ORI GIN AL PA PER
October 23, 2011 Turkey/Van–Ercis earthquake:structural damages in the residential buildings
Erkan Celebi • Muharrem Aktas • Naci Caglar • Askın Ozocak •
Mustafa Kutanis • Necati Mert • Zeki Ozcan
Received: 27 January 2012 / Accepted: 26 October 2012 / Published online: 16 November 2012� Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
Abstract On October 23, 2011, a magnitude of Mw 7.2 earthquake struck the Van
province in eastern Turkey which caused approximately 600 life loss and 4,000 injured
people. Although the recorded peak ground accelerations were relatively low (0.15–0.2 g)
compared with that of other recent destructive Turkish earthquakes and the code-based
design response spectrum, a large number of reinforced concrete buildings with 4–6 stories
and non-engineered masonry buildings were either heavily damaged or collapsed in the
region. Based on the post-earthquake technical inspections, the goal of this paper is to
introduce major reasons for structural damages in the disaster area and to discuss these
failures along with the approaches given in the design code which is renewed after August
17, 1999 Marmara Earthquake. Some remarkable lessons learned from earthquake-induced
failures and damages specific to building construction techniques are presented in this
paper.
Keywords Van earthquake � Structural failures � Reinforced concrete structures �Masonry buildings
1 Introduction
After the earthquake of Marmara (on August 17, 1999), during the last decade, Turkey has
suffered several destructive seismic events (Afyon Sultandagi Mw 6.1, 2002; Bingol Md
6.4, 2006; Elazig Kovancilar, ML 6.0, 2010; Kutahya Simav ML 5.7, 2011) that caused life
loss and injuries. On October 23, 2011, at 10:41:20 UTC, a magnitude of Mw 7.2 earth-
quake struck the Van province in eastern Turkey. The Earthquake Department of the
Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) reported the earthquake’s
epicenter as 38.689 N–43.465E with the depth of 19.02 km. The fault rupture propagation
was along the northeast and southwest directions, and the faulting mechanism was reverse
E. Celebi � M. Aktas (&) � N. Caglar � A. Ozocak � M. Kutanis � N. Mert � Z. OzcanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Sakarya University,54187 Esentepe-Sakarya, Turkeye-mail: [email protected]
123
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0478-9
with a fault surface area of 60 km 9 20 km. The average displacement on the fault surface
at a depth of 10–15 km was 2 m (KOERI).
Earthquake epicenter was located directly between Ercis district and Van City. The
officially reported populations of Van City and Ercis district are 367.419 and 77.065,
respectively. The total population of Van province has been estimated around 1.035
million. Ercis district was the most heavily damaged area in this earthquake. The
total number of 548 citizens in Ercis district and 61 citizens in Van city are confirmed
death.
This paper presents the on-site structural investigations of a team consist of 7 acade-
micians from Civil Engineering Department of Sakarya University, Turkey after Van
earthquake.
2 Tectonic settings overview
General tectonic setting of Eastern Anatolia is mainly controlled by collision of unevenly
moving Arabian plate to the north with the Anatolian plate along a deformation zone
known as Bitlis Thrust Zone (Fig. 1). The collision leads westward extrusion of the
Anatolian plate along the two notorious transform faults with different sense of slip, the
dextral North Anatolian Fault and the sinistral East Anatolian Fault Zones, which join each
other in Karlıova Triple Junction (KTJ) in the Eastern Anatolia (Fig. 2). In the east of KTJ,
however, the collision-caused deformation is largely accommodated within the Eastern
Anatolian Block through distributed NW–SE trending dextral faults and NE–SW trending
sinistral faults representing escape tectonics, and shortening of the continental lithosphere
along the Caucasus thrust zone. East–west trending Mush-Lake Van and Pasinler ramp
basins constitute other conspicuous tectonic properties within the Eastern Anatolia (Utkucu
2006).
The faults are seismically active and they form the source for many earthquakes. Some
of the major earthquakes in the twentieth century are September 13, 1924 Pasinler
(M = 6.8), 1975 Lice (M = 6.6), November 24, 1976 Caldıran (M = 7.3), October 30,
1983 Horasan–Narman (M = 6.8), May 5, 1986 (M = 5.8) and June 6, 1986 Dogansehir
(M = 5.6) earthquakes (Bozkurt 2001).
