Companies Auditor’s Report Order

(CARO) 2016

CA. V Kalyan Chakravarthy

B.Com, FCA, DISA, CISA, DIRM

V R Jogeswara Rao & Co.

Chartered Accountants

An introduction for students

Kondharu raaste, Stock audit report lo kanabadutundi

Kondharu raaste, Tax

audit report lo kanabadutundi

Nenu raaste, CARO report lo kanabadutundi

!!!!

Co. Auditor

Introduction:

• Notified on 29th March 2016. • Applicable for all the financial year commencing

on or after from 1st April 2015. • Consists of 16 clauses. • Seven new clauses added to CARO 2015 • Three clauses removed • Modifications made in some.

Notified on…29/03/2016

S.O. 1228(E).-In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-

section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18

of 2013 ) and in supersession of the Companies (Auditor’s

Report) Order, 2015 published in the Gazette of India,

Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii), vide

number S.O. 990 (E), dated the 10th April, 2015, except as

respects things done or omitted to be done before such

supersession, the Central Government, after consultation

with the, committee constituted under proviso to sub-

section (11) of section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013

hereby makes the following Order, namely:-

Applicable from

• Auditors Report for the Financial Statements made

as on 31 March, 2016 will include CARO, 2016 Report

(If Applicable to the Company).

Applicable to

• To every company including a foreign company as defined U/s 2(42) of Act, 2013

Non Applicability

• (i) a banking company as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking

Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);

• (ii) an insurance company as defined under the Insurance Act,1938 (4 of

1938);

• (iii) a company licensed to operate under section 8 of the Companies Act;

• (iv) a One Person Company as defined under clause (62) of section 2 of the

Companies Act and a small company as defined under clause (85) of section 2

of the Companies Act; and

• (v) a private limited company, not being a subsidiary or holding company of

a public company, having a paid up capital and reserves and surplus not

more than rupees one crore as on the balance sheet date and which does not

have total borrowings exceeding rupees one crore from any bank or financial

institution at any point of time during the financial year and which does not

have a total revenue as disclosed in Scheduled III to the Companies Act, 2013

(including revenue from discontinuing operations) exceeding rupees ten crore

during the financial year as per the financial statements. (Cumulative condition)

What has changed?

• Under the CARO, 2015, Private Limited Companies having Paid up share capital of Rs. 50 Lakh were not required to follow CARO the limit has now increased to Rs. 1 Crore

• The other criteria for exemption under CARO, 2015 was company does not have loan outstanding exceeding Rupees 25 Lakhs from any Bank or Financial Institution, The same has now increased to Rs. 1 Crore

• The Limit of Turnover was Rs. 5 crore under CARO, 2015. Same has now increased to Rs. 10 Crore.

Clause (i)-Fixed Assets & Immovable Properties

• Whether the company is maintaining proper records showing full particulars, including quantitative details and situation of fixed assets;

• Whether these fixed assets have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals; whether any material discrepancies were noticed on such verification and if so, whether the same have been properly dealt with in the books of account;

• Whether the title deeds of immovable properties are held in the name of the company. If not, provide the details thereof.

An Additional Requirement of Reporting by the Auditor that the Title Deeds of the Immovable Properties is held in the name of the company or not is also needed to be provided.

What has changed?

Clause (ii)-Inventory

• Whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the Management and whether any material discrepancies were noticed and if so, whether they have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

The Requirement of checking the reasonability and adequacy in relation to the process followed for physical verification in relation to the size of the company and nature of the business has been removed.

Clause (iii)-Loans given

• Whether the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. If so,

(a) Whether the terms and conditions of the grant of such loans are not prejudicial to the company’s interest;

(b) whether the schedule of repayment of principal and payment of interest has been stipulated and whether the repayments or receipts are regular

(c) If the amount is overdue, state the total amount overdue for more than ninety days, and whether reasonable steps have been taken by the company for recovery of the principal and interest.

(Sec 189: Register of contracts or arrangements in which directors are interested)

What has changed?

• The Clause has been expanded and it now includes the auditor to report on the Loans given by the Company to companies, firms, Limited Liability partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013.

• The auditor will now also report that whether the terms and conditions of the grant of such loans are not against the interest of the company.

• The limit for overdue amount of Rs. 1 lakhs has been done away with. The auditor will now report in case of any amount is overdue for more than 90 DAYS and whether the company has taken reasonable steps to recover the principal and interest.

Clause (iv)-Compliance with Sec 185 and 186 of the Companies Act,2013

• In respect of loans, investments, guarantees and security whether provisions of Section 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with. If not, provide details thereof.

