Upload
bianca-kramer
View
629
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on various developments in rapid reviews, inlcuding Cochrane Response and TRIP Rapid Reviews. Presented at WEB&Z meeting (Dutch medical information specilists) November 28, 2013
Citation preview
How rapid is a rapid review?
Bianca KramerNovember 28, 2013
How long does it take to conduct a systematic review?
The Cochrane Oversight Committee. Measuring the performance of The Cochrane Library. 2012
Cochrane reviews 2010:
23 months (median)
Cochrane reviews in numbers
The Cochrane Oversight Committee. Measuring the performance of The Cochrane Library. 2012
2011
New reviews published 416
Updated reviews published 468
Active reviews that are up-to-date 36,5 %
“I see a future for Cochrane as having
2 types of systematic review:
rapid systematic reviews undertaken in
a significantly reduced timeframe,
and a more costly systematic review”
http://blog.tripdatabase.com/2013/04/a-critique-of-cochrane-collaboration.html
How to do a systematic reviewin a month (or less) ?
How to do a systematic reviewin a month (or less) ?
Formulate clinical question (PICO / DDO)
Systematic literature search
Selection (inclusion / exclusion criteria)
Critical appraisal (validity / relevance)
Summarize data
http://innovations.cochrane.org/response
http://innovations.cochrane.org/sites/innovations.cochrane.org/files/CHA-RR%20Evidence%20Summary-Final%2024May2013.pdf
Cochrane ResponseRapid Review example
- produced in 10 weeks
- 8291 references screened, 69 included
In general:
- 2-3 key databases, - publication date/geographical location
- full-text availability- focus on SRs, RCT/cohorts if necessary
Cochrane ResponseRapid Review example
http://www.cadth.ca/en/resources/rx-for-change/interventions-professionals
- evidence synthesis: narrative
Percentage of studies that favour intervention:
0 % = no effect1-33 % = generally ineffective34-66 % = mixed effects> 67 % = generally effective
Formulate clinical question (PICO / DDO)
Systematic literature search
Selection (inclusion / exclusion criteria)
Critical appraisal (validity / relevance)
Summarize data
http://www.cochrane.org/news/tags/authors/webinar-introduction-rapid-reviews-30-jan-2014
http://www.isehc.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/October-2013.pdf
Superfilters Website: A Literature Searching Tool for Clinicians and Review Authors
Nancy L Wilczynski, N Hobson, C Cotoi, R Brian Haynes
“To develop a superfilters website that
provides clinicians and review authors with the
opportunity to search across several electronic
databases simultaneously with empirically derived,
high performance, search filters.”
http://www.isehc.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/October-2013.pdf
Superfilters Website: A Literature Searching Tool for Clinicians and Review Authors
Nancy L Wilczynski, N Hobson, C Cotoi, R Brian Haynes
“To add ‘capture-mark-recapture’ (CMR) statistical
modeling to the review authors’ superfilter site to
help those searching for all available evidence to
determine whether to continue or stop searching,
for example, when conducting systematic reviews”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Collar_tagged_Rock_Hyrax.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wing_tag_Great_Frigatebird.jpg
Formulate clinical question (PICO / DDO)
Systematic literature search
Selection (inclusion / exclusion criteria)
Critical appraisal (validity / relevance)
Summarize data
TRIP Rapid Reviews: Systematic Reviews in 5 minutes ?
http://blog.tripdatabase.com/2013/10/trip-rapid-reviews-systematic-reviews.html
TRIP Rapid Reviews: Systematic Reviews in 5 minutes ?
1) Enter domain and intervention
2) Select articles from list of TRIP search results (controlled trials)
3) ...
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AThe_Big_Red_Button_(3085157011).jpg
http://blog.tripdatabase.com/2013/10/trip-rapid-reviews-systematic-reviews.html
TRIP Rapid Reviews: Systematic Reviews in 5 minutes ?
4) Machine reading of abstracts (2 methods)
→ intervention favoured? sample size?
5) Positive/Negative score (+1/-1), corrected for sample size
6) Scores for each article averaged → final score
Formulate clinical question (PICO / DDO)
Systematic literature search
Selection (inclusion / exclusion criteria)
Critical appraisal (validity / relevance)
Summarize data
Reading list:
http://www.slideshare.net/JulianeRied/development-of-cochrane-response-part-1-garritty
Development of Cochrane Response part 1/2
(Chantelle Garrity, OHRI, Canada)
http://blog.tripdatabase.com/2013/04/a-critique-of-cochrane-collaboration.html
A critique of the Cochrane Collaboration
(Jon Brassey, TRIP Database)
http://www.slideshare.net/JulianeRied/development-of-cochrane-response-part-ii