3 Strong ground motions and response spectra
Turkish National Strong Ground Network operated by AFAD recorded the strong ground
motion data for calculating the peak acceleration values for 23 October Van earthquake.
The peak acceleration values recorded at Muradiye Station were 178.5, 169.5 and
79.15 cm/s2 in north–south, east–west and vertical direction, respectively. Time history
plots for earthquake records are given in Figs. 3, 4, 5.
Figure 6 provides a comparison of response spectra of N–S and E–W components of
Muradiye station records with the code-based spectrum. Both components are below the
design spectra defined for high-seismic zones in Turkey. In Fig. 6, it is observed that both
response spectra components are below the design spectra and the range of frequencies
which are bounded approximately by 2 and 4 Hz are very close to fundamental period of
damaged structures in Ercis.
2288 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
4 Geological and geotechnical overview
4.1 Geological overview
Van Lake Basin is originated with rock groups of different origins and wide range age of
Paleozic age to actual deposits (Fig. 7). South of the basin is formed by the metamorphic
rocks belonging to Bitlis Massive, and west and north of the basin is covered with the
young volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. The east part is covered with Mesozoic aged
oceanic cover, and complex (melange)-structured rocks were formed. Small basins located
in east–west direction are full of young-actual alluvial and lacustrine deposits and car-
bonates, related to neotectonic event at Senozoic period (Ciftci et al. 2008).
In Degens et al. 1978, it is stated that Van Lake reached its maximum level 16,000 years
ago and draw back 10,000 years ago. Researchers claim that marine environment left its
place to terrestrial environment at the late of Miosen.
Faults and opening cracks appeared, and volcanos in East Anatolia are presented in
neotectonic period (Fig. 8). Alive fault map of Van zone was presented in Fig. 2. There is
no live fault in Fig. 2, but existence of embedded faults can be seen near the epicenter of
the 2011 earthquake with the dashed line in Fig. 8. According to this phenomenon, it may
be thought that magmatism may still be active in this region.
Fig. 1 Major tectonic elements of Eastern Turkey that taken from (Saroglu et al. 1992). MRB Mus RampBasin, PRB Pasinler Ramp Basin, KTJ Karlıova Triple Junction. Large rectangle encloses the map areashown in Fig. 2, black filled triangles show the location of Suphan and Nemrut volcanoes (SV and NV,respectively), and large arrows indicate relative plate motions (Utkucu 2006)
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2289
123
4.2 Geotechnical overview
Old lacustrine deposits that form the Van plain consist of uncemented gravelly, sandy and
silty levels. The most encountered form of soil is sand and silt in the area. Gravelly and
clayey levels are observed generally in thin bands. Lacustrine deposits are observed at
1,800 m level.
Fig. 2 The map showing tectonic features, M C 4.0 seismicity and known source mechanism solutions ofLake Van area along with the bathymetry of Lake Van. The M C 5.0 earthquakes after 1860 are shown withwhite and black filled stars (macroseismic and instrumental epicenters, respectively). The 4.0 B M \ 5.0earthquakes after 1970 are denoted by black and dark gray filled circles. Black filled circles with assignednumbers show the 4.0 B M \ 5.0 earthquakes selected for the correlation with the water-level changes ofLake Van. Large open triangles indicate the location of the Nemrut and Suphan volcanoes. The faultslabelled as I, II, III and IV were adapted from Ketin (1977). SBF Southern Boundary Fault, NFZ NorthernBoundary Fault, C¸FZ C¸ aldıran Fault Zone, MF Malazgirt Fault, TF Tatvan Fault, KFZ Karayazı FaultZone, EFZ Ercis Fault Zone, TFZ Tutak Fault Zone, TB Tatvan Basin, DB Deveboynu Basin (Utkucu 2006)
Fig. 3 October 23, 2011 Van earthquake acceleration time history N–S component for Muradiye (6,503)station
2290 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
Definition of Van formation (Tmv) was first done for the formation pattern at the east of
Van Lake. Van formation is originated by generally fragmentally rocks and by thin-
medium, rarely thick-layered sandstones and thin-layered shales. Foliation is seen at some
sections because of the tectonic affects.
