Upload
masuma-ryzvee
View
170
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
3
Principles of AdhesionPrinciples of Adhesion
Clean surfaces
Closely approximating surfaces
Maximum surface area of contact
Good surface wetting by the adhesive
Stable over long-term
Requirements for BondingRequirements for Bonding
+ >Mechanical Adhesion
ChemicalAdhesion
Stress over Bond Lifetime
•Enamel, Dentin•All areas of the bond •Stresses: residual (shrinkage) thermocycling occlusion mastication•Chem / Bio environment
• Surface area• Penetration of resin• Undercuts• Cured adhesive strength
•Ionic bonds•Metallic bonds•Covalent bonds•Dipole interactions•Van der Waals
6
Structure of DentinStructure of Dentin
Erosion
TranslucentDentine
Inner Occlusal Dentine
Outer Occlusal Dentine
PULP
Multizoned Carious Lesion
Reactive Dentine (erosion, abrasion)Physiologic Dentine (aging, wear) -many occluded tubules
4% vol
28% vol
Heymann & Bayne 1993
Cavity edge Axial wall
Cementum
Gingival floor
7
>50% Class V & IIcavity surfaces had oblique or parallel cut dentinetubule orientations
DIRECTION OF DENTINAL TUBULES
8
Direction of Tubules and Prisms
Potential for poor bonding to dentine at gingival floors
Dentine tubulesDentine tubules Hybrid layerHybrid layer MicroleakageMicroleakage
End on (90End on (90ºº)) 30-35 µm + tags30-35 µm + tags Signif. lowerSignif. lower
Parallel cutParallel cut 1-10 µm + few tags1-10 µm + few tags Signif. higherSignif. higher
10
The Smear Layer The Smear Layer
~1-5 µm
Bond strength to tooth
structure ~2-5 Mpa
Can be altered or removed
11
Hybrid Layer Formation in Dentine
ETCHANTPRIMER
ADHESIVE RESIN
IntertubularDentine
PeritubularDentine
Dentinal Tubules
HybridZone
Collagen
FRQ
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1st / 2nd GenerationOnly bond to enamel, pH neutral
3rd Gen.pH < 7
3-step Etch&Rinse
2-stepEtch&Rinse
2-stepSelf-etch
1-stepSelf-etch
1989: Hybrid layer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
Enamel Etch Concept – Buonocore 1955
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1983 Scotchbond / 3M Bis-GMA-PO4-ester
1988 Scotchbond 2 / 3M Maleic acid/HEMA
1973 Concise Enamel Bond / 3M
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1th / 2th GenerationNo etching, pH-neutral
3th Gen.pH < 7
3-step Etch&Rinse
2-stepEtch&Rinse
2-stepSelf-etch
1-stepSelf-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1983 Scotchbond / 3M Bis-GMA-PO4-ester
1988 Scotchbond 2 / 3M Maleic acid/HEMA
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1th / 2th GenerationNo etching, pH-neutral
3th Gen.pH < 7
4th Gen.Etch&Rinse
5th Gen.Etch&Rinse
6th Gen.Self-etch
7th Gen.Self-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1th / 2th GenerationNo etching, pH-neutral
3th Gen.pH < 7
3-stepEtch&Rinse
5th Gen.Etch&Rinse
6th Gen.Self-etch
7th Gen.Self-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1th / 2th GenerationNo etching, pH-neutral
3th Gen.pH < 7
3-stepEtch&Rinse
2-stepEtch&Rinse
6th Gen.Self-etch
7th Gen. Self-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1th / 2th GenerationNo etching, pH-neutral
3th Gen.pH < 7
3-step Etch&Rinse
2-stepEtch&Rinse
2-stepSelf-etch
7th Gen.Self-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1th / 2th GenerationNo etching, pH-neutral
3th Gen.pH < 7
3-step Etch&Rinse
2-stepEtch&Rinse
2-stepSelf-etch
1-stepSelf-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesHistory
N-Phenyl-Glycin-Glycidyl-MethacrylateBowen 1965
1990 2000 2010
3-step Etch&Rinse
2-stepEtch&Rinse
2-stepSelf-etch
1-stepSelf-etch
1989: Hybridlayer
Dental AdhesivesGenerations
FRQ
-Straight forward bonding-Strong acids etch very well-Surface can be dry-Resin flows in spaces-Polymerizes forming strong bond
Bonding to EnamelEtch enamel with 35% phosphoric acid
Enamel etch pattern
FRQ
Bonding Mechanism to Dentin
1st, 2nd generation: only bond to etched enamel, bond to dentin best achieved by sandwich technique with glass ionomer base
3rd generation: weakly acidic primers partially dissolve the smear layer and etch dentin – low bond strength due to inadequate resin systems
FRQ
The Hybrid LayerDemineralized, resin-impregnated dentin
Concept established by Nakabayashi (1980s)
TEM visualization techniques by Yoshida and van Meerbeek (1998)A – glass filled adhesive resin (Optibond FL)H – hybrid layerT – dentin tubuleR – resin tagI – nondemineralized intertubular dentin
B. van Meerbeek et al., J. Dent. Res. 1998 2 µm
FRQ
Etching enamel and dentin (total etch)
