Upload
infoseg-sa
View
8.556
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Analysis of a scientific article using the mind mapping technique
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Image courtesy of dream designs at FreeDigitalPhotos.net
Problems when reading scientific articles as linear text
• Difficult to analyze an understand • Difficult to memorize • Do not create a feeling of perspective • Do not create a feeling of structure • Do not show the relation between the parts • Cognitive disonance between the linear representation and
the mental processes of the brain when analyzing information
• Do not allow to have an overall picture • Do not allow to analyze the thought of the author when
she created the article • Loss of context in long articles
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Possible Solutions
• Mind map as a complement to the text
• Mind map to view before reading the article
• Mind map to view instead of the article
This last option is possible and reasonable.
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Who creates the mind map?
• Option 1. Each reader.
• Option 2. An expert reader of each team with experience in mind mapping.
• Option 3. An external expert.
• Option 4. The company that publishes the article.
In the future, it is probably the publishing companies that will create the mind maps attached to the articles.
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Time Saving
• Savings of between 30 to 50% are to be expected.
• Previous experiences
Boeing. 11 hours/person/week
Cisco. 8 hours/person/week
• 15% in recall.
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Time Saving Estimation
• Analysis of a linear text article 3 hours
• Team of 6 people = 18 hours
• Mind map creation = 1 extra hour
• Analysis of the mind map = 1 hour
• Team of 6 people = 1*4 + 5*1 = 9 hours
• Savings = 18 – 9 = 9 hours (50%)
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Other uses of the mind map of the article
• Collaborative work. Group revision.
• Brainstorming.
• Preparation of new articles.
• Training of new team members.
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Example
The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): A novel tool for the non-invasive evaluation of steatosis using Fibroscan®
M. Sasso, V. Miettea, L. Sandrin, M. Beaugrand
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 13-20
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Current methods and limitations when evaluating steatosis (I)
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Results
• The mind mapping technique increases productivity between 25 and 50%.
• This is equivalent to hundreds or thousands of hours per year for each team using mind mapping.
• The investment is minimum and the implementation is fast (days)
• No other technique offers productivity increases at this level.
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Other applications in Healthcare
Personal Health Record
Medicine Labels
Drug Interactions
Management Reports
Big Open Data
Open Data
Instrucciones pre-operatorias
Instrucciones de alta
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k
Mind map viewer MindManager
Jose M. Guerrero [email protected]
@InfosegS
https://es.linkedin.com/in/josemguerrero2012
(c) Infoseg, S.A. 2015 http://bit.ly/1Eimh3k