Sand dimensioned material is generally silty and poor-graded class in lacustrine
deposits. Gravels of maximum grain size 5 cm are formed by partly merged ophiolitic
pieces. There are 7�–24� of slopes formed to settle through Van Lake at lacustrine and
alluvial deposits. This slope does not have tectonic basis that took place during the sedi-
mentation (Aksoy 1988).
During the site observation at the city center of Van, it was seen that clay additively but
not fully uncemented sand–gravel layers under the organic soil could hold up itself at 90�in a 1.5-m-deep open foundation pit that is located near the building completely collapsed
Fig. 4 October 23, 2011 Van earthquake acceleration time history E–W component for Muradiye (6,503)station
Fig. 5 October 23, 2011 Van earthquake acceleration time history vertical component for Muradiye (6,503)station
Fig. 6 Damped linear response spectra [5 %] for Muradiye station records obtained during October 23,2011 Van earthquake and comparison with the code-based spectrum
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2291
123
in the earthquake. There was no soil problem noted down for collapsed, heavily damaged
and undamaged buildings in the city center of Van.
Also, in the district of Ercis, there were no structural deformations related to soil
properties under the structure. In the area, soil can be classified as hard clay and clayey
sand–gravel levels, and it supplied enough bearing capacity and met the settlement criteria
for the buildings which generally have 4–8 stores (see Fig. 9). For example, in Van city
center, there was no deformation observed in 10-m-deep excavation which was supported
by poor anchoraged piles (see Fig. 10).
Sand cones which signed the liquefaction phenomena were observed in the wide pasture
field of Topaktas village which is close to the city center (Fig. 11a). The pasture field is a
wide flat area near the Mermit stream that gets a lot of water when the stoppers of
Sarimehmet Dam are opened. According to a resident from Topaktas village, during the
earthquake, there were sand and water gushing out and reaching up to 5 m from the ground
at this pasture field. He also added that he did not meet the sand layer when he bored a well
at the area before the earthquake. Thus, liquefiable sand layers are located more than 7-m
depth. Grains of gravel dimension are also seen in the same area. This also supports the
Fig. 7 Geological map of Van Lake Basin (Ciftci et. al. 2008)
2292 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
Fig. 8 Volcanos appeared atneotectonic term in East Anatolia(Bol 1993)
Fig. 9 Soil section of an open foundation pit (Ercis District)
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2293
123
idea of gravel liquefaction. Moreover, lateral spreading deformations resulting with liq-
uefaction were also observed on the field (Fig. 11b).
In addition to this, landslides were observed at the natural slopes which the Mermit
stream flood near its skirt and artificial slopes which were formed near the sand quarry
(Fig. 12a, b).
5 Structural failures of the reinforced concrete structures
5.1 Poor concrete quality
In the Turkish Earthquake Code, it is clearly expressed in section 3.2.5 of that the mini-
mum characteristic strength of concrete must be at least 20 MPa for reinforced concrete
structures to be built in earthquake active zones (TEC 2007). However, in Ercis district, the
characteristic strength of concrete for the most damaged RC buildings is well below that
value. Diyarbakir Chamber of Civil Engineers (DCCE) investigated the characteristic
strength of concrete by drilling cores from 6 destroyed RC buildings and conducting
compression tests on them. It is reported by DCCE that the characteristic strength
of concrete varied between 4.70 and 15.60 MPa with the average value of 9 MPa
(Bedirhanoglu 2011).
At the field investigation, it is found that the handmade concrete is generally used and
sand obtained from dried river bed is used without processing it to be suitable for concrete
production (Fig. 13). In other words, aggregates containing high percentage of organic
materials and washable particles like clay and silt with coarse material are used in concrete
production. Moreover, it is observed that the aggregate used in most buildings did not
possess a particle size distribution. The aggregate dimensions are observed to be around
4–5 times larger than the maximum aggregate diameter allowed for concrete (Fig. 14).
Fig. 10 Deep excavation with poor anchoraged piles (Van City center)
2294 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
5.2 Poor reinforcement detailing
The most critical regions in a structure subjected to earthquake are column ends and beam–
column joint connections. Therefore, Turkish Earthquake Code has significant limitations
about the dimensions and reinforcement details of these regions in order to improve the
strength and ductility of the structural elements and structure. It was observed that the
confinement reinforcement such as cross-ties did not exist in the first 30–40 cm region at
column-foundation connections (Fig. 15) and the beam–column connections (Fig. 16).
