Upload
wigley-and-associates
View
255
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P U B L I C E N G A G E M E N TI N P U T R E V I E W
C I T Y C O U N C I L M A Y 2 6 , 2 0 1 5
Woodley Street Reconstruction
Tonight’s Outline
Review of Public Engagement Input Discussion of Project Scope Moving Forward and
Next Steps
Pavement Condition?
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Yes No
ROADWAY PAVEMENT CONDITION a. Do you feel the pavement surface has deteriorated to the point it needs to be fixed?
Yes No
Project History
On the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) starting with the 2012 -2016 CIP.
Joint County/City application for Federal funds was approved in 2013.
February 3, 15 – Project Scope approved by Council April 7, 15 – Cost sharing agreement approved by
Council. April 21, 2015 – Engineering services contract
awarded by Council.
Planning Documents
Safe Routes to School Sidewalk shown on both sides of Woodley St
Comprehensive Plan Priority Growth to east and south Provide for all modes of transportation Strong Neighborhood Qualities Streets will create an attractive public realm Places will be better connected
Complete Streets Policy Provide for Pedestrians, transit, motorist, freight, emergency responders and
accommodate all ages and abilities safely.
Rice County Transportation Plan Woodley identified as a minor arterial – Link urban area’s to principal arterials
Engagement Schedule Review
April 29 – Project Scope Meeting and Online survey available. May 6 – Community Context– Discuss features desired
by the community at large. May 13 – Neighborhood Meeting – Discussion with
neighboring property owners on their desires and concerns.
May 13 – Online survey closes. May 20 – Community Review – Present information
compiled from previous meeting for discussion. May 26 – City Council Work Session – Discussion with
Council on the results on the public input process.
June 3 – Community Feedback – Presentation of thefinal results for Council direction on Woodley Street.
Purpose of Public Engagement
The City of Northfield is seeking public input on the scope of the project.
In particular: Sidewalks
Yes – 1 side, both sides No
Bike Lanes Yes – 1 side, both sides No
Parking Yes – 1 side, both sides No
Tree Removal/Impact
Sidewalks Both Sides
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
SIDEWALKS a. Are you in favor of sidewalks on both sides of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Community Survey
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
SIDEWALKS a. Are you in favor of sidewalks on both sides of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Neighborhood Survey
Sidewalks Both Sides
Community Survey Comments: Supportive Concerns about tree
removal A few comments stating 1
side only
Neighborhood Survey Comments: None
Sidewalk One Side
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
SIDEWALKS a. Are you in favor of sidewalks on only one side of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Community Survey
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
SIDEWALKS a. Are you in favor of sidewalks on only one side of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Neighborhood Survey
Sidewalk One Side
Community Survey Comments: Prefer both sides Safety concerns with only
one side A compromise solution
Neighborhood Survey Comments: Most support for one side Roughly equal support for
both sides or no walks
Bike Lanes Both Sides
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
ON-STREET BIKE LANES a. Are you in favor of bike lanes on the north and south side of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Community Survey
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
ON-STREET BIKE LANES a. Are you in favor of bike lanes on the north and south side of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Neighborhood Survey
Bike Lanes Both Sides
Community Survey Comments: Generally supportive of
bike lanes Some comments in
opposition
Neighborhood Survey Comments: Supportive of this option
Bike Lanes One Side
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
ON-STREET BIKE LANES a. Are you in favor of bike lanes on only one side of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Community Survey
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
ON-STREET BIKE LANES a. Are you in favor of bike lanes on only one side of Woodley Street?
Yes
No
Othercomments:
Neighborhood Survey
Bike Lane One Side
Community Survey Comments: Both sides would be
preferred One bike lane could add to
safety concerns and confusion
A couple comments against
Neighborhood Survey Comments: Most comments against
bike lanes Some support for two
lanes Safety concerns about
lanes
On-street Parking – Neighborhood Survey
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
I use on-street
parking infront of my
homeregularly.
I do not useon-streetparking infront of my
homeregularly.
Othercomments:
I use on-streetparking infront of myhomeregularly.
I do not useon-streetparking infront of myhomeregularly.
Othercomments: 0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
I prefer noparking
restrictionsin front ofmy home.
I have nopreference
aboutparking
restrictionsin front ofmy home.
Othercomments:
I prefer noparkingrestrictionsin front ofmy home.
I have nopreferenceaboutparkingrestrictionsin front ofmy home.Othercomments:
Parking InformationWoodley (Division to Prairie)
Date Day Time Weather # cars parked3.17.15 Tuesday 6:55 A.M. Clear 30° 03.17.15 Tuesday 2:00 P.M. Clear 45° 33.17.15 Tuesday 4:50 P.M. Cear 40° 23.18.15 Wednesday 6:55 A.M. Clear 30° 13.18.15 Wednesday 8:55 A.M. Clear 29° 03.21.15 Saturday 10:00 A.M. Clear 40° 23.22.15 Sunday 5:00 P.M. Snow 25° 43.25.15 Wednesday 12:30 P.M. Cloudy 37° 13.27.15 Friday 7:00 P.M. Pcloudy 35° 13.29.15 Sunday 10:00 A.M. Wclear 35° 13.29.15 Sunday 12:00 P.M. Cloudy 35° 33.29.15 Sunday 3:15 P.M. Clear 40° 33.31.15 Tuesday 3:30 P.M. Clear 60° 34.2.15 Thursday 11:00 A.M. Clear 50° 25.16.15 Saturday 1:10 P.M. 12
On-street Parking
Asked only of neighborhood residents General themes from survey: Prefer parking on street – one side minimum Concerns about safety Couple comments prefer no parking
Comments on Parking from Community Review Meeting: The questionnaire was confusing with the question saying
“Regular use of on-street parking” Neighborhood wanted parking on both sides
General Comments
Themes: Tree removal concerns Pedestrian, and bike safety comments Traffic calming/complete streets - Safety Agricultural equipment access Sidewalk community and neighborhood split Bike lane community and neighborhood split
Tree Impacts
North Side
South Side
TotalTrees
Healthy Trees
Ash Trees
Unhealthy Trees
Tree Removal
Total
HealthyTree
Removal55 45 7 3 27 17
TotalTrees
Healthy Trees
Ash Trees
Unhealthy Trees
Tree Removal
Total
Healthy Tree
Removal
45 39 5 1 23 17
Timeline
State Aid and Federal funding require several approvals along the way.
Accept Feasibility Report August 18, 2015 Improvement Hearing Sept. 1, 2015 Requires 80% Vote 6/7 to Order the Improvement
Late Summer Submittal of Project Memorandum State Review and approval of design and plans in
December Need Final scope for Feasibility Report and
Project Memorandum by June 23, 2015
Project Scope Recommendation
44 ft Wide, Sidewalk Both Side, Parking Lane, Bike Lane, Shared Parking/Bike Lane
Council Goals1. 2016 Project2. 44’ Wide Street (County allowing City to decide wants
in the 44’)3. Retain Parking both sides (neighborhood)4. Increase Multi-Model (sidewalks both sides, Bike Lane,
Shared Parking/Bike Lane-wider lane)5. Safety – Traffic Calming6. Landscape Enhancements 2 to 1 Tree Replacement