44
Practical Responsive Images http://unsplash.com/

Practical Responsive Images : Digital Henley : May 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Practical Responsive

Images

http://unsplash.com/

A picture is worth a thousand words…

http://unsplash.com/

…but the cost is much greater

http://httparchive.orghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_comparisons

213,000 Words

1249kB Images

Average Bytes per Page by Content Type (April 2015):

If 1kB is 1024 ASCII characters

6 characters/word

An estimated average word length is five characters, plus a space

(1249kB * 1024) / 6 = ~213,160

(including HTML)

(of a total: 1950kB)

50-60 img requests

per page

Average image size for JPEG

was 30kB

The cost of images

Pride and Prejudice contains approximately

122,000 words

http://www.searchlit.org/novels/460.php

The cost of images

The cost of images

The Value of Images

http://www.thoughtmechanics.com/the-importance-of-images-in-web-design/

“Pictures have the power to create an emotional response in the audience, which is worth its weight in gold. An image can also

communicate instantly, as our brain can interpret them much quicker than text.”

thoughtmechanics.com

“If I’d have to pick one single thing that would sell a product online, it’s images.”

Peep Laja (Conversion Coach)

The Value of Images

http://www.jeffbullas.com/2012/05/28/6-powerful-reasons-why-you-should-include-images-in-your-marketing-infographic/

In an ecommerce site, 67% of consumers say the quality of a product image is “very important” in selecting and purchasing a product

http://www.jeremysaid.com/the-jaw-dropping-effect-that-images-can-have-on-your-conversion-rates/

Headshots of customer service reps on a web page can boost conversion rates by 20%

Articles with images get 94% more total views

Including a Photo and a video in a press release increases views by over 45%

60% of consumers are more likely to consider or contact a business when an image shows up in local search results

In some studies 10-15x

more viewers look at and engage with the

content when the model is looking or gesturing towards it

Images are powerful

http://thinkeyetracking.com/2009/06/cuing-customers-to-look-at-your-key-messages/ Photo courtesy of Christian Hambly

In some studies 10-15x

more viewers look at and engage with the

content when the model is looking or gesturing towards it

Images are powerful

Images are engaging

http://www.eye-tracking.net/examples-of-eye-tracking-tests/

Eye tracking studies have shown that, as human beings, we give the most

attention to other human faces.

A lot has changed since 1993

Guess the year?

1993 was also the year that the <img > tag was first proposed and has remained mostly unchanged …

…whereas the rest of the web-world change quite a bit!

http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html

The first ever website.

August 6, 1991Publish date:

In 1996

The closest you can experience this

today is probably

Hotel WiFiText was pretty popular…

56kbps = 7kBps 1850kB would take 265 second = 4.5 minutes

Bandwidth

A plethora of devices

Mobile adoption

http://www.creativebloq.com/netmag/how-web-design-and-mobile-design-are-becoming-same-thing-81412610

“Mobilegeddon”

21st April 2015 : Google update to its search algorithms which would begin to factor in a website’s

“mobile-friendliness” as a ranking signal

http://techcrunch.com/2015/04/21/googles-mobile-friendly-update-could-impact-over-40-of-fortune-500/#.8gqeuh:DxeE

http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/rolling-out-mobile-friendly-update.html

https://www.google.co.uk/webmasters/tools/mobile-friendly/

Foreground images at 100%

Raster image optionsBackground-images via CSS

.item_visuals img{ width: 100%; }

……does nothing for payload.

.banner { background-image: url('banner_750px.jpg'); } @media (min-width: 750px) { .banner { background-image: url('banner_1500px.jpg'); } }

…use alternatives to raster images

if you can…….

SVG

http://icomoon.io/

using <noscript>, custom data- attributes and .insertAfter($(this))

http://allbs.co.uk/2012/05/11/responsive-images-intro/

Javascript Image Replacement

<script>

var areawidth = $(window).width(); var widthDownTosmall = 600; var widthUpToLarge = 1100;

$('noscript[data-imageid]').each(function(){ var imageBase=“image/path"; var imageid = $(this).attr("data-imageid"); var imageSmall = $(this).attr("data-small-imageid"); var imageLarge = $(this).attr("data-large-imageid"); if (areawidth <= widthDownTosmall) {imageid = imageSmall; } if (areawidth >= widthUpToLarge) {imageid = imageLarge; } $('<img src="' + imageBase + imageid + '"/>').insertAfter($(this)); }); </script>

<noscript data-imageid=‘bag.jpg’ data-small-imageid=‘bag_small.jpg’ data-large-imageid=‘bag_large.jpg’> <img src=‘bag_small.jpg’ alt='Bag' />

</noscript>

<picture> srcset/sizes attributes

Enter our heroes:

http://responsiveimages.org/

Responsive Images Community Group

Nitty gritty

<picture> <source media="(min-width: 40em)" srcset="apple-big.jpg 1x, apple-big-hd.jpg 2x"> <source srcset="apple-small.jpg 1x, apple-small-hd.jpg 2x"> <img src="apple-fallback.jpg" alt="How do you like them apples?"> </picture>

