Upload
elinatapio
View
335
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
SVAK180-kurssin työpajaesitelmä. Oyserman, Ruonala & Sivunen
Citation preview
Which equal environment and identity strengthens and weakens
the sign language for deaf people?
Joni OysermanSilja RuonalaNina Sivunen
28.11.2011Jyväskylän yliopisto
Contents
Background Data collection Results Consideration References
“Deaf people are nation without a country”
Bernard Mottez
Topic's selecting and background
Interesting- how the deaf uses sign language in different environment
Which kind of equivalent do they experience Do they feel equal in a multimodal
interaction environment
Data Collection Thesistools
Questionnaire 15 questions Answered 65
Questionnaires had focused to get a response for how deaf, hard-of-hearing, CI-user feel equal in different environment
Table 1 Male
Female
Deaf school
HH school/class
Hearing school
Institution school
Netherlands
Finland
Deaf
CODA
HH
CI-user
Hearing
Work
Student0
10
20
30
40
50
6016
49
18
0
20
22
8
57
32
2
6
1
24
24
22
Table 2
Result
Majority of deaf had answered No feel equal in work place
Caused unfair with identity in communication or asseignments
“Yes” for Facebook equal No barries on communication Visual discourse (Norris)
Less “Yes” for msn, chat, twitter equal No enough skills to communicate written
language
Result
“Yes” for less equal in Youtube Directed by audio (2,2 millions hits)
“Yes” for equal feel in street, resturant and shops – but no equal feel in public transport (bus, train and airplane)
Information by audio Deaf with hearing sport is clearly low equal than
with deaf environment
Consideration
Sign language identity become weak depends spoken and written environment
Deaf people are depending on multimodal environment and by interaction
An environment with signed language and visual space it strengthens the sign language identity
Deaf feel equal with an identity balance except in bus, train and airplane and sport with hearing
Reference
Broesterhuizen, M. 2003. Doofheid: beperking of kracht? Tijdschrift voor Theologie, 43, no. 1: 52-77.
Norris, S. 2011. Identity in (inter)action : introducing multimodal (inter)action analysis. Gruyter
Mouton.
Salo, S. 2005. Tapaustutkimus kuuron omasta identiteetistä sekä voimaantumisesta. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Opettajankoulutuslaitos. Kasvatustieteen pro gradu –tutkielma.
Skelton,T. & Valentine, G. 2003. It feels like being Deaf is normal: an exploration into the complexities of defining D/deafness and young D/deaf people’s identities. Loughborough University: Sheffield University.
Wallvik,B. Yhdistystoiminnan synty. In Malm, A. & Östman, J-O. 2000. Viittomakieliset ja heidän kielensä. Teoksessa Viittomakieliset Suomessa. Finnlectura: Pieksämäki.