Upload
sgri6476
View
263
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STIGMA RESISTANCE IN EATING DISORDERS
#1 Stigma is commonly experienced among people with eating disorders
#2 More frequent stigmatization is associated with adverse outcomes
#3 Males and individuals with bulimia face unique forms of stigma
Eating disorders are (still) stigmatized
#1 Destigmatization initiatives mostly target public perceptions of eating disorders
#2 … how achievable is this goal?
#3 Can we foster an ability to process and deconstruct stigma?
Can we fix stigma by changing public perceptions?
#1 Refers to an ability to counteract or resist the stigma associated with eating disorders
#2 Studied in schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder, but not in eating disorders
#3 An intervention designed to build stigma resistance would target the stigmatized
Stigma resistance
Stigma resistance – the measure
› Ritsher, Otilingham & Grajales (2003)
› Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale
› Stigma Resistance; one of five subscales
#1 Greater stigma resistance among the currently diagnosed will be associated with positive outcomes
#2 Stigma resistance will discriminate the currently diagnosed from the recovered
Hypotheses
› Anorexia nervosa slightly overrpresented among the recovered
› Recovered much more likely to not currently be in treatment
› Recovered more likely to be in a relationship
Sample
Anorexia nervosa
Bulimia nervosa
EDNOS Total
Currently diagnosed 168 69 88 325Recovered 82 17 28 127
Comparison of EDE-Q global scores
Group0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Clinical norm(Welch et al. 2011)
Community norm(Mond et al. 2006)
Currently diagnosed
Recovered
Comparison of EDE-Q subscale scores
Restraint Eating Concern Shape Concern Weight Concern
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Clinical norms(Welch et al. 2011)
Community norms(Mond et al. 2006)
#1 Very large differences (Cohen’s d > 1.0) between diagnosed and recovered groups for EDE-Q global score and all four subscale
#2 Significantly fewer eating disorder behaviours for the recovered group
#3 Median of zero for frequency of eating disorder behaviours for the recovered group
#4 For anorexia nervosa, a significantly higher BMI for recovered versus currently diagnosed›Currently diagnosed mean BMI = 17.78›Recovered mean BMI = 21.95
How do you know they’re recovered?
Levels of stigma resistance
Low (6%)
Moderate (54%)
Currently diagnosed Recovered
Minimal (3%)
Low (20%) High (23%)
Moderate (37%)
High (57%)
Co-variate adjusted comparison of stigma resistance
Group1
2
3
4
Schizophrenia(Brohan et al. 2010)
Currently diagnosed
Recovered
Depression & bipolar(Brohan et al. 2010)
p = .006
Associations with stigma resistance
Variable Currently diagnosed
Recovered
r p r pEating disorder symptoms -.26 < .001 -.11 .205Depression symptoms -.36 < .001 -.29 < .001
Self-esteem .36 < .001 .35 < .001
Self-stigma of seeking help -.29 < .001 -.24 .008Internalized stigma -.40 < .001
#1 Stigma resistance may have benefits, including aiding in recovery from eating disorders
#2 Could we augment current destigmatization interventions that currently target public perceptions of eating disorders?
#3 Create a stigma resistance scale specific to eating disorders
Discussion
#1 Diagnoses and recovery status were self-reported
#2 Cross-sectional design
#3 Internal consistency of the Stigma Resistance subscale needs improvement
Limitations
GRIFFITHS, S., MOND, J. M., MURRAY, S. B., THORNTON, C., & TOUYZ, S. (IN PRESS). STIGMA RESISTANCE IN EATING DISORDERS. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY