Upload
john-turner
View
295
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IMPROVING YOUR DIGITAL PRESENCE AS A RESEARCHER
Presented by:John R. Turner, Ph.D.Assistant Professor, University of North TexasCollege of Information, Dept. of Learning Technologies
Part of the Graduate Writing Collegium Webinar Series UNT - Spring Semester 2016
1
GETTING STARTED
• Slideshare Link• Available on Facebook Page
2
THE RESEARCH CYCLE
Literature Gap / Problem
Literature Search
Research Design
Data Collectio
n / Analysis
Write Results
/ Article
Submit for
Publication
Review Proces
s
Article Publishe
d
3
?
Revise / Rewrite
PRESENTATION SUMMARY
• Post-publication• Tools to help expand coverage of
publications• Individual Researcher IDs• Researcher’s Digital Profiles• Research Tools
• Additional Researcher Tools• Research• Dissemination
• What’s Next?• Dataset Repositories• Evaluation
4
TYPICAL POST-PUBLISHING MINDSET
• Need to publish another article (Publish or Perish).• My peers will cite my work because it’s good, after all it’s
published, right?• The journal and the publisher will see that my article is seen by
the right people.• It’s a good journal, therefore my article should get distributed.
5
DISSEMINATING YOUR OWN RESEARCH
Improve the likelihood that YOUR publications have an IMPACT:• Conducting research, writing and publishing your article in a scholarly
journal is not the final step….You have to actively promote your research.
• The core of dissemination strategy is “self-archiving”.• By uploading your article to various databases or websites makes it easier
discoverable and more visible and therefore more likely to be cited.Source: Cacean & Harzing, n.d., p. 9
6
TRADITION VS ALTERNATIVE METRICS SITES
7http://libguides.library.uu.nl/researchimpact/altmetrics
COPYRIGHT TRANSFER AGREEMENTS (CTA)
• It is up to the author(s) to make sure that by uploading the scholarly peer-reviewed publication into a digital repository they do not violate the terms of the signed copyright transfer agreements (CTAs).• RePEc Database – http://repec.org/• SSRN Database – http://www.ssrn.com/en/• List of OA Repositories (ROAR) – http://roar.eprints.org/• Directory of OA Repositories – http://opendoar.org/index.html• Registry of research data repositories – http://www.re3data.org/
Source: Cacean & Harzing, n.d., p. 10
8
WILEY: PI & PIQ, HRDQ
• http://exchanges.wiley.com/authors/licensing-info--faqs_333.html
• PIQ CTA states:• C.1. – Submitted Version; a. personal website, subject matter archive,
or employer’s institutional repository.• C.2. – Final Published Version; a. copies for colleagues with no
systematic distribution; b. Reuse (less than 50%); c. Teaching duties; d. Oral presentations.
• C.3. Article Abstracts…; a. re-use unmodified abstracts for any non-commercial purpose.
9
SAGE: ADHR, HRDR
• TO - Cleared:• Supply article to students, teaching **• Supply article to colleague at academic institution **• Supply article to commercial org for republication ***• Upload article to institution repository or website **• Upload article to repository, not affiliated with
institution, 12 mo. After *• Republish in book author is writing **• Contribute to book by other ***
Version 1 – original submission to the journal (before peer review)*Version 2 – original submission with revisions post peer-review**Version 3 – copy-edited and typeset proofs and the final published version***Permissions Required
Source: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journals-permissions
10
HRDI: TAYLOR & FRANCIS ONLINE
• www.tandfonline.comWe encourage you to:Share your work. Make printed copies of your article to use for lecture or classroom purposes.Include your article in a thesis or dissertation.Present your article at a meeting or conference and distribute printed copies of the article.Republish the article (making sure you cite the original article).Adapt and expand your published journal article to make it suitable for your thesis or dissertation.
Source: http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/copyright-and-you/
11
PREVIEW
12
A WORD ABOUT YOUR CV
• ALWAYS have an updated CV available• When someone asks for your CV, can you send them a copy
electronically on the spot?
• Update your University’s faculty profile page, regularly.
• Keep a current biography handy.
13
INDIVIDUAL RESEARCHER ID
14
A RESEARCHER’S ID
• A researcher’s ID number (specific to the researcher) comes from two separate sources:• ORCID – http://www.orcid.org• ResearcherID – http://www.researcherid.org• Both sources can be integrated – meaning that once an ORCID is
populated you can transfer your metadata to the ResearcherID profile.
15
A RESEARCHER’S ID –CONT-
• The general steps:1) Sign up for an account with ORCID2) Create your profile3) Build your publication lists4) Once your ORCID has been populated, sign up for an account with
ResearcherID5) Transfer/Integrate your ResearcherID account with your ORCID
account.6) Whenever you update your ORCID, check to make sure that the
ResearcherID reflects the same changed – this should happen automatically.
