Upload
george-s-ferzli
View
2.247
Download
6
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LAPAROSCOPIC COLON RESECTION -
Anterior Approach
Sandeep Malhotra, MD
Scott Steinberg, MD
George Ferzli, MD, FACSProfessor of Surgery, SUNY Downstate Health Science Center, Brooklyn, NY
Anterior Approach
• Patient supine
• Position hand over sigmoid and rotate in semi-circle to place trocars (3)
Trocar Placement : Anterior Position
Anterior position
1
2
Trocar in inguinal crease cuts sigmoid
Repair - Anterior Position
If proximal colon can be brought through inguinal crease trocar incision, tension free repair will be successful
Anterior Approach
Anterior Approach
Laparoscopic Sigmoid ColectomyTotal (n) = 62 pts Lateral (24) Anterior (38)
Age 48 (32 - 70) 46 (27 - 86)
Sex, M:F 23:1 35:3
Indications:
• Diverticulitis 16 (2 abscess) 20 (4 abscess)
• Polyp 3 6
• Carcinoma 5 12
Complications 1 hematoma flank,
1 re-op for SBO,
1 leak (cut.drainage)
1 leak (re-op hartman)
Hospital Stay 2.2 (2 - 10) 2.4 (2 - 9)
OR Time 142 (98 – 216) 147 (110 – 279)Ferzli G et al. (2000 – 2001) Unpublished Data
Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Cancer
Colorectal ResectionLaparoscopic vs. open resection for carcinoma
0
10
20
30
40
RHC Trans AR Sig LAR APR Total
Ave
. # ly
mp
h no
des
0
5
10
15
20
25
RHC Trans AR Sig LAR APR
Ave
. spe
cim
en le
ngth
, cm
0
4
8
12
16
20
RHC Trans AR Sig LAR APR
Ave
. dis
tal m
arg
in, c
m
LCR OCR
0
7
14
21
28
35
RHC Trans AR Sig LAR APR
Ave
. pro
xim
al m
arg
in, c
m
LCR OCR
RHC = Right hemicolectomy; Trans = Transverse; AR = Anterior resection; Sig = Sigmoid; LAR = Low anterior resection; APR = Abdominoperineal resection
Franklin ME et al, Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:s35-s46
Colorectal ResectionLaparoscopic vs. open resection for carcinoma
Laparoscopic
(n=192)
Open
(n=224)
Hospitalization, days 5.6 9
Blood loss, mL 150 450
Wound complications 0.5% 6%
Recurrence rates 12.2% 22%
Cumulative death and recurrence rates 5 years into the study (Stages I, II, and III)
13% 19.1%
Franklin ME et al, Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:s35-s46
Colorectal ResectionLaparoscopic vs. open resection for carcinoma
Follow-up Lap. Open
No. of cases (n) 40 43
Overall metastases 8 (20%) 10 (23%)
Single site metastases 3 5
Liver 2 4
Regional 1 1
Multiple site metastases 5 5
Liver+ Peritoneum 4 4
Liver+Peritoneum+
Trocar-site or scar
1 1
Five-year overall survival
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 12 24 36 48 60
Follow-up (months)
Sur
viva
l (%
)
Five-year disease-free survival
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 12 24 36 48 60
Follow-up (months)
Sur
viva
l (%
)
Lap OpenSantoro E et al, Hepato-Gastroenterology 1999; 46:900-904
Colorectal ResectionLaparoscopic vs. open resection for carcinoma
Lap (n=18) Open (n=18) Converted (n=7)
Operating room time (min) 210 138 242
Blood loss (mL) 284 407 683
ICU stay (days) 3 4 6
Clear liquids (days) 2.7 4.4 5
Regular diet (days) 4.1 5.8 7
Length of stay (days) 5.2 7.3 8
Complications (n, %) 1, 5% 5, 28% 8, 100%
Length of specimen (cm) 26 26 32
Number of lymph nodes 11 10 12
Late death from cancer (mean follow-up 4.9 years)
4 6 1
Recurrence 0 1 1
Curet MJ et al, Surg Endosc (2000) 14: 1062-1066
Long-Term Survival After Laparoscopic Colon Resection For Cancer
• Aim: To evaluate long-term survival after curative, laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
• Design: Retrospective review of 102 consecutive patients with laparoscopic colon resection between 1991 and 1996 with 5-year follow-up. Comparison made to open colectomy at the same institution and National Cancer Database during similar time period.
Lujan HJ et.al. Dis. of Colon and Rectum;45:491-405,April 2002
Long-Term Survival After Laparoscopic Colon Resection For Cancer
02040
6080
100
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time in years
% s
urv
iva
l
Lap
Open0
20406080
100
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time in years
% s
urvi
val
Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV
Long-Term Survival After Laparoscopic Colon Resection For Cancer
02040
6080
100
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time in years
% s
urv
iva
l
Lap
Open – Nat.Ca. Database
020406080
100
0 1 2 3 4 5
Time in years
% s
urvi
val
Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV
Long-Term Survival After Laparoscopic Colon Resection For Cancer - Conclusions
• Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is safe and feasible
• 5-year survival after laparoscopic colon resection for cancer is similar to survival after conventional surgery
• Prospective randomized trials currently under way will likely confirm these results
Lujan HJ et.al. Dis. of Colon and Rectum;45:491-405,April 2002