 financial literacy assessment, which was administered to
approximately 29000 students in 13 OECD countries and economies
(Australia, the Flemish Community of Belgium, the CzechRepublic,
Estonia, France, Israel, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, the Slovak
Republic, Slovenia, Spain and the United States) and five partner
countries and economies (Colombia, Croatia, Latvia, the Russian
Federation and Shanghai-China), representing 40% of world GDP.
Shanghai-China has the highest average score in financial literacy,
followed by the Flemish Community of Belgium, Estonia, Australia,
New Zealand, the Czech Republic and Poland. On average, all of
these score above the average for the participating OECD countries
and economies. There are wide differences in average performance
between the highest- and lowest-performing countries and economies:
more than 75 score points (a full PISA proficiency level) among
OECD countries and economies, and more than 225 score points across
all participants. Yet only a small proportion (16%) of the
variation among countries mean financial literacy scores is
explained by per capita GDP. Only one in ten students across
participating OECD countries and economies is able to tackle the
hardest financial literacy tasks in PISA 2012. They can analyse
financial products involving features that are not immediately
evident, such as transaction costs, solve non-routine financial
problems such as calculating the balance in a bank statement while
accounting for transfer fees, and demonstrate an understanding of
the wider financial landscape, such as the implications of
income-tax brackets. In contrast, 15% of students, on average,
score below the baseline level of performance in the PISA financial
literacy scale. At best, these students can recognise the
difference between needs and wants, make simple decisions about
everyday spending, recognise the purpose of common financial
documents, such as an invoice, and apply single and basic numerical
operations (addition, subtraction or multiplication) in contexts
that they are likely to have encountered personally.
12. Executive Summary 14 OECD 2014 Students and Money:
Financial Literacy Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI Students
in some countries that perform well in financial literacy, such as
Australia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, the Flemish Community of
Belgium and New Zealand, score higher in financial literacy, on
average, than their performance in mathematics and reading would
predict. In contrast, in France, Italy and Slovenia, students
performance in financial literacy is relatively low, on average,
when compared with students in all participating countries and
economies who have similar proficiency in mathematics and reading.
Thus, although financial literacy skills are positively correlated
with mathematics and reading skills, high performance in one of
those core subjects does not necessarily signal proficiency in
financial literacy. Across the 13 participating OECD countries and
economies, the difference between the highest-achieving 10% of
students and the lowest-achieving 10% is 247 score points. On
average, 37% of performance differences in financial literacy
within countries are observed between schools a significant
proportion, but smaller than that observed in mathematics and
reading. A more socio-economically advantaged student scores 41
points higher in financial literacy than a less- advantaged
student, on average across participating OECD countries and
economies. Estonia is the only participating country that combines
above-average performance with a weaker-than-average association
between financial literacy performance and socio-economic status.
On average across OECD countries and economies, non-immigrant
students perform slightly better in financial literacy than
immigrant students with similar socio-economic status, language
spoken at home, and performance in mathematics and reading. The gap
in financial literacy performance between immigrant and
non-immigrant students is larger than the OECD average in the
Flemish Community of Belgium, Estonia, France, Slovenia and Spain.
Gender gaps in financial literacy among 15-year-olds are small,
unlike those found in adult populations. In all participating
countries and economies, except Italy, there are no differences in
average financial literacy scores between boys and girls. Across
OECD countries and economies, there are more top-performing boys
than girls, and more low-performing boys than girls, in financial
literacy. In Australia, the Flemish Community of Belgium, Estonia,
France, New Zealand and Slovenia, more than 70% of 15-year-old
students hold a bank account; but in Israel, Poland and the Slovak
Republic, fewer than 30% do. In 9 out of 13 OECD participating
countries and economies, after adjusting for socio-economic status,
students who hold a bank account perform as well as those who do
not, while in the Flemish Community of Belgium, Estonia, New
Zealand, and Slovenia, students who hold a bank account score
higher in financial literacy than students of similar
socio-economic status who do not. Students attitudes towards
learning, such as perseverance and openness to problem solving, are
positively associated with financial literacy. On average across
OECD countries and economies, the difference in financial literacy
performance between students who agreed with the statement I like
to solve complex problems and students who disagreed is equal to 31
score points, or almost half a proficiency level.
