10
Q1 MEDIA QUALITY REPORT

2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

Q1

MEDIA QUALITY REPORT

/IntegralAds

Page 2: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

Integral Ad Science’s Q1 2015 Media Quality Report highlights the state of media quality in global online advertising across display, video, and mobile inventory. Integral processes hundreds of billions of impressions quarterly and is thus able to analyze the industry on a broad and representative level, across multiple media quality metrics: TRAQ (TRue Advertising Quality), Brand Risk, Viewability, and Ad Fraud.

Q1 2015 Media Quality Report Highlights:

• Impressions sourced directly from Publishers generally saw higher quality media. Publishers had a TRAQ score of 673, whereas Networks and Exchanges had a TRAQ score of 551.

• Networks and Exchanges saw over 4x the amount of fraud as Publishers direct.

• Though generally assumed to be viewable, mobile in-app impressions were only 81.0% viewable.

• Most video impressions were seen in 300x250 ad units, indicating that the majority of video ads are served in-banner.

• On a broad level, video viewability improved from Q4 2014 to Q1 2015 increasing from 39.0% to 41.8%. Video viewability also improved at every quartile, from 1st quartile to completion.

• Featuring international data for the first time, the Q1 report revealed that media quality is a global issue.

• Initial findings indicated that there is generally more content flagged for violence in the US than internationally.

1All percentages based on impressions analyzed in Q1 2015.

MOBILEINSIGHT 81.0% of impressions served in-app were viewable.

