95
ROOT REPAIR MATERIALS Dr.Rakesh Nair PG Student KVG Dental College Sullia Karnataka India

Root repair materials

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Root repair materials

ROOT REPAIR

MATERIALS

Dr.Rakesh Nair

PG StudentKVG Dental College

Sullia

Karnataka

India

Page 2: Root repair materials

Introduction

Classification

MTA

Biodentine

GIC based sealers

Amalgam

Gutta percha

ZOE

Composite resins

Daiket

Bioceramic sealers

Recent materials

References

Page 3: Root repair materials

Roots needing repair are serious complications in dental

practice and pose a number of diagnostic and

management problems.

However, when teeth are of strategic importance root

repair is clearly indicated whenever possible.

With advent of 3-D imaging and illumination the scope

and success of root repair is very high.

Page 4: Root repair materials

Root fracture

Infective

Perforation

Root end

filling

Root

maturogenesis

Internal resorption

Perforation

Iatrogenic

Gouching

Strip

perforations

Apical

perforations

Furcal

perforations

Reasons for root repair

Trauma

Page 5: Root repair materials

ROOT END FILLING

MATERIALSPERFORATION REPAIR

MATERIALS

ROOT

REGENERATION

MATERIALS

ROOT REPAIR MATERIALS

Bioactive

materialsBiologic

materials

Page 6: Root repair materials

Amalgam

Gutta percha

ZOE

GIC related materials

Composite resin

Diaket

MTA

Biodentine

ROOT END FILLING MATERIALS

Recent materials

• ERRM

• Bioaggregate

• I root BP Plus

bioceramic putty

• Novel root-end filling

material

Page 7: Root repair materials

MTA

Biodentine

GIC

PRF

Page 8: Root repair materials

Calcium hydroxide

MTA

Biodentine

PRP/PRF

Page 9: Root repair materials

Traditionally, amalgam was the material of choice for

root-end fillings.

The biocompatibility of amalgam is cited as a current

issue of concern in dentistry.Many in vivo usage

studies in animals have reported unfavorable tissue

response to amalgam.

The use of amalgam as a root-end filling material can

now be confined to history.

Page 10: Root repair materials

When GP is used as a root-end filling material, it absorbs

moisture from periapical tissues because of its porous nature.

It expands initially,then contracts.

Pitt Ford et al. found that the tissue response to GP with zinc

oxide root canal sealer was characterized by little or no

inflammation.

In a comparative in vivo study on bone defect regeneration,

most histological sections using GP as retrograde material

showed signs of non-healing with lack of cortical bone and

high level of inflammatory infiltration.

Page 11: Root repair materials

The material was considered to have good handling properties

and postoperative results.

However, the original ZOE cements were weak and likely to

be absorbed over a period of time.

Therefore, it was unsuitable for longterm use.

Two approaches were adopted to improve the physical

properties of ZOE cements.

Page 12: Root repair materials

The partial substitution of eugenol liquid with EBA and the

addition of fused quartz or aluminum oxide to the powder to

give an EBA cement, Super EBA cement(Staident

International Ltd., Staines, UK).

The addition of polymeric substances to the powder,

(a) polymethymethacrylate to the powder, Intermediate

Restorative Material (IRM, DENTSPLY DeTrey GmbH,

Konstanz, Germany)

(b) polystyrene to the liquid, Kalzinol (DENTSPLY DeTrey

GmbH)

Page 13: Root repair materials

Eugenol is the major cytotoxic component in ZOE cements.

Zinc released from these cements is considered to be partly

responsible for the prolonged cytotoxic effect.

Results of a comparative study showed no cell growth in the

originally seeded cells in fresh IRM.

Recent studies have shown IRM to be more toxic than

comparative materials.

In a research that investigated cellular attachment to root-end

filling materials as a measure of the biocompatibility of the

materials, both IRM and Super EBA rendered poor attachment

Page 14: Root repair materials

GIC have been suggested as an alternative root-end

filling material.

Biocompatibility studies exhibited evidence of initial

cytotoxicity with freshly prepared samples.

Toxicity decreases as the setting occurs.

Page 15: Root repair materials

Composite resins and resin-ionomer hybrids.

The biocompatibility of composite resin is influenced by the

amount and nature of its leachable components.

The healing response of the periradicular tissues to composite

resins in general appears to be very diverse, ranging from poor

to good depending on the type of material used.

Two composite resin-based materials, Retroplast (Retroplast

Trading, Rorvig, Denmark) and Geristore (Den-Mat, Santa

Maria, CA, USA) have been advocated for use as root end

filling materials.

Page 16: Root repair materials

Results of the observational studies examining various

root-end filling materials on gingival fibroblast cells

showed greater cell attachment to Geristore in

comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

Other in vitro interpretations indicate that Geristore is less

cytotoxic to gingival fibroblasts in comparison to MTA,

GIC and IRM

Surgical repair of root and tooth perforations JOHN D. REGAN, DAVID E. WITHERSPOON &

DEBORAH M. FOYLE. Endodontic Topics 2005, 11, 152–178

Page 17: Root repair materials

(3M ESPE GmbH, Seefeld, Germany)

A polyvinyl resin, has been advocated for use as a root-end

filling material.

When Diaket was used as a root canal sealer, biocompatibility

studies showed that it was cytotoxic in cell culture and

generated long-term chronic inflammation in osseous and

subcutaneous tissues.

However, when mixed at the thicker consistency advocated for

use as a root-end filling material, Diaket has shown good

biocompatibility with osseous tissues.

Page 18: Root repair materials
Page 19: Root repair materials

MTA -first described in litrature by Lee , Mahmoud

Torabinejad And Colleagues in 1993 when used as root

end filling material..

Mineral trioxide aggregate, or MTA, is a biocompatible

material with numerous exciting clinical applications in

endodontics.

The material appears to be an improvement over other

materials for endodontic procedures that involve root

repair and bone healing.

Page 20: Root repair materials

POWDER

Tricalcium Silicate

Dicalcium Silicate

Tricalcium Aluminate Tetracalcium AluminoFerrite

Calcium Sulphate

Bismuth Oxide

WATER

Distilled water

Page 21: Root repair materials

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) is a fine hydrophilic

powder available in single use sachets of 1 gram.

Some companies also provide premeasured water sachets for

ease of use.

The important barriers to the widespread use of MTA are its

cost and difficulty in storage.

Page 22: Root repair materials
Page 23: Root repair materials

• There are few published reports of experimental

data relating to the comparative setting times of

the different forms of MTA.

• Although the manufacturers of MTA-Angelus

claim that this material has a setting time of 10

min, there appears to be no independent evidence

to confirm this

Grey Proroot MTA - 2 h 45 mins ± 5 mins (Torabinejad)

- 2 h 55 min (Islam et `al)

White MTA - 2 h 20 mins (Islam et `al)

SETTING TIME

Page 24: Root repair materials

• The presence of gypsum is reported to be the reason

for the extended setting time of MTA.

• In order to reduce the setting time, the effect of

accelerators such as sodium phosphate dibasic

(Na2HPO4) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) are being

investigated currently.

• MTA Bio is one commercially available product

which incorporates an accelerator of this sort, and is

promoted as a rapid-setting material.

Mineral trioxide aggregate in paediatric dentistry VIDYA SRINIVASAN1 , PAULA

WATERHOUSE2 & JOHN WHITWORTH3 mineral trioxide aggregate in paediatric

dentistry VIDYA SRINIVASAN1 , PAULA WATERHOUSE2 & JOHN

WHITWORTH3

Page 25: Root repair materials

The regeneration of the new cementum over MTA is a unique

phenomenon that has not been reported to occur with other

root end fillings.

The deposition of cementum hard tissue with MTA was also

seen in root end fillings , dental pulps and apical tissue after

root canal filling.

Torabinejad et al believed that the deposition of cementum

against MTA may be due to a number of factors such as

sealing ability, biocompatibility or alkaline pH on setting.

Page 26: Root repair materials

The setting reaction of MTA is a complicated process

depending on the exact proportions of mineral phases,their

purity and temperature of the mix.

On hydration calcium silicates present in MTA undergoes

hydrolysis and produce calcium silicate hydrate and calcium

hydroxide.

About one third of hydration products is constituted by

calcium hydroxide which makes MTA highly alkaline.