What has changed?

The Auditor’s Report has now been extended to cover Loan given by the company to its Directors and Investment by the Company. This is to bring more transparency and also is a significant step towards implementation of these two vital provisions of the Companies Act, 2013.

Sec 185 and Sec 186 of the Companies Act, 2013

• Section 185 states that “no company shall directly or indirectly

give loan to any of its director or any other person in whom the

director is interested” or provide “any guarantee or security in

connection with the loan taken by him or such other person”.

Any other person in whom the director is interested” includes:

Director and his/her relatives

• Any director of lending company

• Any relative of director

• Director of a holding company

• Any firm in which director is a partner or relative of a partner

• Any partner of such director

Director and other than relatives

• Private company in which such director is a director or member

• Body corporate in which such director (s) hold > 25% shares

• Body corporate, MD, BOD or manager accustomed to act in accordance with directions of BOD or Director of lending company.

Exceptions to Sec 185:

• Giving loans to Managing director/ Whole time director,

pursuant to the conditions of services extended to all its

employees or any scheme approved by members through

Special resolution.

• Loan given by the company in its Ordinary course of its

business, but the interest on such loans should not be

less than the rate prescribed by RBI.

• Loan made or guarantee given or security provided by the

holding company to its Wholly Owned Subsidiary.

• Guarantee given or Security provided by the holding

company to its Subsidiary.

Sec 186 (1):

• Sec-186(1) states that “ Without prejudice to provisions

contained this Act, a Company shall not make investment

through not more than two layers of investment”

Exceptions to sec-186(1)

• Can acquire any company incorporated outside India

having investment subsidiaries beyond two layers as per

laws of such country

• Can invest for the purpose of meeting the requirements

under any rule or regulation, time being in force

“Investment u/s 186(1)”

Deemed as

investment

• Subscription/ Purchase of shares

• Subscription/ Purchase of share warrants

• Subscription/ Purchase of debenture bonds

Not deemed as investment

• Making of Loans

• Making of advances

• Financial transactions like Leases or purchase of receivables

Investment made through layers?

• If A invests in B & B invests in C, and C in D then A has invested in D through B & C. So, B & C are merely acted as LAYERS

Company-A

Company-B

Company-C

Company-D

A

D

C B

• If A invests in B & C

and B & C invests in

D, then there will be

ONLY ONE LAYER

Sec-186(2) states that “NO company shall give directly or indirectly-”

• Loans to any person or other body corporates

• Guarantee or security provided in connection with a loan

to other body corporate or person

• Acquire by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise,

the securities of any other body corporate.

• THRESHOLD LIMIT:

• Higher of

• A) 60 % of (Share capital + Free reserves + security premium)

• B) 100 % of ( Free reserves + security premium)

Exceptions to section-186(2)

• The loan or guarantee given or security provided or

acquisition made can exceed the threshold limit as

per section-186(2), if;

• Prior approval by means of Special resolution passed at a

general meeting AND

• The company shall disclose full particulars of loans given,

investment made or security provided, to the members in

the financial statements & the purpose thereof.

Clause (v)-Deposits

• In case the company has accepted deposits, whether the directives issued by the Reserve Bank of India and the provisions of sections 73 to 76 or any other relevant provisions of the companies Act, 2013 and the rules framed there under, where applicable, have been complied with?

• If not, the nature of such contraventions be stated;

• If an order has been passed by Company Law Board or National Company Law Tribunal or Reserve Bank of India or any court or any other tribunal, whether the same has been complied with or not?

No change in the provision

Clause (vi)-Maintenance of cost records

• Whether maintenance of cost records has been specified by the Central Government under subsection(1) of section 148 of the Companies Act, 2013 and whether such accounts and records have been so made and maintained.

• No change in the provision.

Clause (vii)-Payment of statutory Dues

• (a) whether the company is regular in depositing undisputed statutory dues including

• provident fund,

• employees’ state insurance,

• income tax,

• sales tax,

• service tax,

• duty of customs,

• duty of excise,

• value added tax,

• cess

• and any other statutory dues with the appropriate authorities and

if not, the extent of the arrears of outstanding statutory dues as at the last day of the financial year concerned for a period of more than six months from the date they became payable, shall be indicated by the auditor.

Cont…

• (b) Where dues of income tax or sales tax or service tax or duty of customs or duty of excise or value added tax have not been deposited on account of any dispute, then the amounts involved and the forum where dispute is pending shall be mentioned.

What has changed?