Fig. 11 a Sand cones, b gravelcones and lateral spreadings metat Topaktad pasture field
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2295
123
Many of the beam–column and column-foundation connections are heavily damaged as
a result of absence of confinement reinforcement, wide spacing of the cross-ties and
insufficient lateral cross-ties at these joints. Because of these insufficiencies, spilling of
Fig. 12 a Artificial slopes, b natural slopes slided during the earthquake in Topaktas village
Fig. 13 Typical concrete quality of RC elements
2296 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
cover and core concrete and buckling of longitudinal reinforcing bars are observed in many
damaged RC buildings (Fig. 17a).
Moreover, several number of detailing deficiencies such as using inadequate hook, 90�hooks for cross-ties (Fig. 17b) and insufficient overlap lengths are also observed in the
heavily damaged buildings.
Fig. 14 Particle size distribution in concrete
Fig. 15 Column-foundationconnections
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2297
123
5.3 Soft story buildings
The commercial usage of the ground stories without having reinforced structural wall
systems and unreinforced masonry infill walls, which induced soft and weak stories in
reinforced concrete buildings, is one of the substantial reasons for the heavy structural
damages and building collapses observed in earthquake region. The stores designed with
wide openings at ground floor level are generally surrounded by glass windows instead of
masonry infill walls. Upper floors considered as housing units have heavy masonry walls,
while the base floors do not have adequate shear resistance in the affected area. The high
ductility demand and overall shear forces imposed to the building, which occurred
instantaneously at the first floor during earthquake, could not be properly fulfilled by using
lateral load-resisting structural systems with having poor reinforcement detailing without
satisfying the requirements of seismic code. Because of the sudden discontinuities in the
lateral rigidity and strength between the adjacent stories, the soft story building cannot
dissipate the seismic energy as required. In this case, shearing failures such as crushing of
core concrete on column ends and anchorage dissolving with buckling of longitudinal bars
at joint connections are observed due to the demand of undesirably large drift and seismic
energy dissipation during earthquake-induced building movement.
The stability of individual column members and the entire structure are influenced by
increased number of plastic hinges, which leads to collapse mechanism in many floors due
to p-delta effects. Thus, the upper floors with limited damage are collapsed on the ground
story. The soft story effects on collapsed apartment buildings in both the center of Van and
Ercis district shared a common failure feature that can be seen from Fig. 18a, b. Turkish
seismic code has included special design provisions to avoid soft story behavior and weak-
story irregularities.
5.4 Ribbed slab construction
In the affected area, it is observed that the rib beam slab systems are widely used as floor
members in reinforced concrete building. Inspections of earthquake-induced structural
Fig. 16 Beam–column connections
2298 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
damages in the epicenter region have shown that many residential structures with one-way
spanning asmolen (lightweight gas-concrete block) slab systems creating inadequate shear
resistance, are heavily damaged. As shown in Fig. 19, four-story trade center building in
(a)
(b)
Fig. 17 Detailing deficiencies in structural elements. a Buckling of longitudinal reinforcing bars,b inadequate hook detailing
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2299
123
Ercis district which was under construction during earthquake is a good example to
discuss.
In ribbed slabs, strong column–weak beams are usually formed. Thus, designer should
take actions against reduced lateral stiffness of the structure in both directions. In Van, it
was observed that the improper orientation and location of the limited number of the shear
walls with non-ductile detailing resulted in extreme failures. Asmolen floor framing pos-
sessing thin slab thickness has low lateral load carrying capacity in one-way direction,
perpendicular to the street (Fig. 20). Thus, plastic hinges are concentrated on all column
ends in the long direction (parallel to the street) of this trade center (Fig. 21). Therefore,
(a)
(b)
Fig. 18 Failures due to soft story action. a From Ercis District, b from Van City
2300 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
using shear walls for both directions in a ribbed slab system may prevent collapses or
lateral drifts. In ribbed slab system, the case of badly oriented columns and lack of shear
walls can be a reason for damage.
