Upload
tuno-pulcins
View
54
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Minimally Invasive Total Hip Replacement (MITHR)
Students:
For: Guntis Balodis,
Against: Andris Džeriņš
Mentor: Asoc. Prof. Pēteris Studers
2
Total hip replacement has been termed as «Operation of Century» as it has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced hip disorders1
In 1890, Gluck in Germany reported first total hip replacement from ivory2
In 1960s low friction arthroplasty procedures developed by Sir John Charnley2
Introduction
1. Learmonth DI, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. The Lancet
2007;370:1508-19.
2. Bhan S, Pankaj A. History and evolution of hip arthroplasty. Bhan S, Malhotra R (Ed). Key Issues in Hip
Arthropasty. New Delhi. Mediworld publications 2007.pp.4-10.
3
In 2003 Berger popularized the idea of MITHR1
Prof. Frederick Laude in Paris adapted the anterior approach and modified the traction table and tissue retractors to create a truly “minimally invasive approach” 13 years ago1
History of MITHR
1. http://kog.net.au/hip/anterior-minimally-invasive-hip-replacement-surgery-amis-thr
4
Minimally invasive technique- total hip replacement performed through an incision that is less than 10 cm in length (6-10cm)
Minimally invasive THA involves a modified surgical dissection that uses internervous planes while minimising any tendon or muscle trauma during the exposure1
Introduction
1. Single-incision, minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: length doesn't matter. de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Zalzal P,
Winemaker MJ J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec; 19(8):945-50.
5
MITHR: anterolateral approach
Dtsch Arztebl 2006; 103(49):A3333–9 www.aerzteblatt.de
6
MITHR: posterior approach
Dtsch Arztebl 2006; 103(49):A3333–9 www.aerzteblatt.de
7
MITHR: direct two-incision approach
Dtsch Arztebl 2006; 103(49):A3333–9 www.aerzteblatt.de
8
The incision lenght
Total hip arthroplasty through the mini-incision (Micro-hip) approach versus the
standard transgluteal (Bauer) approach: a prospective, randomised study. J
Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Aug;22(2):168-72.
13,4 cm
9,3 cm
9
MITHR is not suitable for all patients1:Elderly patients
Overweight patients (BMI >30)
Severe acetabular dysplasia
Severe acetabular protrusion
Previous hip operations
Severe hip contracture
Muscular patients
Patient Characteristics for MITHR
1. http://www.arthritis-health.com/surgery/hip-surgery/minimally-invasive-hip-replacement-vs-traditional-hip-replacement
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/858818
10
Tissue trauma is similar between the groups by assesing cytokine level (Ogonda et al. and Chimento et al. 2012)
Mow et al. Skin and soft tissue damage is caused by the high retractor pressure required for the MIS exposure1
Damage to surrounding tissue
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2000333-technique
1. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and
meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;
35(2): 173–184.
11
Surgery time
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):1970-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
Minimally invasive surgery
+5 min
Standart approach
+12 min
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Dec; 5(4): e31
12
Hospitalization time
Minimally invasive surgery
+ 1 day
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr; 471(4): 1283–1294.
13
There were no statistically significant differences between the exposure methods during THA for complications such as:
infection rates
intra- or postoperative fracture
dislocation rate
deep vein thrombosis
haematoma formation
wound complications
component loosening
Complication rates I
Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-
analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Int Orthop. 2011 Feb; 35(2):
173–184.
14
Complication rates II
MI technique has a five times greater rate of iatrogenic lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy (p < 0.0001) 1
Femoral nerve palsy may be associated with retractor position2
Reduced operative visibility may increase the potential for nerve injury1
1. Yoon TR, Park KS, Song EK, Seon JK, Seo HY. New two-incision minimally invasive total hip
arthroplasty: comparison with the one-incision method. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14:155–160. doi:
10.1007/s00776-008-1305-8.2. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and
meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;
35(2): 173–184.
http
://im
g.m
edsc
apes
tatic
.com
/pi/m
eds/
ckb/
54/2
9654
tn.jp
g
15
There was no statistically significant difference between the exposure method in respect to:
WOMAC score (p = 0.13)Harris hip score (p=0.06)Oxford Hip score(p = 0.29)SF-36 physical function (p=0.69)
Clinical outcomes
2. Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and
meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Smith TO, Blake V, Hing CB. Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;
35(2): 173–184.
16
6 weeks – 2 years after surgery
6 weeks 12 weeks 1 year 2 years0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Standart lateral
VAS pain at motion Harris VAS satisfaction
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Dec; 5(4): e31.
[0-10] [0-10] [0-10]
17
6 weeks 12 weeks 1 year 2 years0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Minimally invasive
VAS pain at motion Harris VAS satisfaction
6 weeks – 2 years after surgery
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Dec; 5(4): e31.
[0-10] [0-10] [0-10]
18
Repantis et al. 2014. On discharge, postoperative hematocrit lower in conventional THA patients, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08)
There was no statistical significant difference in the amount of blood units transfused in the two groups (p = 0.67).
Blood-loss
Repantis T, Korovessis PG. Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional
anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. E J of Orth Surg. Feb 2014.
19
Blood-loss
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr; 471(4): 1283–1294.
Minimally invasive surgery
+73 ml
Minimally
invasive
surgery
+59 ml
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):1970-82. doi: 10.1016
20
Woolson et al. 2004. The posterolateral MI group was had a higher percentage of acetabular component malposition (p = 0.04), and poor fit and fill of femoral components (p = 0.004)1
Radiological outcomes
1. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip
replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg.
2004;86:1353–1358.
2. Kim YH (2006) Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive
technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 21: 1092–
1098.
Kim YH 2006. Femoral offset was significantly increased ( p =
0.02) involving the posterolateral approach2
http
s://o
peni
.nlm
.nih
.gov
/det
aile
dres
ult.p
hp?i
mg=
PM
C31
4398
2_or
-200
9-2-
e27-
g002
&re
q=4
21
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
1
1
1
1
STD MIS
Radiological outcomes
Mean change of
position Medially
Mean change of
position CraniallyOrthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Dec; 5(4): e31.
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1
1
1
1
STD MIS
Radiological outcomes
Mean inclination Mean anteversion
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Dec; 5(4): e31.
23
The learning curve of the MI anterior approach is more than 46-100 patients
During this learning curve, the complication rate is higher because of the technical difficulties
The complication rate is twice as high for surgeons who perform fewer than 50 MITHRs a year1
Learning curve I
1. Y.M. den Hartog & S.B.W. Vehmeijer (2013) High complication rate in the early
experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior
approach, Acta Orthopaedica, 84:1, 116-117
24
MITHR, when performed by an experienced surgeon, can have results equivalent to conventional THR1
While MITHR can be safe and effective, the evidence does not support making it the standard of care1
The choice of operative approach depends on surgeon preference and experience2
Conclusions
1. A Henderson, J Grahame. Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Internet Journal of
Academic Physician Assistants. 2008 Volume 7 Number 1.
2. Medscape- Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2000333-overview?
pa=URmJ1OJ6kpGaWAiWnspY9Td01cngGy7K0Xf%2FM3gwc%2BD
%2Fm65xAqLuxe5rW4NwbmwdVrJxKJt4DRD8mxYr6kYfOw%3D%3D
25
Thank You for Your Attention!