Page 27: Root repair materials

CaO + H2O -- Ca(OH)2

Whereas, C2S and C3S react with water to produce calcium

silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and calcium hydroxide

as:

2(3CaO.SiO2) + 6H2O -- 3CaO2.SiO2.3H2O+ 3Ca(OH)2

2(2CaO.SiO2) + 4H2O --3CaO2.SiO2.3H2O+ Ca(OH)2

Page 28: Root repair materials

The C3S is most important mineral phase in MTA and

engages in the formation of C-S-H to provide early

strength.

On the other hand, C2S reacts relatively slow and give

later strength to the set material.

C3A present in MTA reacts with water to form calcium

aluminates and (in presence of calcium sulphate) sulfate

aluminates.

Page 29: Root repair materials

The C-S-H, the major hydration product of MTA is an

amorphous compound with varying stoichiometric values.

The Ca:Si ratio in C-S-H generally varies between 0.8 and 2.1

with highly variable content of water therefore, set MTA can

be described as calcium hydroxide contained within a silicate

matrix.

Page 30: Root repair materials

MTA offers a biologically active substrate for bone cells and stimulates interleukins production.

Calcium hydroxide in contact with pulp tissue or culture medium produces deposition of calcite crystals. Also observed was rich extra cellular network of fibronectin in close contact with these crystals.

MTA is superior to amalgam, IRM, and super-EBA in preventing leakage of methylene blue, fusobacterium nucleatum, and endotoxin . It is biocompatible and induces osteogenesis and cementogenesis.

Which makes it an ideal choice for root repair.

Page 31: Root repair materials
Page 32: Root repair materials
Page 33: Root repair materials

Intra canal repair of accidental perforations after

administering anesthesia, application of rubber dam and

locating the perforation site, the area should be rinsed

thoroughly with sodium hypochlorite.

In cases of long – standing perforations or in the presence of

contamination, sodium hypochlorite should be left in the root

canal system for a few minutes to disinfect the site of the

perforation.

Perforation repair

Page 34: Root repair materials

After complete instrumentation and obturation of the canals

with gutta percha and root canal sealer apical to perforation

sites (furcation and stripping), mix MTA with sterile water and

place it at the perforation site with an amalgam carrier and

pack it against the site with a plugger or a cotton pellet.

Page 35: Root repair materials

After repairing the perforation area with MTA, place a wet

cotton pellet over MTA and seal the access cavity with a

temporary filling material.

Remove the temporary and the wet cotton pellet at least 3

to 4 hours later and place a permanent filling material in the

root and / or in the access cavity preparation.

When MTA is placed in perforations with a high degree of

inflammation, the material remains soft when checked at

the second appointment. This is due to the presence of low

pH, which prevents proper setting of MTA.

Assess the healing in 3 to 6 months as indicated.

Page 36: Root repair materials

For apical perforations, mixed MTA should be placed into the

apical portion of the canal with a messing gun (R. chige,

Inc.,Boca Raton, FL ) or a small amalgam carrier and packed

with small pluggers or paper points.

A 3 to 5 mm apical plug is needed to prevent coronal leakage

and extrusion of obturation material into the periapical

tissues. After inducing an apical plug, place a wet cotton

pellet against it and close the access cavity with a temporary

filling material.

Remove the cotton pellet at least 3 to 4 hours later and

obturate the rest of the canal with gutta – percha and root

canal sealer. In case of a large apical perforation, and ample

moisture, placement of apical plug and obturation of the root

canal system can be accomplished in one visit.

Page 37: Root repair materials

Repair of perforations as a consequence

of an internal resorption

After administering anesthesia and

preparing the access cavity, the root canal

should be completely cleaned and shaped.

Because of the presence of granulation

tissue and the presence of communication

between the root canal and the

periodontium,heavy hemorrhage is

usually encountered.

Page 38: Root repair materials

Root end filling

Infected root canals harbor numerous species of bacteria which

can progress into periradicular tissues and cause development of

periradicular lesions.

Because of the complexity of the root canal system and our

inability to completely clean it using present techniques and

instruments, root canals cannot always be adequately treated.

Page 39: Root repair materials

Advantages

The advantage of using a material to form an immediate apical barrier over

the conventional apexification treatment is that endodontic treatment can be

achieved in a single appointment .

(MTA can be used as a one step obturation material in an open apex)

70% of the failures in study of perforation repair were associated with

extrusion of repair material. But MTA does not have to be compacted as

firmly as amalgam to adapt adequately to the tooth surface .

