19
knobbe.com Boris Zelkind & Tom Cowan October 18, 2016 Introduction to IP – Part 2: Some Basics of U.S. Patents

Introduction to IP - Part 2: Some Basics of U.S. Patents

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

knobbe.com

Boris Zelkind & Tom Cowan October 18, 2016

Introduction to IP – Part 2:

Some Basics of U.S. Patents

2 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

• Market Exclusivity – Key patents may enable you to be exclusive provider of new type of product or service, and to maintain competitive edge

• Company Value – Patents are an asset; enhance the value of a company; can charge premium for patented items

• Revenue – Patents may be licensed to others to derive revenue and/or obtain access to technology of others

• Legal Protection – Strong patent portfolio deters other patent holders from suing you

• Attracts Investors – Provides incentive for venture capitalists to invest in or buy a company

Why get Patents?

3 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Basic Legal Requirements for U.S. Patents

• Must be:

– (1) useful,

– (2) novel, and

– (3) non-obvious

• Quid pro quo

– Obtain “legal monopoly”

– Must disclose how to practice the invention

4 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

What rights does a U.S. patent grant?

• Gives the patent owner the right to exclude others from practicing the patent (20 years)

• Does NOT provide the right to practice invention

Rights you may think a patent provides (right to do whatever you want inside fence)

Rights a patent actually provides

(right to exclude others from trespassing)

5 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Types of U.S. Patents

• Utility – most common type

• Design – look and feel

• Plant

Utility Patent

No. 4,656,917 Design Patent

No. D593,087

Plant Patent

No. 1

6 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

U.S. Utility Patent Document

What is claimed is: 1. A Phone with Lifetime

Charge, comprising:

a three-ended spring;

a vibratory encryption

chip; and

a xenon polyethelene

coating.

Drawings “Claims”

“Specification”

Written

Description

7 Confidential and Proprietary Information – Do Not Distribute

What to Patent?

MEDM.000GEN

• Patents protect aspects of inventions

• Some factors to consider:

Invention Idea No. 123

Sample Factors

Competitor Activity /

Blocking Ability

Revenue Driver Potential

Patentability

Difficult to Prove

Infringement

Technology Complexity

Obtain feedback from marketing

Obtain feedback from IP attorneys

Obtain feedback from tech. dev.

8 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Spectrum of Eligible Subject Matter

Improve Function

of the Computer

Itself

Fundamental

Economic Practices;

also: diagnostic tests,

DNA

Effect an

improvement in any

other technology

Effect an

improvement in a

non-technical field

• Eligibility = threshold requirement for a patent

• Eligible for a patent: processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter

• Not eligible: abstract ideas, laws of nature, natural phenomena

• Recent scrutiny of eligibility: Biotech, Software & Business Methods

LESS

ELIGIBLE

MORE

ELIGIBLE

9 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Inventorship

• Why does inventorship matter?

– Necessary to enforce the patent

– Equal and undivided interest in patent among joint inventors

• Who is an inventor?

– Conception = touchstone of inventorship

• Conceive of “definite and permanent idea”

• Inventive contribution to at least one “Claim”

• Joint inventorship

– Laboratory hands v. joint inventor

– Improvements, etc. may lead to joint inventorship

– Collaboration, outsourcing, partners, etc.

10 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Ownership

• Why does ownership matter?

– Determines who can enforce & license the patent

• Who is an owner?

– Inventors by default are the owners

– Ownership changes with written “assignments”

• Joint Ownership

– Usually not desirable

• ALL joint owners must agree to enforce (sue for infringement)

• ANY joint owner can unilaterally license and collect royalty

– Agreements affecting ownership

• Employment, Consulting, Development, Manufacturing, Collaboration, Visitor’s Confidentiality Agreements; Government Interests

11 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Filing Procedures – U.S. Provisional

• Provisional Applications

– Establishes priority date for disclosed material

– One-year pendency, no examination

– Can file numerous provisionals, convert all into one “non-provisional application” one year from earliest provisional

– Patent Office fees: $280 / $70 (small entity)

12 Confidential and Proprietary Information – Do Not Distribute

Use of Provisional Applications

Provisional Application

Non-Provisional Application

Within 12 Months

Typical Filing Multiple Non-Provisionals

Non-Provisional Application

Provisional Application

Non-Provisional Application

Non-Provisional Application

Within 12 Months

MEDM.000GEN

13 Confidential and Proprietary Information – Do Not Distribute

Advanced Use of Provisional Applications

Non-Provisional Application

1st Provisional Application 2nd

Provisional Application 3rd

Provisional Application 12

months

• In view of “first to file” rule, can file multiple provisional applications

within the 12 month anniversary period

• Roll-up provisional applications into one large non-provisional / PCT

application

MEDM.000GEN

14 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Filing Procedures – U.S. Non-Provisional

• U.S. Non-Provisional Application

– Can claim priority to:

• One or more provisional applications

• Other pending non-provisional application(s)

– Examined: ~18-24 months

• Priority Exam: ~6-12 months

– Issues as a patent: ~ 2-5 years

– Official fees: $1600 / $730 small entities

15 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Examination Process – Results Vary

Possible Results

• All Claims Immediately Allowed – VERY unusual

• More typical: one or more rounds of “negotiation”

– Office Action from Patent Office

– Response from Applicant (possibly w/ claim amendments)

• Might pursue some claims in continuing application(s)

Patent

Application

Issued Patent

Examination Process

“Patent Pending”

(3 mos. – 3 years)

16 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Issued Patent #2

Issued Patent #3

Continuation Applications

Original Non-

Provisional Application

(“Parent”)

Issued Patent #1

Continuation Application

#1

Continuation Application

#2

“claim scope”

Larger/different “claim scope”

• Continuations

– Filed before parent issues

– Same drawings and written description as parent

– Different claims from parent

17 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Filing Procedures – International PCT

• Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application

– “International” application

• Can claim priority to application w/in previous 12 months

• Provides priority in 149 member countries

• No such thing as “International Patent”

– Preliminary exam report provided to national phase countries

– Enter “National Phase” within 30 months of priority

– U.S. Patent Office fees: $3581 / $2421 small entity

• Can select non-U.S. patent offices for PCT application

18 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.

Timeline for Filing

12 Months 18 Months

Utility / PCT National Phase

(U.S., Europe,

Japan, Korea,

China, etc.)

3rd Provisional

(optional)

1st Provisional

2nd Provisional

(optional)

• Typical Filing Strategy

knobbe.com

Orange County San Diego San Francisco Silicon Valley Los Angeles Seattle Washington DC

Boris Zelkind

Tom Cowan

[email protected]

[email protected]

858-707-4000

Q & A Introduction to IP – Part 2