Hydrophilic primer wets and penetrates dentin very well
Hydrophobic bond
Introduced around 1993
First adhesives with high dentin bond strength
Gold standards (Optibond FL, Scotchbond Multipurpose)
4th Generation Adhesives
44thth Generation Generation
A B
Etch Prime Bond
FRQ
Etching enamel and dentin (total etch)
Hydrophilic primer and hydrophobic bond of 4th generation combined into one bottle
Introduced around 1997
Most popular adhesives in many parts of the world
Examples: Prime&Bond NT, Optibond Solo Plus, Singlebond 2
5th Generation Adhesives
55thth Generation Generation
Etch Prime+
Bond
FRQ
5th Generation AdhesivesAdvantages:
Less steps compared to 4th generation
Long clinical history of over 10 years
Disadvantages:
Highest incidence of post-operative sensitivities
Higher technique sensitivity
moisture of etched dentin
thickness of adhesive layer
phase separation
Loss of dentin bond strength over time
FRQ
Etched dentin
Bur Cut dentin with smear layer
-More complicated bonding-Acids demineralize and open tubules-Surface is hydrophilic and must be kept moist-Requires priming-Must be completely sealed to prevent sensitivity
Etched Dentin and Post-operative Sensitivity
FRQ
Smear Layer after Cavity PreparationCavity preparation produces smear layer
Smear plugs close orifices of dentin tubules
FRQ
Etching opens Dentin Tubules
Etching with phosphoric acid (and also strong self-etch adhesives with pH <2) remove smear plugs
Open tubules (etched bovine dentin): smear layer is removed
Adhesive needs to close open tubules completely!
Perfect Impregnation
No Sensitivity
Unperfected Impregnation
Nanoleakage
NoImpregnation
Sensitivity
Weak Hybridization
Microleakage
Resin Impregnation
FRQ
Dull dentin appearance indicates dehydration
What happens if the tooth surface is overdried?What happens if the tooth surface is overdried?
The collapsed collagen decreases porosity and reduces adhesive absorption : Increases chance for sensitivity
FRQ
The tooth surface needs to be moist!The tooth surface needs to be moist!
Expanded collagen is porous and will absorb adhesive: minimizes post-op sensitivity.
FRQ
„Phantom“ Hybrid LayerPerdigao, 1995
Overetched, overdried dentin
Adhesive resin
Uninfiltrated, collapsed collagen (removed by NaOCl)
Resin tags in non-demineralized dentin
FRQ
Consequences of Over-DryingCollapse of collagen network
Incomplete infiltration and seal of the etched dentin
Fluid movement within collagen leads to post-operative sensitivities
Lower bond strength
No protection of the exposed collagen against degradation
Endogenic enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases / MMPs) are liberated and activated during etching step
MMPs are active in incompletely infiltrated dentin and lead to significant loss of dentin bond strength over a few months
FRQ
How to Minimize POS with 5th Generation Adhesives
Isolation with Rubber Dam to prevent contaminationUse an RMGI as liner / base (e.g. Vitrebond), especially in deep
cavitiesDo not over etch dentin – apply etchant to enamel first, then dentinThoroughly rinse off etching gelKeep dentin moist after etching – do not dry with air, but rather blot
excess moistureApply adhesive immediately after blottingApply adhesive generously – 2-3 coatsDo not air thin too aggressively – if all adhesive is blown away, there is
nothing to bond toContinue immediately with filling composite
FRQ
Self-Etch Adhesives (6th and 7th Gen)
Acidic monomers in formulation to provide etch pattern for retention and chemical bond (eg MDP, 4-META)
Introduced around 2000 (6th Generation, eg Clearfil SE Bond, first version of Prompt L-Pop)
Mild SE adhesives (pH >2) / Strong SE adhesives (pH <2)
Successful in USA, Japan, Western Europe Ease of use Low incidence of post-operative sensitivity
FRQ
Acidic, hydrophilic primer
Hydrophobic bond
(eg Clearfil SE Bond)
or
Acidic resin and aqueous phase
have to be mixed before application
(eg Xeno III, Adper Prompt L-Pop)
6th Generation Self-Etch Adhesives
A
Etch+
PrimeBond
66thth Generation Generation
B
FRQ
7th Generation Self-Etch AdhesivesAll components combined into one bottle
Usually „mild – ultra-mild“ (pH > 2)
Fastest growing segment in adhesives market
Intensely researched, but limited clinical evidence available
Etch+
Prime+
Bond
77thth Generation Generation
FRQ
Low POS with Self-Etch AdhesivesFirst version of Prompt L-Pop
0%2%4%6%8%
10%12%14%16%18%20%
Prompt Prime&Bond NT
1 month6 month
*Note: Data pertains to clinical study on original Prompt
formulation. U Iowa; Denehy et al.