<img src="apple-fallback.jpg" srcset="apple-big.jpg 1000w, apple-med.jpg 640w, apple-small.jpg 320w" sizes="(min-width: 40em) 50vw, 100vw" alt="How do you like them apples?" />

srcset x-descriptor (Device Pixel Ratio)

http://respimg.es/eg/pri2

<img srcset="Butterfly-600-retina.jpg 2x" src="Butterfly-600-standard.jpg" width="600" alt="text" />

standard image ~ 34KB‘retina’ image ~ 113KB

srcset w-descriptor without sizes (assumes 100vw)

<img srcset=“Apple_800.jpg 800w, Apple_1200.jpg 1200w" src=“Apple_fallback.jpg” alt=“How do you like them Apples?"/> </div>

sizes attribute : vw (% viewport width)

<img src=“Apple_fallback.jpg” alt="text" sizes="(min-width: 640px) 50vw, 100vw" srcset=“Apple_400.jpg 400w, Apple_600.jpg 600w, Apple_800.jpg 800w, Apple_1200.jpg 1200w" /> </div>

Viewport width

If width ≥ 640px then use 50vw

i.e. Calculations use 50% of width

50%

Within the fluid context of responsive websites, the restrictive nature of the <img> element, and lack of CSS controls for foreground images, has not been the elephant in the room. It's just been the elephant that we couldn't agree what to do with….

Picture element : Art Direction

http://respimg.es/eg/pri5

<picture> <source media="(max-width: 500px)" srcset="Apples-slices.jpg, Apples-slices-2x.jpg 2x" /> <source media="(max-width: 780px)" srcset="Apples-crop-500.jpg 500w, Apples-crop-780.jpg 780w" /> <source srcset="Apples-780.jpg 780w, Apples-1000.jpg 1000w, Apples-1800.jpg 1800w"/> <img src="Apples-fallback.jpg" alt="text" /> </picture>

Picture element : Art Direction

http://respimg.es/eg/pri5

Use Case 2: Crop to point of interest (Art Direction)

Use Case 3: Device Orientationsrcset="landscape_variant.jpg" media="(min-width: 400px) and (orientation: landscape)"

srcset="portrait_variant.jpg" media="(min-width: 400px) and (orientation: portrait)"

http://responsiveimag.es/Practical_Example_3.html

Picture element: Image Format : webp/svg<picture> <source type="image/webp" srcset="Apples_600.webp" > <source type="image/vnd.ms-photo" srcset="Apples_600.jxr" /> <img src="/Apples_600.jpg" alt="text" /> </picture>

http://respimg.es/eg/pri6

(As of : April 2015)

Can I Use

http://caniuse.com/#search=srcset http://caniuse.com/#search=picture

A responsive image polyfill.

For today, and future-legacy-browsers

picturefill

http://scottjehl.github.io/picturefill/

Developed and maintained by Filament Group

<script> document.createElement( "picture" ); </script> <script src="picturefill.js" async></script>

(scaling / CDN)

Where do we get all those image variants?

Batch Statics

v

Server-side image manipulation

Build Your Own

v

SaaS

image.jpg?w=400&qlt=70&unsharp=0,1,1,7

At-request-time image variants:

Control width, quality, sharpening….

Dynamic Imaging Systems

additional benefits include “apparent image requests”

for SEO context:

Dynamic Imaging Systems

/B473P_AB123_89_4UVWL/apple-ipad-mini-3-64gb-wi-fi-gold.jpg

Avoiding Forking our Content

Viewport width

50%

Within the fluid context of responsive websites, the restrictive nature of the <img> element, and lack of CSS controls for foreground images, has not been the elephant in the room. It's just been the elephant that we couldn't agree what to do with….

Combining the two

<img src="http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple2.jpg?w=400&qlt=80" alt="How do you like them Apples?" sizes="(min-width: 640px) 50vw, 100vw" srcset="http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg?w=200&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7 200w, http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg?w=400&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7 400w, http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg?w=600&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7 600w, http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg?w=800&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7 800w, http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg?w=1200&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7 1200w" />

</div>

Combining the two

<picture> <!--[if IE 9]><video style="display: none;"><![endif]--> <source srcset="http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg? w=1400&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7" media="(min-width: 1200px)"> <source srcset=“http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg? w=1200&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7" media="(min-width: 1050px)"> <source srcset=“http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg? pcrop=700,0,2500,800&w=950&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7" media="(min-width: 850px)"> <source srcset=“http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple_Row2.jpg? pcrop=1300,0,1900,800&w=850&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7" media="(min-width: 600px)"> <source srcset=“http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Red_And_Green_Apples2.jpg? w=600&qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7"> <!--[if IE 9]></video><![endif]--> <img srcset="http://images.amplience.com/i/benco/Apple2.jpg?w=600&qlt=80" alt="How do you like them Apples?"> </picture>

<picture>

srcset/

Dynamic Imaging System

Practical Responsive

Images=+

@bseymour

respimg.es

Thank you

benseymour.com

https://www.codeclub.org.uk/

http://www.stemnet.org.uk/

https://www.codeclub.org.uk/