42
JOURNAL CLUB Arthroplasty for Fractures Arthroplasty for Fractures of the Proximal part of the of the Proximal part of the Humerus. Humerus. Dr.Jeya venkatesh MS(Orth) Dr.Jeya venkatesh MS(Orth) Dept of Orthopaedics, Dept of Orthopaedics, JPNATC, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi. AIIMS, New Delhi. 1

Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Journal club presentation on Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures of the Proximal part of the Humerus. Based on review article published in Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (America) Indications, Surgical techniques, outcomes are discussed in detail.

Citation preview

Page 1: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

JOURNAL CLUB

Arthroplasty for Fractures Arthroplasty for Fractures of the Proximal part of the of the Proximal part of the Humerus.Humerus.

Dr.Jeya venkatesh MS(Orth)Dr.Jeya venkatesh MS(Orth) Dept of Orthopaedics,Dept of Orthopaedics, JPNATC, JPNATC, AIIMS, New Delhi.AIIMS, New Delhi.

1

Page 2: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

William Osler first introduced the concept of ‘Journal club’ in 1875

2

Page 3: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

3

Page 4: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

David Dines- Ex President of the

American Shoulder and Elbow Society

Biomet Biomodular Total Shoulder System

Josua Dines James E. Voos

4

Page 5: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Proximal humeral fractures account for 4% to

5% of all fractures

Complex Fractures? ORIF? Hemi? RSA

5

Page 6: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Concomitant injuries Preinjury shoulder function

? Previous fracture? Previous rotator cuff deficiency? Severe osteoporosis

6

Page 7: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

AP Transscapular Y

View Axillary view

CT :Extensive comminution, displaced #

Full length view C/L humerus - Template

7

Page 8: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

8

Page 9: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

NEER’S (>1cm displacement, >45˚ angulation ) AO HERTEL’S

9

H

G

S

L

Page 10: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

10

Page 11: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Surgical technique:Surgical technique:

11

Page 12: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Delto pectoral incision

Different Fibre orientationCephalic vein laterally

Axillary fold

12

Page 13: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Keep Deltoid origin & insertion intact

13

Page 14: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Incise fascia over biceps tendonIdentify the LHB

14

Page 15: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Identify long head of biceps

15

Page 16: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Separate & secure the tuberosities.

16

Page 17: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Secure sutures in tendon bone interface

17

Page 18: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Excision of fractured Humeral head

18

Page 19: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Visualise the Glenoid

19

Page 20: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Humeral canal is prepared by sequential reaming

20

Page 21: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Anterolateral & posterolateral drill-holes

1 to 1.5 cm distal to the fracture

Sutures are placed through these holes prior to cementing

21

Page 22: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Height of the component

pre op Templating

Intramedullary device

Measurements on device

22

Page 23: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

23

Page 24: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

24

Page 25: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Effect of Incorrect Version

Too Anteverted Too Retroverted

Tuberosity healing compromised25

Page 26: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Closed reduction with trial headcomponent.

The head should translate 50% anteriorly, posteriorly, & inferiorly on the glenoid surface.

160˚ of forward elevation and stable internal & external rotation of the arm.

26

Page 27: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Success of surgery =Success of surgery =Tuberosity reconstructionTuberosity reconstruction

27

Page 28: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Bone grafting priorto tuberosity fixation

28

Page 29: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

The final humeral head component is placed after the sutures have been passed, and the tuberosity reconstruction commences.

29

Page 30: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

The greater tuberosity is secured to the shaft & the implant first, and this is followed by fixation of the lesser tuberosity.

30

Page 31: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Vertical, Horizontal & Figure of eight sutures fix the tuberosities in position.

31

Page 32: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Based security of the reconstruction.

0 to 6 weeks : Only Passive

> 6 wks : Active assisted exercises

8 to 12 weeks : Strengthening exercises

32

Page 33: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Component malposition

Rotatorcuff failure

Periprosthetic fracture

Heterotopic ossification33

Page 34: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Good pain relief, but varying outcomes with regards to function, motion &strength.

34

Page 35: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Bastian and Hertel : ORIF vs Hemisimilar functional results & patient satisfactionsimilar functional results & patient satisfaction. ORIF with preservation of the humeral head

should be considered when an adequate reduction and stable conditions for revascularization can be obtained.

Hemiarthroplasty is a viable alternative for patients with osteopenic bone and/or a comminuted fracture.

Bastian JD, Hertel R. Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplastyof fractures of the proximal humerus:outcomes in a consecutive case series. J ShoulderElbow Surg. 2009;18:216-9

35

Page 36: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Krishnan et al. : using ‘Gothic arch’ technique reported 88% of the tuberosities healed anatomically. The mean active mean active anterior elevation was 129˚, and pain scores anterior elevation was 129˚, and pain scores averaged 1.2 points on a 10-point scaleaveraged 1.2 points on a 10-point scale.

Krishnan SG, Bennion PW, Reineck JR, BurkheadWZ. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture:restoration of the Gothic arch. Orthop Clin North Am.2008;39:441-50,

36

Page 37: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Boileau et al. described the ‘‘unhappy triad,’’ ‘‘unhappy triad,’’ in which a prosthesis has excessive height and retroversion and the greater tuberosity is positioned too low --> poor functional results, persistent pain & stiffness.

Boileau P, Walch G, Krishnan SG. Tuberosityosteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty for four-partfractures of the proximal humerus. Tech ShoulderElbow Surg. 2000;1:96-109.

37

Page 38: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

AcuteAcute reconstruction (less than four weeksafter the injury) results in betterbetter functional outcomes because of the ease of tuberosity reconstruction

Dines DM, Warren RF. Modular shoulderhemiarthroplasty for acute fractures. Surgical considerations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;307:18-26.

38

Page 39: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Bufquin et al. In RSA satisfactory mobility was RSA satisfactory mobility was obtained despite frequent migration of the obtained despite frequent migration of the tuberositiestuberosities, and they cautioned that an assessment of long-term results is required.

Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:516-20.

39

Page 40: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Descending order of Clinical successDescending order of Clinical success:

(1) Hemi in a patient with reconstructible tuberosities,

(2) RSA in a patient with reconstructible tuberosities,

(3) RSA in a patient without reconstructible tuberosities,

(4) Hemi in a patient without reconstructible tuberosities.

40

Page 41: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

Newer techniques to improve functional outcomes.

Long term multicentric randomised comparative study between RSA & Hemiarthroplasty.

41

Page 42: Shoulder Arthroplasty for Fractures

42THANK YOU