46
SIMON NUDDS DIRECTOR OF UK MEDIA ANALYTICS NIELSEN DORON WESLY HEAD OF MARKET STRATEGY TREMOR VIDEO MAURICIO LEON COMMERCIAL DIRECTOR PERFORMICS

Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Citation preview

Page 1: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

SIMON NUDDSDIRECTOR OF UK MEDIA ANALYTICS NIELSEN

DORON WESLYHEAD OF MARKET STRATEGYTREMOR VIDEO

MAURICIO LEONCOMMERCIAL DIRECTOR PERFORMICS

Page 2: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

WITH BENEFITS?

Page 3: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

VOD IS A LEAN-FORWARD MEDIUM WITH LESS CLUTTER THAT CAN:

AMPLIFY AWARENESS GENERATE MORE EFFICIENT & EFFECTIVE

CAMPAIGNS

COMPLEMENT A TV BUY

Page 4: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

OBJECTIVE:HOW DOES VOD COMPLEMENT

Page 5: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

PHASE ONE:VOD CONTRIBUTION TO TV’S INCREMENTAL REACH

PHASE TWO:VOD CONTRIBUTION TO TV'S AWARENESS AND MESSAGE ASSOCIATION

Page 6: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

PHASE ONE:VOD CONTRIBUTION TO TV’S INCREMENTAL REACH

OCT. 2011 - DEC. 2011

Page 7: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

TV + VOD INCREMENTAL REACH

a. FMCG Beverage Alcohol 1.33%

b. FMCG Beverage 0.33%

c. Finance 0.44%

d. Retail (ce) 0.19%

e. Tech 0.45%

a. FMCG Beverage Alcohol A16-34 ~41%

b. FMCG Bev ABC1 Women ~14%

c. Finance ABC1 ~20%

d. Retail (ce) ABC1 ~10%

e. Tech A16-34 ~15%

10-41% OF PEOPLE ONLINE WERE NOT EXPOSED TO TV

Page 8: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

METHODOLOGY

FUSION OF TV AND VOD (ONLINE) PANELS

MEASURE REACH AND FREQUENCY ACROSS SINGLE CAMPAIGN

MEASUREMENT PERIOD: OCT. 2011 – DEC. 2011

5 BRANDS ACROSS 4 CATEGORIES FMCG BEVERAGE (x2) RETAIL FINANCE TECH

Page 9: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

STEP 1

TAG

STEP 2

VISUALISE

STEP 3

EXTRACT

STEP 4

COMBINE

METHODOLOGY

Page 10: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

BARBRespondent Level Data

Nielsen OnlineRespondent Level Data

To isolate the impact of online activity when combined with TV, we utilize Nielsen-IMS’ CampaignRF fusion tool

METHODOLOGY

Page 11: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

BARBRespondent Level Data

Nielsen OnlineRespondent Level Data

We link respondents from one dataset to another

by using the common variables (i.e. demos, geo

demos, etc.) that exist on the BARB panel, Nielsen

NetView panels and a hub where the reach results

are reported.

On-the-fly fusionUsing common demo

variables

METHODOLOGY

Page 12: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

These linking variables were validated by a series

of statistical tests and analyses to ensure they

closely match to produce an accuracy level of 95%

or higher.

Nielsen OnlineRespondent Level Data

On-the-fly fusionUsing common demo

variables

“Fused result of TV and online viewing”

METHODOLOGY

Page 13: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

64.6%

65.93%

FMCG BEVERAGE ALCOHOL A16

TV Only TV + VOD

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

% Reach70%

25 150

Source: Nielsen IMS CampaignRF, Oct.-Dec. 2011

Page 14: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

FMCG BEVERAGE ABC1W 15+

87.56% 87.89%

TV Only TV + VOD

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

% Reach

90%

50 550

Source: Nielsen IMS CampaignRF, Oct.-Dec. 2011

Page 15: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

% Reach

FINANCE ABC1 ADULTS

78.46%78.9%

TV Only TV + VOD

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

80%

50 250

Source: Nielsen IMS CampaignRF, Oct.-Dec. 2011

Page 16: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

% ReachRETAIL (CONSUMER ELECT) ABC1 15+

89.72% 89.91%

TV Only TV + VOD

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

% Reach

90%

50 600

Source: Nielsen IMS CampaignRF, Oct.-Dec. 2011

Page 17: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

TECH 16-34S

87.38% 87.83%

TV Only TV + VOD

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

% Reach

90%

50 550

Source: Nielsen IMS CampaignRF, Oct.-Dec. 2011

Page 18: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

UK DIGITAL VIDEO VIEWERS

Digital Viewers(millions)