13. Executive Summary 15Students and Money: Financial Literacy
Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 Performance in
financial literacy Relative performance in financial literacy,
compared with students around the world with similar performance in
mathematics and reading Mean score in PISA 2012 Share of lowest
performers (Level 1 or below) Share of top performers in financial
literacy (Level 5) Gender difference (Boys - Girls) Mean score % %
Score dif. Score dif. OECD average-13 500 14.6 21.2 1 2
Shanghai-China 603 1.5 63.5 -1 0 Flemish Community (Belgium) 541
8.3 37.4 11 9 Estonia 529 4.8 26.3 -3 5 Australia 526 9.8 30.2 -3
18 New Zealand 520 15.6 32.8 3 12 Czech Republic 513 9.5 22.5 6 19
Poland 510 9.0 19.7 3 2 Latvia 501 9.0 15.4 -11 1 United States 492
16.8 19.5 1 1 Russian Federation 486 16.0 14.0 1 14 France 486 18.4
18.3 -6 -24 Slovenia 485 16.6 14.5 -8 -8 Spain 484 15.7 13.7 6 4
Croatia 480 15.5 11.4 5 2 Israel 476 22.1 18.0 -6 -5 Slovak
Republic 470 21.9 13.4 -3 2 Italy 466 20.7 8.6 8 -14 Colombia 379
55.1 2.1 0 -5 Note: Countries/economies in which the performance
difference between boys and girls is statistically significant are
marked in bold. Countries and economies are ranked in descending
order of the mean score in financial literacy in PISA 2012. Source:
OECD, PISA 2012 Database, Tables VI.2.1, VI.2.2, VI.2.4 and VI.3.2.
12 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888933094944 Table VI.A Snapshot of
performance in financial literacy Countries/economies with mean
score/share of top performers/relative performance above the OECD
average-13 Countries/economies with share of lowest performers
below the OECD average-13 Countries/economies with mean score/share
of top performers/share of lowest performers/relative performance
not statistically different from the OECD average-13
Countries/economies with mean score/share of top
performers/relative performance below the OECD average-13
Countries/economies with a share of lowest performers above the
OECD average-13
14. Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills for the 21st
Century Volume VI OECD 2014 17 Readers Guide Data underlying the
figures The data referred to in this volume are presented in Annex
B and, in greater detail, including some additional tables, on the
PISA website (www.pisa.oecd.org). Five symbols are used to denote
missing data: aThe category does not apply in the country
concerned. Data are therefore missing. cThere are too few
observations or no observation to provide reliable estimates (i.e.
there are fewer than 30students or fewer than 5 schools with valid
data). mData are not available. These data were not submitted by
the country or were collected but subsequently removed from the
publication for technical reasons. nThere are too many missing
values to provide reliable estimates (i.e. the percentage of
missing values in the sample is 15% or larger). wData have been
withdrawn or have not been collected at the request of the country
concerned. Country coverage Four of the six volumes of PISA 2012
Results feature data from 65 countries and economies, including all
34OECD countries and 31 partner countries and economies (see Box
VI.A in the section What is PISA?). This volume features data from
18 countries and economies that participated in the assessment of
financial literacy, including 12 OECD countries and the Flemish
Community of Belgium. The statistical data for Israel are supplied
by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli
authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice
to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli
settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law.
Calculating international averages The averages of 13 OECD
countries and economies participating in the assessment of
financial literacy were calculated for most data and indicators
presented in this volume. These averages correspond to the
arithmetic means of the respective country and economy estimate. In
the case of some countries and economies, data may not be available
for specific indicators, or specific categories may not apply.
