49
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Social Sexing Technical Aspects 94 th Clinical Genetic Seminar SR Ghaffari MSc MD PhD M Rafati MD PhD 2/4/2016 1

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

Preimplantation Genetic DiagnosisSocial Sexing

Technical Aspects

94th Clinical Genetic SeminarSR Ghaffari MSc MD PhD

M Rafati MD PhD

2/4/2016 1

Page 2: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

2

Conventional Techniques

PCR-based Techniques Hybridization based techniques (FISH)

2/4/2016

Page 3: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

PCR Based Techniques

2/4/2016 3

Page 4: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

4

Hybridization Based Technique (FISH)

Probes Definition Types

Hybridization PrinciplesFluorescent microscopy

2/4/2016

Page 5: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

5

Hybridization based techniqueFISH

chromosome X chromosome Y chromosome 18

male nucleus

Chromosome XChromosome Y

2/4/2016

Page 6: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

6

Misdiagnosis

Complexity of misdiagnosis estimation due to:

o Many transferred embryos do not result in a pregnancy o Some spontaneously abort o Pregnancy termination in mistakenly predicted ones without

confirmation

(ESHRE Report, X)

2/4/2016

Page 7: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

7

Misdiagnosis after FISH testing

Among 15981 embryo transfer: 16 (0.1%)o For chromosomal rearrangements: 0.1%o For PGS: 0.08%o For X-linked disease testing: 0.5%o For social gender selection: 0.3%

(ESHRE Report, X)

2/4/2016

Page 8: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

8

Misdiagnosis after PCR testing

Allele dropout (ADO) and contamination are inherent pitfalls of single cell PCR and each can lead to an adverse misdiagnosis

Misdiagnosis rate of 10/3727 (0.27%) after embryo transfer for single gene disorders

Misdiagnosis rate:f 3.6% in

o (ESHRE Report, X) sex determination

FISH-based analysis, is technically more robust than a simple PCR assay for sex determination

2/4/2016

Page 9: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

9

Social sexing: genetic method

In recent data: only FISH

No misdiagnosis reported in data XII

(ESHRE Report, XII)

2/4/2016

Page 10: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

10

Preimplantation Genetic Screening using Next Generation Sequencing

2/4/2016

Page 11: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

Chromosome abnormalities

De novoAneuploidiesSex chromosome abnormalities

Inherited Balanced chromosome abnormalitiesTranslocation Inversion …

2/4/2016 11

Page 12: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

12

Aneuploidies Chromosome segregation during female meiosis is particularly error prone

in humans

It worsens with advancing age

Approximately a quarter of oocytes from women in their early 30s are chromosomally abnormal

Aneuploidy rates increasing to over 75% in the oocytes of women over 40

2/4/2016

Page 13: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

13

Aneuploidies Most of the aneuploid embryos produced from such oocytes fail to implant in the

uterus, although a minority do succeed in forming a pregnancy only to later miscarry

It is recommended to restrict the number of embryos transferred to the uterus, ideally a single embryo

Currently, the decision of which embryo should be transferred is primarily based on a simple evaluation of morphology.

However, the appearance of an embryo is only weakly correlated with its potential to form a pregnancy and reveals no useful information about its chromosomal status

2/4/2016

Page 14: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

14

PGS In the past decade

PGS by FISH Limited number of studied chromosomes (22, 16, 21, 18, 13, X, Y, …)

Meta analysis: no improvement in pregnancy rate

In recent 2 years Array based techniques

Screening of all 24 chromosomes several randomised trials chromosome screening have been undertaken, producing

clinical data supporting the hypothesis that screening of embryos for aneuploidy can improve IVF outcomes, increasing pregnancy rates and reducing miscarriages

2/4/2016

Page 15: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

152/4/2016

Page 16: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

16

Method

Three patient groups are compared: Couples with RIF for whom embryos were selected by array CGH (group RIF-

PGS): 43 Couples with the same history for whom array CGH was not performed (group RIF

NO PGS): 33 Good prognosis infertile couples with array CGH selected embryos (group NO RIF

PGS): 45

A single euploid blastocyst was transferred in groups RIF-PGS and NO RIF PGS. Array CGH was not performed in group RIF NO PGS in which 1-2 blastocysts

were transferred

2/4/2016

Page 17: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

Results

One monoembryonic sac with heartbeat was found in: 28 patients of group RIF PGS (68.3%) 31 patients of group NO RIF PGS (70.5%)

In contrast, an embryonic sac with heartbeat was only detected in 7 (21.2%) patients of group RIF NO PGS.

2/4/2016 17

Page 18: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

18

Conclusion

PGS by array CGH with single euploid blastocyst transfer appears to be a successful strategy for patients with multiple failed IVF attempts.

2/4/2016

Page 19: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

19

Limitations

The extremely limited amount of tissue available for analysis, only one cell (blastomere)

Cost: cost of aneuploidy screening is multiplied by the number of embryos produced

by the couple (averaging approximately six, but in some cases exceeding 20)

Time Scalability: any test must be scalable, allowing multiple samples to be

assessed simultaneously Less than 24 h available for genetic analysis.

2/4/2016

Page 20: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

202/4/2016

Page 21: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

21

Method

A rapid (<15 h) NGS protocol was developed, with consumable cost only two-thirds that of the most widely used method for embryo aneuploidy detection

Validation involved blinded analysis of 54 cells from cell lines or biopsies from human embryos.

2/4/2016

Page 22: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

222/4/2016

Page 23: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

23

Results

Research Phase: Sensitivity and specificity were 100%.

Clinical phase: The method was applied clinically, assisting in the selection of euploid

embryos in two IVF cycles, producing healthy children in both cases.

2/4/2016

Page 24: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

24

Simultaneous Investigation of Single Gene Disorders

NGS allows the potential for simultaneous chromosomal analysis and diagnosis of gene mutations in single cells Aneuploidy: low-pass sequencing of WGA products yields <0.1%

coverage of the genome PCR before NGS Library preparation Combination of libraries NGS

2/4/2016

Page 25: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

25

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that NGS provides highly accurate, low-cost diagnosis of aneuploidy in cells from human preimplantation embryos and is rapid enough to allow testing without embryo cryopreservation.

The method described also has the potential to shed light on other aspects of embryo genetics of relevance to health and viability.

2/4/2016

Page 26: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

26

Detection of Chromosome Abnormalities using NGS

Our Experience

2/4/2016

Page 27: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

27

Investigation of products of conception

2/4/2016

Page 28: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

28

Product of conception: Trisomy of chromosome 16

2/4/2016

Page 29: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

29

Product of conception: Trisomy of chromosome 22

2/4/2016

Page 30: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

30

Detection of unbalanced chromosome abnormality

2/4/2016

Page 31: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

31

Partial trisomy of 1qpartial monosomy of 4p

2/4/2016

Page 32: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

32

Preimplantation genetic screening using NGS (PGS-NGS)

Aneuploidy screening of all chromosomes Increasing the pregnancy rate following ART Techniques Proposed clinical applications:

Repeated ART Failure Recurrent abortion Routine ART ….

Workflow: Single cell whole genome amplification of blastomeres NGS analysis

2/4/2016

Page 33: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

33

Whole Genome Amplification

2/4/2016

Page 34: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

34

Rule out of Contamination

2/4/2016

Page 35: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

35

STR Markers

2/4/2016

Page 36: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

36

Fetus and the Parents

• M

2/4/2016

Page 37: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

37

Normal embryo

2/4/2016

Page 38: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

38

PGS-NGSMonosomy of chromosome 13

2/4/2016

Page 39: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

39

Gender: Female

2/4/2016

Page 40: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

40

Gender: Male

2/4/2016

Page 41: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

41

ESHRE Report

2/4/2016

Page 42: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

42

ESHRE PGD

European society of human reproduction and embryology Established in 1997

The aims: (i) to survey the availability of PGD (ii) to collect prospectively and retrospectively data on accuracy, reliability and

effectiveness of PGD (iii) to initiate follow-up studies (iv) to produce guidelines and recommended PGD protocols (v) To formulate a consensus on the use of PGD (vi) to educate in the science of genetics and reproduction

2/4/2016

Page 43: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

432/4/2016

Page 44: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

442/4/2016

Page 45: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

45

Pregnancies and Babies

6458 fetal sacs 5187 clinical pregnancies 744 pregnancy complications 4140 deliveries 5135 newborns (singletons: 3182, twins: 921, triplets: 37) PND in 2462 cases and postnatal investigation in 2049 cases

(ESHRE Report, X)

2/4/2016

Page 46: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

46

Pregnancies and Babies Till 2013:

50000 cycles10000 babies

2/4/2016

Page 47: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

47

What about PGD babies?

Among 4021 newborns:Major malformations: 84 (2%)Neonatal complications: 402 (10%)

These cumulative data again confirm that pregnancies and babies born after PGD are similar to the pregnancies obtained and babies born after ICSI treatment

(ESHRE Report, X)2/4/2016

Page 48: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

48

Final Recommendation

• Before PGD is performed, genetic counseling must be provided to ensure that patients fully understand the risk of having an affected child, the impact of the disease on an affected child and the limitations of available options that may help to avoid the birth of an affected child.

2/4/2016

Page 49: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis using Next Generation Sequencing for Social Sexing

49

Thank You

2/4/2016