Display

Mobile

Video

International

Page 3: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

2

TRAQ SCORE

BRAND RISK

VIEWABILITY

AD FRAUD

1,000250551 673

TRue Advertising Quality Score

PUBLISHERSNETWORKS & EXCHANGES 1,000250551 673

TRue Advertising Quality Score

PUBLISHERSNETWORKS & EXCHANGES

In view as per MRC standard

PUBLISHERSNETWORKS & EXCHANGES

41.8%52.8%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

In view as per MRC standard

PUBLISHERSNETWORKS & EXCHANGES

41.8%52.8%

In view as per MRC standard

PUBLISHERSNETWORKS & EXCHANGES

41.8%52.8%

PUBLISHERS

NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

4.0%

16.5%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%

PUBLISHERS

NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

4.0%

16.5%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%

PUBLISHERS

NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

4.0%

16.5%

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%

DISPLAY SNAPSHOT

Page 4: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

BRAND RISK BY LEVEL

DISPLAY

3

Brand Risk by Level

VERY HIGH

HIGH

MODERATE

7.9%

1.3%0.6%

10.9%

1.9%0.9%

9.7%

13.7%

PUBLISHERS NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

Brand Risk by Level

VERY HIGH

HIGH

MODERATE

7.9%

1.3%0.6%

10.9%

1.9%0.9%

9.7%

13.7%

PUBLISHERS NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

BRAND RISK BY CATEGORY

ADULT

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL

HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

ADULT OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

PUBLISHERS

33.1%

2.4%6.0%

7.7%

1.9%1.8%

47.2%NETWORKS

&EXCHANGES

4.1%

4.6%7.5%

2.5%2.4%

47.7%

31.3%

47.7%

ADULT

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL

HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

ADULT OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

PUBLISHERS

33.1%

2.4%6.0%

7.7%

1.9%1.8%

47.2%NETWORKS

&EXCHANGES

4.1%

4.6%7.5%

2.5%2.4%

47.7%

31.3%

47.7%

ADULT

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL

HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

ADULT OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

PUBLISHERS

33.1%

2.4%6.0%

7.7%

1.9%1.8%

47.2%NETWORKS

&EXCHANGES

4.1%

4.6%7.5%

2.5%2.4%

47.7%

31.3%

47.7%

Page 5: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

DISPLAY

4

VIEWABILITY BY TIME

VIEWABILITY BY AD SIZE

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

≥1s ≥5s ≥15s

52.8%

41.8%

24.7%

13.9%

35.0%

19.8%

PUBLISHERS NETWORKS & EXCHANGESViewability by Time

52.8%

41.8%

24.7%

13.9%

35.0%

19.8%

≥ 1s ≥ 5s ≥ 15s0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

PUBLISHERS NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

≥1s 44.0%

≥5s 24.7%

≥15s

≥1s

≥5s

≥15s

≥1s

≥5s

≥15s

13.9%

48.4%

31.7%

18.7%

57.2%

37.4%

20.6%

Viewability by Ad Size

LEADERBOARD

MEDIUM RECTANGLE

SKYSCRAPER

728x90

300x250

160x600

Page 6: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

VIDEO

5

OVERALL

VIDEO ENGAGEMENT METRICS

TRue Advertising Quality ScoreBrand RiskTRAQ Score

Moderate to Very High RiskViewability Ad Fraud

In view as per MRC standard

569 22.7% 41.8% 14.0%

IMPRESSIONS ON AUTOPLAY

54.4%

COMPLETION RATE IN VIEW

IMP

RES

SIO

NS WITH MULTIPLE VIDEOS O

N PA

GE

14.4%

MOST COMMON PLAYER SIZE

300 x 250

1st Quartile

Midpoint

3rd Quartile

Completion

33.1%

31.5%

30.2%

28.9%

Video: Completion Rates In View

MOST COMMON IN-STREAM VIDEO CATEGORIES

Arts & Entertainment

Sports

News

Food & Drink

Home & Garden

1

2

3

4

5

Page 7: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

6

VIDEO

6

BRAND RISK BY CATEGORY

BRAND RISK BY LEVEL

PUBLISHERS

11.8%27.1%

6.7%

2.0%

1.3% 1.1%

2.2%

0.4%0.5%3.6%

79.5%

53.1%NETWORKS

&EXCHANGES

5.0%

5.7%

ADULT

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL

HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

ADULT OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

PUBLISHERS

11.8%27.1%

6.7%

2.0%

1.3% 1.1%

2.2%

0.4%0.5%3.6%

79.5%

53.1%NETWORKS

&EXCHANGES

5.0%

5.7%

ADULT

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL

HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

ADULT OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

PUBLISHERS

11.8%27.1%

6.7%

2.0%

1.3% 1.1%

2.2%

0.4%0.5%3.6%

79.5%

53.1%NETWORKS

&EXCHANGES

5.0%

5.7%

ADULT

OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL

HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

ADULT OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE

ILLEGAL DOWNLOADS

ILLEGAL DRUGS

ALCOHOL HATE SPEECH

VIOLENCE

y

VERY HIGH

HIGH

MODERATE15.7%

4.3%

1.1%

18.4%

3.0%

1.5%21.1%22.9%

PUBLISHERS NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

y

VERY HIGH

HIGH

MODERATE15.7%

4.3%

1.1%

18.4%

3.0%

1.5%21.1%22.9%

PUBLISHERS NETWORKS & EXCHANGES

Page 8: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

7

INTERNATIONAL DISPLAY SNAPSHOT

7

TRAQ SCORE

BRAND RISK

VIEWABILITY

AD FRAUD

TRue Advertising Quality Score

AUSTRALIA FRANCE GERMANY UK

1,000250

601607

632623

Moderate to Very High Risk

NETWORKS & EXCHANGESPUBLISHERS

9.7% 13.7%TRue Advertising Quality Score

1,000250

601

607

623

632

AUSTRALIA

GERMANY

UK

FRANCE

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

Moderate to very high risk

UK

11.0%

GERMANY

17.4%

FRANCE

10.6%

AUSTRALIA

17.7%

In view as per MRC standard

47.8%

42.3%

AUSTRALIA

GERMANY

FRANCE

UK51.8%

44.4%

In view as per MRC standard

47.8%51.8%

44.4%42.3%

AUSTRALIA

GERMANY

FRANCE

UK

In view as per MRC standard

47.8%51.8%

44.4%42.3%

AUSTRALIA

GERMANY

FRANCE

UK

In view as per MRC standard

47.8%

42.3%

AUSTRALIA

GERMANY

FRANCE

UK51.8%

44.4% In view as per MRC standard

47.8%51.8%

44.4%42.3%

AUSTRALIA

GERMANY

FRANCE

UK

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

12.9%UK

11.2%GERMANY

10.4%FRANCE

8.7%AUSTRALIA

Page 9: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

Integral Ad Science is the leading provider of actionable advertising intelligence for buyers and sellers of digital media. Since launching the industry’s first preventative brand safety solution in 2009, Integral has evolved into a global media valuation platform that is the industry’s standard for rating media quality. Integral focuses on a comprehensive solution set that enables advertising to appear in quality environments and receive favorable exposures while allowing sellers to monitor and control inventory quality and performance. Integral’s technology drives improved visibility, efficiency, and ROI for all players across the digital media landscape.

CONTACT US

[email protected]

+1 (646) 278-4871

About INTEGRAL AD SCIENCE

Page 10: 2015 Q1 Media Quality Report

Q1

MEDIA QUALITY REPORT

/IntegralAds

integralads.com