–% change

–% of internet users

–% of population

2012

32.6

8.9%

69.9%

51.4%

2013

34.4

5.5%

71.7%

53.8%

2014

36.3

5.8%

74.1%

56.4%

2015

37.8

4.1%

75.6%

58.3%

2016

39.1

3.3%

76.7%

59.7%

2017

40.0

2.4%

77.4%

60.6%

Digital Viewers(millions) 32.6 34.4 36.3 37.8 39.1 40.0

Source: eMarketer, Feb 2013

VOD PENETRATION

Page 19: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

PHASE TWO:VOD CONTRIBUTION TO TV'S AWARENESS AND MESSAGE ASSOCIATION

Page 20: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

VOD AMPLIFIES

Page 21: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

VOD +

Page 22: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

VOD + INCREASE RETURN ON BRANDING

Page 23: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

VOD EXTENDSIMPACT

Page 24: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

METHODOLOGY

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN (TEST VS. CONTROL)

NATIONAL REP. SAMPLE FOR ABC1 TARGET

TV EXPOSURE (OTS) BASED ON MEDIA

CONSUMPTION REPORTING (12 MIN. SURVEY)

VOD EXPOSURE BASED ON COOKIE FILE

AVIVA

MEASUREMENT PERIOD: AUG.-NOV. 2012

Page 25: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

MEDIA CONSUMPTION QUESTIONS

Do you watch

commercial TV?

Page 26: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Thinking about your commercial TV viewing habits, on average, what time of day do you watch

TV?

Page 27: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

On average, how many hours of commercial TV do you watch a

day?

Page 28: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Which, if any, of the following TV shows have you watched since 1st

of Sep. 2012?

Source: Nielsen, Tremor VideoWave 1 = Last month, Wave 2 since Sep 1 2012

Page 29: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Which, if any, of the following TV shows have you watched since 1st

of Sep. 2012?

Source: Nielsen, Tremor VideoWave 1 = Last month, Wave 2 since Sep 1 2012

SPOT SCHEDULE

ITV / ITV+1

• Downton Abbey

• Coronation Street

• X-factor

Station Day Time Sec Programme

ITV London

Sun 9:45:00 PM

:30 Downton Abbey

Page 30: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

33%

39%37.7% 35.9%

41.4%

2.6%

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug-Nov 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGY

TV is off-air: VOD sustains and increases viewers’ brand awareness

(Unaided Awareness)

Page 31: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

33%

39%37.7% 35.9%

41.4%

2.6%

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug-Nov 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGY

TV is off-air: VOD sustains and increases viewers’ brand awareness

(Unaided Awareness)

Page 32: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

33%

39%37.7% 35.9%

41.4%

2.6%

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug-Nov 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGY

TV is off-air: VOD sustains and increases viewers’ brand awareness

(Unaided Awareness)

Page 33: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug-Nov 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGY

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

TV is off-air: VOD sustains and increases viewers’ brand awareness

(Unaided Awareness)

Page 34: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

29.2%

43.6%

48%

26.1%

31.7%

-3.1%

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGYTV + VOD (vs. TV alone): A higher percentage of viewers connected the core message with the brand

(Message Association)

Page 35: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

29.2%

43.6%

48%

26.1%

31.7%

-3.1%

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGYTV + VOD (vs. TV alone): A higher percentage of viewers connected the core message with the brand

(Message Association)

Page 36: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Before Campaign

Sep.-Oct.TV

Sep.-Oct.TV + VOD

Nov.No VOD

Nov.VOD

Nov. Carry Over

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012

VOD AMPLIFIES TV DOMINANT STRATEGY

VOD Effect Incrementalto Base of Campaign

TV + VOD (vs. TV alone): A higher percentage of viewers connected the core message with the brand

(Message Association)

Page 37: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012; TV heavy + medium = >14 hours/week, TV light = <14 hours/week

Cost to Raise Awareness per Person (Index)

RETURN ON BRANDING INVESTMENT

TV TV + VOD

Unaided Awareness 100 171

Message Association 100 101.1

It appears that TV + VOD are less cost efficient at increasing awareness and message association.

But the story is very different for light TV viewers (1/4 of ABC1 Target).

