60
AUTOMATED PERIMETRY SIVATEJA CHALLA

Automated perimetry

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Automated perimetry

AUTOMATED PERIMETRY SIVATEJA CHALLA

Page 2: Automated perimetry

INTRODUCTION

• Automated way of mapping the visual field• Important diagnostic test in glaucoma• Diagnosing and monitoring progression of other disease

Page 3: Automated perimetry

TRAQUIARS HILL OF VISION

Page 4: Automated perimetry

NORMAL VISUAL FIELD

Page 5: Automated perimetry

BASICS

• Current standard unit of luminous intensity is candela/m² (cd/m²)

• Apostilbs [asb units] – HVF• asb to cd/m², multiply by 1/pi (0.31831)• 1 asb is the least intense stimulus that can be seen foveally.

LIGHT INTENSITY

Page 6: Automated perimetry

• describes retinal sensitivity

• Lower intensity (asb) required at particular point, higher is the sensitivity (db value) at that point.

DECIBELS

Page 7: Automated perimetry

• HIGH db VALUE------- low asb intensity of light stimulus ------ HIGH RETINAL SENSITIVITY

• LOW db VALUE------ high asb intensity of light stimulus ------ LOW RETINAL SENSITIVITY

• Background illumination in HFA is 31.6 asb

Page 8: Automated perimetry

STIMULUS SIZE

Page 9: Automated perimetry

THRESHOLD

• The intensity of stimulus which is appreciated 50% times and missed 50% times is called threshold intensity

starting with a stimulus which the patient is very likely to observe

reducing it by 2-4 dB to non seeing intensity

again increasing the intensity to cross the threshold

Page 10: Automated perimetry

TYPES

• KINETICEg. Goldmans projection perimeter• STATIC and KINETICEg. Humphreys visual analyser, octopus

Page 11: Automated perimetry

STATIC KINETICComputerised Manual

Stimulus size constant Stimulus is moved from a non seeing area to a seeing area along a set meridian

contrast sensitivity is tested thru out speed,size,colour and brightness of target are the different variables

ADVANTAGESquantifiable,reproducablestatistical manipulation easy

inexpensive and durable machinesStatistical manipulation difficult

Threshold detection is more sensitive Patients are comfortable

reduces the need for highly trained technicians

can define scotomas rapidly

DISADVANTAGESLarge amounts of unfamiliar data interpretation difficult

skill,training important

tedious and time consuming and expensive

early or subtle changes can be overlooked

Page 12: Automated perimetry

ANATOMICAL BASIS OF FIELD OF VISION

FORMATION OF OPTIC NERVE

Page 13: Automated perimetry

STAGES OF ARCUATE FIELD DEFECTS

Page 14: Automated perimetry

OTHER FIELD DEFECTS

• Centro caecal defect (optic nerve disease)• Altitudinal defects (advanced glaucoma/AION)• central scotoma (optic neuruitis or mac disease)• Hemianopic defects

Heteronymous defects Homonymous defects

Page 15: Automated perimetry

INTERPRETATION OF FIELDS

Page 16: Automated perimetry

APPROACH

1 Check patient and test data

Obtain general impression

2

Observe defectsand defect curve

3

Review statistics4

PATIENT DATA

CORRECTED COMPARISONSPDNP

COMPARISONSTDNP

PROBABILITYTDPP

CORRECTEDD PROBABILITYPDPP

GLOBAL INDICES

GREY SCALEVALUES

RAW DATA

BABIE’S CURVE

TEST DATA

Page 17: Automated perimetry

WANDER• What was done?

• Accuracy (Reliability)

• Normal or abnormal

• Defect pattern

• Evaluate compatible disease

• Review

Page 18: Automated perimetry
Page 19: Automated perimetry

ZONE 1 Patient data and test parameters

Page 20: Automated perimetry

PATIENT DATA

• Name• Age/sex• Eye• Pupil size• V/A with refractive status

EXAMINATION DATA

• Programme• Strategy• Stage/ Phase

• Test target/ duration ( Goldmann size III )

• Background illumination ( 31.5 apostilb )

Page 21: Automated perimetry

ZONE 2reliability indices

Page 22: Automated perimetry

RELIABILITY• Fixation loss >20% is unreliable• False positive >33% is unreliable• False negative >33% is unreliable

Page 23: Automated perimetry
Page 24: Automated perimetry

ZONE 3Grey scale

Page 25: Automated perimetry

GRAY SCALE

• Most Colourful- Least reliable

Page 26: Automated perimetry

ZONE 4total deviation

Page 27: Automated perimetry

NORMAL RETINAL SENSITIVITY

PATIENT’S RETINAL SENSITIVITY

DIFFERENCE

HUMPHREYTOTAL DEVIATION NUMERICAL PLOT

Page 28: Automated perimetry

- media opacities.- cataracts .- corneal opacities.- refractive errors.- rarely miosis.

Page 29: Automated perimetry

Normal ‘Hill’ Of Vision

Page 30: Automated perimetry

Generalised Depression of Hill

Page 31: Automated perimetry

ZONE 5pattern deviation

Page 32: Automated perimetry

Total deviation

Generalized depression in

field

Pattern deviation

Page 33: Automated perimetry
Page 34: Automated perimetry
Page 35: Automated perimetry

• Probability values (P) :Indicates the significance of the defects .

• Shown as P< 5%, P< 2% , P<1% and P< 0.5%.

• The lower the P value, the greater is its clinical significance

clinical significance : if there are abnormal points in total deviation plot that persist in the pattern deviation plot, we are looking at scotomas .

Page 36: Automated perimetry

ZONE 6global indices

Page 37: Automated perimetry
Page 38: Automated perimetry

GLOBAL INDICES - MD

A

B

Page 39: Automated perimetry

<-6dB MILD GENERALISED DEPRESSION

-6 TO -12dB MODERATE GENERALISED DEPRESSION

->-12dB SEVERE GENERALISED DEPRESSION

GLOBAL INDICES - MD

Page 40: Automated perimetry

MEAN DEVIATION

NO OF POINTS <5%

NO OF POINTS <1%

CENTRAL FIELD

EARLY <6DB <18 <10 O POINTS <15 DB

MODERATE 6-12 DB 18-37 11-20 No points ‘0’ db and 1point <15 db in one hemifield

SEVERE >12 DB >37 >20 No points ‘0’ db and 1point <15 db in both hemifields

Page 41: Automated perimetry

GLOBAL INDICES – PSD OR LV

150

160150

150

150

140

170 110

MEAN STANDARDDEVIATION

0

10

40

Page 42: Automated perimetry

GLOBAL INDICES

MD: NORMALPSD: NORMAL

MD:ABNORMALPSD: NORMAL

MD: ABNORMALPSD:ABNORMAL

MD: ABNORMALPSD: ABNORMAL

SHAPE(PATTERN STD DEVIATION)

HEIGHT(MEAN DEVIATION)

Page 43: Automated perimetry

Short term fluctuation ( STF)

Page 44: Automated perimetry

Corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD):• Measure of variability within the field after correcting for

short term fluctuation ( intra-test variability )

• Newer programs like SITA do not determine CPSD and STF.

PSD STF CPSD

Page 45: Automated perimetry

Interpretation of the field defect using the MD and CPSD :

Page 46: Automated perimetry
Page 47: Automated perimetry

ZONE 7Glaucoma hemifield test

Page 48: Automated perimetry
Page 49: Automated perimetry

ZONE 8Numerical display

Page 50: Automated perimetry

• Gives the threshold for all points checked• Value in () indicates that the point has been tested twice

Page 51: Automated perimetry

IS THE DEFECT DUE TO GLAUCOMA??

Page 52: Automated perimetry

CPSD 4 dB P <5%

GHT – outside normal limits

ANDERSON’S CRITERIA

1

23

CPSD 4 dB p< 5%

Page 53: Automated perimetry

Step wise interpretation

Basic dataReliabilityTotal & Pattern deviationStatistical indicesGlaucoma hemi field testActual threshold values/foveaIs it abnormal –Anderson’s criteriaIs it glaucoma –correlate clinicallyEstablish a baseline

Page 54: Automated perimetry

TEST 30-2 24-2 10-2 MAC PROGRAMME

TEST POINTS 76 54 68 16

DENSITY(DEGREES)

6 6 2 2

BARE AREA AROUND FIXATION PT

3 DEGREES 3 1 1

Page 55: Automated perimetry

PIT FALLS

Page 56: Automated perimetry
Page 57: Automated perimetry
Page 58: Automated perimetry

ARTEFACTS

• OBSTRUCTIONRIM ARTEFACTSPTOSISMEDIA OPACITIESANGIOSCOTOMA

• MIOSIS

• REFRACTION ARTEFACTS• HIGH POWER PLUS AND MINUS LENSES

Page 59: Automated perimetry

PRACTICAL PEARLS(DURING RECORDING)

• pause the test in between if he/she is tired• >50% stimulus will not be seen so that he is reassured

and does not press the trigger due to impatience• Should have taken enough rest,may be given coffee,

ensure he is attentive• Give practice sessions esp to glaucoma patients• Close other eye well• If test is abnormal repeat• Always record same program which was done earlier

Page 60: Automated perimetry

T h a n k Y o u !!