41
CURRENT STATUS OF TOTAL HIP SURGERY WHAT IS NEW??? ANTHONY S UNGER, MD WASHINGTON, DC

Current Status of Total Hip Surgery- What is New?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

CURRENT STATUS OF TOTAL HIP SURGERYWHAT IS NEW???

ANTHONY S UNGER, MDWASHINGTON, DC

WHAT’S NEW

THA 2012

SURGICAL APPROACH

METAL ON METAL

SURFACE REPLACEMENT

STEMS

CUPS

BEARINGS

DVT PROPHYLAXIS

INFECTION WORK UP

SURGICAL APPROACH

THE DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH

DAA ADVANTAGES

PATIENT SUPINE—LL EQUALIZATION

LOWER DISLOCATION RATE

LESS INVASIVE ?

OBESE PATIENTS EASIER

LESS DVT??—LESS KINKING OF FEMORAL VEIN

DAA-TABLE-LESS ADVANTAGES

QUICKER, LESS SET UP

BETTER ASSESSMENT OF STABILITY

CHEAPER—NO TABLE COSTS

BETTER ABILITY TO EQUAL LL

DON’T NEED XRAY

Creatine Kinase Differences between Anterior and Posterior MIS THA

5.5X 1.4X 1.8X

DAA-TABLE-LESS

QUICKER RECOVERY, MORE BLOODLOSS??

BEREND ET AL, JBJS, 2009

DAA vs DL IMPROVED HARRIS HIP SCORE AND LOWER EXT ACTIVITY @ 6 WKS

HIGHER RATE OF D/C TO HOME

INCREASED BLOODLOSS(155CC VS 130 CC)?

DAA-TABLE-LESS

BETTER FUNCTIONAL SCORES

RESTREPO ET AL, J OF A, 2010

PROSPECTIVE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES OF DAA VERSUS DIRECT LATERAL

UP TO 2 YRS DAA HAD BETTER FUNCTION SCORES ON SHORT SF-36 AND WOMAC

METAL ON METAL

MOM WARNINGS

BRITISH ORTHOPAEDIC SOCIETY AND BRITISH HIP SOCIETY 2010

YRLY XRAY AND CLINICAL EVAL

METAL IONS, MARS/CT IN SYMPATOMATIC PTS

REPEAT TESTING FOR ELEVATED ION LEVELS(>7PPB)

ENDORSED BY US FDA, AAOS, AAHKS, HIP SOCIETY

METAL ON METAL

EFFECT OF ELEVATED METAL IONS NOT UNDERSTOOD

EFFECT OF FEMORAL HEAD SIZE ON ION LEVELS SHOW CONFLICTING RESULTS

CLINICAL TRIALS COMPARING MOM TO OTHER BEARINGS USING RANDOMISED CONTROLS LACKING

MALVIYA, A. ET AL, JBJS 92:1675, 2010

METAL ON METAL

PSEUDOTUMORS

MARS STUDY(METAL ARTIFACT REDUCTION MRI)

17/30(57%) IN PAINFUL MOM

17/28(61%) IN NON PAINFUL MOM

“COMMON IN WELL POSITIONED IMPLANTS”

HART, A. J. , JBJS 94:317, 2012

METAL ON METAL

PSEUDOTUMORS

ULTRASOUND- MOM VS MOP

42% IN MOM THA

25% IN MOM SRA

12% IN MOP

ION LEVELS DID NOT CORRELATE

WILLIAMS, D.H ET AL, JBJS 93:2164, 2011

AAOSMOM TECH UPDATE 2011

#1 WHAT ARE CLINICAL OTCOMES OF MOM THA VS OTHER BEARINGS??

PTS WITH MOM HAVE GREATER RISK OF REVISION

#2 WHAT ARE THE PT FACTORS THAT BEST PREDICT SUCCESS OF MOM?

LARGE HEAD IN MOM THA INCREASE REVISION

SMALL HEAD SIZE IN MOM SRA INCREASE REVISION

PTS OLDER THAN 65 HAVE HIGHER REVISON RATE

NO GENDER DIFFERENCES

MOMAAOS TECH UPDATE 2011

#3 WHAT IS PREVELANCE OF CLINICAL PROBLEMS WITH MOM THA COMPARED TO OTHER BEARINGS??