Readers should, therefore, keep in mind that the term OECD average
refers to the OECD countries included in the respective
comparisons. Rounding figures Because of rounding, some figures in
tables may not exactly add up to the totals. Totals, differences
and averages are always calculated on the basis of exact numbers
and are rounded only after calculation. All standard errors in this
publication have been rounded to one or two decimal places. Where
the value 0.0 or 0.00 is shown, this does not imply that the
standard error is zero, but that it is smaller than 0.05 or 0.005,
respectively. Reporting student data The report uses 15-year-olds
as shorthand for the PISA target population. PISA covers students
who are aged between 15 years 3 months and 16 years 2 months at the
time of assessment and who are enrolled in school and have
completed at least 6 years of formal schooling, regardless of the
type of institution in which they are enrolled and of whether they
are in full-time or part-time education, of whether they attend
academic or voca- tional programmes, and of whether they attend
public or private schools or foreign schools within the country or
economy.
15. Readers Guide 18 OECD 2014 Students and Money: Financial
Literacy Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI Reporting school
data The principals of the schools in which students were assessed
provided information on their schools character- istics by
completing a school questionnaire. Where responses from school
principals are presented in this pub- lication, they are weighted
so that they are proportionate to the number of 15-year-olds
enrolled in the school. Focusing on statistically significant
differences This volume discusses only statistically significant
differences or changes. These are denoted in darker colours in
figures and in bold font in tables. See Annex A3 for further
information. Categorising student performance This volume uses a
shorthand to describe students levels of proficiency in the
assessment of financial literacy as follows: Top performers are
those students proficient at Level 5 of the assessment. Strong
performers are those students proficient at Level 4 of the
assessment. Moderate performers are those students proficient at
Level 2 or 3 of the assessment. Lowest performers are those
students proficient at Level 1 or below of the assessment. Highest
achievers are those students who perform at or above the 90th
percentile in their own country/economy. High achievers are those
students who perform at or above the 75th percentile in their own
country/economy. Low achievers are those students who perform below
the 25th percentile in their own country/economy. Lowest achievers
are those students who perform below the 10th percentile in their
own country/economy. Abbreviations used in this report Coeff.
Coefficient ISCED International Standard Classification of
Education Corr. Correlation ISCO International Standard
Classification of Occupations Diff. Difference PPP Purchasing power
parity ESCS PISA index of economic, social and cultural status S.D.
Standard deviation GDP Gross domestic product S.E. Standard error
INFE International Network on Financial Education Further
documentation For further information on the PISA assessment
instruments and the methods used in PISA, see the PISA 2012
Technical Report (OECD, forthcoming). This report uses the OECD
StatLinks service. Below each table and chart is a url leading to a
corresponding ExcelTM workbook containing the underlying data.
These urls are stable and will remain unchanged over time. In
addition, readers of the e-books will be able to click directly on
these links and the workbook will open in a separate window, if
their Internet browser is open and running.
16. Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills for the 21st
Century Volume VI OECD 2014 19 What is PISA? What is important for
citizens to know and be able to do? That is the question that
underlies the triennial survey of 15-year-old students around the
world known as the Programme for International Student Assessment
(PISA). PISA assesses the extent to which students near the end of
compulsory education have acquired key knowledge and skills that
are essential for full participation in modern societies. The
assessment, which focuses on reading, mathematics, science and
problem-solving, does not just ascertain whether students can
reproduce knowledge; it also examines how well students can
extrapolate from what they have learned and apply that knowledge in
unfamiliar settings, both in and outside of school. This approach
reflects the fact that modern economies reward individuals not for
what they know, but for what they can do with what they know. PISA
is an ongoing programme that offers insights for education policy
and practice, and that helps monitor trends in students acquisition
of knowledge and skills across countries and in different
demographic subgroups within each country. PISA results reveal what
is possible in education by showing what students in the
highest-performing and most rapidly improving education systems can
do. The findings allow policy makers around the world to gauge the
knowledge and skills of students in their own countries in
comparison with those in other countries, set policy targets
against measurable goals achieved by other education systems, and
learn from policies and practices applied elsewhere. While PISA
cannot identify cause-and-effect relationships between
policies/practices and student outcomes, it can show educators,
policy makers and the interested public how education systems are
similar and different and what that means for students. A test the
whole world can take PISA is now used as an assessment tool in many
regions around the world. It was implemented in 43 countries and
economies in the first assessment (32 in 2000 and 11 in 2002), 41
in the second assessment (2003), 57 in the third assessment (2006)
and 75 in the fourth assessment (65 in 2009 and 10 in 2010).
