Upload
oecd-governance
View
425
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This presentation by Virginie GRAND was made at the 7th Meeting on Public-Private Partnerships held on 17-18 February 2014. Find more information at http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/ppp.htm
Citation preview
7th Annual Meeting of Senior PPP OfficialsOECD Conference Centre, Paris
February 2014
PUBLIC
2
Project Finance Update
Global PF deal volume: by financing type
The overall project finance market continues to remain strong and steady (1,000 deals, USD400bn volume)
Project bond element is growing strongly, but project loans remain dominant
Government/DFI involvement still an important component
Liquidity has increased, leading to some margin contraction
Source: Dealogic Project Finance Review 2013
PUBLIC
3
Project Finance Update
Global PF deal volume: by region
Global PF deal volume: by sector
Some of the large markets are "domestic“ The nature of growth varies between the
different regions. Oil & Gas, Infrastructure and Energy remain
the predominant sectors Petrochemicals, Telecoms and Mining
contribute, but from small base,
Source: Dealogic Project Finance Review 2013
PUBLIC
4
Key considerations for a Successful PPP Framework
‘Bankable’Project
Value for Money
Funders’ requirements
Public Sector commitment and skills
Private Sector expertise and engagement
Adequate Risk Allocation
Favourable Legal and Regulatory Framework
PUBLIC
5
Key considerations for a Successful PPP Framework
Institutional Framework
• Stable political framework
• Well understood and appropriate legal and regulatory and financial environment – PPP law
• Good governance - PPP central government institutions
• Standardisation
• Deal flow: quantity, sufficient scale to justify a PPP strategy, quality
• Leverage: create more opportunities to attract new financing using credit enhancing
Public Sector Commitment
• Clear PPP policy statement; Government support, financial and human resources
• Multi-sector PPP/Concession law or regulations
• Planning and projects selection; market soundings, consultation, approvals process
• Clarity on output awaited from the authority
• Dialogue procedures (ability to discuss project specific issues with the bidders)
• Transparent and competitive procurement; clear, robust, and objective criteria (technical / price)
• PPP Contract performance monitoring capacity
PUBLIC
6
Key considerations for a Successful PPP Framework
Private Sector
• Project discipline
• Technical solutions / innovations
• Innovative financing
• Development of skills (sponsors, contractors, banks); training programmes
• How do authorities create the incentives for the private sector to deliver value for money
Securing the financing
• How attractive is a country and its PPP programme to (domestic and foreign) investors and lenders?
• Are lenders/investors comfortable with the law governing project documents?
• Are macroeconomic risks of inflation, exchange rate and interest rate allocated efficiently?
• Is a country’s lending capacity sufficient to finance its long term PPP programme?
• Funders’ requirements - risk allocation:
•Specific public credit enhancements; PPP & infrastructure investment fund
PUBLIC
7
Common Pitfalls
• Poor project scoping
• Under-scoping so bidders are unclear about the requirement
• Over-scoping so bidding is restricted and/or over guided
• Mis-costing – leading to unaffordable bids
• Overly complex projects with “combinations”
• Project on Project risk
• Difficult consortium combinations making EPC difficult (eg rolling stock / infrastructure)
• Limitations on supply chain
• Unrealistic or unclear risk allocation
• Patronage / market
• Quasi government counterparty rather than government
• “latent defect” risk on existing assets
• Inflexible procurement process
• Locking in funding too early
• Insufficient flexibility can lead to stranded bids
• Not considering funding early enough – too much flexibility can lead to unrealistic bids
PUBLIC
8
• New structures are emerging as a result of bank market constraints and governments initiatives to encourage institutional investors to fund infrastructure projects.
