76
Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected] Why SEO That Used to Work Fails How shifts in the search landscape, marketing channels, & user behavior mean what used to work in SEO, doesn’t anymore.

Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected]

Why SEO That Used to Work FailsHow shifts in the search landscape, marketing channels, & user

behavior mean what used to work in SEO, doesn’t anymore.

Page 2: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

bit.ly/whyseofails

Get the presentation:

Page 3: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#1Tactical SEO fails. Strategic

SEO works.

Page 4: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

SEO as a Tactic:

Example: Rand’s new site offering dating advice to Jewish guys

I went on dates with four

different people from

1995-2001 (then I met

Geraldine).

I must be qualified!

Page 5: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

I want to rank for

these keywords.

SEO as a Tactic:

Controlling

your nebbishy

nature

How to say no

to Mom’s

setup

attempts

What is this

‘sports’ thing?

How schlubby

is too

schlubby?

Keywords for Menschify.com

Page 6: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

I want to grow our search

traffic by 33% this year.

SEO as a Tactic:

Page 7: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Why Doesn’t This Work? What

Changed?

Page 8: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

The Ranking Algo Used to Feel Like This:

Keyword

Matching

Domain

Authority

Link

SignalsQDF Ranking+ + + =

Great. Just do that stuff on the

pages I told you to rank.

Page 9: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Now It Feels More Like This:

Keyword

Matching

Domain

Authority

Link

Signals

QDF

(& QDD)

Ranking

+ + + +

Uhhh…OK. So just do all that now, right?

Intent

Matching

Topical

Authority

Usage

Signals

User

Experience+ + + =

HTTPS,

Mobile,

+

Page 10: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

We Used to Run Marketing

Channels as Distinct, Separate Silos

Organic

Search

Social

Media

Paid

SearchEmail

Brand

Marketing

Offline &

WoM

Onpage ChannelsQuality

Score

List Size &

QualitySentiment Virality

Offpage Following SpendOpen &

Click RateReach Distri-bution

Page 11: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Each Channel Contributed

Individually to the Whole

3XOrganic

Search

Social

Media

Paid

Search+ + =

Page 12: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Then, Some Marketers Realized the Benefits of

Channel Integration

6X=

Organic

Search

Social

Media

Paid

Search

Page 13: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

This Integration Benefits from Two Trends

Search Social Offline Email Content WoM

#1: More web users consuming more of these in tandem:

#2: Many of these channels

directly & indirectly influencing

each other:

Page 14: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

So What Does Strategic

SEO Look Like?

Page 15: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

SEO As a Strategy:

Audience

Amplification

Funnel

We need to answer questions

about each of these to form a

coherent SEO strategy

Page 16: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Who is my target customer? And who will

eventually become a target customer?

Who/what influences my target customers?

Audience

What channels can I use to reach these

three audiences?

Page 17: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Funnel

Which parts of our marketing

funnel are right for SEO?

What problems, questions, or topics

do people have that align w/ our

goals?

Page 18: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

How will we earn the visibility signals

necessary to compete?

Amplification

Why will those who see our work amplify us

rather than our competition?

Page 19: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

SEO As a Strategy:

Audience

Amplification

Funnel

Once you nail these, the

tactical to-do list is much

easier to create (and much

more effective)

Page 20: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#2Building a well-SEO’d site may be

less valuable than building a

powerful brand.

Page 21: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

2011:

I think that’s the only

one I’ve heard of…

Page 22: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

2015:

Hmm… Pretty sure that’s 5 of

the 7 largest, best-known auto

insurers in the US?

Page 23: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

2011:

I know Sunset, but none

of these others.

Page 24: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

2015:

This is the only brand on

page one I don’t know.

Page 25: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Why? What Changed?

Page 26: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#1: Brands Got Serious About Investing in SEO

In years past, big brands

didn’t have in-house SEO

teams. Today, it’s a

standard.

Page 27: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#2: Brands Benefitted from Shifts in Google’s Algo

More Links = Higher

Rankings

Better Links =

Higher Rankings

Brand familiarity & UX

barely influence SEO

Usage signals mean brand & UX

are powerful influencers

Naïve KW matching

rewards KW-centric SEO

Topic & intent-matching reward

more holistic content

2015:2011:

Page 28: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

These brand info drop-

downs suggest to me

Google’s deeply

interested in

highlighting brands in

their SERPs.