Sixty-five countries and economies participated in PISA 2012. In
addition to OECD member countries, the survey has been conducted
in: East and Southeast Asia: Himachal Pradesh-India, Hong
Kong-China, Indonesia, Macao-China, Malaysia, Shanghai-China,
Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Tamil Nadu-India, Thailand and Viet Nam.
Central, Mediterranean and Eastern Europe, and Central Asia:
Albania, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Croatia, Georgia, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malta,
Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, the Russian Federation and Serbia.
The Middle East: Jordan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.
Central and South America: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica,
Netherlands-Antilles, Panama, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
and Miranda-Venezuela. Africa: Mauritius and Tunisia. Decisions
about the scope and nature of the PISA assessments and the
background information to be collected are made by leading experts
in participating countries. Considerable efforts and resources are
devoted to achieving cultural and linguistic breadth and balance in
assessment materials. Since the design and translation of the test,
as well as sampling and data collection, are subject to strict
quality controls, PISA findings are considered to be highly valid
and reliable. ...
17. What is PISA? 20 OECD 2014 Students and Money: Financial
Literacy Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI Map of PISA
countries and economies OECD countries Partner countries and
economies in PISA 2012 Partner countries and economies in previous
cycles Australia Japan Albania Montenegro Azerbaijan Austria Korea
Argentina Peru Georgia Belgium Luxembourg Brazil Qatar Himachal
Pradesh-India Canada Mexico Bulgaria Romania Kyrgyzstan Chile
Netherlands Colombia Russian Federation Former Yugoslav Republic of
Macedonia Czech Republic New Zealand Costa Rica Serbia Malta
Denmark Norway Croatia Shanghai-China Mauritius Estonia Poland
Cyprus1, 2 Singapore Miranda-Venezuela Finland Portugal Hong
Kong-China Chinese Taipei Moldova France Slovak Republic Indonesia
Thailand Panama Germany Slovenia Jordan Tunisia Tamil Nadu-India
Greece Spain Kazakhstan United Arab Emirates Trinidad and Tobago
Hungary Sweden Latvia Uruguay Iceland Switzerland Liechtenstein
Viet Nam Ireland Turkey Lithuania Israel United Kingdom Macao-China
Italy United States Malaysia 1. Note by Turkey: The information in
this document with reference to Cyprus relates to the southern part
of the Island. There is no single authority representing both
Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises
the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and
equitable solution is found within the context of the United
Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the Cyprus
issue. 2. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD
and the European Union: The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all
members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The
information in this document relates to the area under the
effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
PISAs unique features include its: policy orientation, which links
data on student learning outcomes with data on students backgrounds
and attitudes
towardslearningandonkeyfactorsthatshapetheirlearning,inandoutsideofschool,inordertohighlightdifferencesin
performance and identify the characteristics of students, schools
and education systems that perform well; innovative concept of
literacy, which refers to students capacity to apply knowledge and
skills in key subjects, and to analyse, reason and communicate
effectively as they identify, interpret and solve problems in a
variety of situations; relevance to lifelong learning, as PISA asks
students to report on their motivation to learn, their beliefs
about themselves, and their learning strategies; regularity, which
enables countries to monitor their progress in meeting key learning
objectives; and breadth of coverage, which, in PISA 2012,
encompasses the 34 OECD member countries and 31 partner countries
and economies.