The setting ability of MTA is uninhibited by blood or water. This is an

important request of a material which has to be used normally in presence of

blood & water and also in teeth with necrotic pulps and inflamed periapical

lesions because one of problems in these cases is presence of exudates at the

root apex

Page 40: Root repair materials

The slow setting time of MTA is an advantage in that it reduces the amount of setting shrinkage which may help explain MTA’s low micro leakage .

A major problem in performing endodontics in immature teeth with necrotic pulp and wide open apices is obtaining an adequate seal of the root canal system. MTA has been proposed as a potential material to create an apical plug at the end of the root – canal system, thus preventing the extrusion of filling materials

MTA has an antibacterial effect on few of the facultative bacteria, when comparatively none other test materials had all of antibacterial effects desired .

MTA has low solubility and a radioopacity slightly more than that of dentin

Page 41: Root repair materials

The use of MTA in cases where the material comes in direct contact with the oral cavity for an extended period of time is unpredictable. This is due to the fact that MTA dissolves in an acidic pH

MTA powder has to be mixed with sterile water and cannot be mixed with anesthetic / sterile liquid. This is because the effects other liquids may have on MTA’s physical, chemical and biological properties are unknown

Excess moisture has to be removed from the preparation / resorptive defect site, because MTA becomes soupy and difficult to condense.

It has low compressive strength, and so can not be placed in functional areas

Page 42: Root repair materials
Page 43: Root repair materials

When MTA is used as a root canal sealer and is compacted

against dentin a dentin MTA interfacial layer is formed which

resembles hydroxyapatite in composition and structure when

examined under x-ray diffraction and SEM analysis.

Morover the hydration of MTA forms a gluey matrix that will

adhere to the guttapercha providing a better seal.

Also the relatively long setting time and maturation add to the

sealability of the material.

MTA based root canal sealers.Manjusha et`al.Journal of orofacial research.2013

Page 44: Root repair materials

Alkaline environment by hypochlorite irrigation helps in the

efficiency of the material.

Hence citric acid and EDTA final rinses are not advocated

with MTA sealer.

Eg:-Pro root endo sealer,cpm sealer,mta obtura,mtas,F-doped

MTA.

Page 45: Root repair materials

Case 1

Page 46: Root repair materials

Case 2

12 month post

reimplantation

MTA

Page 47: Root repair materials

Internal

resorption

Sagittal section-

CBCT

MTA plug

1 year follow up

Case 3

Page 48: Root repair materials

Biodentine™ was developed by Septodont’s

Research Group as a new class of dental material

which could conciliate high mechanical

properties with excellent biocompatibility, as well

as a bioactive behavior

The material is actually formulated using the

MTA-based cement technology and the

improvement of some properties of these types of

cements, such as physical qualities and handling.

Page 49: Root repair materials
Page 50: Root repair materials
Page 51: Root repair materials
Page 52: Root repair materials
Page 53: Root repair materials

Grech et al. investigated the setting time of Biodentine

using an indentation technique while the material was

immersed in Hank’s solution

The setting time of Biodentine was determined as 45

minutes.

This short setting time was attributed to the addition of

calcium chloride to the mixing liquid

Page 54: Root repair materials

Compressive strength is considered as one of the main

physical characteristics of hydraulic cements.

The product sheet of Biodentine states that a specific feature

of Biodentine is its capacity to continue improving in terms

of compressive strength with time until reaching a similar

range with natural dentine.

In the study by Grech et al., Biodentine showed the highest

compressive strength compared to the other tested materials.

The authors attributed this result to the enhanced strength

due to the low water/cement ratio used in Biodentine.

Page 55: Root repair materials
Page 56: Root repair materials

Microhardness. Grech et al. evaluated the microhardness of

the material using a diamond shaped indenter.

Their results showed that Biodentine displayed superior values

compared to Bioaggregate and IRM.

Page 57: Root repair materials

7 USES

Page 58: Root repair materials

Biodentine has a wide range of applications including

endodontic repair (root perforations, apexification, resorptive

lesions, and retrograde filling material in endodontic surgery)

and pulp capping and can be used as a dentine replacement

material in restorative dentistry.

Page 59: Root repair materials

Some authors have indicated that there are few studies on the

properties of newly developed materials such as Biodentine.