Page 29: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

In many results, there’s

an eerie correlation

between high rankings

and sites that have the

brand drop-down.

Page 30: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Building a well-known brand may

soon be a prerequisite for ranking in

Google.

Page 31: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#3Choosing the right keywords is

much more complex than in the

past.

Page 32: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Old Keyword Prioritization Methodology

Term/Phrase Est. Volume Biz Value

What’s a Mensch

What to wear on a

first date

Sarmassophobia

Kosher date ideas

100/month

1,000/month

20/month

30/month

Low

Medium

Medium

High

Pri

2

1

5

3

Fear of dating 50/month Medium 4

Page 33: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Why doesn’t this work anymore?

What changed?

Page 34: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Even ranking #1 probably won’t

get the site many visits.

Page 35: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

This SERP has a bias to

fresh content and an

image block that

probably gets a lot of the

traffic

Page 36: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

It probably makes no sense to

target these queries separately

Page 37: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Opportunity seems higher and

competition lower than the

others keywords…

Page 38: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

What Should Keyword Evaluation

Look Like in 2015?

Page 39: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

New Keyword Prioritization Methodology

KW Volume Value

What’s a Mensch

What to wear on a

first date

Sarmassophobia

Kosher date ideas

100/mth

1,000/mth

20/mth

30/mth

Medium

Low

High

High

Pri

4

3

1

2

Fear of dating 50/mth High 1

Oppty FeaturesDiff

54%

47%

17%

50%

41%

Low

Medium

High

High

High

KG

Images

None

Forum Sitelinks

None

Page 40: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

54%

47%

17%

50%

41%

New Keyword Prioritization Methodology

KW Volume Value

What’s a Mensch

What to wear on a

first date

Sarmassophobia

Kosher date ideas

100/mth

1,000/mth

20/mth

30/mth

Medium

Low

High

High

Pri

Fear of dating 50/mth High

Oppty FeaturesDiff

Low

Medium

High

High

High

KG

Images

None

Forum Sitelinks

None

These two should be targeted by

a single piece of content

4

3

1

2

1

Page 41: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

4

3

1

2

1

54%

47%

17%

50%

41%

New Keyword Prioritization Methodology

KW Volume Value

What’s a Mensch

What to wear on a

first date

Sarmassophobia

Kosher date ideas

100/mth

1,000/mth

20/mth

30/mth

Medium

Low

High

High

Pri

Fear of dating 50/mth High

Oppty FeaturesDiff

Low

Medium

High

High

High

KG

Images

None

Forum Sitelinks

None

This may not even be a target at all given

the low opportunity for traffic

Page 42: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

4

3

1

2

1

54%

47%

17%

50%

41%

New Keyword Prioritization Methodology

KW Volume Value

What’s a Mensch

What to wear on a

first date

Sarmassophobia

Kosher date ideas

100/mth

1,000/mth

20/mth

30/mth

Medium

Low

High

High

Pri

Fear of dating 50/mth High

Oppty FeaturesDiff

Low

Medium

High

High

High

KG

Images

None

Forum Sitelinks

None

The image block may be an easier target

for this query

Page 43: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Keyword Evaluation in 2015

Has to Be Broader to Be

Successful

Potential Reach

(volume)Intent Overlap

Opportunity

Business

Value

Verticals/

Features

Content

Requirements

Audience

Targeting

Page 44: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#4Earn links like a publicist, not

like a link builder.

Page 45: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Irony: If Anyone Can Get the Link,

No One Should

Google should really have

an answer box here

warning searchers

against using any of

these results

Page 46: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Same story here – chase links like this and

Google will make your life rough.

Page 47: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

BTW – if you ever want to get around these annoying things, just use

Google’s “cache:url” command and hit “Text only”

Page 48: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Every One of These is Dangerous:

Article Marketing

Private Blog Networks

Article Directories

Link Directories

Web 2.0 Links

Article Spinners

Xrumer blasts

Link Wheels

Press Release Submissions

Link Pyramids Social Bookmark Links

Dofollow Comments

SENuke

Open Edu/Gov Links

Redirection links

Page 49: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

When it comes to links, stay away from these

verbs and adjectives:

Manual High PR

BuySpin

Dofollow

Submit Blast

Multi-tier

Expired Domain

Inject

Separate C-block Private

Page 50: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

It’s not just manipulative links – manual link

acquisition in general sucks

I’ve spent months

mastering link building, and

can get 2-3 good

links/day… why can’t I beat

the competition?!