18. What is PISA? Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills
for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 21 Who are the PISA
students? Differences between countries in the nature and extent of
pre-primary education and care, in the age of entry into formal
schooling, in the structure of the education system, and in the
prevalence of grade repetition mean that school grade levels are
often not good indicators of where students are in their cognitive
development. To better compare student performance internationally,
PISA targets a specific age of students. PISA students are aged
between 15 years 3 months and 16 years 2 months at the time of the
assessment, and have completed at least 6 years of formal
schooling. They can be enrolled in any type of institution,
participate in full-time or part-time education, in academic or
vocational programmes, and attend public or private schools or
foreign schools within the country. (For an operational definition
of this target population, see Annex A2.) Using this age across
countries and over time allows PISA to compare consistently the
knowledge and skills of individuals born in the same year who are
still in school at 15, despite the diversity of their education
histories in and outside of school. The population of participating
students is defined by strict technical standards, as are the
students who are excluded from participating (see Annex A2). The
overall exclusion rate within a country was required to be below 5%
to ensure that, under reasonable assumptions, any distortions in
national mean scores would remain within plus or minus 5 score
points, i.e. typically within the order of magnitude of 2 standard
errors of sampling. Exclusion could take place either through the
schools that participated or the students who participated within
schools (see Annex A2, Tables A2.1 and A2.2). There are several
reasons why a school or a student could be excluded from PISA.
Schools might be excluded because they are situated in remote
regions and are inaccessible, because they are very small, or
because of organisational or Key features of PISA 2012 The content
The PISA 2012 survey focused on mathematics, with reading, science
and problem-solving minor areas of assessment. For the first time,
PISA 2012 also included an assessment of the financial literacy of
young people, which was optional for countries. PISA assesses not
only whether students can reproduce knowledge, but also whether
they can extrapolate from what they have learned and apply their
knowledge in new situations. It emphasises the mastery of
processes, the understanding of concepts, and the ability to
function in various types of situations. The students Around 510
000 students completed the assessment in 2012, representing about
28 million 15-year-olds in the schools of the 65 participating
countries and economies. The assessment Paper-based tests were
used, with assessments lasting a total of two hours for each
student. In a range of countries and economies, an additional 40
minutes were devoted to the computer-based assessment of
mathematics, reading and problem solving. Test items were a mixture
of multiple-choice items and questions requiring students to
construct their own responses. The items were organised in groups
based on a passage setting out a real-life situation. A total of
about 390 minutes of test items were covered, with different
students taking different combinations of test items. Students
answered a background questionnaire, which took 30 minutes to
complete, that sought information about themselves, their homes and
their school and learning experiences. School principals were given
a questionnaire, to complete in 30 minutes, that covered the school
system and the learning environment. In some countries and
economies, optional questionnaires were distributed to parents, who
were asked to
provideinformationontheirperceptionsofandinvolvementintheirchildsschool,theirsupportforlearningin
the home, and their childs career expectations, particularly in
mathematics. Countries could choose two other optional
questionnaires for students: one asked students about their
familiarity with and use of information and communication
technologies, and the second sought information about their
education to date, including any interruptions in their schooling
and whether and how they are preparing for a future career.