16
ORCID
• ORCID is an open, non-profit, community-based effort to provide a registry of unique researcher identifiers and a transparent method of linking research activities and outputs to these identifiers. ORCID is unique in its ability to reach across disciplines, research sectors, and national boundaries and its cooperation with other identifier systems.
http://orcid.org/about
17
ORCID
https://www.orcid.org/content/requiring-orcid-publication-workflows-open-letter
18
“The ability to connect research and researchers enhances the scientific discovery process and improves the efficiency of research funding and collaboration.”
ORCID QR GENERATED CODE
19
ORCID HOME PAGE
20
A
B
C
D
E
F
RESEARCHERID
• ResearcherID provides a solution to the author ambiguity problem within the scholarly research community. Each member is assigned a unique identifier to enable researchers to manage their publication lists, track their times cited counts and h-index, identify potential collaborators and avoid author misidentification. In addition, your ResearcherID information integrates with the Web of Science and is ORCID compliant, allowing you to claim and showcase your publications from a single one account. Search the registry to find collaborators, review publication lists and explore how research is used around the world!
www.researcherid.com/Home.action
21
RESEARCHERID PROFILE PAGE
22
A
B
C
DF
E
G
H
RESEARCHERID LAB EXAMPLES
23
RESEARCHERID – WEB OF SCIENCE PUBLICATIONS
• Web of Science Publications are highlighted in “Blue”• These publications are used as data in the Researcher ID Lab
(previous slide)• This Publication has 2 citations (Item A) in WoS listings.
24
A
RECOMMENDATIONS
25
Faculty Bio.
Publication Bio.
* ALSOAdd to your Bio:LinkedinFacebookGoogle+etc…
RESEARCHER PROFILE TOOLS
26
TYPICAL FEATURES
• Benefits:• Sharing of research• Publications• Non-published works• Conference proceedings• Presentation materials
• Connecting with colleagues• Meeting new colleagues with similar
research interests
27
• Cont.• Q&A• Job Postings• Internal metrics• Similar functions as in most social
media sites (i.e., like, follow, bookmark)
http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/openresearchexeter/2013/11/06/74/
ADVANTAGES
• To make your research and teaching activities known• To increase the chance of publications getting cited• To correct attribution, names and affiliations• To make sure that a[s] much as possible is counted in research
assessments• To increase the chance of new contacts for research
cooperation• To increase the chance of funding• To serve society better (Utrecht University Library, Researcher
Profiles)libguides.library.uu.nl/researchimpact/profiles 28
RECOMMENDATION
• Use multiple Sources• “Consider using ResearchGate in conjunction with other sites such as
Academia.edu, Mendeley, Google Scholar or figshare” (Open Research Exeter).
• You have to do something:• “In the past, authors were almost entirely dependent on their
publishers to make sure their work gets found, read and cited. But with almost 2 million new articles being published every year, it’s becoming ever more critical for authors to use their own networks and expertise to ensure their publications get noticed.” (cited in Beisel, 2014)
29
RESEARCH GATE
• Cautionary Notice• “Many of the publications that are available through ResearchGate are
actually uploaded illegally in terms of publisher open access policy. Putting a copy of your paper on ResearchGate will not mean that you are compliant with funder policy. On the contrary, you may be in breach of publisher policy” (Open Research Exeter).
http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/openresearchexeter/2013/11/06/74/
30
RESEARCH GATE EXAMPLE
31
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
ACADEMIA
32
A
B
CD
KUDOS
33
A
GOOGLE SCHOLAR CITATIONS
34
AB
ALTMETRIC
• Views and measures the attention an article gets:• Mainstream and social media• Public policy documents• Online reference managers• Wikipedia
35
ALTMETRIC EXAMPLE
36
B C
RESEARCH
37
OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK (OSF)
• Part of the Center for Open Science (COS) initiative• COS builds and designs free & open tools that makes research
more efficient, one of which is OSF:• https://github.com/centerforopenscience/
• OSF is: “a web platform for sharing, connecting, and streamlining scientific workflows” (Carp, 2014, para 4).
• OSF “supports the entire research lifecycle: planning, execution, reporting, archiving, and discovery” (DataONE).
38
OSF EXAMPLE
39
A
BC
D
OSF - WIKI
40
A
OSF – WIKI HISTORY
41
A
ADDITIONAL RESEARCHER TOOLS
42
101 INNOVATIONS
• 400+ Tools – Grew from the 101 Innovations• 101 Innovations at
https://figshare.com/articles/101_Innovations_in_Scholarly_Communication_the_Changing_Research_Workflow/1286826
• Categorized into 7 research phases: preparation, discovery, analysis, writing, publication, outreach, & assessment
• Additional spreadsheet consisting of 600+ tools & innovations in scholarly communication.
Source: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KUMSeq_Pzp4KveZ7pb5rddcssk1XBTiLHniD0d3nDqo/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=1519702055
43
400+ TOOLS
44
WEB OF SCIENCE
• Provides free access to:• ResearcherID• EndNote (basic)• Get a Badge • ResearcherID Labs (examples provided in ResearcherID slide)• ResearcherID Badge• Collaboration Network• Citing Articles Network
45
ENDNOTE
46
A
INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INDEX (ISI)
47
A
HARZING.COM
A program developed by Harzing that helps academics present research impact.