• First project bonds have closed in the UK, France and Spain in 2013
• Infrastructure financing In the emerging markets remains dominated by DFIs and ECAs
255203
275320
249
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Q3 Loan Bond Equity # of projects
Global Project Finance transaction volumes
11360
100 10560
62100
120 130
120
9570
70107
60
5550
65
60
20
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2008 2009 2010 2011 3Q 2012
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
Europe Asia Americas MENA # of projects
Transaction volumes by region
Global project finance trends – bank debt still the preferred route
PUBLIC
9
Greenfield finance structures in EuropeNeed to adapt bank model and favour alternative funding options
A number of funding options
have emerged to support the more limited bank debt
that is currently available
Structure Types Examples
Bank debt
- International
- Domestic
• Long-term amortising debt of 20+ years
• “Soft” mini-perm (cash sweeps, large margin step ups)
• “Hard” mini-perm
• Bank debt bridge to bond
• PFI standard, French & Dutch PPP
• M25, Manchester waste, A41
• Utilities / brownfield / trains
Government Co-Lending / Support
• All funding from financial close
• Bank construction debt facility take-out
• Completion payment
• Debt Guarantee
• Direct funding
• IUK Guarantee Scheme
• UK Prudential Borrowing
• French rail projects
• Dutch Milestone Payment
• CDP’s involvement in Italy
Project Bond
• Public listed bond
• Private placements
• With our without credit enhancement (PCBE)
• Direct lending
• EU Project Bond Initiative
• N33 in the Netherlands
• Cité Musicale in France
• Several PFIs in the UK
Multilaterals / ECA
• EIB / EBRD
• IFC in emerging Europe
• ECAs
• EIB has lent to most TEN-T / TEN-E projects
• IEP in the UK
PUBLIC
10
Greenfield finance structures in the emerging marketsProject finance is still driven by the Multilaterals and the ECAs
In most cases, commercial banks
appetite will be maximized with
adequate ECA / PRI cover
Structure Types Examples
Multilaterals / DFI
• Direct lending up to a percentage of the project costs
• Take project risk
• USD funding is the preferred route
• A/B loans
• IFC
• EIB
• EBRD
• Proparco / DEG / FMO
Regional / national development banks
• Domestic / regional focus
• Usually provide local currency financing
• Direct lending
• ADB
• IADB
• IDB
• BNDES / BANOBRAS
• IDC /DBSA
Export credit
Cover
• ECA covered commercial facility
• 100% political risk and a significant portion of commercial risk
• Europe: HERMES, COFACE, SACE, etc..
• Asia: NEXI, KSURE, etc…
• South Africa: ECIC
• US EXIM
Export Credit
Direct Lending
• Some ECAs can propose direct funding in addition to insurance cover
• JBIC
• KEXIM
PRI Providers• Insurance product offering commercial banks
a 100% political risk cover
• MIGA
• Private insurers
PUBLIC
Disclaimer
The Global Banking division of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited (“HSBC”) has prepared this document (the “Document”) for information purposes only. This Document does not constitute a commitment to underwrite or purchase or subscribe for all or any portion of the securities mentioned herein. Any such commitment shall be evidenced only by a fully executed subscription agreement, purchase agreement or similar contractual document. This Document should also not be construed as an offer for sale of or subscription for any investment, nor is it calculated to invite/solicit any offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment.
HSBC has based this Document on information obtained from sources it believes to be reliable but which it has not independently verified. HSBC makes no guarantee, representation or warranty and accepts no responsibility or liability for the contents of this Document and/or as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Document. HSBC and its affiliates and/or its or their respective officers, directors and employees may have positions in any securities mentioned in this Document (or in any related investment) and may from time to time add to or dispose of any such securities (or investment). HSBC and/or any of its affiliates may act as market maker or have assumed an underwriting commitment in the securities of any companies discussed in this Document (or in related investments), may sell them to or buy them from clients on a principal or discretionary basis and may also perform or seek to perform banking or underwriting services for or relating to those companies. As HSBC is part of a large global financial services organisation, it or one or more of its affiliates may have certain other relationships with the parties relevant to the proposed activities as set out in this Document, and these proposed activities may give rise to a conflict of interest, which the addressee hereby acknowledges.
No consideration has been given to the particular investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any recipient. This Document, which is not for public circulation, must not be copied, transferred or the content disclosed to any third party and is not intended for use by any person other than the addressee or the addressee's professional advisers for the purposes of advising the addressee hereon.
PUBLIC