Click here to load reader
Upload
theheartorg
View
1.196
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
http://www.theheart.org/web_slides/1283825.do An active-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial on ARISTOTLE to compare the safety and efficacy of apixaban (an investional anticoagulant) and warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in subjects with AF and risk factors for stroke.
Citation preview
ARISTOTLE
(Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in
Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation)
ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for the Prevention of Stroke in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation)
• An active-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial to compare the safety and
efficacy of apixaban and warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism
in subjects with AF and risk factors for stroke
• Population and treatment:
18 201 AF patients randomized to apixaban (5 mg orally twice daily) or
warfarin (target INR of 2.0 to 3.0)
• Subanalysis:
ARISTOTLE subcohort separated by LV function and symptom status: 2736
patients with LV systolic dysfunction, having an LVEF <40% with or without
clinical heart failure; 3207 patients with HF-PEF (ie, >40%); and 8728 with
neither symptoms nor LV systolic dysfunction, with LVEF >40%
JJV McMurray (University of Glasgow, Scotland) European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Congress 2012
AF=atrial fibrillation; LV=left ventricular; HF=heart failure; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction;
HF-PEF=heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
ARISTOTLE: Results (efficacy)
End point Apixaban
(%/year)
Warfarin
(%/year)
p for
interaction
Stroke or systemic embolism* 0.213
LV systolic dysfunction 0.99 1.80
HF-PEF 1.51 1.54
No LV systolic dysfunction of HF 1.16 1.58
All 1.27 1.60
*Primary end point
• Stroke or systemic embolism* risk
similarly low among the three
patient categories and overall
significantly reduced for apixaban
vs warfarin
Outcomes in patients with AF by LV
systolic function and HF status
Outcomes in patients with AF by LV
systolic function and HF status
ARISTOTLE: Results (safety)
End point Apixaban
(%/year)
Warfarin
(%/year)
p for
interaction
SSE/death 0.632
LV systolic dysfunction 7.76 8.37
HF-PEF 5.07 5.57
No LV systolic dysfunction of HF 3.14 3.79
All 4.49 5.04
SSE/major bleeding/death 0.589
LV systolic dysfunction 10.11 10.81
HF-PEF 6.71 7.76
No LV systolic dysfunction or HF 4.78 5.76
All 6.13 7.20
*Primary end point
HF-PEF=heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
• Event rates increased when SSE
was combined with the competing
risk of all-cause mortality;
apixaban maintained its
significant advantage over
warfarin
• Event rates increased more, and
apixaban superiority persisted,
with the addition of major
bleeding to the end point
ARISTOTLE: Commentary*
*All comments from ARISTOTLE "heart-failure substudy" sees apixaban stroke protection regardless
of HF, LV function (http://www.theheart.org/article/1404439.do)
"[AF patients with HF, LV systolic dysfunction, or both] had worse outcomes than
patients with atrial fibrillation and neither heart failure nor systolic dysfunction,
although this was primarily driven by mortality and not by thromboembolic risk,
which was actually quite low in all groups."
- Dr John JV McMurray
theheart.org is the leading online source of independent cardiology news.
We are the top provider of news and opinions for over 100 000 physicians.
Become a member of http://www.theheart.org
Become a fan on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/theheartorg
Follow us on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/theheartorg