Source: http://www.harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish
• About Publish or Perish• Publish or Perish is a software program that retrieves and
analyzes academic citations. It uses Google Scholar and (since release 4.1) Microsoft Academic Search to obtain the raw citations, then analyzes these and presents the following metrics:• Total number of papers and total number of citations• Average citations per paper, citations per author, papers per author,
and citations per year• Hirsch's h-index and related parameters• Egghe's g-index• The contemporary h-index• Three variations of individual h-indices• The average annual increase in the individual h-index• The age-weighted citation rate• An analysis of the number of authors per paper.
48
PUBLISH OR PARISH - EXAMPLE
49
A
SHERPA/ROMEO
50
A
B
SHERPA/ROMEO EXAMPLE
51
SHERPA/ROMEO COLORS
52
COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
53
Source:http://uba.uva.nl/en/services/citing-and-publishing/copyright/copyright-information-site.html
WHAT’S NEXT?
• Dataset Repositories• DATACITE – https://www.datacite.org
• Individual/Tenure/Departmental Evaluations
54
DATACITE
• DATACITE’s Goals are to:• Establish easier access to data on the Internet• Increase acceptance of research data as legitimate, citable
contributions to the scholarly record• Support data archiving that will permit results to be verified and
re-purposed for future study (About DataCite, 2016)
55
CITING YOUR DATA
• DATACITE• Data citation helps by:• Enabling easy reuse and verification of data• Allowing the impact of data to be tracked• Creating a scholarly structure that recognizes and rewards data
producers (Cite your data)
• Publish your dataset AND assign a DOI so that you can reference your dataset in your article
56
ADDITIONAL DATASET DOI SOURCES
• Figshare – https://figshare.com• Zenodo – https://zenodo.org• Dryad – http://datadryad.org
• Various options are available for each. Identify which offering is best for your needs.
57
DIFFERENT OFFERINGS:
• Figshare (no fee):• Citable, shareable, & discoverable• Any format• Any research output• 20 GB private space• Synchs with ORCID
• Zenodo (no fee):• All types of research output• All uploads get DOI• Everything is citable & discoverable
• Dryad ($120, some waivers available): • DOI assigned• Data linked to publication• Flexible format• Option to make private during
peer review process
58
INDIVIDUAL/TENURE/DEPARTMENTAL… EVALUATION(S)
• You are coming up for your first tenure review and need to show the impact that you have made to your field of study by your research?• Other researchers (more senior faculty) show impact based on total grant
funds awarded• New faculty have # of publications
• How can you identify impact?• Individually• Comparatively (with others in the same department/college)• By University (within) / Across Universities
59
EVALUATION
• “The Scopus database should be used to analyse the publication activity of individual researchers as well as the department as a whole” (Shashnov, Kotsemir, 2015, p. 625).
• By department:• Publication activity• Collaboration• Journals• Citation indicators• Department rankings…
Shashnov & Kotsemir, 2015
60
EVALUATION –CONT-
• Department Evaluation based on individual researcher’s indicators (comparative metrics):
• Total # of publications• Total # of citations• Hirsh index• Average # of citations per publication• Share of self-citation and citation by
co-authors• Share of publications without citations
Shashnov & Kotsemir, 2015
61
REFERENCES
• About DataCite (April 19, 2016). Retrieved from https://www.datacite.org/about-datacite• Beisel, A. (June 25, 2014). Researcher tools review: Kudos. American Journal Experts. Retrieved
from https://www.aje.com/en/author-resources/articles/researcher-tools-review-kudos• Cacean, V., & Harzing, A-W (n.d.). How to increase the visibility and impact of your research.
Retrieved from www.harzing.com/download/impactguide.pdf• Carp, J. (June 18, 2014). A web platform for streamlining scientific workflows. Opensource.com.
Retrieved from https://opensource.com/life/14/6/center-open-science-framework• Cite your data (April 19, 2016). Retrieve from https://www.datacite.org/services/cite-your-data.html• DataONE. Open Science Framework. Retrieved from https://www.dataone.org/software-tools/open-
science-framework• Open Research Editor (November, 2013). Review of ResearchGate: Pros and cons and
recommendations. Retrieved from http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/openresearchexeter/2013/11/06/74/• Shashnov, S., & Kotsemir, M. (2015). Measureing the research capacity of a university: Use of Web
of Science and SCOPUS. Paper presented at SGEM 2015 International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and arts. Retrieved from http://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=131074121084086070094096000092109093109023030014084091014027000126031072108085005090035056097013011097115069068029020095020122027020011005061091107094121106009090093061020081064109080031113117021028122098113002026085004090090107079084002015089095091073&EXT=pdf
• Utrecht University Library (April 4, 2016). Research impact & visibility: Researcher profiles. Retrieved from libguides.library.uu.nl/researchimpact/profiles
62
APPENDIX: CITATION METRICS
63
http://www.harzing.com/pophelp/metrics.htm