‹Nº›

Expert Workshop on the Measurement of Public Procurement of Innovation

“What are the user interests behind requests for data and indicators on PPI? Can these requirements be clearly identified and delivered? ” Laura Hernández Garvayo – Metrics Department February 4th, 2013 OECD, Paris

‹Nº›

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. USER INTERESTS FOR DATA AND INDICATORS 2. PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE IN MEASURING INNOVATIVE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: THE E2I 2010 ACTION PLAN 2.1 TEMPLATE FOR PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES DATA

3. PROPOSED METHODOLOGY FOR AN INNOVATIVE PUBLIC PROCUREMENT SCOREBOARD 4. NEXT STEPS

‹Nº›

• provides objective data about R&I indicators and their evolution

• analyses science, technology and innovation policies and strategies.

• publishes reports regarding R&I

The aim of ICONO is to be a reference from the point of view of

the measurement of science and innovation The observatory is on the scene of any relevant activity related to science, technology and innovation indicators: 1) national and international forums: European Commission, OECD, RICYT 2) agreements with institutions: INE, Cotec, SCImago, IVIE-ÁBACO 3) workshops, events and conferences

For whom? Public administration R&D

Research agents S&T Private industry Media and Press

Society

ICONO is FECYT's Observatory of R&I Indicators

‹Nº›

1. User interests for data and indicators

WHY

• “In God we trust, all others must bring data”

Edwards Deming

WHAT

• Public Understanding of Science Survey, Fecyt 2012

HOW

• Budget, Programmes and Staff

• Job creation, firms, products and services

‹Nº›

Public Understanding of Science Survey, Fecyt 2012 Over 80% of Spanish think public investment in science and innovation should increase. Near 60% of the population think firms do not invest enough in science and innovation

5

81,6%

82,8%

82,3%

80,9%

Yes

21,5%

No

59,4%

Doesn t know

18,1%

NC

1,0%

Q13. Should public administration invest in science and innovation? Q.15. Do firms invest enough in Science and innovaton?

‹Nº›

2. Previous experience in measuring IPP: the e2i 2010 Action Plan

• Monitoring the National Innovation Strategy (e2i): FECYT developed a data collection methodology targeted for all ministerial actions within the scope of the 2010 Action Plan.

• In order to meet the established objectives, FECYT carried out the following actions:

1. Identification of public authorities responsible of the innovation Strategy Action Plan 2010.

2. Drafting two templates for data collection:

o calls for tenders

o procurement of goods and services.

The actions of the e2i 2010 Action Plan collected using the template for procurement of goods and services can be understood as a first approach to an Innovative Public Procurement Scoreboard.

‹Nº›

Axis Action Name

Performance Indicators Impact Indicators

Chapter

Approved budget (total)

Executed budget (total)

Number of tenders

Number of allocations

Total of beneficiary

entities

Number of beneficiary companies

Jobs

Companies

Total of beneficiary companies

beneficiary SME

R&D&i Other

activities

Number of companies

involved Policies for innovation in Defence

Technology and Innovation Strategy for Defence 6 135.378,38 137.961,24 237 71 347 170 40 676 2.387 210

Technology and Innovation Strategy for Defence 6 54.477,76 52.571,38 3.109 162 154 64 53 125 13

Measures for the international development of global innovative companies

Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative companies. Support Plan for Business Projects involving International Innovation Dissemination.

6 1.117,00 860,50 79 30 30 30 30

Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative companies. Support Plan for Business Projects involving Design Internationalisation

6 407,00 313,00 12 11 11 11 11

Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Internationalisation plan for the Biotechnology sector.

6 116,00 90,00 1 1 19 18 18

Incorporation of internationalisation support policy – international support policy for innovative companies. Internationalisation Plan for the Nanotechnology sector

6 137,00 106,00 1 1 1

Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative companies. Internationalisation Plan for Technological Centres

6 244,00 188,00 1 1 21 20 20

Incorporation of innovation in internationalisation support policy – Support to the internationalisation of innovative companies. Internationalisation Plan for the Design sector

6 103,00 80,00 1 1 25 24 24

2.1 Template for procurement of goods and services data

continues

‹Nº›

Axis Action Name

Performance Indicators Impact Indicators

Chapter

Approved budget (total)

Executed budget (total)

Number of tenders

Number of allocations

Total of beneficiary

entities

Number of beneficiary companies

Jobs Companies

Total of beneficiary companies

beneficiary SME

R&D&i Other

activities

Number of companies

involved

Development of i-Government

Web page of Spanish cultures 6 4.776,60 4.776,60 1 1 11 26 11

Database digitalisation of the Ministry of Culture 6 138,00 3 1 1 1 5 1

Strategic Plan for the Modernisation of the Justice Sector 6 573.216,01 573.216,01 20 20 20 900 20

Innovation projects for State Security Forces 6 4.500,00 4.500,00

Development of the Green Economy

Meteorological Support Services for Air Navigation 6 2.820,00 1.095,00

28 6 6 6 6 2 2.980,00 2.948,00

Regionalised Climate Scenarios 6 63,80 63,80 1 1 1 1 2 1

Policy for Rural Affairs Innovation

Development of the Science Industry

MetOp European satellite programme 3rd mission (MTG) 7 1.226,00 1.226,00

Air Quality Plan 2 165,00 92,00

6 3 3 3 3 6 1.794,00 1.410,00

Local Innovation Support Plan

State Fund for Employment and Sustainability 7 916.739,77 916.739,77 7.650 7.644 4.962 4.962 62.779 4.962

Development of Health and Social Care Economy

Health Information System of the National Health System 6 3.000,00 3.000,00 30

Clinical information interoperability 6 2.000,00 1.677,50 15

INGESA Actions 6 639,00 639,00 26 15 15 15 6 12

National Health System Organ Donation and Transplant 6 220,48 220,48

TOTAL 1.706.258,8 1.703.774,28 11.156 7.969 665 5.345 5.158 1.714 65.249 5.227

2.1 Template for procurement of goods and services data

SCOPE 15 Ministries and their managerial departments 133 programs and actions 15 responsible delegates Data collection by collaboration

‹Nº›

3. Proposed Innovative Public Procurement Scoreboard

INPUT

1.Total and percentage of Public Administrations Expenditure on IPP:

1.1. National (and regional) level

1.2. Ministries and their managerial departments

2. Programmes financing IPP:

2.1. Number of programmes

2.2. Amount financed by each programme

3. Total number of IPP dedicated Personnel:

3.1. Public sector

3.2. Private sector

OUTPUT

1. Total number of firms dedicated to IPP

2. Number of products/services resulting from IPP.

3. Turnover due to IPP of companies with IPP contracts.

4. Number of new created positions linked to IPP.

5. Number of patents linked to IPP.

6. Number of scientific publications linked to IPP

Source: State Procurement Platform and Template (

• An innovative public procurement scoreboard: input and output indicators (ongoing) -this data is being collected from State Procurement Platform

• Indicators and sources for the scoreboard

‹Nº›

4. Nexts Steps

• Drafting a template for public authorities bidders responsible of Innovative Public Procurement contracts. It implies identification of:

o ministries and their managerial departments,

o programs and actions

o responsible delegates

• Defining procedure for validation of main indicators (state procurement platform)

‹Nº›

Thank you!

ICONO, Spanish Research and Innovation Observatory:icono@fecyt.es Laura Hernández Garvayo: laura.hernandez@fecyt.es

Follow Icono on Twitter @ICONO_FECYT

Follow Fecyt on Facebook and Twitter: www.facebook.com/fecyt.ciencia @FECYT_Ciencia

www.icono.fecyt.es On the web:

Email: