Upload
ali-naffaa
View
379
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A research study about finding the most accurate, economically viable, and user friendly alternative to mercury thermometer for the Lebanese healthcare industry
Citation preview
Comparative Evaluation of Non-Mercury Thermometers in a Hospital Setting
Rafic Hariri School of NursingJune 1, 2011
1
BackgroundPurposeLiterature reviewResearch MethodsResultsRecommendationsLimitations
Outline
2
Phasing out MERCURY
WHY???
Toxic
Pollutant
Bioaccumulative
3
Phasing out MERCURY
Mercury in the atmosphere has increased 20 times since 1840
Human activities account for about 70% of the mercury emissions compared to natural sources
[Source: US Geological Survey, 2002]
4
Phasing out MERCURYMercury Baseline Information from LEBANON (2001 –
2005)
Average Mass Imported (Kg Hg per year) 214
Quantity of Thermometers Imported 427517
Estimated Releases (Kg Hg per year) 31
Percentage Releases 14.5
United Nations Development Programme (August, 2007). UNDP project document: Government of Argentina, India, Latvia, Lebanon, Philippines, Senegal, Kingdom of Tanzania and Vietnam. Retrieved on November 20, 2010 from http://gefmedwaste.org/downloads/ProDoc.pdf
5
WHO Policy on Mercury in Health
Care(August 2005)
Short Term: Address mercury clean up, waste handling and storage procedures. Develop and implement plans to reduce the use of mercury equipment and replace with mercury free alternatives.
Medium Term: Increase efforts to reduce use of unnecessary mercury equipment
Long Term: Support a ban of mercury containing devices and promote alternatives.
6
Purpose
The objectives of the study are:
To determine the available thermometry technologies available in the Lebanese market and their cost effectiveness for a model healthcare facility.
To determine the suitability of use of two alternative thermometers in a hospital setting based on differences in their essential characteristics and preferences of healthcare professional staff.
7
Literature incomprehensive and inconclusive
difficult for meta-analysis because studies target different patient populations and utilize a variety of devices
Overall, electronic thermometers have the widest support as reliable, accurate, and safe alternatives to mercury thermometers.
The problem is that they are thought to be expensive
Crawford, D. C., Hicks, B., & Thompson, M. J. (2006). Which thermometer? Factors influencing best choice for intermittent clinical temperature assessment. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 30(4), 199 – 211.
8
Research Methods Market survey
Nursing leadership preferences
Comparative costing
Clinical comparison
- comparative accuracy
- ease of use
Nursing staff perspective
9
Market survey Ten vendors were identified and contacted Brands available
- 10 compact electronic- one electronic- 5 infrared tympanic- 3 infrared temporal- one Galinstan-in-glass
10
Nursing Leadership Preferences Eight nurse managers questionnaire (seven multiple-choice questions + add
on)
Analysis of preferred criteria showed that the selected thermometer should display the result digitally and have the ability to measure the temperature from different sites.
ELECTRONIC or COMPACT ELECTRONIC
11
Selection of the two non-mercury thermometers
Electronic
Suretemp Plus 690
(Welch Allyn – USA)
12
Selection of the two non-mercury thermometers Compact Electronic
10 brands
Peak temperature alarm Fever warning
Flexible probe tip Start-up self-check
Memory function Meet standards
MT 200 (Microlife, Switzerland)
13
Comparative costing of thermometers
Types of costs included in the analysis are:
Alexander, D., & Kelly, B. (1991). Cost effectiveness of tympanic thermometry in the pediatric office setting. Clinical Pediatrics, 30(4 Suppl), 57-59.
Cost type Examples Sources of data
thermometer costs Thermometer, accessories
Vendor’s quotations
disposable supply costs
Batteries, Alcohol swabs, Probe covers
Hospital data
personnel costs Nurses' time User manual
equipment service costs
medical engineer time, Maintenance, Calibration
Personal experience
14
Comparative costing of thermometers (USD)
Type of thermometers
Electronic Compact electronic
Infrared tympanic
Infrared temporal
Mercury
Total investment cost
10,029 2,719 3,292 6,580 23,092
Total annual running cost 8,807 15,603 30,543 33,556 31,213
Total cost at year one 18,836 18,322 33,835 40,136 54,305
Total cost at year ten 98,099 158,749 308,722 342,140 543,050
15
Clinical evaluation: accuracyo 150 readings from five clinical departments (30 each)o Measurement sites included oral cavity (40 %), axilla
(40%), and rectum (20%) o 62% of readings were taken on female patients
Age Frequency Percentage
≤ 1 month 30 20
1 month – 18 years 32 21
19 years – 60 years 61 41
≥60 years 27 18
16
Clinical evaluation: accuracy
Total sample Oral Axillary Rectal
Sample Size (readings)
150 60 60 30
Mean difference of readings (SD*)
0.45 (0.49) 0.2 (0.35) 0.775 (0.47) 0.31 (0.41)
Range of difference of readings
-0.7 to +2.2 -0.7 to +1.4 0 to +2.2 -0.4 to +1.3
95% confidence interval
0.37-0.53 0.11-0.29 0.65-0.89 0.15-0.46
t-test 11.27 4.46 12.64 4.11
P value ˂ 0.001 ˂ 0.001 ˂ 0.001 ˂ 0.001
Correlation coefficient (Pearson R)
0.64 0.7 0.65 0.81
17
18
Clinical evaluation: accuracy
Total sample Oral Axillary Rectal
Limits of agreement [-0.534, 1.434] [-0.505, 0.905] [-0.194, 1.724] [-0.510, 1.136]
Number with 0.5°C or more difference (%)
45 (31.3) 8 (13.3) 33(55) 6(20)
Number of readings higher with compact electronic (%)
127 (84.6) 45(75) 59(98.3) 23(76.6)
Number of identical readings (%)
7 (4.6) 5 (8.3) 1(1.6) 1(3.3)
Number of lower readings (%)
16 (10.6) 10 (16.6) 0 6(20)
19
Clinical evaluation: ease of use
o Ten healthcare staff (RNs & PNs) took the temperature of a volunteer three times by each thermometer.
o Such a difference translates to a 1392 $ in savings from personnel cost annually.
Comparison of the measurement time of both thermometers in seconds
Thermometer type
Mean (SD) Mean difference
Level of significance
Number of steps (range)
Electronic 21.55 (2.07)14.84 P<0.001
6 to 7Compact electronic
36.39 (4.45) 6 to 7
20
Healthcare personnel perspective Five healthcare personnel (practical nurses) Five days
Question Compact electronic
ElectronicBoth are the
sameWhich thermometer is more likely to be broken during use?
- 80% 20%
Which thermometer do you think is more accurate? 20% 40% 40%
Which thermometer is easier to use? 20% 80% -
21
Healthcare personnel perspective“The nylon probe covers of the MT200 are not enough
protection from nosocomial infections since micro-tears may happen to the probe cover during measurement which might affect its integrity.”
“Equipments used on isolation patients are kept in their rooms, which might increase the possibility of losing the MT200 because of its small size.”
“Removal of the probe cover of MT200 may pose a risk of contamination.”
22
Healthcare personnel perspective“Adult patients were pleased more with the electronic
thermometer”
“Probes of electronic thermometer are thick causing discomfort for the neonates.”
23
Recommendations
Electronic thermometers are the most cost-effective type of thermometers in the Lebanese setting.
Compact electronic thermometers cannot replace electronic thermometers from the accuracy point of view.
Electronic thermometers are easier to use than compact electronic thermometers.
Most of healthcare personnel's comments favor the electronic thermometer.
The Electronic thermometer is the recommended replacement for the mercury thermometer in Lebanon.
24
Limitations The study was done in a rural governmental hospital that
may differ from other Lebanese healthcare institutions in
various ways.
the clinical evaluation of the thermometers regarding
accuracy lacked a standard reference thermometer for
comparison thereby limiting the validity of the
comparison.
25
26