The requirement of Reporting by Auditor regarding transfer to Investor Education & Protection Fund in accordance with the Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 has now been removed and comes as a relief to the corporates. The Term Wealth Tax has also been OMITED since the same has now been ABOLISHED.

Clause (viii) - Default in repayment of dues

• Whether the company has defaulted in repayment of loans or borrowings to a financial institution, bank, government or dues to debenture holders?

• If yes, the period and amount of default to be reported. (in case of defaults to banks, financial institutions, and government, lender wise details to be provided).

This Provisions comes tough for companies Defaulting Repayment of Loans (And not any other dues) to Banks, Financial Institutions, Govt. or to Debenture Holders. The additional requirement under CARO, 2016 is that the Auditor will now give the lender wise details in case the default is in payment to a financial institution and banks.

Clause (ix)-Corporate Guarantee given for other’s loan

• Whether moneys raised by way of public issue/follow on offer (including debt instruments) and term loans were applied for the purposes for which those are raised.

• If not, the details together with delays / default and subsequent rectification, if any, as may be applicable, be reported.

What has changed?

Earlier under CARO, 2015 only money raised by TERM LOANS were taken into consideration but the same has now been revised to include money raised by Public issue & Debt Instruments. The delay for non-application of the term loan and money raised by other means will also be reported by the Auditors.

Clause (x)- Reporting on Fraud

• Whether any fraud by the company or any fraud on the Company by its officers/ employees has been noticed or reported during the year; If yes, the nature and the amount involved be indicated.

CARO, 2016 now includes Fraud by the Officers or employees of the company. Earlier the provision was not specific

Clause (xi)-Managerial Remuneration • Whether managerial remuneration has been paid /

provided in accordance with the requisite approvals mandated by the provisions of section 197 read with schedule V to the Companies Act? If not, state the amount involved and steps taken by the company for securing refund of the same.

What has changed?

The clause is newly inserted and deals with reporting of auditor regarding Managerial remuneration paid by Company under section 197 of the act.

Clause (xii)-Requirements by a Nidhi Cos.

• Whether the Nidhi Company has complied with the Net Owned Fund in the ratio of 1:20 to meet out the liability and whether the Nidhi Company is maintaining 10% unencumbered term deposits as specified in the Nidhi Rules, 2014 to meet out the liability.

What has changed?

A similar provision was there under the CARO, 2003. It deals compliance with the special statute for chit funds and mutual funds and has been reinforced.

Clause (xiii)-Related party transactions

• Whether all transactions with the related parties are in compliance with Section 188 and 177 of Companies Act, 2013 where applicable and the details have been disclosed in the Financial Statements etc as required by the accounting standards

What has changed?

Newly inserted to keep a check by auditor on Related Party Transactions

Clause (xiv)- Private Placement / Preferential Allotment

• Whether the company has made any preferential allotment / private placement of shares or fully or partly convertible debentures during the year under review and

• if so, as to whether the requirement of Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 have been complied and the amount raised have been used for the purposes for which the funds were raised. If not, provide details thereof.

What has changed? Similar provision was present in CARO, 2003 which was regarding report by Auditor compliance of the provisions in relation to preferential allotment , The same has now been reinserted in CARO, 2016 with an additional report by auditor on Compliances with regards to Provisions of Section 42 i.e Private Placement.

Clause (xv)-Non cash transactions

• Whether the company has entered into any non-cash transactions with directors or persons connected with him and if so, whether provisions of Section 192 of Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with.

(Newly inserted)

Non-cash transaction here refers to acquiring of assets of co. by directors etc for consideration other than cash & vice versa The provision also requires approvals by way of resolution of GM & stipulates consequences such as voidability of arrangement subject to conditions of indemnity & bona-fide

Clause (xvi)-Registration with RBI

• Whether the company is required to be registered under section 45IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 and if so, whether the registration has been obtained.

“Financial activity as principal business is when

• a company’s financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the total assets and

• income from financial assets constitute more than 50 per cent of the gross income.

A company which fulfills both these criteria will be registered as NBFC by RBI.”

(Newly inserted)

Reasons to be stated for un-favourable or qualified opinions

• Where, in the auditor's report, the answer to any of the questions referred to in paragraph 3 is unfavorable or qualified, the auditor's report shall also state the reasons for such unfavorable or qualified answer, as the case may be

• Where the auditor is unable to express any opinion on any specified matter, his report shall indicate such fact together with the reasons as to why it is not possible for him to give his opinion on the same.

Our corporate world is full of non-compliances…

So what are you waiting for?

Go save the world ! Be a Co. Auditor…

& don’t forget your team…