% S
ensi
tive
FRQ
Total number of dentists
Number of dentists encountering post-operative sensitivity
Total numberof post-operative sensitivities
Total number of restorations placed
Percentage of restorations with post-operative sensitivity
100
7
26
5572
0.5%
Low POS with Self-Etch Adhesives Adper Easy Bond Application test 3M ESPE internal data
FRQ
Why do Self-Etch Adhesives reducePost-Operative Sensitivity?
No separate etching step – minimized danger of overetching and desiccation of dentin
Resin penetrates as far as demineralization of dentin – minimized danger of unimpregnated collagen layer under adhesive
FRQ
Self etch
2 steps
Demineralization Resin penetration
Risk of nanovoids
Demineralization
resin penetration+
- 2 consecutive steps- risk of nanovoids, if penetration depth of etchant and resin are not equal- higher risk of post-op sensitivity
- 1 single step- no risk of nanoleakage, since penetration depths are equal- lower risk of post-op sensitivity
Adper Easy One
FRQ
Why do Self-Etch Adhesives reducePost-Operative Sensitivity?
No separate etching step – minimized danger of overetching and desiccation of dentin
Resin penetrates as far as demineralization of dentin – minimized danger of unimpregnated collagen layer under adhesive
Adhesive is neutralized by basic hydroxyapatite during application
FRQ
Why do Self-Etch Adhesives reducePost-Operative Sensitivity?
No separate etching step – minimized danger of overetching and desiccation of dentin
Resin penetrates as far as demineralization of dentin – minimized danger of unimpregnated collagen layer under adhesive
Adhesive is neutralized by basic hydroxyapatite during application
Mild self-etch adhesives do not dissolve smear layer completely – most tubules remain protected by smear plugs
FRQ
7th Generation adhesive on dentin
lab-demineralized dentin
particle-filled adhesive
Clearfil Protect LinerClearfil Protect Liner
acid-resistant submicron hybrid acid-resistant submicron hybrid layerlayer
dentin tubuledentin tubule
smear plugsmear plug
TEM image courtesy of Prof. van Meerbeek, Univ. Leuven, Belgium
FRQ
What the Scientific World says...First glance:
MassesMasses Converting and using Converting and using Self-Etch Self-Etch
AdhesivesAdhesives
Opinion Opinion LeadersLeaders
Supporting Total-Etch Supporting Total-Etch Adhesives – even Adhesives – even
4th4th
FRQ
“3-step etch&rinse adhesives and (mild) 2-step self-etch adhesives are still the benchmarks
When bonding to enamel, an etch&rinse approach is definitely preferred
When bonding to dentin, a mild self-etch approach is superior, as it involves (like with glass-ionomers) additional ionic bonding
Altogether, … selective etching of enamel followed by the application of the 2-step self-etch adhesive to both enamel and dentin currently appears the best choice“
Van Meerbeek et al.2009 Conclusions
FRQ
Bond Strengths Bart van Meerbeek et al
„Relationship between Bond-strength tests and Clinical Outcomes“Dent Materials, 2009, 11, 148ff.
“A good correlation (…) was found between the annual failure ratesreported in the systematic review of Peumans et al and the “Battle of the Bonds” shear-bond strength data from Degrange et al.”
„The significantly highest bond strength was measuredfor OptiBond FL (Kerr) that somewhat surprisingly performed not significantly better than the relativelynew 1-step adhesive Easy Bond (3M ESPE).“
FRQ
Adper Easy Bond3M ESPE
Development Objectives A new self-etch formulation Fast and easy to use Robust application Moisture tolerant
+++++
FRQ
Gentle agitation of adhesive maximizes penetration into etched dentin and enhances integrity of hybrid layer leading to
better bonds and less sensitivity.
Adper™ Easy OneSelf Etch Application
FRQ
The Formulation Meeting of the Generations
Adper Easy Bond
HEMA Bis-GMADimethacrylate Vitrebond™ CopolymerFillerEthanolWaterInitiatorsMethacrylated phosphoric esters
Adper Single Bond 2
HEMA Bis-GMADimethacrylateVitrebond™ CopolymerFillerEthanolWaterInitiators
pH = 2.7pH = 4.7