The material is characterized by the release of calcium when

in solution.

Tricalcium silicate based materials are also defined as a source

of hydroxyapatite when they are in contact with synthetic

tissue fluid.

Page 60: Root repair materials

Another area of use of Biodentine, specifically from an

endodontic point of view, is the repair of perforations.

which is likely to be encountered in clinical practice. It is

essential that a perforation repair material should have

sufficient amount of push-out bond strength with dentinal

walls for the prevention of dislodgement from the repair site.

Page 61: Root repair materials

Aggarwal et al. studied the push-out bond strengths of

Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, and MTA Plus in furcal

perforation repairs.

Push-out bond strength increased with time. Their results

showed that the 24 h push-out strength of MTA was less than

that of Biodentine .

Blood contamination affected the push-out bond strength of

MTA Plus irrespective of the setting time.

A Review on Biodentine, a Contemporary Dentine Replacement and

Repair Material.Ozlem Malokondu et`al.J.Bio Med Res.2014.

Page 62: Root repair materials

In a study by Guneser et al., Biodentine showed

considerable performance as a repair material even after

being exposed to various endodontic irrigation solutions,

such as NaOCl, chlorhexidine, and saline, whereas MTA

had the lowest push-out bond strength to root dentin.

Effect of various endodontic irrigants on the push-out bond

strength of biodentine and conventional root perforation repair

materials.Guneser,Akbuluz,Eldinez.J.Endod.March.2013

Page 63: Root repair materials

Porosity and Material-Dentine Interface Analysis.

Tricalcium silicate based materials are especially indicated in

cases such as perforation repair, vital pulp treatments, and

retrograde fillings where a hermetic sealing is mandatory.

Therefore, the degree of porosity plays a very important role

in the overall success of treatments performed using these

materials, because it is critical factor that determines the

amount of leakage.

Page 64: Root repair materials

Case 1

Page 65: Root repair materials
Page 66: Root repair materials

Case 2

Palatogingival groove

Biodentine seal

Page 67: Root repair materials

Radiopacity.

Radiopacity is an important property expected from a

retrograde or repair material as these materials are

generally applied in low thicknesses and they need to be

easily discerned from surrounding tissues.

The ISO 6876:2001 has established 3mmAl as the

minimum radiopacity value for endodontic cements.

Page 68: Root repair materials

Zirconium oxide is used as a radiopacifier in Biodentine

contrary to other materials where bismuth oxide is preferred as

a radiopacifier.

The reason for such a preference might be due to some study

results which show that zirconium oxide possesses

biocompatible characteristics and is indicated as a bioinert

material with favorable mechanical properties and resistance

to corrosion.

Page 69: Root repair materials

A clinical observation stated that the radiopacity of

Biodentine is in the region of dentin and the cement is

not adequately visible in the radiograph.

This posed difficulty in terms of practical applications

T. Dammaschke, “Biodentine-an overview,” Septodont CaseStudies Collection, no. 3, 2012.

Page 70: Root repair materials

Solubility.

Grech et al. demonstrated negative solubility values for

a prototype cement, Bioaggregate, and Biodentine, in a

study assessing the physical properties of the materials.

They attributed this result to the deposition of substances

such as hydroxyapatite on the material surface when in

contact with synthetic tissue fluids.

This property is rather favorable as they indicate that the

material does not lose particulate matter to result in

dimensional instability.

A Review on Biodentine, a Contemporary Dentine Replacement and Repair Material. Özlem Malkondu,

Meriç Karapinar KazandaL and Ender KazazoLlu.Bio Med Res.June.2014

Page 71: Root repair materials

Effect on the Flexural Properties of Dentine.

An important issue related to the usage of calcium

silicate based materials is their release of calcium

hydroxide on surface hydrolysis of their calcium silicate

components.

On the other hand, it has also been indicated that

prolonged contact of root dentine with calcium

hydroxide as well as MTA has detrimental and

weakening effects on the resistance of root dentine.

Page 72: Root repair materials

Discoloration.

One study evaluated Biodentine from this perspective where

Biodentine, along with 4 different materials, was exposed to

different oxygen and light conditions and spectrophotometric

analysis was performed at different periods until 5 days.

Favorable results were obtained for Portland Cement (PC) and

Biodentine and these 2 materials demonstrated color stability

over a period of 5 days.

Based on their results, the authors suggested that Biodentine

could serve as an alternative for use under light-cured

restorative materials in areas that are esthetically sensitive.

Page 73: Root repair materials

Wash-Out Resistance.

Washout of a material is defined as the tendency of freshly

prepared cement paste to disintegrate upon early contact with

fluids such as blood or other fluids.

The results of the available study on these characteristics of

Biodentine did not reveal favorable results as the material

demonstrated a high washout with every drop used in the

methodology.

The authors attributed this result to the surfactant effect by the

water soluble polymer added to the material to reduce the

water/cement ratio.

Page 74: Root repair materials

Biocompatibility of a dental material is a

major factor that should be taken into

consideration specifically when it is used

in pulp capping, perforation repair or as

retrograde Filling

Though the information accumulated so

far regarding the biocompatibility of

Biodentine is rather limited, the available

data generally is in favor of the material

in terms of its lack of cytotoxicity and

tissue acceptability.

Page 75: Root repair materials

Han and Okiji compared Biodentine and white ProRoot MTA

in terms of Ca and Si uptake by adjacent root canal dentine

and observed that both materials formed tag-like structures.

They observed that dentine element uptake was more

prominent for Biodentine than MTA. The same authors in

another study also showed the formation of tag-like structures

composed of Ca and P-rich and Si-poor materials.

They also determined a high Ca release for Biodentine.

Page 76: Root repair materials

Recently, ERRM putty and paste (Brasseler USA,

Savannah, GA, USA) have been developed.

It is available as ready-to-use, premixed bioceramic

materials recommended for perforation repair, apical

surgery, apical plug, and pulp capping.

Page 77: Root repair materials

Biomaterials are native or synthetic polymers that

perform as scaffolds for tissue regeneration and hold

wide importance in the field of dentistry, drug delivery,

cancer treatment, thrombotic diseases, and cosmetic

surgery.

Page 78: Root repair materials

Various bioactive materials are available in today’s

time like mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), bioactive

glass, and bioaggregate materials.

In regenerative endodontic therapy, an ideal autologous

biomaterial for pulp-dentin complex regeneration is

platelet-rich fibrin (PRF).

Page 79: Root repair materials

PRF was first developed by Choukroun et al., in 2001 at

France.

Studies have demonstrated that the PRF has a very significant

slow sustained release of many key growth factors like

platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor-

β for at least 1 week and up to 28 days.

Page 80: Root repair materials

Various clinical applications of PRF include,

root coverage,

bone regeneration,

treatment of endo-perio lesions,

sinus floor elevation,

stabilize graft material in ridge augmentation,

socket preservation,

filling cystic cavities,

and in various medical fields.

Page 81: Root repair materials

PRF represents a new revolutionary step in the platelet gel

therapeutic concept.

Unlike other platelet concentrates, this technique does not

require any gelifying agent, but not more than centrifugation

of the natural blood without additives.

Page 82: Root repair materials

No biochemical handling of blood.

Simplified and cost-effective process.

Use of bovine thrombin and anticoagulants not required.

Favorable healing due to slow polymerization.

More efficient cell migration and proliferation.

PRF has supportive effect on immune system.

PRF helps in hemostasis.

Page 83: Root repair materials

The protocol for PRF preparation is very simple and simulates

that of PRP.

It includes collection of whole venous blood (around 5 ml) in

each of the two sterile vacutainer tubes (6 ml) without

anticoagulant and the vacutainer tubes are then placed in a

centrifugal machine at 3,000 revolutions per minute (rpm) for

10 min

After which it settles into the following three layers: Upper

straw-colored acellular plasma, red-colored lower fraction

containing red blood cells (RBCs), and the middle fraction

containing the fibrin clot.

Page 84: Root repair materials
Page 85: Root repair materials

The middle part is platelets trapped massively in fibrin

meshes.

The success of this technique entirely depends on time gap

between the blood collection and its transfer to the centrifuge

and it should be done in less time.

The blood sample without anticoagulant, starts to coagulate

almost immediately upon contact with the glass, and it

decreases the time of centrifugation to concentrate fibrinogen.

