Upload
smart-savvy-associates
View
178
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
raise your leader quotient LeaderLounge™
lead, think, align, communicate, influence, coach, strategize, deliver, ignite (passion)lead, think, align, communicate, influence, coach, strategize, deliver, ignite (passion)
• Publisher of Forbes magazine• Featured column, Innovation Rules, covering business and leadership issues• Accomplished entrepreneur as well as a journalist and speaker• Author of Life 2.0 and The Soft Edge: Where Great Companies Find Lasting Success.
Rich Karlgaard
• Veteran newspaper reporter and columnist, magazine editor, and entrepreneur
• Author /Coauthor of nearly twenty award-winning books
• The Intel Trinity, was named the Best Book of 2014 by 800CEOread.com.
Michael S. Malone
Discussion Topics
1. Ideal Team Size2. ‘Diversity’ vs. ‘Good Chemistry’ 3. The importance of “Pairs” 4. Brain Structure and teams5. Change & Maneouverabiliy6. Team Life Cycle Turn over vs. Tenure
Talk amongst yourselves...Describe the best team you ever worked within (or led).
How many people served on that team?What ingredients combined to make it a great team? What did you accomplish?
“The figure of 150 seems to represent the maximum number of individuals with whom we can have a genuinely social relationship, the kind of relationship that goes with knowing who they are and how you relate to each other.”
Impossible Connectivity
2 members =1 connection
3 members = 3 connections
4 members = 6 connections6 members = 15 connections
16 members = 120 connections
32 members = 496 connections
“Big teams usually wind up just wasting everybody’s time. That’s why having a huge senior leadership team—say, one that includes all the CEO’s direct reports—may be worse than having no team at all.” ~ J. Richard HackmanHarvard Psychologist
Problems with Increasing Team Size
Can impair performance Networking Problem Integration Costs Free riding Relational losses
“Great leaders create team genius by bringing together, and holding together, the most diverse and heterogeneous teams.”
What you can do?
Know your own preferences, weaknesses, strengths, and understand how they effect your team’s performance Help your team learn, acknowledge and value, their own preferences, and how they complement the team Keep project goals front and center, and schedule time for :
1) divergent thinking (generating multiple options) 2) convergent thinking (focusing on a single option and implementation)
Diversity works if …
The team 1. has a compelling direction: the team task is clear, challenging and consequential2. is bound (it is clear who is and who is not on the team) and stable (membership is not constantly fluctuating), and its members are interdependent 3. is set up with the right mix of members, who have norms of conduct that guide their behavior4. is diverse but not so different that they cannot work with each other5. have the right set of skills and expertise for the team task6. has a supportive organizational context that provides team members with access to resources to help accomplish their task7. receives coaching from experts, peers and leaders
The Chemicals
Endorphins – The runner’s high. Dopamine – Incentive for progress.
Serotonin – The Leadership Chemical. Oxytocin – Chemical Love.
SELFISH CHEMICALS SELFLESS CHEMICALS
Alex Pentland, the director of MIT’s Human Dynamics Laboratory, and his team use sociometers” to generate data on communication patterns and productivity of teams in real organizations.
Sociometrics: How Teams Best Communicate
communicate frequently —about 12 exchanges per hour.
talk and listen in equal measuretalk informally (outside formal meetings)
look for ideas and information outside the groupadjust their patterns of communication
Making Pairs Work
Identify the Need
Prepare the Pair
Determine the Goal Establish Metrics
Manage with the Right Intensity
Stay Observant Create Opportunities
Keep Records
Manage Transitions
“Here is the uncomfortable truth: Humans run to a much slower evolutionary clock than our inventions. To use an engineering term, we are the “gating factor” that keeps a process from running faster. It is people, not scale or technology, who determine how well an organization adapts to change.”
The exponential forces at work in today’s culture and economy reward winners quickly and punish losers mercilessly.
“And it almost never happens unless a small, cohesive team is found at the center or top of that organization and is endowed with two other crucial factors: the power to execute its decisions across the entire organization and the trust of its players in the periphery around that team.”
Post Mortem
UNHEALTHY, UNSUCCESSFUL TEAMS
UNHEALTHY, UNSUCCESSFUL TEAMS
UNHEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL TEAMS
UNHEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL TEAMS
HEALTHY, UNSUCCESSFUL TEAMS
HEALTHY, UNSUCCESSFUL TEAMS
HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL TEAMS
HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL TEAMS
Threats to Team
• Turnover• Framing• Belief• Tenure• Congruence• Integration
• Moderation• Dissent• Creativity• Divergence• Experience• Proximity Threats