View
658
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This presentation was held during the 5th GIB
Summit, May 27-28 2015. The presentation and
more information on the Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation are available
on www.gib-foundation.org
The next GIB Summit will take place in Basel, May 24-25, 2016.
The information and views set out in this presenation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation. Neither the Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use of the information contained therein.
大公国际资信评估有限公司
Innovative Sustainable Infrastructure Rating Model
— for the 5th Global Infrastructure Basel Summit
Guan, Jianzhong May 27, 2015
3
Contents
I. Research Ques-ons II. Sustainability reflects the rule of forma-on of
infrastructure credit risks
III. The core ideas of Sustainable Ra-ng Methodology
IV. The logic of Sustainable Infrastructure Ra-ng Methodology
V. The significance of crea-ng Sustainable Infrastructure Ra-ng Methodology
4
I. Research Ques-ons
• Infrastructure projects are characterized by their novelty. They have no opera-ng history and their credit risk is focused on two phases, the construc-on phase and the opera-on phase.
1. What are the conspicuous features that differentiate
infrastructure projects from other rated entities?
• Current ra<ng methodologies, mainly western ra-ng methodologies, focus mainly on the regulatory environment, scale and diversity, financial strength (cash flows). They obviously do not reflect the par<cularity of the forma<on of credit risks in infrastructure projects, hence can not sa<sfy the needs of investors. This is the external factor that limits capital from flowing into infrastructure projects.
2. Can current rating methodologies of
incumbent CRAs reflect the particularity of
credit risks of infrastructure projects?
• The interna-onal community need a ra<ng methodology which can reveal the rule of forma<on of credit risks in infrastructure projects now more than ever .
3. What is the solution?
5
II. Sustainability reflects the rule of forma-on of infrastructure credit risks (2-‐1)
1. The concept of sustainability
Sustainability
Sustainability of the environment
Ecology
Market demand
Sustainability of construction
Sustainability of operation
6
The sustainability of ecology and
market demand
sustainability of operation
Fundamentally decide
sustainability of construction
Directly decide
The lack of operation history
The development of rating methodology
challenges
II. Sustainability reflects the rule of forma-on of infrastructure credit risks (2-‐2)
2. The logic of the elements of sustainability
7
novelty
Sustain-ability
fundamental requirements for
developing an infrastructure
rating methodology
III. The core ideas of The Sustainable Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐1)
8
The evalua<on of ecological impact and market demand as the basis for ra<ng the environmental values of infrastructure projects.
The evalua<on of technology, qua-‐ lity and progress in the construc<on phase as the basis for ra<ng construc<on risks of infrastructure projects.
The projec<on of opera<ng cash flows and profits as the basis for ra<ng opera<on risks.
Ra-ng factors
III. The core ideas of The Sustainable Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐2)
9
To improve the
sustainability of credit risk projec-ons of infrastructure
projects
Innova<ng credit
engineering ra<ng
methodology
III. The core ideas of The Sustainable Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐3)
10
Credit rating
Environment
Degree of devia<on for sources of repayment Construc<on
III. The core ideas of The Sustainable Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐4)
11
Regulatory regime
The degree of devia<on between the project and ecology & market demand
The degree of devia<on between relevant indicators and benchmarks in the construc<on phase
The degree of devia<on between sources of repay-‐ ment and profitability in the opera<on phase
U<lize the devia<on to predict the debt requirement and repayment risks of different stages in the con-‐struc<on phase and opera<on phase
Employ engineering techniques to simulate various states with key credit indicators
IV. The logic of Sustainable Infrastructure Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐1)
Regulatory regime
Construc-on
Opera-on
Opera-ons phase
Construc-o
n ph
ase
indicators
benchmarks
Project characteris<cs
Ecology and market demand
Sources of repayment
profitability
Degrees of
devia-on
Credit engineering
Repayment risks
IV. The logic of Sustainable Infrastructure Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐2)
Debt requirements
12
13
What is credit engineering? Credit engineering is a new ra<ng technique, which is based on the needs of determining, evalua<ng, early warning and managing credit risk factors, employing modern engineering and high-‐tech methods, to accurately reveal credit risks with foresight, and crea<vely solve the problems of managing credit risks.
IV. The logic of Sustainable Infrastructure Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐3)
Infrastr-‐ucture projects
Credit risks
Engineering technique
1. Modeling
3. Network topology
2. Compu-ng
4. Stress test
5. Simula-on
14
Structure of credit risk research
1. Determina-on of credit risks
3. Early warning of credit risks
2. Evalua-on of credit risks
4. Management of credit risks
Maximum debt burden
Realize the counter-‐cyclical func-on of credit ra-ngs
IV. The logic of Sustainable Infrastructure Ra-ng Methodology (4-‐4)
15
The first to develop ra<ng methodologies based on the rule of forma<on of credit risks in infrastructure projects
The first to objec<vely present the debt repayment risks of infrastructure projects to investors
Open the gate for project finance innova<on to meet the financing need of infrastructure projects
Innova<ng infrastructure ra<ng methodology as the breakthrough to lead global capital to invest in infrastructure and promote global economic development
V. The significance of Sustainable Ra-ng Methodology