5.5 Strong beam and weak column behavior
In earthquake-resisting structure design, one of the important points is to avoid the strong
beam–weak column behavior. The main purpose of this approach is to enable the weak
element, that is, beams, to lose their bearing capacity initially and contrary to enable the
columns to stand for a while to provide living space for people. To achieve this behavior,
Turkish Earthquake Code section 3.3.5 requires the sum of bearing capacity moments of
columns should be at least 20 % more than the sum of bearing capacity moments of beams
at the same joint for structures which resist the earthquake effects by frames or frame–wall
combination (TEC 2007). Doing so, will create plastic hinges at the end of the beams. It is
Fig. 19 Trade center having one-way spanning asmolen slab systems
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2301
123
observed that many multi-story buildings collapsed because of strong beam and weak
column type connection (Fig. 22). As mentioned in the previous section, poor reinforce-
ment detailing was also present in such connections.
5.6 Unconfined gable walls
The most common earthquake damage observed in the roofs is the collapse of the gable
walls (Fig. 23). The reason of the vast majority of the collapse of the gable walls is because
they are not adequately connected to the structure and they are constructed with missing
lintels. However, it is stated in the masonry building section of Turkish Earthquake Code
5.7.3 that in the case where the height of the end wall (gable wall) resting on the horizontal
lintel at the top story exceeds 2 m, vertical and inclined lintels shall be constructed (TEC
2007). This condition is not met for the majority of buildings that are damaged in the
Fig. 20 Shear cracks on structural walls and on columns in the short direction of the building
2302 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
earthquake region. Also, vehicles parked near the buildings are damaged and people
nearby are injured just because of the collapse of gable walls.
5.7 Large and heavy overhangs
One of the most important mistakes observed is the existence of large and heavy overhangs over
the ground floors. This type of design is permitted by the existing public building code. However,
large and heavy overhangs without perimeter frames in the structures create problems when
subjected to the seismic loads. Perimeter columns were not connected by beams for architectural
concerns. This design approach created a case in which perimeter frames were not formed. Thus,
large and heavy overhangs caused bad damages in the structure. Moreover, large and heavy
overhangs will behave as cantilever beam under the additional forces due to the vertical com-
ponent of the seismic load. Also, the center of stiffness and center of mass will not coincide
because of these overhangs. Thus, earthquake forces applied to the center of mass will create extra
moments. Damages related to the existence of large and heavy overhangs are given in Fig. 24.
6 Structural failures of the masonry structures
The buildings in rural areas were built as masonry structures, which are made of stone,
brick and adobe materials. The reason of choosing such construction materials is that they
are easily available and they are more economical when compared with reinforced con-
crete. Tough climate in the region makes these materials desirable because these materials
are naturally insulated material which keeps the structure warm in winter and cool in
summer. Pumice concrete blocks (briquettes) are also commonly used in the region
(Fig. 25). The strength of masonry often depends on the bond between brick and mortar.
This bond is often very poor when cement mortars or clay-mud mortars are used.
Another widely used material in masonry structure is stone in the region. The binder
used in such structures is low-strength cement mortar or clay. Poor quality of this binder is
one of the reasons for the structural damages (Fig. 26).
Among the masonry buildings, the most damaged ones were adobe structures (Fig. 27).
Adobe construction elements are produced as a mixture of clay-mud-straw in 10–30 cm
dimension in the earthquake-affected region.
Fig. 21 Plastic hinges at all column ends in the long direction of the building
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2303
123
The roof of adobe structures is built by tree trunks which are covered with 25–30 cm
thickness of soil layer. Due to atmospheric condition in time, degradation both in material
and in connections can be observed. Furthermore, heavy roof floor supported by these
materials can cause shear failures in the walls. Also, connection between walls and roof
Fig. 22 Damages due to strong beam–weak column behavior
2304 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
Fig. 23 Damaged gable walls
Fig. 24 Damages on the large and heavy overhangs
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2305
123
were not observed in most structures. Thus, due to all these reasons, damage pattern in the
structural walls was inspected as the out-of-plane failure (Fig. 28). According to the
Turkish Earthquake Resistant Design Code (2007), reinforced concrete horizontal bond
beams shall be provided at places where slabs are supported by walls, such that they shall
be cast monolithically with the slabs (TEC 2007 section 5.5.2). However, horizontal bond
beams were not used in destructed masonry buildings.
Damages on the walls are also caused by large window openings (Fig. 29). Most of the
masonry walls are constructed by using sand–cement mortar as a binder. However, in
villages, clay-mud mortar is widely used instead. These buildings were commonly
Fig. 25 Structures with briquette wall and its damages
2306 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
constructed by their own residents without any engineering knowledge. These kinds of
damages were observed in the Topaktas, Tevekli, Mollakasim and Alakoy villages.
Historical buildings also faced damages in the earthquake. A good example for this type
of damage can be seen when the pre- and post-earthquake pictures of historical tomb is
examined (Fig. 30). For instance, crack lengths are increased and separations between
stones are observed in 7.5-m height Kadem Pasa Hatun Tomb which was built in 1,458
with cutting stone technique.
Fig. 26 Damages in the stone structure
Fig. 27 Example of adobe wall damages; diagonal shear cracking, failure of corner and collapse of out-of-plane
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2307
123
7 Conclusion
Making scientific observations just after earthquake is devastating. Searching the damages
and failures for possible evidence of insufficient design code and academic knowledge was
really hard. As mentioned in the above sections, reason for such damages and failures was
not surprising according to up-to-date academic knowledge and current national design
Fig. 28 Examples of openings-and out-of-plane between the structural walls
Fig. 29 Structural wall damages caused by large window openings
2308 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
code. Thus, both structural and non-structural problems observed in post-earthquake site
visit can be summarized as follows:
• Earthquake spectra calculated with the records obtained from the near site station are
well below the design spectra given in the national code. Designers of the damaged
structures either did not consider the design code or constructers did not construct the
structures as designed.
• Some part of Ercis district do have gravel liquefaction problem. Since this part of Ercis
is not well populated, damages in the structures and casualties are not severe.
• Failures in reinforce concrete structures can be grouped as
• Poor material quality,
• Poor and uninspected labor,
• Reinforcement detailing unlike the ones mentioned in the design code,
• Not considering soft story action in the design phase,
• Missing out shear walls when designing ribbed slabs,
• Not avoiding strong beam–weak column connections,
• Unconfined gable walls, large and heavy overhangs caused damages to the buildings,
but they caused more economical damages by falling onto the cars which are parked
nearby.
• Masonry structures which are mostly located in rural areas faced damages due to poor
connections and poor material quality.
References
Aksoy E (1988) Stratigraphic tectonics of East-Northeast Region of Van City, PhD Thesis, Fırat University,Elazıg, Turkey (in Turkish)
Bedirhanoglu _G, Onal T (2011) Van Depremi On Degerlendirme Raporu, IMO Diyarbakır Subesi
Fig. 30 Pre- and post-earthquake condition of the historical tom
Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310 2309
123
Bol E (1993) Neotectonics and neotectonic principles of Turkey, Cukurova University, Final Project (inTurkish)
Bozkurt E (2001) Neotectonics of Turkey—a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14:3–30Ciftci Y, Isık MA, Alkevli T, Yesilova C (2008) Environmental geology of Van Lake Basin, Geol Eng J (in
Turkish)Degens ET, Wong HK, Kutman F, Finckh P (1978) Geological development of Lake Van: a summary. In:
Degens, ET, Kurtman F (eds) The Geology of Lake Van. The Mineral Research and ExplorationInstitute of Turkey (MTA), Publication no: 169, Ankara, pp 134–146
Saroglu F, Emre O, Kuscu I (1992) Active fault map of Turkey. General Directorate of the Mineral Researchand Exploration, Ankara
TEC (2007) Specification for buildings to be built in earthquake regions. Ministry of Public Works andSettlement, Government of the Republic of Turkey
Ketin I (1977) A short explanation about the results of observations made in the region between Lake Vanand Iranian border. Bull Geol Soc Turk 20:79–85 (in Turkish)
KOERIhttp://www.koeri.boun.edu.tr/Haberler/23%20October%202011,%20Mw=7.2%20Van,%20Turkey%20Eq._6_205.depmuh
Utkucu M (2006) Implications for the water level change triggered moderate (M C 4.0) earthquakes in LakeVan basin, Eastern Turkey. J Seismolog 10:105–117
2310 Nat Hazards (2013) 65:2287–2310
123
Recommended