19
Commercial law update In house lawyers forum – autumn 2013

Commercial law update - In house lawyers forum autumn 2013, Richard Nicholas

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Commercial law update In house lawyers forum – autumn 2013

1. when will ‘good faith’ be implied

(updated)?

2. what amounts to a ‘material’ or

‘repudiatory’ breach (updated)?

3. what does ‘nemo dat quod non habet’

now mean for users of software or IP?

In house lawyer ‘checker’ product

• free second opinion/expert view/check

a point

• approx. 20 minutes on the telephone

• equivalent to seeing a specialist at their

desk

• exclusively for in house lawyers

Terms and conditions apply

3 cases

• Compass Group v Mid Essex (2013) CA

• TSG Building Services v South Anglia

(2013) CFI

• Yam Seng v International Trade Corp

(2013) CFI

• remember Compass Group v Mid Essex

(CFI)? (Ketchup and Chocolate Mousse)

1. no implied duty of good faith

2. if ‘good faith’ is a contract term (as here

– then must act accordingly so

termination, without discussion could be

a breach)

• Compass Group v Mid Essex (2013) Court

of appeal

– ‘co-operate in good faith’ is binding

– but only to matters of discretion (not

absolute contractual remedies)

• TSG Building Services v South Anglia

(2013) EWHC

• “work together in trust, fairness and

mutual partnership…”

• could well be pervasive but would not

affect right to terminate for convenience

• Yam Seng v International Trade Corp

(2013) CFI

• ‘good faith’

• can be implied where necessary to make

sense of a distribution agreement (false

information about products, undercutting

distributor’s prices)

• no implied duty of ‘good faith’

• an obligation of ‘good faith’ can be

implied to make sense of the contract

• if implied it can be pervasive (i.e.

attach to any matter of discretion in the

contract)

• but it won’t override a clear contractual

right (e.g. to terminate)

… repudiatory / material breach

• SSSL v Scottish Building Society (2013)

CFI (Scotland)

• ‘material breach’ - lack of consent

… repudiatory / material breach

• introduction of customers to new

savings scheme

• obligation to use reasonable endeavours

to comply with DPA

• lack of consent from customers to use of

personal data (because SBS couldn’t

legitimately use that data)

… repudiatory / material breach

• Telford Homes v Ampurius [2013] EWCA

Civ 577

• repudiatory breach – time for

determining if breach is repudiatory is

when innocent party seeks to terminate

• actual breach (as well as anticipatory

breach) may be cured, losing right to

terminate (can still sue for damages)

• VLM Holdings v Ravensworth Digital

Services Ltd 2013 (CFI)

A Head Licensor (VLMH)

I

B Licensor (VLMUK)

I

C Licensee (S)

• (*you can’t give what you haven’t got)

• why?

– licensor and head licensor – same

directors

– head licensor ‘consented’ to grant of

licence

– licensee didn’t know it was a sub-licence

– head licensor was therefore undisclosed

principal, licensor was agent (licence

was actually between head licensor and

licensee)

• be clear

– who owns the IP – (is this a licence or sub

licence?)

– that licensee is not your agent (make

explicit)

– whether sub-licences can be granted

– what terms sub-licences should have

(survive or not) – include example

licence?

• check who owns the IP

– if you need greater comfort – ensure that

the head licensee has consented to the

sub-licence

– insert an express provision for the sub-

licence to continue (and ideally ensure

the head licensor has agreed this)

• be careful with ‘good faith’ and other

‘fluff’ (it can also be used against you)

• if you must agree to it – try to limit its

scope within the agreement

• good faith can be implied by the court

where necessary

• but if you’re up against a clear

contractual right, ‘good faith’ won’t

help you

• a failure to get consent (for data

protection purposes) may be a material

breach

• if you want to terminate as a result of

the breach of the person you’re

contracting with – do it quickly (or at

least reserve your rights)

• exclude agency in licence agreements

(unless you’re the licensee) & limit

sublicensee rights

If you’re looking for quick, free legal

advice on the phone, you know what to

do…

Get in touch for details of our in house

lawyer ‘checker’ service.

t +(0)121 237 3992

e [email protected]