19. What is PISA? 22 OECD 2014 Students and Money: Financial
Literacy Skills for the 21st Century Volume VI operational factors
that precluded participation. Students might be excluded because of
intellectual disability or limited proficiency in the language of
the assessment. In 28 out of the 65 countries participating in PISA
2012, the percentage of school-level exclusions amounted to less
than 1%; it was less than 5% in all countries. When the exclusion
of students who met the internationally established exclusion
criteria is also taken into account, the exclusion rates increase
slightly. However, the overall exclusion rate remains below 2% in
30 participating countries and economies, below 5% in 57
participating countries, and below 7% in all countries except
Luxembourg (8.4%). In 11 out of the 34 OECD countries, the
percentage of school-level exclusions amounted to less than 1% and
was less than 3% in 30 OECD countries. When student exclusions
within schools were also taken into account, there were 11 OECD
countries below 2% and 26 OECD countries below 5%. (For more
detailed information about the restrictions on the level of
exclusions in PISA 2012, see Annex A2.) What kinds of results does
the test provide? The PISA assessment provides three main types of
outcomes: basic indicators that provide a baseline profile of
students knowledge and skills; indicators that show how skills
relate to important demographic, social, economic and educational
variables; and indicators on trends that show changes in student
performance and in the relationships between student-level and
school-level variables and outcomes. Although indicators can
highlight important issues, they do not provide answers to policy
questions. To respond to this, PISA also developed a
policy-oriented analysis plan that uses the indicators as a basis
for policy discussion. Where can you find the results? This is the
last of six volumes that present the results from PISA 2012. It
begins by discussing the importance of financial literacy, defining
financial education and financial literacy, and explaining how the
assessment was organised. Chapter2 compares students performance in
the 2012 PISA financial literacy assessment across and within
countries and economies. It discusses what students know about
financial literacy and how well they can apply what they know, and
examines how student performance in financial literacy compares
with performance in reading and mathematics. Chapter 3 examines the
relationship between students financial literacy and the
demographic and socio-economic characteristics of these students
and their families, including gender, socio-economic status,
parents education and occupation, immigrant background, and
language spoken at home. Chapter 4 explores the relationship
between students experiences with money matters (through holding a
bank account and prepaid debit card and through their sources of
money), and their performance in the financial literacy assessment.
It also discusses the relationship between students attitudes
towards learning and their performance in the assessment. The
concluding chapter discusses the practical and policy implications
of the PISA results. The other five volumes cover the following
issues: Volume I, What Students Know and Can Do: Student
Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science, summarises the
performance of students in PISA 2012. It describes how performance
is defined, measured and reported, and then provides results from
the assessment, showing what students are able to do in
mathematics. After a summary of mathematics performance, it
examines the ways in which this performance varies on subscales
representing different aspects of mathematics literacy. Given that
any comparison of the outcomes of education systems needs to take
into consideration countries social and economic circumstances, and
the resources they devote to education, the volume also presents
the results within countries economic and social contexts. In
addition, the volume examines the relationship between the
frequency and intensity of students exposure to subject content in
school, what is known as opportunity to learn, and student
performance. The volume concludes with a description of student
results in reading and science. Trends in student performance in
mathematics between 2003 and 2012, in reading between 2000 and
2012, and in science between 2006 and 2012 are examined when
comparable data are available. Throughout the volume, case studies
examine in greater detail the policy reforms adopted by countries
that have improved in PISA.
20. What is PISA? Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills
for the 21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 23 Volume II, Excellence
through Equity: Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed, defines
and measures equity in education and analyses how equity in
education has evolved across countries between PISA 2003 and 2012.
The volume examines the relationship between student performance
and socio-economic status, and describes how other individual
student characteristics, such as immigrant background and family
structure, and school characteristics, such as school location, are
associated with socio-economic status and performance. The volume
also reveals differences in how equitably countries allocate
resources and opportunities to learn to schools with different
socio-economic profiles. Volume III, Ready to Learn: Students
Engagement, Drive and Self-Beliefs, explores students engagement
with and at school, their drive and motivation to succeed, and the
beliefs they hold about themselves as mathematics learners. The
volume identifies the students who are at particular risk of having
low levels of engagement in, and holding negative dispositions
towards, school in general and mathematics in particular, and how
engagement, drive, motivation and self-beliefs are related to
mathematics performance. The volume identifies the roles schools
can play in shaping the well-being of students and the role parents
can play in promoting their childrens engagement with and
dispositions towards learning. Changes in students engagement,
drive, motivation and self-beliefs between 2003 and 2012, and how
those dispositions have changed during the period among particular
subgroups of students, notably socio-economically advantaged and
disadvantaged students, boys and girls, and students at different
levels of mathematics proficiency, are examined when comparable
data are available. Throughout the volume, case studies examine in
greater detail the policy reforms adopted by countries that have
improved in PISA. Volume IV, What Makes Schools Successful?
