Upload
agustin-formoso
View
130
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Internet Measurements@ LACNIC
IETF 95 - Buenos AiresApril 2016
Agustín Formoso@aguformoso | [email protected]
Agenda• About LACNIC• General overview of LACNIC Labs
measurements• Connectivity measurements in the LAC
region (Simon Project)
About LACNIC• One of the world 5 RIRs• Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
region• LACNIC Labs: engineering, measurements
The team behind this…
Carlos Martinez Gerardo Rada
Guillermo Cicileo Agustín FormosoAlejandro Acosta
Elisa Peirano
IPv6 penetration• Monitoring since 2014• Per-country penetration stats (Google,
Akamai)• Websites with AAAA records• v6 Embryos: ccTLD domains which have
AAAA on w6, www6, ipv6, v6 records butdo not have on www (yet)
IPv6 regional study• In conjunction with CAF and collaboration from
Cisco 6lab• Deep study about the transition to IPv6– ICAv6 Index considering
• Routing ( % of v6 prefixes seen in RT)• Network core (Potential transit ASes over v6)• Content• End users (Google, APNIC)
– Economic alternatives modeling to help agents responsible of v6 deployment make better decisions
– Field study and interviews– Success cases: Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru (and Brazil)
IP addresses: v6 visibility
Assignments are Allocations present at the routing table
Disaggregated allocations are counted only once.
IP addresses: v4 exhaustion models
Estimated run out dates*:◼ 10th June 2017
◼ 10th January 2017◼ 19th December 2016
* As of 18th March 2016
Connectivity• Based on RTT measurements• 32 bytes ICMP pings (IPv4 only, 10 samples)• Point at regional Speedtest servers• Originated from 21 countries• During ~1 year• ~200 measurements per hour• Based on SpeedChecker platform (Maxmind
lite database and Mozilla Geolocation API forgeolocation information)
Connectivity• What is connectivity exactly?• Country-based regional latency graph• 21 nodes• 201 edges• Performed community-based clustering• 4 main clusters
Connectivity
0
1
2
3149 ms
142 ms
143 ms 202 ms215 ms
192 ms
157 ms
226 ms 216 ms
201 ms
DifferenceTo the region 196
4
192Intra-cluster
Difference
142205To the region63
Intra-cluster
54Difference
149 203To the region
Intra-cluster
Difference
Intra-cluster
73To the region
143216
Connectivity latency clusters
� Region 2⁃ Chile⁃ Bolivia⁃ Peru
��Region 3⁃ Paraguay⁃ Argentina⁃ Uruguay⁃ Brazil
��Region 1⁃ Guatemala⁃ Venezuela⁃ El Salvador⁃ Panama⁃ Mexico
��Region 0⁃ Dominican Republic⁃ Colombia⁃ Cuba⁃ Suriname⁃ Trinidad & Tobago⁃ Ecuador⁃ Honduras⁃ Costa Rica⁃ Belize
Primary conclusions• Region divided in 4 main clusters (with
geographic correlation)• Good inter-country connectivity stands for
~150 ms ICMP pings (closer to 200 for weakly connected regions)
• Inter-cluster connectivity stands for ~200 ms ICMP pings
Additional conclusions• Connectivity is usually intuitive• Graph GàH transformation
(edge weight w à 1/w)• Cluster based on 1/w• Look for “dis-connectivity” latency clusters
Additional conclusions� Region 2⁃ Brazil⁃ Costa Rica⁃ Belize⁃ Peru
��Region 3⁃ Ecuador⁃ Suriname⁃ Paraguay⁃ El Salvador⁃ Panama
��Region 1⁃ Chile⁃ Argentina⁃ Honduras⁃ Trinidad & Tobago⁃ Mexico
��Region 0⁃ Dominican Republic⁃ Guatemala⁃ Colombia⁃ Venezuela⁃ Bolivia⁃ Uruguay⁃ Cuba
Additional conclusions• Far north vs down south (predictably)• Some interesting cases– Between oceans• Ecuador and Suriname
– (and neighbors)• Argentina – Chile• Colombia – Venezuela• Brazil – Peru