Page 51: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Manual links can’t compete against a scalable flywheel

Do Amazing Stuff (content, product, press, events, etc)

Get attention from those

who can amplify to a

bigger audience

Grow your amplification abilities(social, blog, RSS, PR, authority from links, etc)

Earn more attention,

amplification, and growth

next time

Page 52: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Manual links can’t compete against a scalable flywheel

Do Amazing Stuff (content, product, press, events, etc)

Get attention from those

who can amplify to a

bigger audience

Grow your amplification abilities(social, blog, RSS, PR, authority from links, etc)

Earn more attention,

amplification, and growth

next time

So that’s

why…

Page 53: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails
Page 54: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Why can’t we “acquire” links? What

changed?

Page 55: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

1997-2011: Link Spam was Google’s Problem

Via the Moz Blog

Page 56: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

2012-Present: Link Spam is Our Problem

Via Marie Haynes

Page 57: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

What kinds of links still work?

Page 58: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Link from a guest post by

Geraldine on MarieClaire.

The Ones You Earn

Page 59: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Link from an interview by

Mashable.

The Ones You Earn

Page 60: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Granted, the anchor text is a little

weird, but it’s still a great link!

The Ones You Earn

Page 61: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

This Will Get You in Trouble:Crappy Links

Seek out

links to rank

better

Acquire

them

manually

Submit,

pay, beg,

trade, etc.+ + = Low Scalability

Risk of Penalties

This Will Get You the Right Links:

Do stuff

worthy of

attention

Earn

amplifi-

cation

Links come

in naturally+ + =

Traffic

Branding

Rankings

Page 62: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#5Nailing SEO might not produce

results w/o accompanying user &

usage signals.

Page 63: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Say you make some

great content, get some

great links, and rank

here.

Page 64: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

But, the piece doesn’t engage

visitors (or it loads slow, or

doesn’t look right on their device).

They click “back” and choose a

different result.

Unbelievably, eHarmony ranks w/ this awful

page (10 signs? They only list 1!!)

Page 65: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

But, searchers who click this

one engage with it, browse

more pages on the site, and

don’t repeat the query.

Page 66: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

All that effort probably won’t help

you maintain those rankings (and

having a poor user experience

could hurt your whole site in the

engines’ eyes)

Page 67: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Why won’t I keep my rankings?

What changed?

Page 68: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Search engines call the click-back-

and-choose-a-different-result

behavior “pogo-sticking,” and they

use it in evaluating rankings.

Read more about

Yahoo!’s Patent Application here.

Page 69: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Read more about

Google’s patent application on usage data here.

Engines probably also use data

related to the visit frequency of

pages/sites, so getting traffic from

other sources and satisfying those

visitors might help your SEO, too.

Page 70: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Perfect

Keyword

Targeting

Domain

Authority

Loads of

LinksAnchor Text+ + + +

Great

Content

Excellent

UX

Lots of

Traffic

High

Engagement+ + +

Schema

Markup

Might Be Worse Than:

Page 71: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Perfect

Keyword

Targeting

Domain

Authority

Loads of

LinksAnchor Text+ + + +

Great

Content

Excellent

UX

Lots of

Traffic

High

Engagement+ + +

Schema

Markup

Might Be Worse Than:Smart players will invest in all of these.

Page 72: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

#6SEO might no longer be a great way

to get early traction.

Page 73: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Bad biscuits make the

baker broke, bro.

Page 74: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Great Biscuits A Brand People Know,

Love, & ShareGreat Rankings

Page 75: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Great Biscuits A Brand People Know,

Love, & ShareGreat Rankings

The era of this formula being

reversible is disappearing fast.

Page 76: Why SEO That Used to Work, Fails

Rand Fishkin, Wizard of Moz | @randfish | [email protected]

bit.ly/whyseofails