Upload
nacroprogrammes
View
170
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at "Building on firm foundations: Making effective liaison and diversion services a reality" conference by Lorraine Khan and Dave Spurgeon, Research and Development Manager, Nacro and Offender Health Collaborative
Citation preview
Developing an All-Age Response
Building on Firm Foundations Wednesday 19th March 2014
Purpose To ensure an age-appropriate response at all stages/points of intervention along justice pathway. Includes: case identification, secondary screening/triage, assessment including specialist assessment; and, referral Considerations What does the core team look like? What does the extended team look like? Where are the similarities and differences?
What should be different as a result of this initiative?
• Earlier identification of health and other vulnerabilities
• Better integration between justice and health – Shared information
– Better quality information to assist justice and health (?) decision making
• Fairer process for those with disabilities
• Better access to support
• Better met needs/improved outcomes
DIFFERENCES & CHALLENGES
Different
• legislation
• presentations
• demand times
• risk factors
• pathways
• responses
PATHWAYS
CJS Pathway Liaison & Diversion
Pre-custody/Voluntary
Attendance
Police Custody Courts
L & D Pathway for Adults
CPS Probation PSR Reports
YJS pathway
The YJS pathway Youth Liaison & Diversion YOT health
practitioner/SLCN
worker/forensic team Street and
school
Restorative
Justice
Triage and
voluntary
attendances
Police
custody
Early
stage
Youth
Court -
Referral
Order
Panel
Youth,
Magistrates or
Crown Court
Custodial
sentence
Youth schemes: differences and challenges
Children and adolescents - not mini adults E.g. Brain development
High-risk times for arrest?– weekends, after school, summer
Legislation, statutory duties, consent
Evidence drivers – e.g. avoid net widening
Diagnoses and presentations
Risk factors important
Tools – SDQ, CHAT,
Pathways, service approach and design needs, responses
Transition
Extending to cover youth justice
Police Restorative Justice/school Safeguarding lead
Triage Teams
Police electronic notification to YOTs (Peny system)
Proportion of voluntary attendances
Appropriate adults?
Referral at caution stage
Link with duty solicitors?
Other youth cover in police custody suites?
Coverage and referral pathways for weekend courts?
Health resources in YOT and what stages in pathway do they cover?
C & YP S:136 pathways and Emergency Duty Teams (EDT)?
Extending to cover youth justice
C & YP Pathways
Youth L&D
SEN teams, school nurses, counselling
and safer school police
YOT case worker &
health teams
Integrated youth teams and
targeted support - VSO
Evidence based parenting work
- MST/FFT. IAPT
Youth drug and alcohol services
Troubled Families Teams and ASB
Specialist CAMHS - Tier 3
& 4
Community paediatricians, Learning
disability & SLCN
Safeguarding:
Emergency Duty teams and
Children's Services
What Does Good Look Like Integration of strategic oversight, development and practice Clear reporting mechanisms within relevant organisations and structures Coverage of pathway with links between each point of intervention Workforce with range of skills to operate at all points of intervention Agreed tools and processes for case identification, secondary screening/triage, and assessment (age-appropriate) Agreed process for referral to services for assessment including specialist assessment Mechanisms for practitioners to receive appropriate clinical supervision Links to wide range of age-appropriate services Gateway for transition between youth and adult services Extended team with clear pathways
Your ideas
What outstanding questions do you have about an effective all-age model?
What currently are your main challenges/barriers?
What ideas have you had to negotiate these barriers?
What do you think good should look like for:
Children and young people?
Adults?