View
87
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
knobbe.com
Boris Zelkind & Tom Cowan October 18, 2016
Introduction to IP – Part 2:
Some Basics of U.S. Patents
2 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
• Market Exclusivity – Key patents may enable you to be exclusive provider of new type of product or service, and to maintain competitive edge
• Company Value – Patents are an asset; enhance the value of a company; can charge premium for patented items
• Revenue – Patents may be licensed to others to derive revenue and/or obtain access to technology of others
• Legal Protection – Strong patent portfolio deters other patent holders from suing you
• Attracts Investors – Provides incentive for venture capitalists to invest in or buy a company
Why get Patents?
3 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Basic Legal Requirements for U.S. Patents
• Must be:
– (1) useful,
– (2) novel, and
– (3) non-obvious
• Quid pro quo
– Obtain “legal monopoly”
– Must disclose how to practice the invention
4 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
What rights does a U.S. patent grant?
• Gives the patent owner the right to exclude others from practicing the patent (20 years)
• Does NOT provide the right to practice invention
Rights you may think a patent provides (right to do whatever you want inside fence)
Rights a patent actually provides
(right to exclude others from trespassing)
5 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Types of U.S. Patents
• Utility – most common type
• Design – look and feel
• Plant
Utility Patent
No. 4,656,917 Design Patent
No. D593,087
Plant Patent
No. 1
6 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
U.S. Utility Patent Document
What is claimed is: 1. A Phone with Lifetime
Charge, comprising:
a three-ended spring;
a vibratory encryption
chip; and
a xenon polyethelene
coating.
Drawings “Claims”
“Specification”
Written
Description
7 Confidential and Proprietary Information – Do Not Distribute
What to Patent?
MEDM.000GEN
• Patents protect aspects of inventions
• Some factors to consider:
Invention Idea No. 123
Sample Factors
Competitor Activity /
Blocking Ability
Revenue Driver Potential
Patentability
Difficult to Prove
Infringement
Technology Complexity
Obtain feedback from marketing
Obtain feedback from IP attorneys
Obtain feedback from tech. dev.
8 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Spectrum of Eligible Subject Matter
Improve Function
of the Computer
Itself
Fundamental
Economic Practices;
also: diagnostic tests,
DNA
Effect an
improvement in any
other technology
Effect an
improvement in a
non-technical field
• Eligibility = threshold requirement for a patent
• Eligible for a patent: processes, machines, manufactures, or compositions of matter
• Not eligible: abstract ideas, laws of nature, natural phenomena
• Recent scrutiny of eligibility: Biotech, Software & Business Methods
LESS
ELIGIBLE
MORE
ELIGIBLE
9 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Inventorship
• Why does inventorship matter?
– Necessary to enforce the patent
– Equal and undivided interest in patent among joint inventors
• Who is an inventor?
– Conception = touchstone of inventorship
• Conceive of “definite and permanent idea”
• Inventive contribution to at least one “Claim”
• Joint inventorship
– Laboratory hands v. joint inventor
– Improvements, etc. may lead to joint inventorship
– Collaboration, outsourcing, partners, etc.
10 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Ownership
• Why does ownership matter?
– Determines who can enforce & license the patent
• Who is an owner?
– Inventors by default are the owners
– Ownership changes with written “assignments”
• Joint Ownership
– Usually not desirable
• ALL joint owners must agree to enforce (sue for infringement)
• ANY joint owner can unilaterally license and collect royalty
– Agreements affecting ownership
• Employment, Consulting, Development, Manufacturing, Collaboration, Visitor’s Confidentiality Agreements; Government Interests
11 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Filing Procedures – U.S. Provisional
• Provisional Applications
– Establishes priority date for disclosed material
– One-year pendency, no examination
– Can file numerous provisionals, convert all into one “non-provisional application” one year from earliest provisional
– Patent Office fees: $280 / $70 (small entity)
12 Confidential and Proprietary Information – Do Not Distribute
Use of Provisional Applications
Provisional Application
Non-Provisional Application
Within 12 Months
Typical Filing Multiple Non-Provisionals
Non-Provisional Application
Provisional Application
Non-Provisional Application
Non-Provisional Application
Within 12 Months
MEDM.000GEN
13 Confidential and Proprietary Information – Do Not Distribute
Advanced Use of Provisional Applications
Non-Provisional Application
1st Provisional Application 2nd
Provisional Application 3rd
Provisional Application 12
months
• In view of “first to file” rule, can file multiple provisional applications
within the 12 month anniversary period
• Roll-up provisional applications into one large non-provisional / PCT
application
…
MEDM.000GEN
14 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Filing Procedures – U.S. Non-Provisional
• U.S. Non-Provisional Application
– Can claim priority to:
• One or more provisional applications
• Other pending non-provisional application(s)
– Examined: ~18-24 months
• Priority Exam: ~6-12 months
– Issues as a patent: ~ 2-5 years
– Official fees: $1600 / $730 small entities
15 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Examination Process – Results Vary
Possible Results
• All Claims Immediately Allowed – VERY unusual
• More typical: one or more rounds of “negotiation”
– Office Action from Patent Office
– Response from Applicant (possibly w/ claim amendments)
• Might pursue some claims in continuing application(s)
Patent
Application
Issued Patent
Examination Process
“Patent Pending”
(3 mos. – 3 years)
16 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Issued Patent #2
Issued Patent #3
Continuation Applications
Original Non-
Provisional Application
(“Parent”)
Issued Patent #1
Continuation Application
#1
Continuation Application
#2
“claim scope”
Larger/different “claim scope”
• Continuations
– Filed before parent issues
– Same drawings and written description as parent
– Different claims from parent
17 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Filing Procedures – International PCT
• Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application
– “International” application
• Can claim priority to application w/in previous 12 months
• Provides priority in 149 member countries
• No such thing as “International Patent”
– Preliminary exam report provided to national phase countries
– Enter “National Phase” within 30 months of priority
– U.S. Patent Office fees: $3581 / $2421 small entity
• Can select non-U.S. patent offices for PCT application
18 © 2016 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved.
Timeline for Filing
12 Months 18 Months
Utility / PCT National Phase
(U.S., Europe,
Japan, Korea,
China, etc.)
3rd Provisional
(optional)
1st Provisional
2nd Provisional
(optional)
• Typical Filing Strategy
knobbe.com
Orange County San Diego San Francisco Silicon Valley Los Angeles Seattle Washington DC
Boris Zelkind
Tom Cowan
858-707-4000
Q & A Introduction to IP – Part 2