MALPOSITIONED IMPLANTS HAVE HIGHER FAILURE RATES AND ELEVATED IONS

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ELEVATED IONS UNKNOWN

MOM HIP WORK UP

GET XRAYS, EXAMINE PT

LOOK FOR MECHANICAL FAILURE

KNOW RECALLS( ASR, DUROM)

LOOK FOR ABNORMAL ANTERVERSION OR HIGH ADB ANGLE

MEASURE IONS(>5-7 PPb)

REVISE IF PAINFUL

DO MARS MRI OR ULTRASOUND TO LOOK FOR PSEUDO TUMORS

SURFACE REPLACEMENT

HIP RSURFACING(SRA)

1.4-3.6 INCREASED REVISION RATE COMPARED TO THA

MCGRORY ET AL 2011

REVISION RATE 3.5% IN 29 STUDIES, 10625 SRAS

VAN DER WEEGEN ET AL, 2011

HIP RESURFACING (SRA)

AMSTUTZ ET AL 2010

10 YR SURVIVAL 88.6% IN 100 CONSECUTIVE SRA

NO FAILURE IN HEAD SIZE >46MM

TREACY ET AL 2011

10 YR SURVIVAL 95.5% IN 144 HIPS

98% SURVIVAL IN MALES

SRAAAOS TECH OVERVIEW 2009 #1 ARE REVSION RATES DIFFERENT FOR

SRA VS THA?

ANALYSIS OF 3 REGISTRIES –SRA>REVISION RATE THAN THA

#2 WHAT CHARACTERISTICS FOR PTS WITH SRA GIVE BEST OUTCOMES?

NO CONCLUSIONS

SRAAAOS TECH OVERVIEW 2009

#3 WHAT IS MORE EFFECTIVE TX SRA OR THA??

LIMITED DATA, NO CONCLUSIONS

#4 IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT EXPERIENCE IMPROVES OUTCOME??

LOW QUALITY STUDIES SUGGEST EXPERIENCE IMPROVES OUTCOMES

STEMS

THA-Stems

THA-STEMS

THA-Stem

CUPS

THA-Ceramics

THA-Ceramics

BEARINGS

Cross-linking and Free Radicals

C C C C CH H H H H

H H

CH

H * H

CH

H

C C CH H

H H H

C*

CH

H H

CH

H

CH

H

Cross-link

Irradiation forms free radicals and crosslinks Heating forms more crosslinks and eliminates free radicals

Free Radicals

This information is provided for internal use only and is not intended for general distribution or use. Product availability is subject to the regulatory or medical practices

that govern individual markets. Please contact your Stryker representative if you have any questions about the availability of Stryker products in your area.

Crosslinking Decreases Wear

Reference (7)

This information is provided for internal use only and is not intended for general distribution or use. Product availability is subject to the regulatory or medical practices

that govern individual markets. Please contact your Stryker representative if you have any questions about the availability of Stryker products in your area.

CROSS-LINKED POLY

WEAR RATE .003 VS .051 MM/YR

95% IMPROVEMENT

FU AT 6.8 YRS

MEN AS GOOD AS WOMEN

50 YR HIP???

Mc CALDAN ET AL JBJS, 2009

DVT PROPHYLAXIS-XARELTO

Xarelto(rivaroxaban)

Xa inhibitor

Record Trial

THA 30 days, 10 mg/day

TKA 14 days, 10 meg/day

Lower DVT than Lovenox

No more bleeding

Cheaper

Use in high risk pts??

INFECTION WORK UP

Leucocyte Esterase

Scientific Articles | December 21, 2011 Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The

Utility of a Simple Yet Unappreciated Enzyme Javad Parvizi, MD, FRCS1; Christina Jacovides,

BS1; Valentin Antoci, MD, PhD1; Elie Ghanem, MD1

1 Rothman Institute of Orthopedics at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address for J. Parvizi: [email protected]

Leukocyte Esterase

Results: On the basis of clinical, serological, and operative criteria, thirty of the 108 knees undergoing revision arthroplasty were infected and seventy-eight were uninfected. When only a ++ reading was considered positive, the leukocyte esterase test was 80.6% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.9% to 91.9%) and 100% specific (95% CI, 94.5% to 100.0%), with a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 83.4% to 100.0%) and a negative predictive value of 93.3% (95% CI, 85.4% to 97.2%). The leukocyte esterase level correlated strongly with the percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (r = 0.7769) and total white blood-cell count (r = 0.5024) in the aspirate as well as with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (r = 0.6188) and C-reactive protein level (r = 0.4719) in the serum.

THANK YOU