Resources, Policies and Practices, examines how student performance
is associated with various characteristics of individual schools
and of concerned school systems. It discusses how 15-year- old
students are selected and grouped into different schools,
programmes, and education levels, and how human, financial,
educational and time resources are allocated to different schools.
The volume also examines how school systems balance autonomy with
collaboration, and how the learning environment in school shapes
student performance. Trends in these variables between 2003 and
2012 are examined when comparable data are available, and case
studies, examining the policy reforms adopted by countries that
have improved in PISA, are presented throughout the volume. Volume
V, Creative Problem Solving: Students Skills in Tackling Real-Life
Problems, presents student performance in the PISA 2012 assessment
of problem solving, which measures students capacity to respond to
non-routine situations in order to achieve their potential as
constructive and reflective citizens. It provides the rationale for
assessing problem- solving skills and describes performance within
and across countries. In addition, the volume highlights the
relative strengths and weaknesses of each school system and
examines how they are related to individual student
characteristics, such as gender, immigrant background and
socio-economic status. The volume also explores the role of
education in fostering problem-solving skills. The frameworks for
assessing mathematics, reading and science in 2012 are described in
PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics,
Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy (OECD,
2013). They are summarised in Volume I. Technical annexes at the
end of this report describe how questionnaire indices were
constructed and discuss sampling issues, quality-assurance
procedures, the reliability of coding, and the process followed for
developing the assessment instruments. Many of the issues covered
in the technical annexes are elaborated in greater detail in the
PISA 2012 Technical Report (OECD, forthcoming). All data tables
referred to in the analysis are included at the end of the
respective volume in Annex B1 or, for Volume VI, in Annex B. A
Readers Guide is also provided in each volume to aid in
interpreting the tables and figures that accompany the report. Data
from regions within the participating countries are included in
Annex B2. Results from the computer- based assessment of
mathematics and reading are presented in Annex B3. References OECD
(forthcoming), PISA 2012 Technical Report, PISA, OECD Publishing,
Paris. OECD (2013), PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework:
Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial
Literacy, OECD Publishing, Paris,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en.
21. 1 Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills for the
21st Century Volume VI OECD 2014 25 The Assessment of Financial
Literacy in PISA 2012 PISA 2012 is the first large-scale
international study to assess the financial literacy, learned in
and outside of school, of 15-year-olds nearing the end of
compulsory education. It assesses the extent to which students in
18 participating countries and economies have the knowledge and
skills that are essential to make financial decisions and plans for
their future. This chapter highlights the importance of financial
literacy, defines financial education and financial literacy, and
discusses how the assessment was organised. It also offers an
overview of the limited and uneven provision of financial education
in schools in participating countries and economies, and describes
the steps taken in some countries to improve financial literacy
among students.
22. 1 The assessment of financial literacy in pisa 2012 26 OECD
2014 Students and Money: Financial Literacy Skills for the 21st
Century Volume VI Over the past decade, developed and emerging
countries and economies have become increasingly concerned about
the level of financial literacy of their citizens, particularly
among young people. This initially stemmed from concern about the
potential impact of shrinking public and private welfare systems,
shifting demographics, including the ageing of the population in
many countries, and the increased sophistication and expansion of
financial services. In many instances, challenging economic and
financial circumstances have heightened these concerns. This has
led to the recognition that better financial literacy skills could
contribute to improved financial decision making, and that these
decisions could, in turn, have positive effects not only on
households but also on economic and financial stability more
gen