Page 38: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012; TV heavy + medium = >14 hours/week, TV light = <14 hours/week; *Calculated % x TV Pop; **Calculated based on nationally rep data; ***Light TV Viewers x % Exposed to VOD

ABC1

Aviva TV: Heavy, Medium, Light 39.5%

Aviva TV Light 48.4%

Aviva VOD 55.5%

Heavy, Medium, and Light TV Viewers

TV + VOD REACH OVERLAP

Even though light TV viewers are ¼

of ABC1 Target, they only

compromise 15% of TV viewing.

EFFECTIVE REACH

Page 39: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012; TV heavy + medium = >14 hours/week, TV light = <14 hours/week; *Calculated % x TV Pop; **Calculated based on nationally rep data; ***Light TV Viewers x % Exposed to VOD

ABC1

Aviva TV: Heavy, Medium, Light 39.5%

Aviva TV Light 48.4%

Aviva VOD 55.5%

Heavy, Medium, and Light TV Viewers

TV + VOD REACH OVERLAP

Even though light TV viewers are ¼

of ABC1 Target, they only

compromise 15% of TV viewing.

EFFECTIVE REACH

26M VIEWERS ABC1 hrs./day

LIGHT

0 – 1.5

LIGHT-MED

1.6 – 2.2

MEDIUM

2.3 – 3.6

MED-HEAVY

3.7 – 5

HEAVY

5.1 – 5.7

14.9% of TV viewing 55.5% of TV viewing

Page 40: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012; TV heavy + medium = >14 hours/week, TV light = <14 hours/week; *Calculated % x TV Pop; **Calculated based on nationally rep data; ***Light TV Viewers x % Exposed to VOD

ABC1

Aviva TV: Heavy, Medium, Light 71%

Aviva TV Light 31.5%

Aviva VOD 77.7%

Heavy, Medium, and Light TV Viewers

TV + VOD REACH OVERLAP

Even though light TV viewers are ¼

of ABC1 Target, they only

compromise 15% of TV viewing.

TOTAL REACH

26M VIEWERS ABC1 hrs./day

LIGHT

0 – 1.5

LIGHT-MED

1.6 – 2.2

MEDIUM

2.3 – 3.6

MED-HEAVY

3.7 – 5

HEAVY

5.1 – 5.7

14.9% of TV viewing 55.5% of TV viewing

Page 41: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

TV

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012; TV heavy + medium = >14 hours/week/>2 hours per day, TV light = <14 hours/week/<2 hours/day

RETURN ON BRANDING INVESTMENT:TV HEAVY/MEDIUM VS. TV LIGHT

Cost to Raise Awareness per Person (Index)

Unaided Awareness 100 58.7108.6

Message Association 100 63.8528.3

TV Heavy/Medium + VOD TV Light + VOD

Page 42: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

PHASE 2: MESSAGE ASSOCIATIONDecay

ON

AIR

WK 1 WK 2 WK 3 WK 4

TV

VOD

Me

ssa

ge

Asso

cia

tio

n +

2.5

-3.1

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012

Page 43: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

TV OFF-AIR VOD ON-AIRON

AIR

WK 1 WK 2 WK 3 WK 4

TV

VOD

Me

ssa

ge

Asso

cia

tio

n +

2.5

-3.1

PHASE 2: MESSAGE ASSOCIATIONDecay

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012

Page 44: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

TV OFF-AIR VOD ON-AIRON

AIR

WK 1 WK 2 WK 3 WK 4

TV

VOD

WK 5 WK 6 WK 7 WK 8

Me

ssa

ge

Asso

cia

tio

n +

2.5

-3.1

y = -22.81ln(x) + 48.202

R2 = 0.86996

PHASE 2: MESSAGE ASSOCIATIONDecay

Source: Nielsen, Tremor Video n=1375 @90% confidence level Aug.-Nov. 2012

Page 45: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

HYPOTHESISVOD is a lean-forward medium with less

clutter that can:

• Amplify awareness and reach

• Generate more efficient and effective

campaigns

• Complement a TV buy

TV + VOD = TV WITH BENEFITSIncremental Reach: VOD + TV increases

by up to 1.33%

When TV goes dark: VOD bolsters brand

awareness by 5.5%, extending campaign

Light TV Viewers: TV + VOD (vs. TV alone) delivers

almost 2x the return on branding

Brand Performance: TV + VOD drive higher brand

performance

FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS INDEED

Page 46: Tv+vod= friends with benefits

SIMON [email protected]

DORON [email protected]@sabredutch

THANK YOU

MAURICIO [email protected]