29
Fast CT Angiography on a Fast Track to Your Practice: Promises and Limitations S. Achenbach Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen

072 ct angiography

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 072 ct angiography

Fast CT Angiography on a Fast Track to Your

Practice: Promises and Limitations

S. AchenbachDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital

Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen

Page 2: 072 ct angiography

Coronary artery imaging:

- small diameters (~1-4 mm)

- complex anatomy

- rapid motion

Page 3: 072 ct angiography

CT Techniques

- High spatial resolution

- Good contrast

- Problem: temporal resolution

Page 4: 072 ct angiography

Electron Beam Tomography (EBT)

50 - 100 ms image acquisition time1.5 mm - 3.0 mm slice thickness

Page 5: 072 ct angiography

Electron Beam Tomography (EBT)

CT coronary imaging feasible

Limitations: 1.5 -3.0 mm slice thickness

X-ray power

„e-Speed“: 1.5 mm slice thickness

50 ms temporal resolution

Page 6: 072 ct angiography

Multislice spiral CT with retrospective ECG gating- Tube rotation: 420-500 ms- Data acquisition in 4-16 slices simultaneously

- Partial scan reconstruction using ~ 210-250 ms

4 slice CT: ~1.3 mm slices 16 slice CT: ~0.75 mm slices

Page 7: 072 ct angiography
Page 8: 072 ct angiography
Page 9: 072 ct angiography

MSCT 4 Slice

Page 10: 072 ct angiography

EBT

Page 11: 072 ct angiography

MSCT 16 slice

Page 12: 072 ct angiography

MSCT 16 slice

Page 13: 072 ct angiography

MSCT 16 slice

Page 14: 072 ct angiography

MSCT 16 slice

Page 15: 072 ct angiography

MSCT 16 slice

Page 16: 072 ct angiography

n Sens. Spec. n.e.

Schmermund JACC 1998 28 82% 88% 12%Reddy Radiology 1998 23 88% 79% 8%Achenbach N Engl J Med 1998 125 92% 94% 25%Ropers Z Kardiol 2000 118 90% 82% 24%Achenbach Heart 2000 36 92% 91% 20%

Nieman Lancet 2001 31 81% 97% 27%Achenbach Circulation 2001 64 91% 84% 32% Knez Am J Cardiol 2001 42 78% 98% 6%Kopp Eur Heart J 2002 102 86% 96% 16%Becker JCAT 2003 28 78% 71% 11%Nieman Heart 2002 53 82% 93% 30%

Nieman Circulation 2002 59 95% 86% 7%Ropers Circulation 2003 77 93% 92% 12%

Page 17: 072 ct angiography

MSCT:

Heart Rate < 60/min desirable:

oral ß-blockade to all patients

EBT/MSCT:

Coronary calcium

Page 18: 072 ct angiography

LIMITATIONS:Contrast, radiationSinus rhythmUnevaluable arteriesAccuracy = 100%

Diagnostic tool with high negative predictive value (~95%) if image quality is sufficient

Page 19: 072 ct angiography

CT to replace cardiac cath?

„A man with a hammer sees a lot of things that need to be hammered.“

(A radiologist/cardiologist with a spiral CT ...)

Page 20: 072 ct angiography

Clinical Indications for MSCT?

... Not for screening

... Not in patients with typical symptoms

... Possibly in patients with relatively low likelihood of signficant stenosis (atypical symptoms, equivocal stress test ...)

Page 21: 072 ct angiography

> 20% „rule out“ coronary angiograms

Page 22: 072 ct angiography

100 patients prior to valve surgery: All 36 patients with stenoses identified by EBT. 54 patients: stenoses ruled out.

Page 23: 072 ct angiography

Anomalous coronary arteries

Page 24: 072 ct angiography

Bypass Grafts:

EBT 4-slice MSCT 16 slice MSCT

Page 25: 072 ct angiography

Nieman et al, Circulation 2002

STENT?

Page 26: 072 ct angiography

Detection of Plaque

4- slice MSCT

Schröder et al. JACC 2001

Page 27: 072 ct angiography

Detection of Plaque

16-slice MSCT

Page 28: 072 ct angiography

Detection of Plaque

Potential role in risk assessment?

- Accuracy / Quantification?

- Reproducibility?

- Progression over time?

- Prognostic value?

Page 29: 072 ct angiography

„Fast CT Coronary Angiography“:- Technical issues

Heart rate, technology, protocols

- „Coronary Angiography“

Potential role to rule out stenoses

- „Plaque imaging“?

(Potential role for risk stratification)