Platelet-rich-fibrin: A novel root coverage approach K

Anilkumar,Geetha,Pameela. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2009 Jan;13(1):50-4

Page 86: Root repair materials

EndoSequence® BC RRM™ (Root Repair Material) is

available in two specifically formulated consistencies

(syringable paste or condensable putty) and contains many of

the same characteristics as BC Sealer.

Page 87: Root repair materials

Calcium silicate

Calcium phosphate monobasic

Zirconium oxide

Tantalum oxide

Filler and thickening agents.

pH > 12

Page 88: Root repair materials

The favorable handling properties, increased strength

and shortened set time make BC RRM™ highly resistant

to washout and ideal for all root repair and pulp capping

procedures.

Research and countless cases confirm that BC RRM™ is

highly biocompatible and osteogenic.

Cytotoxicity evaluation of endosequence root repair material Amer Z. AlAnezi, Jin Jiang,

Kamran E. Safavi. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2013

Page 89: Root repair materials

iRoot BP Plus (Innovative BioCeramix Inc., Vancouver,

Canada) is a fully laboratory-synthesized, water-based

bioceramic cement.

It claims to be a more convenient reparative material,

because it is a ready to-use white hydraulic premixed

formula.

A current study to verify in vitro cytocompatibility of

iRoot BP Plus bioceramic putty concluded that iRoot

and MTA were biocompatible and did not induce critical

cytotoxic effects.

De-Deus G, Canabarro A, Alves GG, Marins JR, Linhares AB, Granjeiro JM.

Cytocompatibility of the ready-to-use bioceramic putty repair cement iRoot BP Plus with

primary Saxena P et al.. Int Endod J 2012;45:508-513.

Page 90: Root repair materials

Bioaggregate appears to be a modified or synthetic version of

original MTA.

According to the manufacturer, this material contains

biocompatible pure white powder composed of ceramic nano-

particles and deionized water.

Bioaggregate appeared to be biocompatible compared with

WMTA on human pulp cells, PDL cells and MG63 cells.

Page 91: Root repair materials

Gel-like calcium silicate hydrate.

Gel-like calcium Aluminate hydrate

Calcium hydroxide

Hydroxyapatite

Calcium sulfate

Bismuth oxide.

Tantalum oxide

Amorphous silicon oxide

Page 92: Root repair materials

A novel resin based root-end filling material (termed

New resin cement, NRC) has been introduced.

NRC is a powder and liquid system. The liquid is

composed of hydroxyethylmethacrylate, benzoyl

peroxide, toluidine, and toluenesulfinate.

And the powder is made of calcium oxide,calcium

silicate, and triphenyl bismuth carbonate.

Novel root-end filling material

Page 93: Root repair materials

One study determined the cytotoxicity of NRC and

concluded that the initial biocompatibility results of

NRC are favorable for a root-end filling material.

A recent in vivo study concluded that NRC shows

moderately higher inflammatory reaction than MTA

however, the calcium reservoir capability of NRC may

contribute to mineralization of the tissues.

Page 94: Root repair materials

Newer and better root repair materials are being introduced in

to the market every year.

The recent trend is towards bioactive materials which have

osteo inductive and conductive properties.

The clinician should have a thorough knowledge about these

products to compare and contrast before using the best

material for each case.

Page 95: Root repair materials

Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update. Payal Saxena1*,

Saurabh Kumar Gupta, Vilas Newaskar. The Korean Academy of Conservative

Dentistry.

BioDentine: A dentin substitute for the repair of root perforations, apexification

and retrograde root filling.J Conserv dent.Francois bronne.

Repair of Furcal Perforation with Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: Long-Term

Follow-Up of 2 Cases. Camila M.M. Silveira et `al. JCDA • October 2008, Vol.

74, No. 8.

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate—A Review. Arathi Rao, Ashwini Rao, Ramya

Shenoy. The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Volume 34, Number 1/2009.

Evaluation of Radiopacity, pH, Release of Calcium Ions,and Flow of a

Bioceramic Root Canal Sealer. George Taccio de Miranda Candeiro. JOE —

Volume 38, Number 6, June 2012.

Role of Platelet rich fibrin in wound healing:A critical review. Balaram Naik, P

Karunakar1, M Jayadev1, V Rahul Marsha. Journal of Conservative Dentistry

.Jul-Aug 2013 .Vol 16 .Issue 4

Dental materials-Mahalakshmi.Edition 1.